.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Will wealthy benefit most from Trump budget? What Americans said in new poll
In a July 1-2 YouGov survey, most respondents said they oppose the bill, saying it will mainly benefit the nation's wealthy. More respondents than not also believe it will increase the federal budget deficit.
The poll comes after the Senate voted 51-50 to pass the legislation, dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' on July 1, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote.
The House — which initially passed the bill in May — is now poised to hold a final vote before a self-imposed July 4 deadline.
The major piece of legislation would enact sweeping changes, including making most of Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent and eliminating federal taxes on tips and overtime pay. It also allocates billions of dollars toward the Pentagon, immigration enforcement and for the construction of a border wall.
Meanwhile, it reduces spending on Medicaid, clean energy initiatives and food assistance programs.
Here is a breakdown of the findings from the poll.
Support or oppose?
In the survey, which sampled 9,197 U.S. adults, 53% of respondents said they either strongly or somewhat oppose the budget, while 32% said they strongly or somewhat support it.
Most Democrats and independents — 86% and 55%, respectively — said they're against the bill, while 76% of Republicans are in favor.
This partisan split largely mirrors the current divide in Congress, as only House and Senate Republicans have voted in favor of the bill.
'Republicans were elected to do exactly what this bill achieves: secure the border, make tax cuts permanent, unleash American energy dominance, restore peace through strength, cut wasteful spending, and return to a government that puts Americans first,' House Speaker Mike Johnson wrote on X.
Meanwhile, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries decried the budget, calling it 'an immoral document' in a speech on the House floor. 'Everybody should vote no against it because of how it attacks children and seniors and everyday Americans and people with disabilities.'
Who benefits?
The majority of respondents, 57%, said they believe the spending bill will mostly benefit wealthy Americans, while 20% said it will primarily help the middle class. Just 3% said they think the legislation will mainly help the poor.
Here, again, there was a major partisan divide. Most Democrats and independents — 87% and 58%, respectively — believe it will mostly help rich Americans. In contrast, a plurality of Republicans, 47%, said it will primarily benefit the middle class.
In a recent analysis, the Congressional Budget Office, a non-partisan government agency, found that the legislation 'would cost the poorest Americans roughly $1,600 a year while increasing the income of the wealthiest households by an average of $12,000 annually,' according to the Associated Press.
Republicans have disputed the CBO's analysis, saying it does not take into account the effect tax cuts have on economic growth.
Effect on the deficit
In the poll — which has a margin of error of 1.3 percentage points — 50% of respondents said the bill would increase the federal budget deficit. Just 16% said it will decrease the deficit, and 12% said it will not have a major effect.
The vast majority of Democrats, 73%, and 50% of independents said they believe the budget will raise the deficit — which is the amount by which annual spending exceeds revenue intake. A plurality of Republicans, 33%, said it will lead to a deficit decrease.
According to the CBO, the latest version of the budget bill would indeed increase the budget deficit by $3.3 trillion over the next decade, Axios reported.
Top Republicans have disputed or downplayed this assessment.
'The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits,' Vance wrote in a post on X, adding that the CBO's score 'is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions.'
Democrats, meanwhile, have seized on the projection.
In a statement, Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar said, 'Congressional Republicans betrayed the American people, passing a bill that will raise our debt by $4 trillion.' She added it will 'kick millions (of) people off their health care, close more than 300 rural hospitals and 500 nursing homes, and raise grocery prices for 40 million people — all to pay for tax cuts for the richest Americans.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street was expecting a TACO Tuesday. But Dow futures fall 250 points after Trump says he will set tariffs as high as 70%
While U.S. markets were closed for the July 4 holiday, stock futures sank on Friday after President Donald Trump said he will start sending out letters informing countries of what tariffs they will face. The rates, which could reach as high as 70%, would become effective Aug. 1, he added. That comes ahead of the July 9 expiration of a temporary pause on his 'Liberation Day' tariffs. U.S. stock futures tumbled on Friday after President Donald Trump said he will start sending out letters informing countries of what tariffs they will face. On Thursday, he told reporters that about '10 or 12' letters would go out Friday, with additional letters coming 'over the next few days.' The rates would become effective Aug. 1. 'They'll range in value from maybe 60 or 70% tariffs to 10 and 20% tariffs,' Trump added. While U.S. markets were closed for the July 4 holiday, futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 251 points, or 0.56%. S&P 500 futures were down 0.64%, and Nasdaq futures fell 0.68%. U.S. oil prices slipped 0.75% to $66.50 per barrel, and Brent crude lost 0.41% to $68.52. Gold edged up 0.11% to $3,346.70 per ounce, while the U.S. dollar fell 0.16% against the euro and 0.30% against the yen. The Trump administration has been negotiating with top trade partners since the president put his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on a 90-day pause. That reprieve will expire on Wednesday, July 9. So far, only a few limited trade deals have been announced, and negotiations with other countries were expected to require more time. So as the Wednesday deadline approached, Wall Street was expecting Trump to announce an extension to the tariff pause by Tuesday, reviving the so-called TACO trade that alludes to his history of pulling back from his maximalist threats. 'We suspect that further last-minute concessions will be made to permit extensions for most countries, but a few of the 'worst offenders' may be singled out for punitive treatment,' analysts at Capital Economics predicted earlier this week. 'Markets seem to be positioned for a fairly benign outcome, implying a risk of some near-term turbulence if that fails to materialise.' That assumes Trump won't risk a repeat of the epic April selloff that was triggered by his Liberation Day tariffs, and Capital Economics also warned such an assumption could be complacent. In fact, Trump has been saying for weeks that he prefers to unilaterally set tariffs with each country rather than engage in negotiations with all of them. But amid the absence of any letters, markets downplayed the risk that tariffs could spike again. Still, Trump has kept beating the drum about letters. In an interview that aired on Sunday, he was asked about the tariff pause and the looming deadline. 'I'd rather just send them a letter, very fair letter, saying, 'Congratulations, we're going to allow you to trade in the United States of America. You're gonna pay a 25% tariff or 20% or 40% or 50%,'' Trump replied. 'I would rather do that.' When asked if the pause will not be extended, he said, 'I don't think I'll need to because—I could—there's no big deal.' Trump further clarified his stance on the July 9 deadline, saying, 'I'm gonna send letters. That's the end of the trade deal.' This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
De minimis exemption slated to end in 2027
This story was originally published on Supply Chain Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Supply Chain Dive newsletter. The de minimis exemption will be eliminated in two years after President Donald Trump signed a sweeping policy bill into law on Friday. As part of the package introduced as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' the U.S. will repeal the exemption allowing imports under $800 to enter the country duty and tax free, effective July 1, 2027. Exemptions will remain in place for eligible items bought during travel and bona fide gifts from foreign citizens to U.S. residents. The bill also establishes a civil penalty, starting 30 days after its enactment, for any person attempting to use de minimis entry in a way that "violates any other provision of" U.S. customs law. The amount is $5,000 for the first violation and up to $10,000 for subsequent violations. The move builds upon the Trump administration's efforts to restrict the de minimis exemption, which lawmakers and customs officials have scrutinized in recent years due to contraband entering the U.S. via low-cost packages. Earlier this year, the White House removed the exemption for imports from China and Hong Kong and announced its plans to end de minimis for other countries once systems are in place to collect duty revenue. The vast majority of de minimis volume entering the U.S. originated from China prior to the May 2 ban, making up 76% of shipments in Custom and Border Protection's 2024 fiscal year. The full repeal of the exemption in two years would expose low-cost shipments from Canada, Mexico and other countries to tariffs and other import taxes. E-commerce companies like Shein and Temu have historically benefited from the exemption, which allows them to ship products made internationally direct to U.S. consumers without facing added duties. Some experts say de minimis-reliant supply chains will shift to more traditional bulk shipping models or expanded U.S. fulfillment operations due to policy changes by the Trump administration. Recommended Reading De minimis' future: 4 questions shippers should consider Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Has Jon Jones already ended his retirement?
This retirement decision by Jon Jones might be even shorter than his previous one. The former UFC heavyweight and light heavyweight champion claims he has re-entered into the drug testing policy. What has sparked this move by Jones? It would appear the recently announced UFC event that is expected to take place in Washington, D.C. from the White House in 2026. Advertisement "Fighting at the White House?" Jones posted on social media with an emoji of two wide-open eyes. MORE: President Donald Trump reveals UFC event at White House in 2026 He added "Just re-entered the testing pool, that lasted for about two weeks. Figured we'd keep everyone's options open." Jones, the heavyweight champion at the time, announced his retirement late last month. The promotion moved quickly to promote interim titleholder Tom Aspinall to the undisputed champion. President Donald Trump stated recently that he wants the UFC on the grounds of the White House for an event to celebrate America next year. Jones greeted Trump Octagon-side after defeating Stipe Miocic in his last match. Advertisement MORE UFC NEWS: