US offers $10m reward in hunt for Al Qaeda leader in Yemen
The department's Rewards for Justice made a series of posts on X asking for information on Saad bin Atef Al Awlaki, the group's leader, and two other senior members, Ibrahim Muhammad Salih Al Banna and Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud Al Qosi.
The State Department upped its reward offer for Mr Al Awlaki, who became the leader of AQAP in 2024 following the death of Khalid Saeed Batarfi, to $10 million.
According to the State Department, Mr Al Awlaki has 'called for attacks against the United States and its allies".
"As the group's amir and as a former AQAP amir in Shabwah province in Yemen, he has led AQAP's attacks against the United States and has kidnapped American and Westerners in Yemen," it said.
Mr Al Banna, for whom the State Department has offered a $5 million reward, is described as a founding member of AQAP and who serves as the group's chief of security. Mr Al Qosi, who has a $4 million bounty, has called for ' lone wolf ' attacks against the US.
What is AQAP?
AQAP was designated by the US a Foreign Terrorist Organisation in January 2010. It is a Sunni extremist group that operates in Yemen and has been behind attacks inside and outside the country.
The group has carried out several attacks against the Yemeni government, with one of the deadliest occurring in 2013 against the Ministry of Defence that killed at least 52 people, according to the US National Counterterrorism Centre.
Since the civil war began between the central government and the Houthis in 2015, AQAP has focused on combating the expansion of the Iran-backed Houthis. According to the NCTC, AQAP has formed a stronghold in Mukalla, in Hadramawt Governorate, where it has freed prisoners, robbed banks and taken over government facilities.
Outside Yemen, AQAP sent an operative who attempted to detonate an explosive device concealed in his underwear aboard a Northwest Airlines flight in December 2009. This was followed by an attempt to send explosive-laden packages to the US in October the following year. And in January 2015, AQAP claimed responsibility for the attack on Charlie Hebdo magazine 's office in Paris that left 12 people dead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
13 hours ago
- The National
US could require bonds of up to $15,000 for some tourist visas under pilot scheme
The US could require bonds of up to $15,000 for some tourist and business visas under a pilot programme being launched in two weeks, a government notice said on Monday. The programme is aimed to crack down on visitors who overstay their visas. The move may make an already expensive process unaffordable for many. 'Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure and who are nationals of countries identified by the department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering citizenship by investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot programme,' said a preview of a notice to be posted in the Federal Register on Tuesday. It was not clear what countries would be affected but the notice said the list would be made public when the programme takes effect. The bond would not apply to citizens of countries enrolled in the Visa Waiver Programme, which enables travel for business or tourism for up to 90 days. The State Department said that under the 12-month pilot programme, people could be required to post bonds of $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000 when they apply for a visa. The funds will be returned to travellers if they depart within the terms of their visas, the notice said. It said the pilot programme is aimed at ensuring the US government does not become financially liable if a visitor fails to comply with the terms of their visa. President Donald Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration a focus of his presidency, boosting resources to secure the border and arresting people who are illegally in the US. Last week, the State Department announced that many visa renewal applicants would have to submit to an in-person interview, something that was not required in the past. And the administration issued a travel ban in June that fully or partly blocks citizens of 19 nations from entering the US on national security grounds. While the notice singles out countries offering citizenship through investment, the administration introduced the Trump Gold Card in recent months, which provides a path to residency and citizenship if a person commits to investing at least $5 million in the US. A similar pilot programme was launched in November 2020 during the last months of Mr Trump's first term in office, but it was not fully implemented due to the drop in global travel associated with the pandemic. It also comes as the Trump administration continues to revoke the visas of international students who have Taken part in pro-Palestine activism, and as the US says it will screen applicants' social media presence for anti-Semitic content.
Al Etihad
14 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Early wins for US, but dynamics of EU alliance is changing
4 Aug 2025 23:55 SULTAN KHALIFA AL RUBAEI*Tariffs have once again taken centre stage in US and international trade, following the August deadline set by United States President Donald Trump for countries to present trade agreement proposals or face steep tariffs. The US administration secured deals with several of its trading partners, most notably the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom. However, the global trade landscape now appears to be bracing for profound changes in trade rules that go beyond the post-World War II US agreement with the EU included a 15% tariff on European goods (significantly lower than the 30% previously threatened by the US president), an exemption for pharmaceutical products, and limited exceptions for aircraft and medical equipment. In return, the EU committed to purchasing $750 billion worth of US energy products and investing approximately $600 billion in the US. This agreement secured substantial additional revenue for the American 'America First' policy pursued by the United States in its dealings with both partners and non-partners pushes it toward manoeuvring economic policies. But beyond the deals and manoeuvres lies US-European relations, particularly with the EU, the foundation of which is no longer only partnership, but also competition, or rather, the partnership is taking a backseat in the face of competition. This shift may be attributed to internal divisions among the EU's 27 member states, the multiple challenges facing the ageing continent, and the heavy reliance on the United States when it comes to defence forces. At this time, none of the EU countries can afford the economic strain of a trade the American side, the current administration has shown little regard for the mutual trust in the transatlantic free trade relations, nor for the existing rules of international trade. As a result, there is a possibility that other global actors may adopt similar protectionist policies, posing a threat to the stability of international markets, particularly in light of the tensions that the current environment may create at the level of international trade the changes and uncertainty, the EU chose to stay aligned with America, albeit at a high cost. The newly imposed tariffs place a heavy financial burden on EU-based companies, forcing them to bear additional billions in expenses. While EU member states acknowledge the agreement's potential harm to their economies, they have viewed it as the best possible option under the current circumstances. It may mark the beginning of a longer negotiation process rather than the end, given the limited options available. Without formal trade agreements with Washington, the EU risks being subjected to US terms, leading to imbalanced deals or potential trade United States emerged as the winner in the agreement with the EU. However, the outcome also places a burden on American consumers, who are likely to face higher prices for imported goods as companies pass on the additional costs. This is particularly significant given that Germany is one of the largest exporters to the US, with exports exceeding €161 billion in 2024. Ireland's exports to the US reached €72 billion and Italy's €64 billion in the same year, according to Eurostat, the EU's statistical office. In total, 20% of the EU's goods exports are directed to the United States. This makes the agreement the least damaging option for Europe to avoid a trade confrontation between two allies who together account for nearly one-third of global trade. The effects of this deal may become visible in the US market in the coming this agreement, the US aims to achieve economic balance and address its trade deficit with the EU, which reached $235.6 billion in 2024. Although the deal helps avoid a trade war, it shows that the dynamics of old alliances are shifting, international trade is being reshaped amid global economic uncertainty, and competition for each country to achieve huge gains has become a defining feature of today's international economic and trade relations. *The columnist is a researcher with the think-tank firm, TRENDS Research & Advisory
Middle East Eye
16 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump Administration says it will withhold disaster funding to states that boycott Israel
US states and territories that boycott Israeli companies or companies operating in Israel will be denied federal funds for natural disaster preparation, Reuters reported on Monday. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) stated in a notice of funding on Friday that it was making nearly $1 billion available to states to protect themselves from natural disasters. The funding announced on Friday applies to 15 different grant programmes that protect states from natural disasters such as floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, and fires as well as terrorist attacks and cyber disruptions. FEMA has also announced an additional $2.2 bn in funding for disaster preparation since 25 July. However, Reuters said that at least $1.9 billion of this funding was conditional on states following Department of Homeland conditions laid out in April that they will not cut 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies or companies doing business in or with Israel' to qualify, according to 11 agency grant notices it reviewed. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters However, the ruling is seen to be largely symbolic. More than 30 US states already have laws that require 'public entities to certify they do not and will not boycott Israel', according to an essay titled 'Anti-BDS laws and the politics of political boycotts' in the University of Pennsylvania's Journal of Law and Social Change. However, in recent months, calls for boycotts of Israeli and international companies who are doing business with Israel have increased. Most recently, UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese's called for action after she published a scathing new report in which she names over 60 companies, including major technology firms like Google, Amazon and Microsoft, alleging their involvement in what she calls "the transformation of Israel's economy of occupation to an economy of genocide". Albanese was sanctioned by the US after she published the report. Political blackmail It is the latest escalation in the Trump administration making war on institutions, departments, or states that do not fall in line with its goals and priorities such as its hardline approach to immigration or issues such as climate change. For example, FEMA's statement on Friday laid out that recipients will no longer be able to spend the funds 'to house illegal immigrants at luxury hotels, fund climate change pet projects or empower radical organizations with unseemly ties that don't serve the interest of the American people'. The statement also said that recipients are required to spend 10 percent minimum on 'supporting border crisis response and enforcement'.
