
Cracking the Code: Understanding Social Security and Maximizing Your Benefits
Social Security is a phrase often used in retirement planning and has been discussed in the media recently. For many, though, it remains a mystery. It provides income, but how does it really work? Further, it's easy to become overwhelmed by countless claims, strategies, and confusing terminology.
This post, however, will help you navigate Social Security's complexities, maximize your benefits, and secure a more comfortable retirement.
What Exactly Is Social Security?
Imagine a safety net made up of generations of hardworking Americans. That's what Social Security is all about. The program was
While working, you and your employer contribute 6.2 percent of your wage through the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). In turn, the Social Security Trust Fund benefits current beneficiaries. In a sense, today's workers are supporting yesterday's retirees.
Decoding the Benefit Calculation
Social Security checks don't appear out of nowhere. The amount is calculated based on your lifetime earnings. As a simplified breakdown, here is what you need to know.
Your earnings history determines Social Security retirement benefits. To calculate your benefit, the Social Security Administration (SSA) uses the following formula:
Your highest 35 years of earnings
(adjusted for inflation)
Your age at the time you begin claiming
Your full retirement age
For your information, based on the 2024 edition of the
Full Retirement Age (FRA)
A person's FRA is the age at which they can receive 100 percent of their Social Security benefit. Depending on your birth year, it may be:
The FRA for those born between 1943 and 1954 is 66.
Those born between 1955 and 1959 will see an increase in FRA.
If you were born in 1960 or later, your FRA is 67.
You can start claiming at age 62 but must accept a 30 percent reduction. Alternatively, you can delay benefits past your FRA and increase your monthly payment up to 70 years of age.
The Million-Dollar Question: When Should You Claim?
Here is where 'strategy' comes in. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. In each case, it varies:
Claiming early (Age 62–FRA).
Pros:
You get to access your income sooner. This is a great option if you need the money or want to retire early.
Cons:
It is possible to have your benefits permanently reduced by up to 30 percent. In addition, your spouse will receive lower survivor benefits as a result.
Claiming at FRA.
Pros:
The benefit you receive is full and unreduced. This is a good middle ground for many people.
Cons:
If you delay, you lose out on the extra boost.
Delaying Until 70.
Pros:
Your benefit increases by 8 percent every year you delay past FRA up to age 70. Over your lifetime, this can amount to a substantial sum.
Cons:
It takes longer for your income to arrive. As such, you might not 'break-even' if you don't live a long life.
Making Sense of the Break-Even Point
In Social Security discussions, the term 'break-even' is often used. It means the benefits you receive from delaying exceed those you would have received from claiming earlier. If you expect to live well into your 80s or beyond, delaying benefits can be beneficial financially.
Strategies to Maximize Your Benefits
Time isn't everything; it's all about playing the long game.
Work at Least 35 Years
With fewer than 35 years of income under your belt, zero-income years are included in your benefit calculation, reducing it. Replacing low-earning years from your early career with part-time work later in life may even be possible.
Boost Your Earnings
You'll receive more benefits if you earn more (especially during years of higher wages). An individual's lifetime earnings are affected by income from raises, promotions, side gigs, and self-employment.
Strategic Delaying
In addition to delaying your benefits beyond your FRA, you may also be able to increase your monthly check considerably. This is particularly useful for those with longer life expectancies and families that have a long lifespan.
Spousal Coordination
To boost household income, married couples can use several strategies:
Spousal benefit
.
At FRA, a spouse can receive up to 50 percent of the other's benefits, even if they didn't work much.
Claim and suspend
.
While one spouse receives a spousal benefit, the other claims their own benefit at FRA.
Survivor benefits
.
After turning 60, widows and widowers can switch from survivor benefits to their own higher benefits.
Increase Your Tax Awareness
Up to 85 percent of your Social Security benefits may be taxable, depending on your other sources of income (pension, withdrawals from retirement accounts, etc.). You can minimize your tax burden if your income does not exceed certain thresholds.
As of 2025, the basic thresholds are as follows:
Single filers
.
An income over $25,000 may be subject to partial taxation.
Joint filers
.
If your income exceeds $32,000, your benefits will be taxed.
Conduct an Earnings Test
If you claim benefits before FRA and continue to work, the Social Security Administration may temporarily withhold part of your benefit. As an example, if you are under the FRA in 2025, you lose $1 for every $2 you earn over $22,320. Although the money isn't lost, it can affect short-term cash flow because it will be added back to your benefits later.
Use Online Tools
The SSA's website (ssa.gov) has calculators and access to your Social Security Statement. By regularly checking your statement, you can ensure that your earnings record and benefits are also accurate.
Be Aware of Special Situations
Divorced individuals.
It may be possible to claim benefits based on your ex-spouse's record if you were married for more than ten years.
Survivors.
Benefits may be available to survivors' spouses and minor children.
Public employees.
The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) or Government Pension Offset (GPO) can reduce the benefits of some government workers.
Debunking Common Social Security Myths
Let's debunk some of the most common myths to help you better understand this vital part of your financial future.
'The Social Security System Is in Financial Trouble'
This is a big one, and it causes unnecessary worry. It is not likely that Social Security will disappear overnight. It is a pay-as-you-go system: you and your employer contribute to FICA taxes, but that money primarily pays current benefits.
Social Security indeed faces some financial challenges. Historically, the system has collected more than it has paid out, accumulating a nice surplus. The tide is turning, however. With more people retiring and living longer, more benefits are being paid out than taxes are being collected.
Related Stories
4/26/2025
4/25/2025
The key takeaway is this: without changes, the surplus will disappear
Another way to think of it is like your car running low on gas. While it won't stop working immediately, you'll have to refuel soon. This is where Congress comes in. As they did in 1983, they will need to make adjustments. Among those adjustments could be raising the retirement age, raising taxes, or taxing benefits differently.
'Social Security Benefits Must Be Claimed by Age 62'
Many people make potentially costly decisions because of this myth. Yes, 62 is the earliest you
can
claim benefits. However, it is not required.
You will receive your full, unreduced pension when you reach your 'full retirement age' (FRA). Your FRA depends on your birth year; if you were born after 1960, your FRA is 67.
At 62, you can claim early and get a permanent reduction in your monthly payments. For example, claiming benefits at 62 could mean a 30 percent reduction in monthly income if your FRA is 67. Even if you plan to live a long retirement life, that's a significant sum.
On the flip side, if you can hold off until age 70, you'll get a 'bonus' of about 8 percent more per year for each year you delay claiming your FRA. In other words, if your FRA is 67 and you wait until 70, your monthly income will increase by 24 percent. If you wait from 62 to 70, your income will increase by 77 percent.
'Retirement Income Will Be Derived Mainly From Social Security'
Although Social Security is an important part of your retirement plan, it usually isn't enough to live comfortably. The purpose of this is to supplement your income, not to be your sole source.
Think of it as one piece of a puzzle. To maintain your desired lifestyle, you'll probably need other sources of income, such as savings, investments, or pensions. With the help of a financial advisor, you can prepare a comprehensive income plan that includes Social Security and other sources of income.
'Guaranteed Colas Are Available Every Year'
Your benefits are adjusted for inflation through the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA). The Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers
However, there is no guarantee that there will be a COLA every year. If there is no significant inflation, there will be no adjustment. The same thing happened in 2010, 2011, and 2016.
Fortunately, the COLA process is automatic. As such, Congress does not need to vote every year.
'There Is No Way You Can Get All the Money Back You Put Into the Program'
This will differ depending on your circumstances, especially how long you live. As a safety net, Social Security provides a guaranteed lifetime income.
Inflation-protected Social Security income provides inflation-free income for life, unlike FICA. Whether you live to 100 or beyond, you'll keep receiving payments. In addition, if you pass away before your spouse, they may be eligible for survivor benefits.
'A Person Can Outlive Their Social Security Benefits'
This is simply not true. You will receive payments every month until you die. It is a federally backed, inflation-indexed, guaranteed income stream.
'For Other Programs, the Government Raids Social Security'
Unlike the government's general fund, the Social Security trust fund is separate from it. Nevertheless, the government borrows from Social Security.
As with other government bonds, tax revenue is invested in Treasury securities. There is no limit to how the government can use the money, but it must repay it with interest.
Despite the appearance that the government is stealing from Social Security, they always repay the money, and the interest increases Social Security's assets.
'After Reaching Full Retirement Age, You Can Claim Early and Get a Bump Up'
This is a common misconception. As soon as you start receiving benefits, the amount is fixed. Your FRA benefit does not increase automatically.
You can, however, suspend your benefits after reaching your FRA and restart them later. As a result, your benefits will increase by 8 percent every year you delay.
It's also possible to cancel your benefits within the first 12 months, repay the benefits you've received, and then claim again later. However, you can only do this once.
'Social Security Benefits Are Tax-Free'
Before 1984, this was true. Benefits may now be taxed up to 85 percent, depending on your income.
Depending on your overall income, you will be taxed on your benefits.
The Long-Term View
In retirement, Social Security is a crucial piece of the puzzle. Having a thorough understanding of it is essential for making informed decisions. Prepare for the future by running the numbers, consulting a financial advisor, and planning for the long-term.
The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors. They are meant for general informational purposes only and should not be construed or interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation. The Epoch Times does not provide investment, tax, legal, financial planning, estate planning, or any other personal finance advice. The Epoch Times holds no liability for the accuracy or timeliness of the information provided.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Reforming Fannie and Freddie is just the first step
For nearly 17 years, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — two pillars of the U.S. housing finance system — have remained under federal conservatorship. The debate over how to exit this limbo has consumed housing policy circles for over a decade. Most stakeholders now agree that reform is overdue. But even the best plan to restructure these institutions will fall short if it ends there. Fannie and Freddie matter. The government-sponsored enterprises guarantee nearly half of all new U.S. mortgages, ensuring liquidity in both good times and bad. They are also among the few institutions with a public mission to serve rural, low-income and historically underserved borrowers. Reimagining them as regulated utilities — with capped returns, cost-based pricing and clear service obligations — would bring transparency and durability to a system long overdue for a modern framework. But structure alone won't solve the affordability crisis gripping communities nationwide. Even perfectly governed Government-Sponsored Enterprises cannot close the gap between surging home prices and stagnating wages. Nor can they single-handedly fix the uneven access to credit or the persistent racial homeownership gap. The median U.S. home now costs over $420,000. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, the nation faces a shortage of more than 7 million affordable rental homes. In many markets, even well-qualified buyers with stable incomes and decent credit are being priced out of the market. The gap between what families earn and what homes cost is no longer just wide — it's systemic. Without a broader effort, a restructured Fannie and Freddie would still be operating on top of a broken foundation. To truly modernize housing finance, we need to rethink how we underwrite risk, where we allow homes to be built, and who gets access to capital. A healthy system must go beyond liquidity. It must support housing production, economic inclusion and long-term market resilience. Here are three critical areas where policy must evolve: 1. Zoning and land use reform The Government-Sponsored Enterprises can't buy loans on homes that don't get built. In many cities, exclusionary zoning — such as minimum lot sizes, bans on multifamily units, and onerous parking requirements — chokes off the supply of new housing. While local governments control zoning, federal policy can provide powerful incentives. One approach is to link infrastructure or transportation grants to inclusive land-use reforms. Removing regulatory barriers to starter homes, townhouses and modular construction could unlock affordable housing supply without the need for new subsidies. 2. Credit Innovation for a changing workforce Today's credit models don't reflect how Americans live and work. Renters with flawless payment histories still struggle to build credit. Gig workers with steady earnings face outdated underwriting standards. Appraisals often undervalue modular and manufactured homes despite their key role in expanding affordability. Federal regulators should accelerate the development of alternative credit scoring models, expand underwriting pilots and recognize stable income sources beyond the traditional W-2. A modern credit system must reward reliability — not just conformity. 3. Equity through transparency The racial homeownership gap isn't closing on its own — it requires deliberate action. Any Government-Sponsored Enterprises reform must include strong data transparency on lending by race, income and geography. Public dashboards, equity benchmarks and stronger oversight should be part of the solution. If the Government-Sponsored Enterprises are to fulfill a public mission, their performance must be trackable, visible and grounded in outcomes — not aspirations. Fixing Fannie and Freddie is necessary — but it's not sufficient. These institutions are deeply ingrained in the core of America's housing and financial systems. Their influence extends from interest rates and loan terms to neighborhood stability and intergenerational wealth. Restructuring them without addressing the broader system would be a missed opportunity. Economists such as Mark Zandi of Moody's Analytics and Jim Parrott of the Urban Institute have long supported a hybrid model: one that combines strong regulation with market participation. They argue that it's possible to balance broad access to mortgage credit with taxpayer protection. Their work affirms that reform doesn't require a false choice between efficiency and equity. We can — and must — pursue both. Recent public friction between Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is another reminder: Housing finance doesn't operate in isolation. Interest rate policy, inflation and credit markets all interact with the institutions that support the mortgage system. Reform must be built to withstand not only market volatility but also political and monetary turbulence. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have helped millions of Americans buy homes and weather economic downturns. But they can't fix zoning laws, modernize credit scoring or close the racial wealth gap on their own. Suppose we want a system that works not just in recovery but in resilience. In that case, we need a long-term vision — one that aligns public purpose with private capital and innovation with accountability. The next chapter of housing finance must be bigger than balance sheets. It must reflect the realities of today's economy and prepare for the demands of tomorrow's homebuyers. This isn't just about fixing what's broken. It's about building a housing finance system that works — for everyone. Omar Mbowe, Ph.D., MBA, is the Managing Partner of Auxilia Capital Partners, a New York–based real estate investment firm. He also serves as the executive director of the HED Initiative.


Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
SALT income tax deduction takes key step forward on Senate deal
A much followed tax break improvement is inching toward becoming a reality. A proposed tweak to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction - capped at $10,000 since 2018 - could soon offer relief to taxpayers in high-tax states. If passed, the Senate's version of the One Big Beautiful Bill of America (OBBBA) would give taxpayers a temporary boost in their ability to deduct SALT payments, especially for those who've felt the sting of the cap since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) took effect. And as lawmakers inch toward a deal, taxpayers - and their accountants - are watching closely. Photo by Ian Hutchinson on Unsplash What is the SALT income tax deduction cap? Under the TCJA, the SALT deduction was capped at $10,000 annually - including the combined total of property taxes, income taxes, and sales taxes. That cap, still in place today, is set to expire at the end of 2025. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter But since its enactment, it has disproportionately affected residents in states with high property values and/or income tax rates. Think: New YorkCaliforniaNew JerseyConnecticutMassachusettsMarylandIllinois In these states, many middle-and upper-middle-income households have long paid more than $10,000 in state and local taxes. Related: How the IRS taxes Social Security income in retirement As a result, despite the higher standard deduction that was part of TCJA, some families have been unable to fully deduct those expenses on their federal tax returns-a costly outcome. Both the House and Senate versions of the OBBBA seek to expand the SALT deduction, but with key differences. In the House proposal, the cap would rise to $40,000 for married couples, phased out for households earning over $500,000. The new cap would last until 2034. Related: Social Security income tax deduction clears critical hurdle Not all lawmakers are on board. Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), for instance, told Axios he was a "no" on a temporary deal. "I need $40K for my constituents, and it has to be $40K forever," he said. The Senate version takes a different approach. It proposes a temporary SALT cap increase from 2025 through 2029, followed by a return to the $10,000 cap: 2025: Cap rises to $40,0002026: Adjusted to $40,4002027–2029: Cap increases annually by 1%2030 and beyond: Cap returns to $10,000 For married individuals filing separately, these caps are halved. High-Income taxpayers face phase-down of SALT deduction The Senate plan includes a phase-down for high earners, starting in 2025. Here's how it works: The benefit phases down once your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) exceeds $500,000 (or $250,000 for married filing separately).The reduction equals 30% of the amount your MAGI exceeds the the SALT cap cannot fall below $10,000 - even for the wealthiest filers. This means high-income households would still see some benefit from the temporary cap hike, just not the full amount. "For a lot of people, this cap is the difference between taking the standard deduction and itemizing deductions," said Michael Lofley, a financial adviser with HBKS Wealth Advisors. "If they itemize, they now get some additional tax benefit for other deductions, like charitable giving or mortgage interest." Related: Medicare recipients face a growing problem While some taxpayers - particularly small business owners - have used pass-through entity taxes (PTETs) to bypass the cap, W-2 earners such as corporate executives don't have that option. For them, this proposal offers real financial relief. Standard deduction increases under Senate tax plan The Senate tax bill includes more than just SALT deduction relief. It also proposes permanent extensions of the TCJA's higher standard deduction amounts. And for the years 2025 through 2028, it adds an extra boost: $1,000 for single filers$1,500 for heads of household$2,000 for married couples filing jointly That means in 2026, the standard deduction could be: $16,000 for singles$24,000 for heads of household$32,000 for married joint filers After 2026, these amounts would adjust with inflation. Retirees also have reason to pay attention. The Senate bill includes a larger senior tax deduction - $6,000 per eligible filer aged 65 or older (up from $4,000 in the House bill). This enhanced deduction would apply through 2028 and would phase out for incomes above: $75,000 (single filers)$150,000 (married filing jointly) Before the TCJA, about 31% to 32% of taxpayers itemized deductions. But after the law took effect in 2018, that figure dropped significantly: 2018: 11% to 11.5%2020–2022: Just 9% to 10% If the SALT cap is temporarily expanded, even if the standard deduction increases, more taxpayers - especially in high-tax areas - may once again find it beneficial to itemize deductions on their federal tax returns. "If Congress meets President Trump's July 4th deadline for passing the final bill, taxpayers will soon be able to update their 2025 tax projections," says Jean-Luc Bourdon, CPA. "This could prompt some taxpayers to revise their estimated quarterly payments or tax withholdings for the remainder of the year." Related: Workers struggle with one big problem when they retire The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Social Security's 2026 Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) Is on Track to Do Something No One Has Witnessed This Century
Nothing is more important for Social Security beneficiaries than the annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) reveal. Updated COLA forecasts following the release of the May inflation report point to a history-making moment for beneficiaries in 2026. However, a Social Security dollar isn't what it used to be -- and that's a big problem. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › In May, the average Social Security retired-worker check made history by crossing above $2,000 for the first time in the program's storied history. While an average monthly payout of $2,000 is a relatively modest sum, it's nevertheless proved vital to helping aging Americans make ends meet. Following 23 consecutive years of surveys from Gallup, we've learned that between 80% and 90% of retirees consistently lean on their Social Security income, in some capacity, to cover their expenses. Considering how many people rely on Social Security as their financial foundation, the annual reveal of the program's cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) during the second week of October is important and highly anticipated. Though we're still in the estimating stage of Social Security's 2026 COLA, it nevertheless appears to be on track to do something no one has witnessed this century. Before diving into this potentially history-making moment in 2026, it's imperative to understand what Social Security's cost-of-living adjustment is and why it's so important for retirees. The best way to view Social Security's COLA is as the mechanism that attempts to mirror the effects of inflation (rising prices) on benefits. For example, if a large basket of goods and services regularly purchased by seniors climbs in cost by 4%, Social Security benefits would need to increase by the same percentage to avoid a loss of buying power. Social Security's COLA is what determines how much of a "raise" beneficiaries receive in the upcoming year. Before 1975, there wasn't a plan for passing along COLAs. Rather, special sessions of Congress doled out arbitrary raises 11 times from 1940 through 1974. Beginning in 1975, the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) became the inflationary measure that America's leading retirement program relied on to dole out annual benefit increases. The CPI-W sports more than 200 spending categories, each of which have their own unique percentage weightings. It's these weightings that allow the CPI-W to be expressed as a single figure each month, making for simple year-over-year comparisons to determine if prices are, collectively, rising (inflation) or falling (deflation). Although the CPI-W is reported monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), only readings from July, August, and September factor into Social Security's COLA calculation. If the average CPI-W reading from the third quarter of 2025 is higher than the comparable period in 2024, beneficiaries can expect a larger monthly payout come 2026. Throughout the 2010s, Social Security's cost-of-living adjustments were nothing to write home about. There have only been three years since 1975 when deflation took place and no COLA was passed along, and they all occurred during the 2010s (2010, 2011, 2016). This time period is also home to the smallest positive COLA on record -- a meager 0.3% in 2017. But Social Security payouts have climbed at a considerably faster pace during the 2020s than they have in decades. Specifically, a record-breaking year-over-year increase in M2 money supply of more than 26% during the COVID-19 pandemic's height sent the prevailing rate of inflation soaring domestically. This led to respective Social Security COLAs of 5.9% in 2022, 8.7% in 2023 (the highest on a percentage basis in 41 years), 3.2% in 2024, and 2.5% in 2025. Collectively, the four most recent cost-of-living adjustments have come in above the average increase of 2.3% since 2010. Following the release of the May inflation report from the BLS, Social Security policy analysts updated their forecasts for the 2026 COLA. Nonpartisan senior advocacy group The Senior Citizens League (TSCL) upped its cost-of-living adjustment projection by a tenth of a percent for the third consecutive month, to 2.5%. Meanwhile, independent Social Security and Medicare policy analyst Mary Johnson, who retired from TSCL last year, also increased her 2026 COLA estimate to 2.5%. A 2.5% COLA would represent about a $50-per-month boost to the average retired-worker check next year. The average monthly payouts for workers with disabilities and survivors of deceased workers would climb by a more modest $40 and $39, respectively, in 2026. But what would make the 2026 cost-of-living adjustment special is that it would mark the fifth consecutive year of at least a 2.5% boost to payouts. The last time Social Security's COLA was 2.5% or greater for five consecutive years was 1987 through 1996, when COLAs came in between 2.6% on the low end to 5.4% on the high end. To reiterate, we haven't even reached the months that count toward the COLA calculation, so expect estimates to shift modestly. But if the current forecasts do prove accurate, we'll be witnessing something that hasn't occurred in three decades. If Social Security benefits were to climb at an above-average pace for a fifth straight year (relative to the average COLA since 2010), most recipients would probably believe they're getting ahead -- but this couldn't be further from the truth. According to an analysis published by TSCL in July 2024, the purchasing power of a Social Security dollar has declined by a stark 20% since 2010. This updated study followed a May 2023-released analysis from TSCL that found a whopping 36% reduction in the buying power of Social Security income between January 2000 and February 2023. The culprit for this persistent decline in the purchasing power of a Social Security dollar is none other than the CPI-W. Though you'd think an encompassing inflationary index would be accurately tracking the pricing pressures program recipients are contending with, the CPI-W's full name exposes its flaw. This is an index that specifically tracks the spending habits of "urban wage earners and clerical workers," who are, in many instances, working-age people not currently receiving a Social Security benefit. People in their 20s and 30s are spending their money very differently than retirees. Whereas the former allocate a higher percentage of their monthly budget to things like education and transportation, seniors spend a larger percentage on shelter and medical care services than working-age Americans. Even though 87% of Social Security recipients were 62 and older, as of December 2023, the inflationary measure the program relies on doesn't take into account the added importance of shelter and medical care service costs. This leads to cost-of-living adjustments that fail to match the inflationary pressures retirees are facing. As long as the trailing 12-month inflation rate for shelter and medical care services is higher than the projected and/or actual COLA, this loss of buying power will only worsen and disappoint retirees. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Social Security's 2026 Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) Is on Track to Do Something No One Has Witnessed This Century was originally published by The Motley Fool