Ranya Rao's mother challenges detention under smuggling law
HP Rohini, who filed the habeas corpus petition on Thursday, has asked the court to declare that any detention of her daughter under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act would be legally untenable. The matter came up for hearing before a vacation bench of Justices H P Sandesh and Ramachandra Huddar. 'The Centre is expected to file its response when the case resumes on June 3,' said an official in the know of the development.
Ranya Rao was taken into custody on March 3 by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) for allegedly bringing in 14.2 kilograms of foreign-origin gold from Dubai through Bengaluru's Kempegowda International Airport. Officials estimate the value of the seized consignment at ₹12.56 crore and claim that the accused attempted to evade customs duties totalling ₹4.83 crore by taping the gold to her body using bandages.
Also Read | Karnataka HC junks bail pleas of Ranya Rao, Tarun Raju in gold smuggling case
The Ministry of Finance, acting on a request from the DRI, issued a detention order through its Central Economic Intelligence Bureau on April 22. If enforced, the Cofeposa order would allow the authorities to hold Rao and her co-accused in custody for up to one year without regular judicial proceedings, even if they were to be granted bail.
Earlier in April, the karnataka high court issued a notice to the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) over the bail application filed by Kannada actor Ranya Rao, who is currently in judicial custody for her alleged involvement in a gold smuggling case.
Ranya Rao, listed as the first accused in the case, was arrested on March 3 at the Kempegowda International Airport in Bengaluru. DRI officials claimed to have seized 14.2 kilograms of gold bars valued at ₹12.5 crore from her possession upon her arrival from Dubai. The agency said the gold, if imported legally, would have attracted import duties worth ₹4.83 crore under the current 38.5% rate.
Also Read | Why was Ranya Rao granted VIP protocol, police escort: HC
Rao, who is also the stepdaughter of Karnataka's Director General of Police K Ramachandra Rao, had earlier been denied bail by the Karnataka High Court. Her alleged accomplice, Telugu actor Tarun Konduru Raju, also remains in custody after his bail plea was rejected. According to the DRI, both actors were in the UAE at the same time, but Raju returned to Hyderabad while Rao landed in Bengaluru, where the smuggling was detected.
Following her arrest, two other individuals have also been taken into custody in connection with the case—Tarun Raju, identified as the second accused, and Sahil Jain, listed as the third accused. All three are presently under judicial custody, with their remand extended until April 21.
The development comes as on Monday, a Bengaluru Sessions Court also denied bail to Tarun Raju, upholding the earlier decision of the Magistrate Court. His plea was filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, but the court found no justification to overturn the previous order.
Raju was arrested on March 10, a week after Rao's arrest, with officials confirming that he had accompanied her on a trip to Dubai prior to the alleged smuggling attempt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
a day ago
- News18
Despite DNA Match With Child, Karnataka HC Refuses To Overturn Acquittal In POCSO Rape Case
The court said while the DNA test confirmed the man was the child's father, absence of supporting oral evidence, especially from the victim, rendered the case legally insufficient The Karnataka High Court recently declined to interfere with the acquittal of a man accused of raping a minor, holding that a DNA match proving paternity does not automatically establish guilt under criminal law. The state had approached the Dharwad Bench of the High Court seeking to overturn the August 2021 acquittal of a 24-year-old man from Belagavi district, who was tried under Section 376(2) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. However, the high court refused to do so, reasoning that while the DNA test confirmed he was the father of the child born to the victim, the absence of any supporting oral evidence, especially from the victim herself, rendered the prosecution's case legally insufficient. The prosecution case was that in January 2015, the accused, then working as a daily wage labourer, allegedly entered into a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old girl in a remote area near Kyadagi forest, Uttara Kannada. The girl later became pregnant. However, it was only a year later that she lodged a police complaint after the accused began to avoid her. A medical examination confirmed her pregnancy, and a DNA test later matched the accused as the biological father of the baby. But at trial, the victim, along with her close family members, turned hostile, denying that any sexual contact had taken place. With 22 witnesses examined and 37 documents submitted, the prosecution pinned its case almost entirely on medical and forensic evidence. The trial court, however, found the evidence inadequate to meet the threshold of 'beyond reasonable doubt" and acquitted the accused. Challenging this, the state contended that the DNA evidence alone was conclusive of the offence. The high court disagreed. In its judgment delivered on July 10, the bench of Justices R Nataraj and Rajesh Rai K underlined that scientific evidence such as DNA tests must be evaluated in the broader context of all available facts and testimonies. 'The victim herself firmly stated that the accused did not have any sexual intercourse with her. She is not aware who the father of her child is. Even her parents and relatives also deposed similarly. In such circumstance, the DNA report cannot be solely relied to convict the accused," the bench observed. The court drew upon precedents from both the Supreme Court and other high courts, emphasising that DNA profiling is rooted in statistical probability and cannot be treated as infallible. It also warned against treating such reports as conclusive in the absence of procedural safeguards around collection, preservation, and contamination. Citing the principle that appellate courts should not lightly interfere with acquittals where the trial court has taken a plausible view, the high court declined to re-evaluate the trial court's findings. The appeal was dismissed. Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
What to watch on OTT this weekend (July 21-July 27)
A chilling crime thriller where one mistake throws a family into chaos. Show time – Sun NXT (Telugu) | Photo | IMDb
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
'25 likes & 5 comments': Cops book Facebook page, users for post targeting Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah
Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah (File photo) BENGALURU: A routine social media monitoring exercise by cybercrime police has led to a suo motu case against a Facebook page and users for interacting on an allegedly derogatory post targeting CM Siddaramaiah. The post, written in Kannada and uploaded on July 21 on 'True Secular' page, accused Siddaramaiah of targeting religious institutions across his terms in office. It claimed he had acted against the Udupi Sri Krishna Mutt during his first term, attempted to alienate the Lingayat community from Hinduism, and was now targeting Dharmasthala. The post had drawn 25 likes & five comments - some of which included alleged derogatory remarks about the CM's leadership. These engagements are now part of the FIR, with the names of those who commented & some who liked the post also listed. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Post found during regular monitoring by cops Police said the post was spotted on July 23 during regular monitoring by sub-inspector Kubera from the cybercrime station attached to the commissioner's office. A senior police officer said the case has been booked under the Information Technology Act, 2000, andSection 299 of BNS, which pertains to deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings. The development comes days after the state govt announced a special investigation team to probe allegations of serial rapes and murders in Dharmasthala — a move that has triggered political reactions and sharp commentary online.
