
EFF asks Ramaphosa for clarity on new lotto operator and alleged ties to Mashatile
EFF leader Julius Malema has demanded clarity from President Cyril Ramaphosa on the awarding of the National Lottery Licence to Sizekhaya Holdings and the company's alleged political ties to Deputy President Paul Mashatile.
Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau awarded the eight-year licence to Sizekhaya in May, handing over the reins from long-term operator Ithuba.
Sizekhaya
Sizekhaya is part-owned by Bellamont Gaming, a company co-owned and co-directed by Mashatile's sister-in-law Khumo Bogatsu and prominent KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) businessman Moses Tembe.
Tembe is also the chair of the consortium, while Sandile Zungu – another prominent KZN businessman – holds directorship.
Furthermore, Zungu is a stakeholder in Goldrush, a gambling company that has shares in Sizekhaya.
'Grave concern'
In the letter, Malema expressed 'grave concern' over the apparent politics of patronage and the 'intricate web of familial and political connections'.
He said the EFF had previously cautioned against this appointment due to, among other things, Zungu and Tembe's affiliation with the ANC.
'The involvement of the Deputy President adds a troubling dimension to this matter. It has come to light that Khumo Bogatsu – a co-owner of Bellamont Gaming, which is also a shareholder in Sizekhaya Holdings – is the twin sister of South Africa's Second Lady, Humile Mashatile, the wife of Deputy President Paul Mashatile,' Malema wrote.
'Furthermore, Ms Bogatsu is engaged to businessman Sbu Shabalala, who is a cousin of Moses Tembe, the lead figure in Sizekhaya and co-owner of the Goldrush Consortium.'
Malema said these links suggest the awarding of the lottery licence may have been influenced, which constitutes state capture.
ALSO READ: Tau vows to investigate after Mashatile's sister-in-law linked to multi-billion lotto operator licence
Malema demands answers from Ramaphosa
He proceeded to demand answers to the following questions:
Are you aware of the extent of political ties involved in the appointment of Sizekhaya Holdings as the National Lottery operator?
If you are aware, do you support the decision made by Minister Tau despite serious procedural irregularities, conflicts of interest, and the defiance of parliamentary oversight?
Have you personally engaged Deputy President Mashatile on this matter, and if so, what explanation has he provided regarding the involvement of his immediate family in a multi-billion-rand public contract?
In light of the State Capture Commission and your stated anti-corruption stance, what is your position on politically exposed persons and their close relatives benefiting from government contracts or public licences such as this one?
Possible legal action
Malema said the EFF believes the National Lottery must serve the developmental interests of South Africans, not those of the political elite.
'The level of political entanglement in this deal, compounded by Minister Tau's refusal to be held accountable, undermines the legitimacy of this award and sets a dangerous precedent for future public procurement.'
He said his party reserves the right to explore legal options, including approaching the courts to 'compel disclosure of the appointment process and, where necessary, to have these appointments reviewed and set aside on grounds of irrationality, procedural irregularity, or breach of public governance principles'.
Mashatile addresses allegations
Mashatile has denied suggestions of political interference and argued that Bellamont Gaming was not doing business with the Presidency.
He said it was unfair to question why his relatives were conducting business.
'There are so many people who know me in this country – family, children, cousins and friends. Where must they do business, in Zimbabwe? Out of this country,' Mashatile asked during an interview with Sowetan on Tuesday.
'They can do business, as long as I'm not involved, not because they know me. Because once you say Mr Mashatile is capable of influencing, even if he is sitting in his house, it's unfair. You must be able to say he went there to interfere.'
ALSO READ: WATCH: Mashatile denies family tied to multibillion-rand lottery deal
Bosa requests transparency
EFF is not the only party that has expressed concern over the awarding of the licence.
In May, Musi Maimane's Bosa called for full transparency from Tau, requesting a list of adjudicators and consultants involved in the lottery tender process.
The party also asked for their disclosures and declarations of interest, as well as a report to parliament outlining the evaluation criteria and scoring of each bid.
'South Africans have a right to know whether this process has been conducted above board or whether it is tainted by insider influence or political interference,' the party said in a statement.
'We will not allow South Africa's public resources, or the hopes of the vulnerable communities who depend on lottery funding, to be hijacked by cronyism or corruption.'
DA asks Tau to appear before committee
The DA also requested Tau and the National Lotteries Commission to appear before the Parliament's trade and industry portfolio committee to answer questions concerning the licence.
During the meeting on 24 June, Tau said he would investigate the conflict-of-interest allegations concerning Sizekhaya – much to the DA's dissatisfaction.
'The DA is astounded that Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau, came to Parliament today to effectively admit to committee, that he had failed in his executive duties to properly oversee the appointment of the new Lottery Operator Sizekhaya Holdings,' DA MP Toby Chance said in a statement following the minister's appearance.
'It is Tau's duty to ensure that conflicts of interest between the bidders and government are picked up, and his lack of awareness of possible links between Deputy President Paul Mashatile, his family and shareholders in Bellamont Gaming is simply unacceptable.'
Watch the meeting here:
NOW READ: Ithuba poised to run Lottery for next year — despite legal concerns
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
40 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Empowering women: SASSA expands leadership training initiative
The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has officially launched the fourth intake of its Women in Leadership Development Programme, a strategic initiative designed to strengthen gender representation and leadership capacity within the public service. Launched on June 24, the programme will see 120 women in middle and senior management positions undergo six months of leadership training. The goal is to empower women with the strategic, emotional, and operational skills required to succeed in complex government environments. The initiative focuses on areas such as strategic leadership, emotional intelligence, people management, and self-awareness, providing participants with tools to excel and lead with purpose. Sassa CEO Themba Matlou, in his keynote address, reaffirmed the agency's commitment to gender transformation. 'It is not a favour; it is an obligation. We must create space and provide resources for women to lead. Our data shows we are doing well at entry levels, but numbers drop at the top. That must change,' said Matlou. He emphasised that leadership development, particularly for women, is integral to Sassa's broader five-year strategy, which includes improving organisational efficiency, enhancing service delivery and reducing poverty. 'An organisation has the responsibility to train, empower and motivate its people. Well-equipped staff translates into improved customer experiences and stronger community impact,' he added. The programme is part of Sassa's drive to create a diverse, inclusive and effective leadership pipeline, ensuring the agency continues to serve South Africans with integrity and professionalism. Matlou encouraged participants to see themselves as catalysts for transformation. 'Each of you represents a step toward a future where women's leadership is the norm, not the exception. Your participation signals change – for yourselves, for this agency and for the people we serve.' As Youth Month draws to a close, Sassa's investment in developing women leaders sends a strong message that inclusive leadership is not just policy – it's a national imperative. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!


The South African
9 hours ago
- The South African
'A great pity': Ramaphosa slams DA's national dialogue withdrawal
President Cyril Ramaphosa said the national dialogue will continue without the input of the Democratic Alliance (DA). He was speaking at a joint media briefing with the President of Austria, Alexander van der Bellen, on Friday, 4 July. Ramaphosa described the DA's decision to withdraw from the national dialogue as 'hypocrisy'. He said it demonstrated a lack of principle. He said South Africans had called for a national conversation about the state of the country after 30 years of democracy. The head of the nation stressed that the dialogue is not a political platform but a collective discussion. Ramaphosa criticised the DA's withdrawal, saying it made no sense and was contradictory. He added that many South Africans were appalled by the party's behaviour. He expressed regret that the DA would deprive the people it represents of the opportunity to contribute to shaping the country's future. The president said the national dialogue will look at the country's governance and economic growth. As well as other aspects such as cultural, sports, and science-related matters. 'And I can name them all so that I can wet their [The DA] appetite. So that their tongues hang out and see that they are going to miss the biggest show in South Africa by defining themselves outside of the national dialogue. What a great pity,' Ramaphosa said. Ramaphosa added that he had anticipated the DA's withdrawal from the Government of National Unity (GNU) before the party pulled out of the national dialogue. This followed its member, Andrew Whitfield's axing from his position as deputy minister of trade and industry. At a media briefing on Friday, 27 June, DA leader John Steenhuisen also accused the African National Congress (ANC) of abusing its power. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news


Daily Maverick
12 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Integrating AI in your business can be a double-edged sword
AI promises to transform businesses with smarter systems and personalised customer experiences. But AI, like any tool, requires skill to wield. Without proper scrutiny, these tools can do more harm than good. The AI sales pitch is irresistible: automated customer service, hyper-personalised engagement, razor-sharp inventory forecasting. But AI, like any tool, requires skill to wield. 'AI isn't magic; it's math and data,' said Matthew Elliot, chief delivery officer at tech consultancy CloudSmiths. 'The more visibility you have into how it works and what it's doing, the safer your outcomes will be.' 'Safe' is the key word here. While AI can give any business an edge, it can just as easily entrench inequality, expose private data, or simply, much like humans, make bad calls. Riskier than you think According to Wendy Tembedza, partner at Webber Wentzel, the issue isn't whether or not to use AI – because most businesses already do. The problems creep in when the risks of its usage are not rigorously assessed. 'Businesses must carefully consider the intended use case of any AI tool and conduct a risk assessment prior to implementation,' she advised. 'This helps manage the risks that may arise from incorrect or inappropriate use.' Those risks include exposure to legal liability if systems fail to meet ethical or compliance standards. If an AI tool inadvertently discriminates, say by offering preferential pricing or marketing to customers living in urban areas that shop online, it poses the risk of enforcing bias. 'In a society where South Africans have unequal access to the internet, AI tools that learn only from online behaviour run the risk of generating biased results,' Tembedza warned. 'The resulting insights may fail to reflect the actual behaviours and preferences of the wider customer base.' Bad inputs, bad outcomes Much of the risk begins with the data. AI tools need clean, well-structured, and representative data to train on. 'Bad inputs make bad decisions,' Elliot said. 'If you don't know where your data came from or how your model behaves, you're flying blind.' TymeBank chief technology officer, Bruce Paveley agrees on that point. 'Bank data is carefully selected and scrubbed to ensure we don't put dirty data into our AI tools,' he said. 'We also allow our AI tools to use learning from other reliable sources to avoid bias toward our own ideas.' What is 'dirty' data? This refers to information that is inaccurate, incomplete, or outdated, hindering the performance and reliability of AI models Elliot reckons that bias is a human problem as much as it is a technical issue, and if your model isn't trained on diverse, representative data, it will leave people behind. To mitigate this, CloudSmiths has developed workflows that stress-tests models against real-world scenarios, using tools such as 'Objective Lens' to detect underrepresentation and misclassification. 'If your AI doesn't work for everyone, it doesn't really work,' Elliot said. Inventory gains, infrastructure pains Inventory management is one of AI's most lucrative use cases. Predictive tools can anticipate buying trends and automate restocking, which reduces waste. But again, the model is only as smart as the data it learns from. 'In practice, many retailers do not have centralised or well-organised data sets,' Tembedza said. 'If data used to train AI models are outdated, inconsistent or inaccurate, no level of technical sophistication can compensate.' Even when the data is right, legacy IT systems often aren't. 'Many retailers continue to operate on legacy information technology systems that may not support the integration of the AI tools they intend to implement,' Tembedza added. In Africa, up to 60% of businesses cited IT infrastructure as a major barrier to AI implementation, a survey by cybersecurity company Fortinet found. Modern, cloud-first businesses like TymeBank are less encumbered, but even their barriers are not always technical. 'The challenge was more adoption by our team members rather than a technical limitation,' said Paveley. 'Education and exposure were key enablers to get our team to embrace AI as a productivity tool rather than one that threatens their jobs.' Leak risks of generative AI When it comes to businesses that adopt and use AI, the most insidious risk does not necessarily come from a chatbot gone rogue but rather from employees pasting confidential information into ChatGPT. 'Never assume off-the-shelf AI is private by default,' Elliot said. He sees companies frequently underestimating the risk of intellectual property exposure and data leaks from generative AI tools. His advice: Use air-gapped or private models for anything involving intellectual property. Train staff on what's safe to input. Review AI governance legislation, like the EU's AI Act. Establish monitoring and evaluation frameworks from day one. 'There needs to be a policy to govern, rather than restrict, usage of AI in our business,' Paveley said. 'Our staff need to complete AI training to ensure they understand the power of productivity improvements but also for awareness of the associated risks.' Boost engagement, don't alienate Done right, the shiny promise of personalisation through AI can boost engagement. If not, it reinforces stereotypes and alienates customers and clients. 'The most ethical AI is also the most useful,' Elliot said. 'If users trust the experience, they are more likely to engage with it – and that's good for everyone.' 'Personalisation shouldn't enforce stereotypes; it should surprise you, teach you something new, or reflect who you're becoming, not just who you've been.' Helpful or harmful? For all its potential, AI certainly doesn't solve problems on its own and certainly not by default. 'The questions are similar from what we hear every day from our South African and UK clients,' Elliot said. 'Typically it's concerns around safety, fairness, cost or return on investment. It seems most businesses are desperately trying to minimise AI risk while staying competitive.'