logo
Abolition of not proven verdict an 'essential' reform

Abolition of not proven verdict an 'essential' reform

The legislation makes major changes to the law to try to improve the experience of victims and witnesses in the justice system and also makes changes to the criminal justice system to try to improve the fairness, clarity and transparency of the framework within which decisions in criminal cases are made.
Among its provisions are the abolition of the not proven verdict - which is unique to Scotland - and the establishment of a dedicated court specialising in sexual offences.
READ MORE:
Writing in The Herald today, Ms Wallace described the not proven verdict as a 'relic of Scottish criminal law that has confused juries and denied justice to victims'.
She added: "Victim Support Scotland welcomes this potential step forward and urges our political leaders to see the removal of this verdict not just as a legislative change, but as a necessity for modern justice.
"Scotland is the only country in the world to have the 'not proven' verdict alongside 'guilty' and 'not guilty'. But unlike its counterparts, 'not proven' has no official legal definition – a bizarre fact that I've found most people are shocked to discover.... To the average person, the lack of definition of 'not proven' creates a feeling of uncertainty about how exactly it should be used in a trial.
"Jurors are offered no specific guidance on how to return this verdict, only being told that it provides the same acquittal as not guilty - leaving it wide open for misinterpretation."
She went on to say that when juries return a not proven verdict, the accused is acquitted though a "shadow of suspicion' can still hang over them while victims are often left with the feeling that their experience has been denied.
"It offers no closure, clarity, or comfort. Instead, it leaves open-ended questions and deep emotional scars. For the accused, we are told, it can cast a shadow of suspicion over them for the rest of their lives that they feel unable to address," she said.
Ms Wallace also pointed out that cases of rape and attempted rape resulted in a not proven' acquittal than in trials for other types of crime.
She stated: "In 2019/20, 44% of acquittals were not proven, compared to 20% across all crimes and offences. One of the most prominent cases involved Miss M, who won a landmark civil case against Andrew Coxen for rape after he was found not proven in a criminal trial.
"Not proven has also been contentious in murder trials. After the killing of Amanda Duffy in 1992, Francis Auld, the man accused of murdering her, was given a not proven verdict.
"The Duffy family later won a civil case against him, with a judge awarding them £50,000 in damages after finding him responsible for her death. However, the Duffy family never received any of this award. The Duffy family, like Miss M, have since been passionate campaigners for change in this area."
She added: "Abolishing the not proven verdict is not a radical departure for Scotland's legal system – it is an essential reform that brings us in line with international standards and modern principles of justice.
"It will improve the clarity of decision-making for juries, ensuring that verdicts are understood by all. It will also help victims better comprehend the outcome of trials and provide a sense of closure.
"Crucially, it might help to increase the paltry levels of public trust in Scotland's legal system. The latest Scottish Crime and Justice Survey revealed that only 36% of people are confident that the criminal justice system gives sentences which fit the crime. This is down significantly, from 41% in 2021/22."
MSPs on the criminal justice committee backed the abolition of the not proven verdict.
They said in a report in March: 'On the balance of evidence, having heard arguments for and against, we believe the not-proven verdict has had its day and should be abolished.'
They added that they did not think it was satisfactory to have a verdict in a criminal trial that had no accepted legal definition.
The committee rejected plans to alter the size of juries or the required majority.
At present 15 people sit on a Scottish jury and a simple majority of eight is required for a conviction. The Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill proposes a smaller jury of 12 and a two-thirds majority for a guilty verdict, but the MSPs concluded that there was no compelling evidence to support the change.
The Scottish Government had originally included in the bill a plan to run a pilot scheme to hear rape trials in front of a single judge or a panel of judges, rather than by a jury. But the proposal was dropped after opposition from lawyers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Readers' Letters: Time for Jews to intervene in Gaza
Readers' Letters: Time for Jews to intervene in Gaza

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Readers' Letters: Time for Jews to intervene in Gaza

Palestinians rush to collect humanitarian aid airdropped by parachutes into Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2025. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana) A reader congratulates one of our columnists for is Gaza views. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... ​Your columnist Joe Goldblatt is to be commended to utter the unequivocal truth that it is time for Jews to intervene to end the unfathomable grief, wholesale destruction and human agony in Gaza. Not long ago, Jews were systematically slaughtered, starved, tormented and sent to crematoria in gas chambers and death camps to perish silently. Their emaciated images are still engraved in our human consciousness. They rekindled our collective remembrance and mourning and offered us not only stories about inhumane barbarism but also stories of unswerving strength, resilience, hope and intrepidity to triumph over adversity and be an impetus for us to work for justice, equality, inclusivity, diversity, respect for human rights and dignities. Dr Munjed Farid Al Qutob, London Bye bye Kate Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Kate Forbes has announced – to all intensive purposes – that if she is to spend her waking hours dealing with children, she would much sooner deal with her own, thank you very much. The hordes of (largely male) creeps and snollygosters that have grown like fungus through much of Scottish society will celebrate the news, doubtless with fictitious references to her supposed religion inspired 'bigotry' without being able to quote one instance of a contentious – let alone partisan – statement she has made once. They always did feel threatened by a woman not afraid to do a proper day's work. With her passing goes our last politician of integrity or sense of duty, and the last positive role model of plurality for a feckless generation of secular Covenanters obsessed with ostracising anyone not signed up to their social media trending 'Sound Doctrine'. Mark Boyle, Johnstone, Renfrewshire The sinking SNP Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It would seem that we, the electorate, are witnessing the 'crew abandoning a sinking ship'. The number of MSPs from the SNP who have intimated their intention to stand down before the 2026 Holyrood Election is ever on the increase. Even Scotland's Deputy First Minister, Kate Forbes, has decided to call it a day. But anyway, there is little doubt that 7th May, 2026, will see the demise of the SNP/Green Administration at Holyrood. It is my view that following the next Holyrood Elections much less emphasis will be placed on matters which are so obviously not included within the powers granted under the Scotland Acts. The SNP Administration has, over its period in office, devoted too much time attempting to interfere with Reserved Matters – which remain under the jurisdiction of Westminster. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If the Scottish Parliament is to continue to exist many changes will require to be implemented by the incoming Administration. Far too much emphasis has been placed by the SNP/Green alliance on matters not in any way relating to Holyrood's remit. Robert I G Scott, Ceres, Fife Vanishing acts The SNP has been and continues to be a vanishing species. Rather like the fairy tale of 'The Goose that Laid the Golden Eggs', the SNP talked up North Sea gas and oil as the way in which an independent Scotland would become some kind of northern European Saudi Arabia. Then, under Nicola Sturgeon, the road to independence came to a branching of the path and she chose to abandon oil on the platform of wind power, and Scotland has been plagued by the horrific windmills ever since, with landscapes destroyed, no matter what the locals think. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This was accompanied by gender identity nonsense and, quite suddenly, the people saw that, like another fairy tale, the emperor had no clothes. Meanwhile, all the leading people in the SNP started to retire, or resign. If they didn't leave the SNP for the Alba party, they decided to leave politics when they saw the writing on the wall. Now, Shona Robison and Fiona Hyslop join Humza Yousaf as they decide to retire. Mhairi Black has left the SNP, as has Fergus Ewing. Rather like Kate Forbes, Fergus Ewing has occasionally sounded alarm at the antics of the Nats. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Now, they have lost one of the few amongst them who occasionally talked sense. Perhaps those leaving the SNP should have a theme tune? May I suggest 'It's All Over Now'. Andrew HN Gray, Edinburgh Holyrood ref With the departure next year of Kate Forbes, perhaps the only nationalist MSP and minister with a slim grasp on reality, the rumblings about the very existence of Holyrood grow. I for one would welcome its going. Just think – at a stroke an instant saving of £billions. More cash for the NHS, Roads, Schools and much else. Women's Rights could be reinforced, not taken away. We could return Scotland to where it once sat proudly at the top table – a leader in engineering and nuclear and oil and gas technology. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At last, no more perpetual Holyrood whining and blaming everyone else for Scotland's self-inflicted ills. And a final bonus of no more cash-devouring pretend embassies and multiple jollies for the SNP's boys and girls. Let us have a referendum, not on the breaking up of the UK, but on the continuing existence of Holyrood as it is. Alexander McKay, Edinburgh Max madness Your article by Catriona Stewart 'report for doomed to fail minimum income guarantee' illuminates the ongoing profligacy of a group of alleged politicians and indeed in some of their eyes 'statesmen and women'. £1.3 million spent on a pigs-might-fly scheme, where from the very outset it was patently obvious this would, if introduced, bankrupt the nation and further encourage the anti-work brigade (many of whom are SNP supporters, funnily enough) to do nothing to change their circumstances. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To even think this was a 'goer' should surely prove this lot are utterly deluded fools. They complain they do not have sufficient 'levers' to carry out policies, may we thank the Lord indeed if this is the case – blatantly obvious to anyone, this is not the case in the most devolved nation in the western world. While disagreeing with Kate Forbes on the Indie issue, I wish her well, one of the few with a moral backbone, though I suspect her leaving has more to it than juggling her private life with parliament. I am sure the example above among countless others would also be a factor. In this case one could not level the sobriquet of 'rats deserting the sinking ship' to Ms Forbes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She leaves with her dignity intact, sadly leaving the real rats still on board the doomed ship SNP. D Millar, Lauder Bird brained E Campbell's letter of 5 August quoting the death rate of birds by various methods and the likely number by the Berwick Bank wind farm, misses one crucial point, that it will be an increase on previous numbers. It is likely to be sea birds who will be the main casualties, not because cats or guns but because of machines that only work when the wind blows. Mechanical power production does not present that problem. C Lowson, Hampshire Cat protection If E Campbell's claim is correct, (letters 5 August 2025) then cats kill one quarter of all UK birds every year, which we very much doubt. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In dismissing as relatively small the number of birds that will be killed by Berwick Bank, he/she also ignores the significant cumulative impact of wind farms and the fact that many of the birds that will be killed by Berwick Bank are in serious decline and, according to the RSPB and other wildlife charities, will 'catapult some species towards extinction'. They are not the same species which will be killed by cats in our back gardens. Cats provide companionship for many, including the elderly and vulnerable in society. They provide a service in natural pest control, eliminating the need for poisons which affect the entire food chain and inflict a miserable death on many innocent creatures. Regrettably it is true that where deterrence fails to reduce the risk of birds to aircraft, birds will be shot. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad While we agree that jetting off on vacation a couple of times a year is unnecessary, there are unfortunately many other reasons that make flying a necessity. We can't do without cats or planes in our lives but there is absolutely no need for any more wind farms, on or offshore. Aileen Jackson, Scotland Against Spin Cable news Let's be careful with those new Berwick Bank Wind Turbines. While those new sea wind turbines can supply 'more than twice Scotland's needs', the power they manufacture has to be led from far out to sea to the land. Twice over recent years off Orkney, the main cable that supplies them from the mainland has been mysteriously severed. Although it is once again mended, the reason for its being broken is not yet understood. Surely there is a lesson here! Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I trust that the electricity from the new Berwick Bank power source is linked to the land by many separate cables, which hopefully arrive at widely varying points on the land. Europe has recently been considering what action can be taken to prevent some possible enemy from severing cables that already exist between the UK and Europe and we must think likewise about the power coming from the Berwick Bank. Archibald A. Lawrie, Kingskettle Write to The Scotsman

John Swinney opens up on health struggles of wife, Elizabeth
John Swinney opens up on health struggles of wife, Elizabeth

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

John Swinney opens up on health struggles of wife, Elizabeth

The First Minister was speaking at The Herald's Unspun Live event. Host Brian Taylor asked the SNP leader about Kate Forbes' shock decision to stand down at the next election, and how he balanced family life with high office. Mr Swinney and Ms Quigley have a teenage son, Matthew. READ MORE Asked if he was anxious about taking the job given his wife's illness, he said: 'Yes, I did, and we have both been very open about this. I left office in 2023 because I thought I had asked too much of my family — too many sacrifices. 'I felt my wife needed her husband at her side a bit more. I am not sure she felt that, but I kind of felt I should be a bit closer at hand. 'So when things changed and the gravity of the situation facing my party became clear in late April 2024 we had to talk through what would happen and how we would manage. 'We manage by a lot of help and support from friends locally, and by us just working together to try and make it all work.' Had Humza Yousaf stood down as First Minister a month earlier, Mr Swinney said he would not have been able to take the job as Elizabeth 'was not doing well'. 'And we have just got a period just now, where things are not too good, to be honest. We are struggling a bit at home. 'Normally, I have commitments in the city tomorrow. I would normally stay in Edinburgh — I am going home tonight because I have just got to adjust.' Mr Swinney said he also understood why Ms Forbes plans on standing down. The Deputy First Minister, who has a three-year-old daughter and will be Unspun Live's guest on Thursday, said she did not want to 'miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. 'I totally understand her situation,' he said. 'And she's a superb Deputy First Minister. She's supported me wholeheartedly. She's done a great job, and I am very, very sorry to be losing her, but I understand that it's tough, and she's made her judgement, and she's set out her reasons, and I completely respect that.'

Swinney rules out SNP rebels' plans in 2026 election
Swinney rules out SNP rebels' plans in 2026 election

The Herald Scotland

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Swinney rules out SNP rebels' plans in 2026 election

There would, he added, be "no humming and hawing." The SNP leader also rejected calls from within his own party to use the election as a de facto referendum. He said only an agreed vote would deliver a legitimate route to independence. He confirmed the SNP would enter the May 2026 Holyrood election on a single, unambiguous pledge: that a majority of SNP MSPs would constitute a mandate to hold another referendum. 'There'll be no mucking about,' he said. 'It will be absolutely crystal clear, because I want the clarity from the people of Scotland to be able to make sure their wishes are delivered.' Mr Swinney's strategy has proved controversial, with rebels set to attempt to amend it at the party's October conference. READ MORE One change backed by 43 branches would make a majority of list votes for pro-independence parties in 2026 a mandate for independence negotiations with the UK Government. Mr Swinney told the audience in Edinburgh's Summerhall: 'I do not think that is an argument that would have any legal force at the end of it, because it is not an agreed process. 'It might be what we would like to do, and I would love Scotland yesterday, today, but it is not going to deliver that agreed process of Scotland becoming an independent country. 'Look at the situation that has emerged in Catalonia without an agreed process. Catalonia tried to secure its independence, and it did not succeed.' The FM said there would be no mucking about at next year's election (Image: Gordon Terris/NQ) Asked by The Herald's Brian Taylor if he was only raising independence because his party was in 'some degree of trouble', the First Minister said it was about his phases. Phase one was ensuring the SNP 'could get a hearing' and was considered 'credible in the eyes of the public'. Phase two was about the constitution. Asked what would happen if he fell short, his plan B, Mr Swinney said: 'Well, I am going to go for my aim, and then we will see.' On Monday, at [[The Herald]]'s Unspun Live, Professor Sir John Curtice said he thought the [[SNP]]'s chances of winning a majority of seats was "extremely unlikely." Asked if not winning a majority of seats would mean a referendum was off the table, Mr Swinney said: 'I am just simply putting forward my point of view. 'And also an important constitutional point and a substantial point about who we are as a country — this country is being denied, under the current arrangements of the actions of the United Kingdom Government, the right to decide. 'By the way, on the point of a generation, while I am on this question, by 2030 a million people will be in Scotland who were not eligible to vote in 2014, if you want to start talking about what a generation looks like.' Mr Swinney also ruled out any co‑operation with Reform UK, describing the party's values as 'anathema' to his own. 'I just think the value system and the outlook of the Reform leadership is anathema to what I represent in my politics. I am not going to do a deal with Reform,' he said. By contrast, he expressed willingness to work with other parties on specific issues, pointing to agreements with the Scottish Greens and Scottish Liberal Democrats on this year's budgets. 'When I became First Minister, in my acceptance speech, I said that I wanted to try to rebuild the ability of Parliament to work properly across parties, because I thought it had become too fractured, too polarised. 'When it got to the budget, four parties voted for the government's budget. 'Alex Cole‑Hamilton, immediately before I became First Minister, said his votes were available to bring down the government and force an early election. 'Three months later, the Liberals were voting for the budget.' Asked about criticism from consultancy EY that Scotland's higher overall tax burden could deter investment, Mr Swinney rejected the claim, pointing to net migration into Scotland as evidence to the contrary. 'I do not take that view,' he said. 'We have got to invest in our infrastructure and services. We are seeing net migration levels into Scotland which are higher — that is an indication that tax is not putting people off coming here.' He said there would be no changes to tax policy before the next election but called for an 'open debate' on how to fund public services in the long term. 'We have to strike a rational balance,' he said. Mr Swinney also reflected on his recent encounter with former US president Donald Trump, who was in Scotland earlier this year. 'I had a very pleasant and courteous exchange with President Trump and valued the opportunity to set out the views of the people I serve,' he said. 'In the conversation, he made it abundantly clear to me that he adores Scotland.' The First Minister presented Mr Trump with a framed copy of a handwritten 1853 marriage record from Lewis relating to the President's mother's grandparents, and a 1921 census entry showing his mother aged nine. 'He seemed deeply touched,' Mr Swinney said. 'I later found out most governments give him golf clubs." READ MORE The First Minister was also asked about Kate Forbes' decision to stand down, and how he balanced family life with high office. Mr Swinney's wife, BBC journalist Elizabeth Quigley, has MS. They have a teenage son, Matthew. Asked if he was anxious about taking the job given his wife's illness, he said: 'Yes, I did, and we have both been very open about this. I left office in 2023 because I thought I had asked too much of my family — too many sacrifices. 'I felt my wife needed her husband at her side a bit more. I am not sure she felt that, but I kind of felt I should be a bit closer at hand. 'So when things changed and the gravity of the situation facing my party became clear in late April 2024 we had to talk through what would happen and how we would manage. 'We manage by a lot of help and support from friends locally, and by us just working together to try and make it all work.' Had Humza Yousaf stood down as First Minister a month earlier, Mr Swinney said he would not have been able to take the job as Elizabeth 'was not doing well'. 'And we have just got a period just now, where things are not too good, to be honest. We are struggling a bit at home. 'Normally, I have commitments in the city tomorrow. I would normally stay in Edinburgh — I am going home tonight because I have just got to adjust.' Responding to Mr Swinney's comments on the constitution, Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: '[[John Swinney]] sounds like a broken record. 'He does not have anything new to say, so instead he has turned to the old SNP playbook by talking up independence and marching activists up the hill." She added: 'John Swinney arrogantly takes the public for granted by assuming the SNP will be returned as the largest party at Holyrood before a single vote is cast. 'And yet just this week, even his Deputy First Minister has decided to abandon ship. 'The people of Scotland will not be fooled by this latest desperate attempt to distract from the SNP's dismal record after 18 years in government. 'Only Scottish Labour has vision for Scotland, by restoring our public services and offering Scots the chance to take a new direction.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store