UAE man fined over ₹16 lakh for posting negative online review against business
Also read: South Korean mother reunites with abducted daughter after 44 years, now suing government over illegal adoption
The Al Ain Court for Civil, Commercial, and Administrative Claims delivered the verdict after the owner of a commercial establishment filed a case, stating that the man's online comments had tarnished his shop's image and caused a significant drop in sales. The claimant had initially sought Dh200,000 in compensation for both material and moral damages, along with legal expenses and court fees.
According to the complaint, the man had posted harmful comments about the business on a social media platform, which the court confirmed had negatively impacted the company's reputation. The defendant had already been found guilty of the act in a previous criminal court ruling.
Also read: 'Spookiest s**t ever': AI blackmails engineer over affair after being told it'll be replaced
During the civil proceedings, the man submitted a written defence urging the court to dismiss the compensation claim. He also requested the Federal Tax Authority to provide the business's tax records to determine whether there had truly been a drop in sales during the time of the alleged defamation. Additionally, he submitted supporting documents, including a dependent's certificate and screenshots of online chats.
Also read: Indian Harvard student fears future after Trump admin blocks international enrolments: 'I don't know where I'll go'
However, the court upheld the earlier judgement and concluded that the man had indeed committed defamation. He was ordered to pay Dh70,000 to the businessman as compensation.
Also read: 'I am not dead yet': Woman in China falls from 12th floor, calls husband for help from ground
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
From aspiration to agency: India redefines its global role
India seems to have resolved a complex arithmetic: diplomacy without submission, trade without compromising sovereignty, tech engagement that does not sacrifice agency, and multilateralism that negotiates interest, not ideology read more It is not the India of aspiration alone; it is the India of agency, reframing between autonomy and engagement, between principle and pragmatism. File image/ AP In the rapidly shifting global political architecture, few nations stand at as pivotal a juncture as India, caught in the confluence of normative aspirations, strategic autonomy, economic opportunity, and diplomatic realignment. From international tech rule‑setting to high‑stakes trade negotiations, from balancing sanctions pressure to recalibrating relations with China, the past few weeks have made clear that it's India's real moment. This is not mere reactivity but about India stepping forward to set the narrative, even under the weight of great power tensions and domestic imperatives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Take the sharp warning from Nato Secretary‑General Mark Rutte, a diplomatic salvo that carries real consequences. In statements delivered in Washington and to Congress, Rutte emphasised that 'secondary sanctions', including tariffs up to 100 per cent, could be deployed against major economies like India, China, and Brazil should they continue to trade with Russia. The intent: leverage global economic ties to pressure Moscow toward a peace settlement over Ukraine. The declaration is a clear signal that India's commercial engagements are being scrutinised through the lens of Western security priorities. Delhi's swift rebuke, citing 'double standards' and asserting its sovereign right to conduct its trade, reveals India's determination to resist external dictates, even as it shoulders the complexity of geopolitical entanglements. Yet, this episode does not simply reflect Indian defiance. Rather, it underscores a rare and consequential exercise of normative sovereignty. India is not tethered to any bloc; it takes pride in being a multi-aligned and principled actor. Domestic energy security demands, its long‑standing commitment to global South solidarity, and cautious calibration with both West and East place it in a strategic sweet spot or jeopardy, depending on perspective. When Rutte urged these countries to 'make the phone call to Vladimir Putin' or face sanctions, he emphasised pressure, but India refused to be boxed into Western frameworks, opting instead for a calibrated diplomacy. This is not a retreat; this is self‑definition in action. World Trade Organisation (WTO) reform, gaining traction ahead of the Cameroon Ministerial, is another arena where India is quietly influencing multilateral rules. Talks now hinge on thorny compromises: easing 'consensus' gridlocks, demanding proof for industrial subsidies, and revisiting the special status of countries like India and China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pushed by the US and Europe to revive a stalled WTO, these shifts could undermine developing country carve-outs. While India remains restrained, its backroom diplomacy is active. The challenge lies in securing meaningful exceptions without stalling reform, testing not just India's trade stance but also its broader role in global rule-making. This is more about realigning trade with development than resistance. At the same time, New Delhi finds itself on the cusp of a potentially transformative bilateral trade agreement with the US, ahead of a hard August 1 US tariff deadline. An article of faith in India's political economy has been bilateralism as an antidote to protectionism, and Washington has signalled expansiveness: from high‑tech to supply‑chain resilience. Yet this is no yawning liberal fixture; it is a negotiation circumscribed by domestic concerns on both fronts. For India, offering tariff concessions or regulatory liberalisation might invite debate around industrial policy and food sovereignty; for the US, access to Indian markets must be matched by deeper procurement commitments and intellectual property standards. If last week's Nato‑sanctions episode underscores Indian autonomy, this trade narrative highlights its readiness to play a constructive, collaborative role, so long as reciprocity and national interest underpin any deal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, India's pivot toward China, marked by Jaishankar's first visit to Beijing since the 2020 standoff, is a calculated move. At the SCO summit, his meeting with Wang Yi focused on de-escalation, a border resolution, and reviving trade minus 'restrictive measures'. China called normalisation 'hard-won', underscoring mutual interest in quiet diplomacy and regional stability. Beneath the optics, India is asserting agency: addressing boundary disputes, restoring critical supply chains, and preserving open trade. It's a calibrated framework—friendship without illusion, cooperation without compulsion. Now, juxtapose these developments with India's stealth campaign in global AI norm‑setting. While less visible to the world's press, New Delhi has been earnest, partaking actively in the Unesco‑led 2025 AI Action Summit and championing inclusive, transparent, and sustainable AI frameworks. Internally, the government's Shinrin hush, its hallmark IndiaAI mission, has enabled the creation of the India AI Safety Institute and the public‑sector BharatGen model, announced earlier this year. This reflects a coherent, outward‑looking narrative: one where India is not merely a consumer of Western AI but a producer and ethical interlocutor in its own right, framing a normative trajectory for the Global South. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This junction of AI, trade, sanctions, and diplomacy reveals an Indian posture defined by complexity rather than simplification. India is neither a protectable emerging market nor a fearful collateral of competition; it is instead a multifaceted actor shaping its lane, steering norms, and anticipating friction. If India is being squeezed by trade reform at the WTO, by diplomatic pressure over Russia, and by bilateral negotiations with large economies, it is responding with a choreography of normative offers, negotiation discipline, and diplomatic nuance. Strategic autonomy is no longer a slogan; it is a tactical posture. India's message comes across loud and clear: we will trade responsibly, not opportunistically; we will engage in global initiatives, not deflect them; we will assert our interests, not surrender them. This posture is especially critical because India's multilateral footprint is expanding with institution‑shaping spaces. In 2025, it has convinced even sceptics that its voice is consequential and its initiatives, from AI safety to trade alliances, are worth centralising. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD None of this is without strain. The geo‑economic environment is a maze of competing pressures: pressure to align with Western sanctions regimes, to commit to bilateral trade deals, to accelerate AI governance, and to stabilise border diplomacies. But India seems to have resolved a complex arithmetic: diplomacy that does not buy influence with submission, trade that does not cost sovereignty, tech engagement that does not sacrifice agency, and multilateralism that negotiates interest, not ideology. The key test lies ahead: can India engineer a degree of coherence across ministries, Commerce, Finance, External Affairs, and IT? Can it manage stakeholder friction between business communities aligned to greenhouse tech corridors and those tied to legacy energy relations with Russia? Can it maintain credibility on the world stage while cultivating domestic legitimacy? These questions are not rhetorical; they are strategic deadlines directed at policymaking systems, where alignment and execution define success. Ultimately, this is more than policy choreography; it is India redefining its global centre of gravity. When the US Congress debates whether India is aligned enough to merit exemption from sanctions, Delhi's internal coordination across diplomatic, economic, and strategic lines becomes part of its national security calculus. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When WTO multilateralism teeters, India can offer constructive reform, leadership or resistance. When AI norm debates emerge, India doesn't merely have a seat; it has proposals. India projects the kind of policy confidence few states of its standing enjoy. India stands assertive, multi‑alignment‑centric, normatively engaged, and institutionally responsive. It is not the India of aspiration alone; it is the India of agency, reframing between autonomy and engagement, between principle and pragmatism. Amal Chandra is an author, political analyst and columnist. He posts on 'X' at @ens_socialis. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump in Scotland: US President on 'working trip'; golf business, bid for British Open and more
President Donald Trump has begun his fourth overseas visit of his second term, heading to Scotland, his mother's birthplace, where he plans to spend several days at his family-owned golf resorts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He is expected to visit the Trump Organization's two existing Scottish golf courses, in Turnberry and Aberdeenshire, with a third course at the Aberdeenshire site set to open soon. This will be Trump's second presidential visit to Turnberry, following his first in 2018. In 2020, ABC News reported that then-US Ambassador to the UK, Woody Johnson, told colleagues he had been asked by Trump to urge the British government to hold the British Open at Turnberry. While the UK government said no such request was made to Scottish officials, Trump also denied having made the request. Following the January 6 Capitol attack, the Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews, organisers of the world's oldest golf tournament, the Open, announced it had "no plans" to bring the event back to Turnberry and "will not do so in the foreseeable future." 'We will not return until we are convinced that the focus will be on the championship, the players and the course itself and we do not believe that is achievable in the current circumstances,' the R&A's chief executive said in a statement at the time. During a 2023 interview at Turnberry with British politician and media personality Nigel Farage, Trump claimed, 'Everyone wants to see the Open Championship here. The players, it's their favorite course, number one rated in Europe.' More recently, R&A chair Mark Darbon admitted there are 'logistical challenges' to holding the tournament at Turnberry, which last hosted the Open prior to Trump's purchase of the property in 2014. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He also confirmed that the organisation met with Eric Trump and other Trump Golf executives a few months ago to explore the possibility. Earlier this year in May, Trump visited Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates on his first overseas visit of his second term, aiming to strengthen ties with Gulf nations. His family's business interests have also expanded in the region, with partnerships on new projects in Saudi Arabia, Doha and the UAE, and involvement in a cryptocurrency venture linked to an Emirati government-affiliated fund. According to his latest financial disclosure, Trump reported hundreds of millions in income from his businesses, including golf clubs and the Mar-a-Lago estate, as well as from products such as watches and fragrances. Despite this, his Aberdeenshire resort reportedly lost £1.4 million last year, per BBC reports. Ethics experts have raised concerns over Trump's overseas travel, suggesting potential conflicts between his presidential duties and private business. Trump's assets are placed in a trust overseen by his children, and officials in his administration have repeatedly dismissed claims of any conflict of interest. 'At this point, he's essentially using the White House as an extension of the Trump Organization and letting the taxpayers pick up the bill,' said Jordan Libowitz, Vice President for Communications at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, speaking to ABC News. The White House described Trump's trip to Scotland as a 'working trip.' The president is expected to hold a bilateral meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and may address the press during his stay. 'President Trump's working trip to Scotland will include a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Starmer to refine the historic US-UK trade deal. Donald J Trump has built the best and most beautiful world-class golf courses anywhere in the world, which is why they continue to be used for prestigious tournaments and by the most elite players in the sport,' said White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers in a statement to ABC News.
News18
18 minutes ago
- News18
Tata Harrier.EV: Waiting Periods Revealed, Check Variant-wise List Here
Last Updated: The has been launched in India at the starting price of Rs 21.49 lakh, while the top model goes up to Rs 30.23 lakh. Ever since the Tata Harrier electric arrived in the Indian market, the model has somehow hooked the audience in no time. The soaring demand somehow listed the product in the top category, pushing the waiting period further across the trims. In case you are confused about the Tata Harrier EV's waiting period, and have no idea how much the company can force you to wait. Do not worry, we have got your back. In this article, we have listed all the trims and their waiting period. Tata Harrier Waiting Period According to the reports, the base model seems to have a massive waiting period up to 30 weeks (seven months) in major cities like Delhi, Mumbai, and Bangalore. When it comes the variants like Adventure and Fearless+, these trims fall on the longest waiting periods, which go up to 28-30 weeks. Model Wise Details Price Range Meanwhile, the has been launched in India at the starting price of Rs 21.49 lakh, while the top model goes up to Rs 30.23 lakh. The Rear Wheel Drive (RWD) trims can cost up to Rs Rs 27.49 lakh, while the QWD variants can be purchased at Rs 28.99 lakh (all ex-showroom). view comments First Published: July 26, 2025, 17:19 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
