
UK energy usage falls in sign of ‘declining economy'
Andy Brown, Energy Institute president, said: 'This plays into an overall de-industrialisation of the UK economy that has been occurring over decades. Energy costs are one element in the equation.'
Critics have argued that net zero is fuelling the problem by adding green costs to bills. Chris Wright, the US energy secretary, has argued that net zero is 'impoverishing your own citizens in a delusion that this is somehow going to make the world a better place'.
Richard Tice, Reform UK energy spokesman, said the energy consumption figures were a 'disaster' for the UK.
He said: 'What these figures highlight in an economy in decline. There is a direct link between a country's energy consumption trends and its prosperity. If energy consumption is growing then, generally, so is the economy. And if consumption is falling then the economy is likely to be in decline.'
Net zero by 2050 'bankrupting Britain'
The fall in energy consumption last year is part of a long-term trend. Total UK energy supply fell by an average 2.1pc each year from 2014-2024, according to the latest Statistical Review of World Energy from the Energy Institute.
Andrew Bowie, Conservative shadow energy spokesman, said: 'As our European competitors increase their energy consumption, Britain's is in decline, fuelled by impossible net zero targets that are crippling British industry.
'Every day we get more evidence of what everyone but Ed Miliband already knows – that net zero by 2050 is impossible without bankrupting Britain.
'The Conservatives are the only party that has been honest by recognising that net zero by 2050 is impossible without making hard working families worse off.'
Earlier this week the Government launched its Industrial Strategy, which promised to lower electricity costs for select industries in a bid to halt de-industrialisation.
However, Mr Brown cautioned: 'The UK government's Industrial Strategy offers reduced electricity costs to some industries but industry utilises a large amount of gas as well as electricity. And since the war in Ukraine gas prices are fundamentally higher. This cost is hard to address.'
Clean power strengths
Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, has said that Britain's industrial future will be based on a boom in low-carbon electricity rather than fossil fuels like gas.
At the launch of the Government's Industrial Strategy he said clean energy was 'the economic opportunity of the 21st century' that would release a 'tidal wave of jobs'.
He added: 'For too long high electricity costs have held back British businesses, as a result of our reliance on gas sold on volatile international markets. Our Industrial Strategy will unlock the potential of British industry by slashing industrial electricity prices in key sectors.
'We're also doubling down on our clean power strengths with increased investment in growth industries from offshore wind to nuclear. This will deliver on our clean power mission and Plan for Change to bring down bills for households and businesses for good.'
The Energy Institute review found that, despite the UK's decline, demand for energy in the rest of the world is surging, rising by 2pc last year alone to a new high of 592 exajoules. An exajoule roughly equates to 174m barrels of oil. The UK consumed about 6.4 exajoules last year.
Fossil fuel consumption was part of that rise, with usage surging despite almost every country claiming to be fighting climate change. Oil consumption rose by up to 1pc while gas increased by 2.5pc. Use of coal, the dirtiest major fuel, hit a new high of 9.2bn tonnes – up from 8.1bn tonnes in 2014.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Taiwan VP says won't be intimidated after Czech officials claim Chinese diplomats planned car crash
Taiwan 's vice president Hsiao Bi Khim says she will not be intimidated by China after Czech military intelligence claimed Chinese diplomats and secret service followed her and planned to intimidate her physically when she visited Prague last year. Ms Hsiao visited the Czech Republic in early 2024. Prague does not have official diplomatic ties with Taiwan but has fostered warm relations with the island, which China views as its own territory. Czech media reported last year that a Chinese diplomat had run a red light when following Ms Hsiao's car. Czech public radio news website said on Thursday that the Chinese had also planned to stage a demonstrative car crash. "I had a great visit to Prague & thank the Czech authorities for their hospitality & ensuring my safety. The CCP's unlawful activities will not intimidate me from voicing Taiwan's interests in the international community," Ms Hsiao said, in a social media post on Saturday, referring to the Chinese Communist Party. The post was linked to a Reuters report about the incident. In another X post, Ms Hsiao thanked global parliamentarians who had expressed solidarity against "violence and coercion'. "Taiwan will not be isolated by intimidation," Ms Hsiao said. Czech military intelligence spokesperson said Chinese diplomats in Prague had taken actions that violated diplomatic rules. 'This consisted of physically following the vice president, gathering information on her schedule and attempts to document her meetings with important representatives of the Czech political and public scene," spokesperson Jan Pejsek told Reuters. 'We even recorded an attempt by the Chinese civil secret service to create conditions to perform a demonstrative kinetic action against a protected person, which however did not go beyond the phase of preparation." A spokesperson for China's foreign ministry denied any wrongdoing by Chinese diplomats and claimed the Czech Republic had interfered in the country's internal affairs by allowing Ms Hsiao's visit to go ahead. The Czech foreign ministry said it had summoned the Chinese envoy over the incident at the time but didn't comment further on Friday. 'This is the CCP's criminality on display for the whole world to see. This isn't diplomacy, it's coercion," the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee wrote on X. Taiwan protests Taiwan claimed the alleged Chinese actions "seriously threatened the personal safety of Ms Hsiao and her entourage". "The Mainland Affairs Council today protested and strongly condemned the Chinese communist's bad behaviour and demanded that the Chinese side should immediately explain and publicly apologise," it said. A senior Taiwan security official briefed on the matter told Reuters that the incident was an example of "transnational repression" by China that the European Union was currently paying close attention to. "This is a problem that everyone should pay attention to," the official, requesting anonymity, said, adding many government officials around the world were threatened by China upon visits made by Taiwanese officials or politicians to their countries. In Beijing, foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun maintained that "Chinese diplomats have always abided by the laws and regulations of the countries in which they are stationed'. "China urges the parties concerned not to be provoked and exploited by separatist forces for Taiwan independence, and to not make a fuss over nothing, engage in malicious speculation and interfere with and undermine the relations between the two countries." Ms Hsiao assumed office along with president Lai Ching Te on May 20 last year. Czech relations with China have cooled in recent years. The Czechs accused China in May of being behind a cyberattack on the foreign ministry. Tsai Ing Wen visited Prague last October. China views separately governed Taiwan as its own territory and has ramped up its military and political pressure in recent years. Taiwan says only its people can decide their future and vows to defend its freedom and democracy.

Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Deep Dive: Wise – Building a World of Money Without Borders: By Sam Boboev
Wise (formerly TransferWise) has quietly become one of fintech's biggest success stories, transforming how people and businesses send money across borders. From humble startup origins in 2011, Wise now moves over £145 billion internationally each year for 15+ million customers – at a fraction of the cost charged by banks. In doing so, Wise saved its users an estimated £2 billion in fees in FY2025 alone. It's a rare fintech that's both fast-growing and profitable, pursuing a bold mission encapsulated in its slogan: 'Money without borders – instant, convenient, transparent and eventually free.' This deep dive explores why Wise matters today – covering the massive market it's tackling, its journey and products, the technology and regulatory infrastructure under its hood, its recent financial performance, competitive landscape, and what customers and leadership are saying. A Massive Market Ripe for Disruption Moving money internationally has long been notorious for high costs and hassle. Over £22 trillion crosses borders each year, projected to reach £28 trillion by 2027 as globalization drives more migration, remote work, and global commerce. By Wise's own 2025 estimate, the number may be as high as £32 trillion annually. Historically, this market was dominated by big banks and legacy remittance providers relying on an antiquated correspondent banking network. International transfers often meant 'expensive, slow and inefficient service, reliant on outdated infrastructure,' as Wise's 2023 report bluntly puts it. Banks and incumbents like Western Union layered on fees and hidden exchange rate markups – profiting from customers' lack of transparency. The result: sending money abroad could cost 5-8% in fees (often not obvious upfront) and take days to arrive. Wise was founded to change this status quo. Its vision of 'Money Without Borders' is about making moving money 'as cheap, fast, and convenient as sending an email,' in the words of its co-founder. Wise's core innovation was using technology and clever account structures to eliminate intermediaries and hidden fees, giving users the real mid-market exchange rate and charging only a low upfront fee. As we'll see, this strategy is forcing the industry to evolve. Today, many fintechs and even banks are racing to offer cheaper, easier cross-border payments – yet traditional banks remain Wise's primary competitors, still handling the majority of cross-currency transactions. A growing field of digital challengers (from neobanks like Revolut to PayPal's Xoom and others) are also carving out niches. But Wise has a head start in scale, efficiency, and trust – built over a decade of singular focus on solving this problem. From Startup to Public Company Wise's origin story is a personal one. In 2011, two Estonian friends living in London – Kristo Käärmann and Taavet Hinrikus – grew frustrated with the 'massive problem' of bank fees on international transfers. They started TransferWise that year to help people send money abroad at the true exchange rate. The concept resonated: by 2014, having raised a $58 million Series C to expand globally, TransferWise launched in the US and Australia. The company hit major milestones quickly. It reached its first £1 billion transferred (cumulative) in 2014, and by 2017 was profitable with over £1 billion being moved every month through its platform – a rarity in fintech. Importantly, Wise also became an innovator in financial infrastructure early on. In 2016 it gained direct access to the UK's Faster Payments network (the first tech company to do so), showing a knack for working with regulators to improve speed and cost. Over time, TransferWise broadened its offerings beyond person-to-person remittances. In 2016 it launched its first business accounts for SMEs to send money internationally on better terms. By 2018 it rolled out a borderless multi-currency account and debit Mastercard, enabling customers to hold money in multiple currencies and spend it via card in different countries with low fees. The company's global footprint also expanded: it opened offices around the world (10 offices by 2019, including a European hub in Belgium to navigate Brexit) and set up an Asia-Pacific hub in Singapore in 2017. In 2021, reflecting its broadened mission, TransferWise rebranded to 'Wise.' That same year, Wise went public via a direct listing on the London Stock Exchange – notably, London's largest tech listing ever at the time. The listing valued Wise at ~$11 billion, signaling its arrival as a major fintech player. Today, Wise is truly international: over 6,500 employees ('Wisers') across 20+ offices serve customers in 170+ countries. Yet the company insists it's 'still solving only a fraction of the problem'. As CEO Kristo Käärmann wrote, 'Twelve years ago we set out to solve the massive problem people and businesses face in sending money around the world… While we're nowhere near mission complete, 16 million people and businesses are now helping us get closer every day.' In the next sections, we'll examine how Wise is attempting to fulfill that mission through its products and underlying infrastructure. --------- Source: Wise Annual Reports FY2023–FY2025; product pages and blog; CEO and executive statements from Wise reports; and Wise investor reports highlighting key metrics. All data and quotes are from official Wise materials. Disclaimer: Fintech Wrap Up aggregates publicly available information for informational purposes only. Portions of the content may be reproduced verbatim from the original source, and full credit is provided with a "Source: [Name]" attribution. All copyrights and trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. Fintech Wrap Up does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the aggregated content; these are the responsibility of the original source providers. Links to the original sources may not always be included. For questions or concerns, please contact us at


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
A British Leyland of TV is the Government's worst idea yet
A show about a good-looking human rights lawyer who becomes a triumphant, reforming prime minister? Or a mini-series about a brilliant, glamorous economist who becomes Britain's first female chancellor? Perhaps a movie about a fiery red-head who works her way up from poverty to become the most powerful woman in the country? As the Government paves the way for a potential merger between ITV, Channel 4, and Channel 5 to create a single, state-backed commercial broadcaster, it is not hard to imagine the kind of shows it might commission. But hold on. A British Leyland of television is the Government's worst idea yet. What the industry actually needs is more competition – not less. It may still be a few years off. But Sir Keir Starmer's Labour Government is very clearly paving the way for a major consolidation of the British broadcasting industry. Last week, as part of its shiny new 'industrial strategy', it opened the door to removing the barriers that prevent a merger between the existing terrestrial broadcasters. Apparently, ministers will examine 'possible consolidation between broadcasters', along with 'closer strategic partnerships'. Meanwhile, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and Ofcom will be asked to review their definitions of 'television advertising' to include YouTube and Netflix, which again will make mergers easier. Add it all up, and it is not hard to see where this is going. We will need a single, state-backed commercial broadcaster to cope with a changing market, stand up to the American streaming giants, and preserve what used to be one of the UK's strongest industries. Heck, they could even bring in the marketing whizzes who gave us Great British Energy and Great British Railways to come up with the branding for Great British Television. Of course, we all understand that something needs to be done. In a world where streaming dominates, and with most people under 30 barely even aware of what traditional broadcasting through signals and aerials was, the industry is in an increasingly dire position. ITV, the biggest of the three, has seen its share price slump from 265p 10 years ago to just 80p now, and the broadcaster is only worth £3bn. There has already been plenty of speculation about a break-up, perhaps with a sale of its production unit, or else a full-scale takeover of the company, probably by a foreign buyer. Channel 4 has been slashing jobs and cutting back on its programming budget as it grapples with a declining advertising market. Meanwhile, Channel 5, which has never been a huge success since it was launched in 1997, is also potentially in play as its American owner Paramount prepares for a takeover by media company Skydance. Why not put all three together and create a new British-owned powerhouse in commercial broadcasting?