Latest news with #AEO
Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Politics
- Sydney Morning Herald
The 151 ballots that the NSW Liberals say should overturn the Bradfield result
Gisele Kapterian, the unsuccessful Liberal candidate for Bradfield, says at least 56 ballot papers were wrongly rejected in the final recount of the ultra-marginal seat, while 95 were incorrectly allowed, prompting her to ask the High Court to overturn the result and declare her the winner. Kapterian last week ended weeks of speculation and lodged a petition with the High Court, which sits as the Court of Dispute Returns to hear election challenges, in a bid to be declared victorious in Bradfield instead of teal MP-elect Nicolette Boele. Boele, who will give her inaugural speech to federal parliament on July 28, won the once blue-ribbon Liberal seat after a recount of the northern Sydney seat in which she finished 26 votes ahead of Kapterian. In her petition, Kapterian says the Australian electoral officer (AEO) – who is the electoral commission's manager in each state – 'wrongly rejected at least 56 of the reserved ballot papers, where those ballot papers indicated a preference, by the voter, for the petitioner ahead of the first respondent'. Boele is listed as the first respondent. 'In each such case the ballot paper was not informal and should not have been rejected,' the petition says, referencing examples such as the officer 'not being satisfied that the figure 1 in one square was distinguishable from the figure in another square'. Kapterian has not seen the ballot papers, and her legal team will be provided with them once the AEC hands them to the court. However, her concerns were formed based on feedback and notes taken by scrutineers overseeing the final recount. The AEO was tasked with reviewing and making rulings on 795 reserved ballot papers. As well as the rejected ballots, Kapterian's petition says the AEO 'wrongly admitted at least 95 of the reserved ballot papers, where those ballot papers indicated a preference, by the voter, for the first respondent ahead of the petitioner'.
The Age
6 hours ago
- Politics
- The Age
The 151 ballots that the NSW Liberals say should overturn the Bradfield result
The unsuccessful Liberal candidate for Bradfield, Gisele Kapterian, says at least 56 ballot papers were wrongly rejected in the final recount of the ultra-marginal seat, while 95 were incorrectly allowed, prompting her to ask the High Court to overturn the result and declare her the winner. Kapterian last week ended weeks of speculation and lodged a petition with the High Court, which sits as the Court of Dispute Returns to hear election challenges, in a bid to be declared victorious in Bradfield instead of teal MP-elect Nicolette Boele. Boele, who will give her inaugural speech to federal parliament on July 28, won the once blue-ribbon seat after a recount of the northern Sydney seat, which saw her finish 26 votes ahead of Kapterian. However in her petition, Kapterian says the Australian electoral officer (AEO) – who is the electoral commission's manager in each state – 'wrongly rejected at least 56 of the reserved ballot papers, where those ballot papers indicated a preference, by the voter, for the petitioner ahead of the first respondent'. Boele is listed as the first respondent. 'In each such case the ballot paper was not informal and should not have been rejected,' the petition says, referencing examples such as the officer 'not being satisfied that the figure 1 in one square was distinguishable from the figure in another square'. Kapterian has not seen the ballot papers, and her legal team will only be provided with them once the AEC hands them to the court. However, her concerns were formed based on feedback and notes taken by scrutineers who were overseeing the final recount. The AEO was tasked with reviewing and making rulings on 795 reserved ballot papers. As well as the rejected ballots, Kapterian's petition says the AEO 'wrongly admitted at least 95 of the reserved ballot papers, where those ballot papers indicated a preference, by the voter, for the first respondent ahead of the petitioner'.
Forbes
14-07-2025
- Business
- Forbes
Why Consistency Is The New Currency In AI Search
Don Dodds, Founder of M16 Marketing and helps brands grow faster using strategy, web design, SEO, KPIs and lead generation. As artificial intelligence reshapes the digital landscape, the way brands are discovered and trusted is rapidly evolving. We're entering a world where AI systems, not just human users, are the primary interpreters of content. From ChatGPT and Perplexity to Google's AI Overviews, intelligent systems are going beyond indexing websites. They are learning from them. In this paradigm, consistency across every digital touchpoint has become a brand's most valuable asset. From SEO To AEO: Training The Machines Traditional SEO focused on optimizing for keyword rankings and earning backlinks to drive human clicks. But AI-powered search changes the equation. These systems synthesize information from multiple sources to produce a single, authoritative answer. This shift demands a new discipline: answer engine optimization (AEO). In AEO, the goal is not just visibility, but verifiability. When AI engines gather fragmented data about your brand across platforms, inconsistencies confuse their models. This could lead to misinformation, or worse, erasure. Brands must now create a cohesive digital footprint that tells the same story wherever it appears, including in metadata, product descriptions, third-party reviews, social content and structured data. The Mechanics Of Machine Learning Models AI models rely on clean data, semantic relationships and reinforcement. When a brand delivers structured content with clear messaging across all surfaces, it provides training signals. These signals help AI associate that brand with specific concepts, solutions and industries. Imagine a company inconsistently described as a "software provider," "app developer" and "digital product studio." An AI model might treat those as three different entities. Now consider the same company using consistent terminology, structured data and rich metadata across their website, press mentions and social platforms. The model doesn't just see them; it learns them. Content As Training Material Every blog post, FAQ, testimonial and knowledge base article becomes part of a feedback loop. But content that isn't structured, updated or contextually aligned across platforms weakens the signal. To train machines to recognize your brand, you must: • Use consistent naming conventions and descriptions. • Implement schema markup across content types. • Maintain semantic clarity in your core messaging. • Ensure data uniformity between owned and earned media. To ensure data uniformity between owned and earned media, brands should maintain consistent messaging and structured data across all owned platforms. Providing clear, accessible media kits helps guide accurate representations in third-party content. For example, if a journalist pulls product details from your press kit, they're more likely to use your correct pricing and features, therefore reducing the chance of misinformation in reviews or articles. Being everywhere isn't enough. You must be the same everywhere. The Brand Knowledge Graph Google's Knowledge Graph functions by building maps of relationships between entities. If your brand is included in these maps, it becomes "known" and can be confidently cited by AI. This inclusion is foundational. You can train machines by intentionally feeding these graphs: • Structured data through • Accurate Wikipedia and Wikidata entries • Consistent citations in press and directories • Reinforced signals through social and UGC platforms It is less about chasing traffic and more about becoming an entity that AI platforms trust. Consequences Of Inconsistency Brands that overlook this shift risk becoming invisible. AI won't rank you lower. It will simply not see you as relevant. For example, if an AI assistant is unsure whether your business serves B2B or B2C markets due to inconsistent messaging across your LinkedIn, website and reviews, it might potentially avoid citing your brand altogether. In a zero-click world, visibility depends not on what you publish, but on what AI systems understand about you. The Future Is Structured As voice search, chatbots and AI agents become primary touchpoints, brands must build for machine readability first. This doesn't mean abandoning creativity but embedding it in a framework that AI can parse. We are moving from the web as a place to be found to a place to be learned. This requires teaching machines (and people) who you are through consistent, structured and contextualized content. Your brand is not just what it says it is. It is what AI believes it is, based on the digital evidence you've published across platforms. Practical Steps To Train Machines To Recognize You • Audit your digital presence. Look for inconsistent job titles, company descriptions, locations and services across all platforms. • Unify your messaging. Develop a brand language guide that includes preferred terms, tone and value statements. • Implement structured data. Use schema markup on your website, especially for products, articles, people and reviews. • Claim and optimize knowledge sources. Update your entries in Wikidata, Crunchbase, Google Business and industry directories. • Distribute with intent. Publish and syndicate your content on platforms that are frequently scraped by AI engines like Wikipedia, Reddit, Medium, YouTube, Quora, LinkedIn and high-authority news sites. These sources are commonly used to train and inform AI models, so maintaining accurate and consistent information there helps shape how AI understands your brand. In an era where AI decides which brands get surfaced, summarized or cited, the question isn't "How can I rank higher?" It is "How do I train the machine to trust me?" The answer: through ruthless consistency, structured communication and a commitment to becoming a brand that is not just seen, but understood. Forbes Agency Council is an invitation-only community for executives in successful public relations, media strategy, creative and advertising agencies. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
12-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) Falls More Steeply Than Broader Market: What Investors Need to Know
American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) closed the most recent trading day at $9.90, moving -2.17% from the previous trading session. The stock's performance was behind the S&P 500's daily loss of 0.33%. Elsewhere, the Dow lost 0.63%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq lost 0.22%. Shares of the teen clothing retailer have appreciated by 0.5% over the course of the past month, underperforming the Retail-Wholesale sector's gain of 0.67%, and the S&P 500's gain of 4.07%. Investors will be eagerly watching for the performance of American Eagle Outfitters in its upcoming earnings disclosure. The company's upcoming EPS is projected at $0.2, signifying a 48.72% drop compared to the same quarter of the previous year. Meanwhile, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenue is projecting net sales of $1.23 billion, down 4.49% from the year-ago period. For the entire fiscal year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates are projecting earnings of $0.83 per share and a revenue of $5.19 billion, representing changes of -52.3% and -2.57%, respectively, from the prior year. Any recent changes to analyst estimates for American Eagle Outfitters should also be noted by investors. Such recent modifications usually signify the changing landscape of near-term business trends. Therefore, positive revisions in estimates convey analysts' confidence in the business performance and profit potential. Empirical research indicates that these revisions in estimates have a direct correlation with impending stock price performance. To benefit from this, we have developed the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model which takes these estimate changes into account and provides an actionable rating system. The Zacks Rank system ranges from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell). It has a remarkable, outside-audited track record of success, with #1 stocks delivering an average annual return of +25% since 1988. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has witnessed a 9.04% decrease. American Eagle Outfitters is currently a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell). Valuation is also important, so investors should note that American Eagle Outfitters has a Forward P/E ratio of 12.19 right now. This represents a discount compared to its industry average Forward P/E of 17.97. The Retail - Apparel and Shoes industry is part of the Retail-Wholesale sector. Currently, this industry holds a Zacks Industry Rank of 209, positioning it in the bottom 16% of all 250+ industries. The Zacks Industry Rank assesses the strength of our separate industry groups by calculating the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks contained within the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. Keep in mind to rely on to watch all these stock-impacting metrics, and more, in the succeeding trading sessions. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
09-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
5 Revealing Analyst Questions From American Eagle's Q1 Earnings Call
American Eagle's first quarter results met Wall Street's revenue expectations but fell short on profitability, leading to a negative market reaction. Management attributed underperformance to a combination of higher merchandise costs, unplanned markdowns, and a $75 million inventory write-down, particularly in Aerie's soft apparel categories. CEO Jay Schottenstein acknowledged, 'We did not execute to our potential,' and highlighted that cold spring weather and missed product trends contributed to the margin decline. The company also accelerated supply chain restructuring, including fulfillment center closures, in an effort to control costs. Is now the time to buy AEO? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $1.09 billion vs analyst estimates of $1.09 billion (4.7% year-on-year decline, in line) Revenue Guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $1.23 billion at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $1.24 billion Operating Margin: -7.8%, down from 6.8% in the same quarter last year Locations: 1,176 at quarter end, up from 1,173 in the same quarter last year Same-Store Sales fell 3% year on year (7% in the same quarter last year) Market Capitalization: $1.74 billion While we enjoy listening to the management's commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls are the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Matthew Boss (JPMorgan) asked about the impact of macroeconomic factors versus execution on recent performance. CEO Jay Schottenstein answered that both external environment and internal execution played roles but expressed optimism for improved consumer sentiment in the second half. Jay Sole (UBS) questioned the nature of merchandising missteps and the timeline for recovery. President Jen Foyle responded that new team talent and a focus on stronger categories should help position the company for back-to-school improvements. Dana Telsey (Telsey Advisory Group) inquired about capital allocation and store remodeling plans. CFO Mike Mathias explained that remodeling and new openings are being recadenced to conserve cash, with continued investment focused on store updates and technology. Rick Patel (Raymond James) sought clarity on promotional outlook versus margin protection. Mathias stated that some margin pressure from promotions will persist in the near term as the company works to clear inventory before back-to-school. Jonah Kim (TD Cowen) asked about digital channel performance and strategies to offset tariff costs. Foyle highlighted digital channel growth, particularly for American Eagle, and credited proactive sourcing adjustments for mitigating tariff risks. Looking forward, our analysts will be monitoring (1) execution of merchandising changes and inventory discipline heading into the back-to-school season, (2) the effectiveness of tariff mitigation and supply chain diversification efforts, and (3) any signs of market share gains in core categories like women's denim and activewear. Progress on these fronts will be central to evaluating whether American Eagle can restore profitability and stabilize sales trends. American Eagle currently trades at $10.10, down from $11.18 just before the earnings. Is the company at an inflection point that warrants a buy or sell? The answer lies in our full research report (it's free). Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth. While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 6 Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Exlservice (+354% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. StockStory is growing and hiring equity analyst and marketing roles. Are you a 0 to 1 builder passionate about the markets and AI? See the open roles here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
