Latest news with #DavidConn
The Guardian
3 days ago
- Politics
- The Guardian
Tuesday briefing: Uncovering the truth behind the bloodshed at Orgreave, four decades on
Good morning. In 1999, the investigative journalist David Conn sat down at home one evening to watch a documentary by the film-maker Yvette Vanson called The Battle for Orgreave, which told the story of the violent policing in 1984 of coalminers at the Orgreave coking plant in Rotherham, South Yorkshire during the miner's strike. A pivotal moment in the year-long strike by the mining unions, opposed by the Thatcher government, what happened on that day at Orgreave is also remembered as one of the most brutal clashes in British industrial history. The violence and bloodshed perpetrated by police at Orgreave was already infamous, but it wasn't until David watched Vanson's film that he learned that 95 miners were arrested that day and then put on trial the following year on charges of riot and unlawful assembly. The trial collapsed after the police evidence was discredited. The film was the start of a 25-year reporting journey for David to investigate the injustice at Orgreave. His initial reporting into the scandal in 2012, which made links between the conduct of South Yorkshire police at Orgreave and its policing of the Hillsborough disaster five years later, has this week culminated in the government announcing a statutory inquiry in an attempt to get to the truth of what happened at Orgreave more than four decades ago. For today's newsletter, I talked to David Conn, now the Guardian's investigations correspondent, about his reporting on the Orgreave scandal and the long road towards establishing the inquiry. Middle East | Israel has launched an air and ground offensive in Gaza, targeting Deir al-Balah, the key hub for humanitarian efforts, and the last part of the Palestinian territory not extensively damaged by war. Utilities | The water industry regulator Ofwat will be abolished after a major review of the sector, which has been hit by scandals over sewage contamination and financial mismanagement. US politics | Harvard University was in court on Monday to argue that the Trump administration illegally cut $2.6bn of its funding. National Archives | The US was warned that invading Iraq without a second UN security council resolution could cost Tony Blair his premiership. Blair's foreign policy adviser, David Manning, said 'the US must not promote regime change in Baghdad at the price of regime change in London'. Reform | Nigel Farage has pledged to spend £17bn in order to halve crime in the UK if his party is elected. He claimed that the cost would be met by scrapping Britain's net zero pledge and HS2. On a hot, cloudless summer morning on 18 June 1984, at the height of the bitter miner's strike, 8,000 miners gathered to picket a coke works in Orgreave. Within hours, the day descended into chaos as the miners faced a force of 6,000 police officers. Police on horseback repeatedly charged the crowd, police bludgeoned picketers and 'snatch squads' were dispatched to arrest over 95 people, who were then charged with rioting. The incident has become widely known as the 'battle of Orgreave', and was even re-enacted in a famous performance work by the artist Jeremy Deller. But David Conn finds the term inappropriate. 'It suggests two equal sides engaged in conflict. This was, in reality, a scene of shocking police violence with officers riding horses into a crowd of men wearing jeans and T-shirts and then beating unarmed people with police truncheons,' he said. 'The miners went there as part of an industrial dispute and some did throw stones, but the extent of misbehaviour was greatly exaggerated and they were met with a state force that was equipped and ready to inflict violence.' How this story of a injustice came to be told Fifteen years later, when David sat down to watch Vanson's documentary, he was shocked by the images of unarmed men being set upon by police, but it was what happened at the trial that was more disturbing. 'I had no idea it had even happened,' he said. 'Yet it was clearly a huge injustice, dubbed an alleged 'frame-up' by South Yorkshire police.' All 95 men were acquitted after their defence team argued that the police's own footage at Orgreave contradicted the testimony from officers that had been the backbone of the case against those standing trial, all of whom would have faced heavy prison sentences if convicted. 'Some of the miners who were acquitted that day said that they expected to be greeted by banks of TV cameras and reporters when they walked out of court because of the discrediting of the police case . But the world had moved on,' said David. 'Their stories just did not become part of the public narrative about what happened at Orgreave.' *** What is the connection between Orgreave and Hillsborough? David immediately saw a link between the forgotten trial and the conduct of the South Yorkshire police at Hillsborough. 'I was already reporting on the false narrative that the South Yorkshire police had constructed seeking to blame Liverpool supporters for the disaster but which was due to their complete mismanagement of the football match,' he said. 'So watching that film was a jaw-dropping moment because [I realised] it was the same police force accused of fabricating evidence and lying.' During his later reporting on Orgreave, David found a document that showed the chief constable of South Yorkshire police, Peter Wright, had been invited to in March 1985 for drinks at the Home Office to celebrate the great work he and his officers had done policing the miner's strike. 'So not only were they not held to account for violence that everyone had seen on television or the fact that, later, the trial had collapsed, but they were congratulated for their fine policing,' he said. 'And it appeared to be the same culture, led by the same chief constable, supported and celebrated by the government, that was in place during the disaster at Hillsborough, and the same lack of accountability was allowed to shift responsibility and falsely blame the victims – another huge injustice – for decades.' Back in 1999, with the Hillsborough injustice still enduring and scant public awareness of the Orgreave trial, as a young freelance journalist David found it difficult to secure commissions to report on these scandals but stuck with the stories for decades as he became established at the Guardian. It wasn't until 2012, when his reporting on the Hillsborough disaster and alleged police cover-up had helped establish the Hillsborough Independent Panel Report (HIP), that he was able to publish his first piece making the connection between the two scandals. The HIP's 2012 report became a landmark, leading to a second Hillsborough inquest, whose jury in 2016 found that no behaviour of Liverpool supporters was to blame for the disaster and that the 96, now 97, people who died were unlawfully killed due to gross negligence manslaughter by the police. Why did it take so long for an inquiry to be set up? David's 2012 article, pointing to the link between the two 1980s South Yorkshire policing scandals, prompted a BBC Yorkshire documentary about Orgreave, broadcast the same year, which highlighted that dozens of police officers' statements alleging criminal behaviour by miners had the same opening paragraphs apparently dictated to them by detectives. Shortly after, activists and veterans of the strike set up the Orgreave Truth and Justice campaign, which has since fought for justice for the victims and accountability for the violent policing that they were subjected to and the discredited evidence advanced to try to convict innocent miners of serious crimes. By 2015, Yvette Cooper was calling for an inquiry, which Labour included in its 2017 manifesto. The government made it a priority to establish the inquiry after they came to power last summer. What happens now? The inquiry will comprise a panel of experts, chaired by Pete Wilcox, the bishop of Sheffield, modelled on HIP. Yet, unlike that panel, the Orgreave inquiry will be statutory, giving it the power to compel people to provide information. Wilcox, who is developing the framework of the inquiry with the Home Office, said he expects it to begin work in the autumn. Eventually, it is likely to produce a report that will aim to illuminate the full truth of the police operation and, campaigners hope, redress the historic 'enemy within' portrayal of the miners involved in industrial action in the 1980s perpetrated by the Thatcher government and large sections of the media at the time. It may also shine light on the culture of South Yorkshire police that was still in place in 1989, when the FA Cup semi-final at Hillsborough would descend into horror. Although no police officer has ever been held to account for the false evidence that was used to charge 95 men, David said it could be unlikely that anybody could be prosecuted, although it has not been ruled out. Is this a victory for the Orgreave campaigners? The launch of the inquiry into the Orgreave scandal is 'a hugely positive outcome', said David. 'It's a positive result for the families and the campaigners and it does show that our journalism can make a concrete difference.' Reporting on Orgreave has been long and time-consuming. 'I've interviewed some of the miners who stood trial after being falsely accused and a lot of them were young guys at the time, with young families and they talked about just how terrifying it had been coming up against the system,' he said. 'They'd been through the strikes, they'd lost so much – their industry, their jobs – they'd faced violence at the hands of the police, and then they were terrified they'd spend years in prison.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion One man called Arthur Critchlow (pictured above), who David first saw breaking down in tears while being interviewed in Yvette Vanson's documentary, who had suffered a fractured skull from a police truncheon, had said this week that the injustice was a trauma that he carried around with him every day for decades. 'And so seeing Arthur Critchlow, with Yvette Cooper in Orgreave this week, talking about what happened and the need for justice is a very emotional moment for me as well, if I'm honest.' Yet for David, this week has been bittersweet: 'It has been 40 years that this injustice has been allowed to stand.' In recent years, the tiny nation of Qatar (population: fewer than 3 million) has acquired an outsized influence, not only due to its immense wealth but its new role as global conflict mediator. Nesrine Malik teases out the story of how and why this happened in a meticulously reported long read. Alex Needham, acting head of newsletters Louise Lancaster, the jailed Just Stop Oil campaigner, is moving and eloquent about her time behind bars in this prison diary. Annie In 2017, Bijan Ghaisar was involved in a minor traffic accident near his home a few miles from Washington DC. Police ended up shooting the unarmed 25-year-old dead. Annie Kelly talks to his mother, Kelly, who was denied justice and can only conclude that the authorities 'wanted us to suffer'. Alex The plight of school staff caught in the minefield of school culture wars is laid out in this anonymous op-ed by a teacher. Annie What do 90s icons do when they want to feel like teenagers again? Go to see the re-formed Oasis, of course. 'I danced my little bottom off,' declares Anna Friel in an interview by Zoe Williams. Alex Football | Liverpool are to take their summer spending to almost £300m after agreeing to pay £69m plus £10m in add-ons for the Eintracht Frankfurt striker Hugo Ekitike. The 23-year-old Frenchman emerged as the Premier League champions' favoured No 9 after they received no encouragement regarding their interest in Newcastle's Alexander Isak. Tennis | A proposed expansion of the Wimbledon tennis site will go ahead after the high court ruled in favour of an original decision to allow a further 39 courts, including an 8,000-seat show court, on the grounds of the old Wimbledon Park golf club. Rugby union | Andy Farrell has named his son Owen as captain of the British & Irish Lions for the squad's final midweek fixture against a First Nations and Pasifika XV on Tuesday. Farrell will lead a side containing eight players who were not originally selected for the tour as the management seek to keep most of their first-choice 23 fresh for Saturday's second Test against the Wallabies. The Guardian's splash is 'Israel launches offensive on Gaza aid hub amid fears over starvation' while the Mirror headlines on 'End this horror now' under the strapline 'UK condemns aid attacks'. 'Britain to be charged by Brussels for sales won via €150bn weapons fund' – that's the Financial Times on another Brexit consequence. An FT-style headline in the i paper: 'Rise in state pension age beyond 68 is 'inevitable', warns Farage – as future of triple lock in doubt'. A more familiar-sounding Reform leader in the Daily Mail – 'Britain is facing societal collapse, warns Farage' – and the Express: 'Farage: three strikes and it's life in jail'. The Telegraph has 'Rayner demands tax on tourists' while the Times runs with 'Patients at risk during walkouts, warns BMA'. 'Come on England' – the Metro supports England's women as they meet Italy at the Euro. What's holding up a ceasefire in Gaza? How are controversial plans for a 'humanitarian city' in Gaza complicating a deal to stop the fighting? Emma Graham-Harrison reports A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad Andy Kalli (pictured above) once lived a double life, earning money during the day and spending it on crack cocaine at night. He first took cocaine at a pub in his late 20s after a business deal went wrong. 'Once I took that line, in my brain, I was 10ft tall. I started doing a bit more. I started going to casinos to make up the £50k I lost. I ended up blowing £100k in a week,' he says. The years ticked on but it became harder to hide his addiction after his daughter was diagnosed with a brain tumour. Kalli missed hospital appointments during her final year of life due to his addiction. Six months after her death, in 2014, he visited a hospital in the West Midlands and asked for help. Kalli has been clean ever since, and he trained as an addictions counsellor. Three years ago, at 61, he graduated with a first degree in psychology focusing on substance misuse. Now he works at the Perry Clayman Project in Luton, Bedfordshire, and says he advises rehab clients not to apologise. 'Your families have heard it a thousand times. It's by making change that you'll be making amends.' Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
ABC News
07-06-2025
- ABC News
Convicted baby killer Lucy Letby is languishing in prison. There's just one, big problem
The idea of a nurse, ostensibly sweet mannered and competent, coldly killing tiny, frail babies in her care is bone-chilling. When the young British neonatal nurse Lucy Letby was accused of murdering numerous infants, we gasped in horror and the media fed our incomprehension and appetites by providing colourful, constant coverage of the charges and trial. It seemed like it was sewn up. Letby had written incriminating entries in her diaries and googled the parents of the babies she had allegedly killed by injecting oxygen into their veins, poisoning them with insulin, and feeding them too much milk. But, most damning of all was the graph which was printed over and over, showing a list of nursing staff against a list of the babies who had died between June 2015 and 2016: Letby had been present, every single time. She was convicted in August 2023 of seven counts of murder and other attempted murders, and is currently serving multiple life sentences with no chance of release. Letby was the fourth woman in British history to be sentenced to die in jail. "She has thrown open the door to Hell," the Daily Mail wrote, "and the stench of evil overwhelms us all." There's only one problem — the cacophony of globally renowned expert voices, some of whose research was heavily relied on by the prosecution, now saying in unison: there is no evidence of wrongdoing. As David Conn wrote in the Guardian, "It is unprecedented that so large a group of experts with such distinguished reputations have so rapidly, publicly and comprehensively spoken out to dispute convictions for murder." The whole thing is awful: grieving parents facing the reopening of painful cases and painful discussions again, and yet also, a potentially innocent woman languishing in jail after a miscarriage of justice and poorly run case. And the grim fact that a public who lapped up the stories of the evil nurse has now largely lost interest. I do not know if Letby is guilty or innocent, but this apparent contradiction between the legal system and medical experts is troubling. The detail is thick and few of us are equipped to deal with the medical and scientific complexities of this case. But this is exactly the problem — the idea of an evil killer, dressed in scrubs, is so spine-tingling that we throw caution. There are several lessons to be learned from this sorry saga; here are just three. In May 2024 an extensive, 13,000 word investigative piece in the New Yorker was the first substantial work to tip people off to the fact that "in the rush to judgement, serious questions about the evidence were ignored." But the man whose slender 1989 academic paper was relied upon by the prosecution to link mottled skin to a pulmonary vascular air embolism (and, they argued, thereby an injection of air into the babies' veins) had been alarmed months before, once he was made aware of the case. Dr Shoo Lee is a respected Canadian neonatalist who argued before the Court of Appeal that the prosecution's expert witness had fundamentally misinterpreted his work. He said none of the babies in the trial should have been diagnosed with a pulmonary embolism and alternatives should be considered. When the court rejected the appeal request, Lee assembled a 14-strong team of the most respected paediatric and neonatal specialists in the world, including a former president of Britain's Royal College of Pediatrics and a former director of Boston Children's Hospital's neonatal intensive care unit. Dr Lee promised to release their conclusions whatever they were. And they were incendiary: finding no medical evidence that Letby had murdered or attempted to murder any baby in her care. The report was 698 pages long. At a press conference in February this year, Lee said there had been serious errors and failings in medical care, and some of the deaths could have been prevented. One panel member, Dr Neena Modi, neonatology professor at Imperial College London, said: "There was a combination of babies being delivered in the wrong place, delayed diagnosis and inappropriate or absent treatment." Police shared a graph showing Letby's presence — marked with an X — at the time of each "suspicious incident" involving the deterioration or death of a baby with the media, which reprinted it numerous times. But, as the New Yorker pointed out, "the chart didn't account for any other factors influencing the mortality rate on the unit. It gave an impression of mathematical clarity and coherence, distracting from another possibility: that there had never been any crimes at all." The neonatal unit Letby worked at, at the Countess of Chester Hospital, run by the National Health Service, in the west of England, was struggling, and a 2016 review by a team from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health found there were inadequate numbers of doctors and nurses. There had been more deaths in the maternal ward as well as neonatal care. Law Professor Burkhard Schafer from the University of Edinburgh argues this graph shows police are skilled at looking for a responsible human, not "finding a systemic problem in an organisation like the National Health Service, after decades of underfunding, where you have overworked people cutting little corners with very vulnerable babies who are already in a risk category." When Schafer saw the diagram of suspicious events, an alarm bell rang. To be true, he says, such a diagram should have included all deaths in the unit, not just those in court, and it should have covered more time. The diagram the police issued has been likened to the "Texas sharpshooter fallacy". Imagine a shooter firing bullets into the side of a barn, then tracing a bulls-eye around the area where most bullets penetrated. In other words, statistical mistakes can be made when analysts ignore a big data set in favour of a small cluster that fits a convenient theory. This exact mistake had been made in cases about two nurses accused of murder before, in the Netherlands and in Italy, leading to a miscarriage of justice due to the belief that "a coincidence cannot be a coincidence". Both spent time in prison and both were later exonerated. This "X" diagram was crucial in the Letby case. As David Conn writes: …there was no evidence against Letby, only the consultants' suspicions due to the statistical coincidence of her having been on shift. Nobody ever saw her harm a baby or commit any of the acts — injecting babies with air, or lacing two feeding bags with insulin — of which she would later be accused and found guilty, and there has never been any tangible or forensic evidence of her doing so. She was well respected as a committed young nurse, who had taken intensive care qualifications, and would volunteer for extra work and overtime when the unit was stretched. Senior staff believed that this explained why she was often on shift for the sickest babies. Especially if insufficient evidence is given and complexity is skipped over. Those following the case read about notes written by Letby that police found in her house, which contained these contradictory statements, some of which appeared to show guilt: "WHY ME?"; "I haven't done anything wrong"; "I killed them on purpose because I'm not good enough to care for them"; "I AM EVIL I DID THIS." She wrote, too, "We tried our best and it wasn't enough." We didn't read of the police video where she said she was processing the guilt of having babies die on her watch: "It was just a way of me getting my feelings out onto paper." Her self-loathing was wrapped in up feelings of incompetence, and the stress of suspicion. Psychologists have said these notes were "meaningless as evidence." Then there was the fact that Letby had googled the names of the parents whose babies had died afterwards, 31 times. This confused me when I read it. What I didn't know was that this was somewhat of a compulsive habit of hers — she seemed to google everyone she met — during the year of the investigation, she had conducted 2,287 searches for people online, saying later she was always on her phone. Her last hope seems to be the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which examines possible miscarriages of justice. Another public inquiry is underway into how murders such as these could have taken place in NHS hospitals, though in August 2024, 24 British experts — doctors, nurses and scientists — sent a letter to the government urging them to postpone or delay such an inquiry due to concern about a failure to learn lessons from "possible negligent deaths that were presumed to be murders". It is up to the courts to decide if there has been miscarriage of justice. Perhaps, in the interests of public confidence, they will take the chance to do so. Whatever happens, we must be acutely conscious of the suffering parents who have been through a horrific ordeal, losing a child then enduring a gruelling public trial. Surely, more than anyone, they deserve to know the truth. Juila Baird is an author, broadcaster, journalist and co-host of the ABC podcast, Not Stupid.
