logo
Convicted baby killer Lucy Letby is languishing in prison. There's just one, big problem

Convicted baby killer Lucy Letby is languishing in prison. There's just one, big problem

The idea of a nurse, ostensibly sweet mannered and competent, coldly killing tiny, frail babies in her care is bone-chilling.
When the young British neonatal nurse Lucy Letby was accused of murdering numerous infants, we gasped in horror and the media fed our incomprehension and appetites by providing colourful, constant coverage of the charges and trial.
It seemed like it was sewn up. Letby had written incriminating entries in her diaries and googled the parents of the babies she had allegedly killed by injecting oxygen into their veins, poisoning them with insulin, and feeding them too much milk. But, most damning of all was the graph which was printed over and over, showing a list of nursing staff against a list of the babies who had died between June 2015 and 2016: Letby had been present, every single time.
She was convicted in August 2023 of seven counts of murder and other attempted murders, and is currently serving multiple life sentences with no chance of release.
Letby was the fourth woman in British history to be sentenced to die in jail. "She has thrown open the door to Hell," the Daily Mail wrote, "and the stench of evil overwhelms us all."
There's only one problem — the cacophony of globally renowned expert voices, some of whose research was heavily relied on by the prosecution, now saying in unison: there is no evidence of wrongdoing.
As David Conn wrote in the Guardian, "It is unprecedented that so large a group of experts with such distinguished reputations have so rapidly, publicly and comprehensively spoken out to dispute convictions for murder."
The whole thing is awful: grieving parents facing the reopening of painful cases and painful discussions again, and yet also, a potentially innocent woman languishing in jail after a miscarriage of justice and poorly run case. And the grim fact that a public who lapped up the stories of the evil nurse has now largely lost interest.
I do not know if Letby is guilty or innocent, but this apparent contradiction between the legal system and medical experts is troubling. The detail is thick and few of us are equipped to deal with the medical and scientific complexities of this case. But this is exactly the problem — the idea of an evil killer, dressed in scrubs, is so spine-tingling that we throw caution.
There are several lessons to be learned from this sorry saga; here are just three.
In May 2024 an extensive, 13,000 word investigative piece in the New Yorker was the first substantial work to tip people off to the fact that "in the rush to judgement, serious questions about the evidence were ignored."
But the man whose slender 1989 academic paper was relied upon by the prosecution to link mottled skin to a pulmonary vascular air embolism (and, they argued, thereby an injection of air into the babies' veins) had been alarmed months before, once he was made aware of the case.
Dr Shoo Lee is a respected Canadian neonatalist who argued before the Court of Appeal that the prosecution's expert witness had fundamentally misinterpreted his work. He said none of the babies in the trial should have been diagnosed with a pulmonary embolism and alternatives should be considered. When the court rejected the appeal request, Lee assembled a 14-strong team of the most respected paediatric and neonatal specialists in the world, including a former president of Britain's Royal College of Pediatrics and a former director of Boston Children's Hospital's neonatal intensive care unit.
Dr Lee promised to release their conclusions whatever they were.
And they were incendiary: finding no medical evidence that Letby had murdered or attempted to murder any baby in her care. The report was 698 pages long.
At a press conference in February this year, Lee said there had been serious errors and failings in medical care, and some of the deaths could have been prevented. One panel member, Dr Neena Modi, neonatology professor at Imperial College London, said: "There was a combination of babies being delivered in the wrong place, delayed diagnosis and inappropriate or absent treatment."
Police shared a graph showing Letby's presence — marked with an X — at the time of each "suspicious incident" involving the deterioration or death of a baby with the media, which reprinted it numerous times. But, as the New Yorker pointed out, "the chart didn't account for any other factors influencing the mortality rate on the unit. It gave an impression of mathematical clarity and coherence, distracting from another possibility: that there had never been any crimes at all."
The neonatal unit Letby worked at, at the Countess of Chester Hospital, run by the National Health Service, in the west of England, was struggling, and a 2016 review by a team from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health found there were inadequate numbers of doctors and nurses. There had been more deaths in the maternal ward as well as neonatal care.
Law Professor Burkhard Schafer from the University of Edinburgh argues this graph shows police are skilled at looking for a responsible human, not "finding a systemic problem in an organisation like the National Health Service, after decades of underfunding, where you have overworked people cutting little corners with very vulnerable babies who are already in a risk category."
When Schafer saw the diagram of suspicious events, an alarm bell rang. To be true, he says, such a diagram should have included all deaths in the unit, not just those in court, and it should have covered more time.
The diagram the police issued has been likened to the "Texas sharpshooter fallacy". Imagine a shooter firing bullets into the side of a barn, then tracing a bulls-eye around the area where most bullets penetrated. In other words, statistical mistakes can be made when analysts ignore a big data set in favour of a small cluster that fits a convenient theory.
This exact mistake had been made in cases about two nurses accused of murder before, in the Netherlands and in Italy, leading to a miscarriage of justice due to the belief that "a coincidence cannot be a coincidence". Both spent time in prison and both were later exonerated.
This "X" diagram was crucial in the Letby case. As David Conn writes:
…there was no evidence against Letby, only the consultants' suspicions due to the statistical coincidence of her having been on shift. Nobody ever saw her harm a baby or commit any of the acts — injecting babies with air, or lacing two feeding bags with insulin — of which she would later be accused and found guilty, and there has never been any tangible or forensic evidence of her doing so. She was well respected as a committed young nurse, who had taken intensive care qualifications, and would volunteer for extra work and overtime when the unit was stretched. Senior staff believed that this explained why she was often on shift for the sickest babies.
Especially if insufficient evidence is given and complexity is skipped over.
Those following the case read about notes written by Letby that police found in her house, which contained these contradictory statements, some of which appeared to show guilt: "WHY ME?"; "I haven't done anything wrong"; "I killed them on purpose because I'm not good enough to care for them"; "I AM EVIL I DID THIS." She wrote, too, "We tried our best and it wasn't enough."
We didn't read of the police video where she said she was processing the guilt of having babies die on her watch: "It was just a way of me getting my feelings out onto paper."
Her self-loathing was wrapped in up feelings of incompetence, and the stress of suspicion. Psychologists have said these notes were "meaningless as evidence."
Then there was the fact that Letby had googled the names of the parents whose babies had died afterwards, 31 times. This confused me when I read it. What I didn't know was that this was somewhat of a compulsive habit of hers — she seemed to google everyone she met — during the year of the investigation, she had conducted 2,287 searches for people online, saying later she was always on her phone.
Her last hope seems to be the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which examines possible miscarriages of justice. Another public inquiry is underway into how murders such as these could have taken place in NHS hospitals, though in August 2024, 24 British experts — doctors, nurses and scientists — sent a letter to the government urging them to postpone or delay such an inquiry due to concern about a failure to learn lessons from "possible negligent deaths that were presumed to be murders".
It is up to the courts to decide if there has been miscarriage of justice. Perhaps, in the interests of public confidence, they will take the chance to do so.
Whatever happens, we must be acutely conscious of the suffering parents who have been through a horrific ordeal, losing a child then enduring a gruelling public trial.
Surely, more than anyone, they deserve to know the truth.
Juila Baird is an author, broadcaster, journalist and co-host of the ABC podcast, Not Stupid.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Huge update on 5 year neighbour dispute over untrimmed hedge
Huge update on 5 year neighbour dispute over untrimmed hedge

News.com.au

time43 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Huge update on 5 year neighbour dispute over untrimmed hedge

A UK couple has won a bitter neighbour dispute over an untrimmed hedge after five years of furious feuding. Keith Smith, 71, and his wife Julie, 68, were locked in a feud with their neighbours in Prestonfield, Edinburgh, over the height of a hedge, The Sun reports. The Smiths claimed the untrimmed cypress trees, belonging to David Hunter and Niena Hunter Mistry, made their lives a misery. The row of trees sparked a five-year battle between the two couples. The neighbour war grew so bitter that it involved the Edinburgh City Council, the Scottish Government and even the police. The Smiths claim the trees cast a shadow across their garden, forcing the pensioners to live out their retirement in darkness. Demanding the trees be chopped down, the Smiths turned to the local authority but were left frustrated when they were refused. The couple paid a massive £350 ($A712) fee for a High Hedge Notice application which was denied after a visit from a city council officer. Appealing the decision, the Smiths won and managed to successfully have the trees trimmed back to 8.5ft in 2023. After the bush was trimmed the Smiths claim that gaps where the tree once stood were suddenly replaced by gardening tools, including ladders, pipes and concrete. The pair went on to claim the trim was inadequate and called for the council to come back, which they did and agreed that the remaining trees should be further cut back. Mr Hunter left a single tree standing untrimmed however which he claimed was not part of the 'boundary hedge' and therefore not subject to the High Hedge Notice. The Smiths then insisted the remaining tree be cut back too with the dispute turning ugly again. The couple, who have lived in their home for 44 years, continued their brutal battle to have the foliage lopped back. Things got so bad that in June of last year the police were called to the quiet suburb where they issued 'two men' with 'recorded police warnings'. Mr Smith previously claimed to Edinburgh Live his neighbours' behaviour had been 'atrocious' and branded the couple's actions 'absolutely appalling'. The hedge owners refused to chop down their bush and claimed they felt harassed and intimidated by the Smiths. The Smiths previously said: 'We, the Smiths, have suffered hugely financially, emotionally and physically by this process and sincerely hope, this will now lead to resolution.' An appeal launched by Mr Hunter in a bid to save his tree was rejected and the last remaining part of the hedge will now have to be cut back to 8.5ft. Mr Hunter insisted the remaining tree was not part of the hedge and begged that it be allowed to stand. He said in a document seen by the Mail Online: 'The individual tree identified in the varied notice cannot reasonably be said to be part of the boundary hedge. 'It appears as a separate individual tree and has never been trimmed. 'We would be very grateful if you would take all our points and concerns into account and request that you quash the revised high hedge notice.' Despite his pleas Mr Hunter was ordered to cut back the remaining piece of his hedge to 8.5ft in line with the previous High Hedge Notice. The Smiths were delighted after a government official stated the tree did in fact cast a shadow over a 'significant' portion of their garden. The official also stated the previous High Hedge Notice applied to the whole hedge, including the remaining tree. Despite the best efforts of Mr Hunter the government official ruled the hedge damaged the Smith's enjoyment of their home. The government ruled the remaining part of the hedge is now subject to the High Hedge Notice and should be trimmed to 8.5ft.

Three-second clip exposes Donald Trump's cheating on Scottish course
Three-second clip exposes Donald Trump's cheating on Scottish course

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Three-second clip exposes Donald Trump's cheating on Scottish course

US President Donald Trump's 'exploits' on the golf course are going viral all over again. Trump is an avid golfer and has regularly made all sorts of claims about club championship victories and his overall ability on the course. The 79-year-old is in Scotland for a three-day tour, visiting his own Trump Turnberry course and Trump International Golf Links in Aberdeenshire during the brief visit. In between rounds, he also joined European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen to announce the United States' 15 per cent tariff on all imports from the EU. But it is a moment from a caddy during Trump's time on the course on Sunday (Monday AEST) that has also gained plenty of attention. In the video you can see above, two caddies or on course officials in red vests are seen walking ahead of the president in his golf cart. One of them slows down before bending over and rather sheepishly dropping a ball onto the first cut of rough, a few feet short of a bunker and clear of the much thicker rough on the Scottish layout. Trump then gets out of his cart, club in hand, ready to hit his next shot. It was a moment that was jumped on by a huge number of people on social media. Author Richard Hanania tweeted the video along with the caption: 'Oh my God this is so pathetic. Trump's cronies drop the golf ball in front of him. He pretends to notice it at that spot. Today, MAGA influencers are tweeting out almost identical messages about his golf swing. We really are in North Korea.' US veteran John Jackson also noticed the incident, writing on X: 'Trump caught cheating at golf, watch the second guy in the red vest toss a ball behind him.' An X account called Wu Tang is for the Children also wrote: 'LMAO for the morons that think Trump doesn't cheat at golf and wins all those club championships fair and square … watch his caddie here.' Hundreds of X users were also commenting on the vision. American health professional Craig Beam said: 'I could get my index down considerably if I had his caddie with me every time I played.' One quipped: 'It is a known fact that had Trump played professional golf, he would have ranked above Tiger Woods and been the winningest golfer in history. Even at 80, with a little more practice, he could win on the Tour.' Another wrote: 'I love how the guy throws the ball back like he's trying to make it look as though he didn't put it there lol.' Another referenced a classic episode from The Simpsons, writing: 'That's what Smithers did for Montgomery Burns.' A fourth wrote: 'The Mystery of how Trump is winning all these golf tournaments solved.' As always with Trump's staunch base of supporters, there were also a number of comments keen to debunk the footage. While the body language of the caddy did appear somewhat damning, many were doing their best to insist it was a normal act out on the course. 'Please learn golf before you post. It's called a drop. Common in golf. He's actually a very good golfer. He doesn't need to cheat,' wrote one supporter. 'Assuming his ball was out of play or in the shrubs, his caddie was simply putting one out for him to play. Pretty standard,' stated a second. — Toph (@tophalba33) July 27, 2025 'Didn't see any ball dropping. Those fellows are secret service checking out the terrain before the cart arrives,' suggested another. 'When you lose a ball, you drop a new one with a penalty, that's kinda how golf works,' said a fourth. A fifth wrote simply: 'Amazing golf swing sir!' During the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, Trump boasted about his latest club championship at his Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey. Shortly after claiming he weighed 215 pounds (97kg) and stood six-foot-three (190cm), dimensions that would put Trump's physical appearance alongside the likes of Muhammad Ali in his boxing prime and Tom Brady, he posted on his own Truth Social site that he had won the senior club championship. There is very little actual footage of Trump on the course, with one being a viral video of him badly shanking an attempted chip in July 2023 playing in Los Angeles (see below). In the Bedminster event, it wasn't just the claim of his victory that raised eyebrows, it was also his supposed score. Trump stated he shot a round of 67 at the course, which has a par score of 72. 'I am pleased to report, for those that care, that I just won the Senior Club Championship (must be over 50 years old!) at Bedminster (Trump National Golf Club), shooting a round of 67,' Trump posted. 'Now, some people will think that sounds low, but there is no hanky/lanky. Many people watch, plus I am surrounded by Secret Service Agents. 'Not much you can do even if you wanted to, and I don't. For some reason, I am just a good golfer/athlete – I have won many Club Championships, and it is always a great honour!' We understand 'hanky/lanky' was a typo when he meant hanky panky, which usually refers to somewhat inappropriate sexual activity. A score of five-under on most championship-level golf courses, which Trump National is, would please seasoned professionals. Trump then remarkably shared the contact details of the head golf professional from Bedminster, Mickey Gallagher, for anyone looking to verify his performance. Author and former sports columnist Rick Reilly also released a book back in 2019 titled Commander in Cheat: How golf explains Trump. During his round on Sunday, Trump's security team also debuted what appeared to be a heavily armoured golf cart 10 months after a would-be assassin aimed an SKS-style rifle toward him at his West Palm Beach tee resort. As the president played at the Trump Turnberry course in South Ayrshire, an imposing, apparently heavily fortified black vehicle followed close behind. Security experts said it showed all the hallmarks of an armour-reinforced golf cart in the mold of Trump's official limo, aka 'The Beast'. Trump drove a standard white golf cart as he played, but the bulky silhouette of the latest addition to his security fleet — which appears to be a modified Polaris Ranger XP — stood out like a sore thumb on the course. Stepped-up hardware to protect Trump on the golf course would not be unexpected given he survived a pair of assassination attempts last year. On September 15, Ryan Routh, 59, trained a rifle styled after a Soviet-designed semiautomatic at Trump's security detail as the president walked along the fifth hole at the Trump International Golf Club in Florida. Less than an hour later, Routh was apprehended during a traffic stop and charged with the attempted assassination of Trump. Two months earlier, Trump survived another assassination attempt at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, carried out by 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.

Man pleads guilty to murdering co-worker Tshewang Choden at National Zoo and Aquarium in Canberra
Man pleads guilty to murdering co-worker Tshewang Choden at National Zoo and Aquarium in Canberra

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Man pleads guilty to murdering co-worker Tshewang Choden at National Zoo and Aquarium in Canberra

The man responsible for a brutal stabbing murder at Canberra's zoo in December 2023 has pleaded guilty in the ACT Supreme Court today. Warning: This story contains graphic details. Jude Widjesinghe, 31, was to have faced trial later this year on a single charge of murder, after Tshewang Choden was stabbed to death in a storeroom in the kitchen area where they both worked. Court documents have revealed the dramatic moment when staff found Widjesinghe covered in blood, sitting in the storeroom. They'd come running when they heard screams but at first were unable to get into the storeroom. Widjesinghe then came out holding the knife, as the other staff fled. By the time more people arrived Widjesinghe was on the ground having injured himself. He was disarmed when a co-worker stood on his wrist to make him drop the knife. Ms Choden was found in the storeroom. She had been stabbed 14 times, with the fatal blows to the neck and chest. Court materials reveal Widjesinghe had worked in the kitchen for a year-and-a-half where he met Ms Choden. In June 2023, Widjesinghe sent Ms Choden a message saying she had the "prettiest name in the world". But when he asked her out for dinner when they were both free she declined. When Ms Choden began dating someone else, she told others that Widjesinghe began to be moody towards her and if other males spoke to her he would get mad and stop talking to her. The pair had worked together on the same shift, but by the time of the murder Ms Choden was doing morning shifts, with Widjesinghe working later. On the day of the murder Widjesinghe and Ms Choden were in the kitchen with another colleague who left soon afterwards. It was shortly after this that workers nearby heard the first screams, and went running to see what was happening. The court documents show in the lead up to the murder Widjesinghe began telling people he was moving back to Sri Lanka, even selling his car. He also wrote letters to friends and relations and sent text messages to say goodbye. Widjesinghe was rushed to hospital after the incident, where he was later charged with murder. He was to have faced trial later this year, but today that was set aside as he pleaded guilty. Widjesinghe will face a sentencing hearing in October.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store