Latest news with #Kiriakou
Time of India
05-07-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Who has the hand on Pakistan's nuclear button?
Amid reports of India hitting Pakistan 's nuclear-related military infrastructure during Operation Sindoor and US President Donald Trump repeatedly making claims about his intervention averting a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan, John Kiriakou , a controversial former CIA officer and whistleblower, has claimed in a viral video that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is under the control of an American general. "The command and control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has been placed under an American general by the Pakistani government,' Kiriakou said. Kiriakou is known for publicly confirming the US government's use of waterboarding and other forms of torture during the post-9/11 "War on Terror". He was stationed in Pakistan in the early 2000s as part of the CIA's counterterrorism operations and managed CIA–ISI joint operations. During his time there, he played a key role in the capture of Abu Zubaydah, a senior member of al-Qaeda, in 2002. Zubaydah was one of the first high-value detainees captured after the 9/11 attacks. In 2012, he was charged under the Espionage Act for leaking the identity of a covert CIA officer to a journalist and was imprisoned. Kiriakou has since become an outspoken advocate for whistleblower protections and a critic of US intelligence practices. Last month, a Pakistani security expert, Imtiaz Gul, ignited a controversy by claiming that Pakistan's strategically important Nur Khan airbase is under American control and even senior Pakistan Army officers are not allowed there. The airbase is also close to the Strategic Plans Division, which is said to be in charge of Pakistan's nuclear weapons. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Fungo nas unhas: um truque simples reduz facilmente Acabe com os Fungo Undo India called Pakistan's nuclear bluff during Operation Sindoor, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar repeatedly saying that India will not submit to Pakistan's nuclear blackmail. The control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has been a subject of a lot of debate ever since 1998 when it joined the ranks of nuclear powers after conducting atomic tests. Besides Kiriakou's claim, various theories have been doing the rounds. There is speculation that the US has an emergency plan ready for Pakistan's nuclear weapons while many think close military cooperation between the two countries suggests a degree of American control over Pakistan's nukes. Live Events You Might Also Like: Does America have a plan to capture Pakistan's nuclear weapons? America's plan to "snatch-and-grab" Pakistan's nuclear weapons America's concerns over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal go decades back. It was reported by NBC News in 2011 that the US has a contingency plan to "snatch-and-grab" Pakistan's nuclear weapons, if and when the US President believes they are a threat to either America or its interests. Plans had been drawn up for dealing with worst-case scenarios in Pakistan, NBC news reported quoting several US officials, who said that ensuring security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons had long been a high US security priority even before 9/11 terrorist attacks. Among the scenarios drawn by the report were Pakistan plunging into internal chaos, terrorists mounting a serious attack against a nuclear facility, hostilities breaking out with India, or Islamic extremist taking charge of the government or the Pakistan army. NBC said in its 2011 report that the greatest success of the US war on terrorism, the military operation that killed Osama bin Laden in his safe house in Pakistan, had fuelled concerns about Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. The report said there were increasing suspicions among US officials that Osama had support within the ISI and the Abbottabad operation had emboldened those in Washington who believed an orchestrated campaign of lightning raids to secure Pakistan's nuclear weapons could succeed. In the aftermath of the bin Laden raid, US military officials testified before Congress about the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons and the threat posed by "loose nukes" - nuclear weapons or materials outside the government's control. Earlier Pentagon reports also outlined scenarios in which US forces would intervene to secure nuclear weapons that were in danger of falling into the wrong hands. In an interview with NBC News in 2011, former Pakistan military ruler Pervez Musharraf had warned that a snatch-and-grab operation would lead to all-out war between the countries, calling it "total confrontation by the whole nation against whoever comes in". Pervez Hoodbhoy, Pakistan's best known nuclear physicist and a human rights advocate, too, said a US attempt to take control of Pakistan's nukes would be foolhardy. "They are said to be hidden in tunnels under mountains, in cities, as well as regular air force and army bases," he said. "A US snatch operation could trigger war; it should never be attempted." Despite such comments, interviews with US officials, military reports and even congressional testimony indicated that Pakistan's weaponry had been the subject of continuing discussions, scenarios, war games and possibly even military exercises by US intelligence and special forces regarding so-called "snatch-and-grab" operations, the 2011 NBC News report said. "It's safe to assume that planning for the worst-case scenario regarding Pakistan nukes has already taken place inside the US government," Roger Cressey, former deputy director of counter-terrorism in the Clinton and Bush White House, had told NBC News. "This issue remains one of the highest priorities of the US intelligence community ... and the White House." Pakistan's "emerging threat" to the US American concerns over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal narrated in the NBC News report in 2011 must have only grown over time as Pakistan stockpiled more nukes and also achieved greater military power. A decade later, in 2021, a Brookings article mentioned the American plan to capture Pakistan's nukes: "Indeed, since the shock of 9/11, Pakistan has come to represent such an exasperating problem that the U.S. has reportedly developed a secret plan to arbitrarily seize control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal if a terrorist group in Pakistan seemed on the edge of capturing some or all of its nuclear warheads," wrote Marvin Kalb. "When repeatedly questioned about the plan, U.S. officials have strung together an artful, if unpersuasive, collection of 'no comments.' Last year, the US was alarmed by a new development in Pakistan. A senior White House official said in December that nuclear-armed Pakistan was developing long-range ballistic missile capabilities that eventually could allow it to strike targets well beyond South Asia, making it an "emerging threat" to the US, Reuters reported. Deputy National Security Adviser Jon Finer's surprise revelation underscored how far the once-close ties between Washington and Islamabad had deteriorated since the 2021 US troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. Speaking to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Finer said the number of nuclear-armed states with missiles that could reach the US homeland "is very small and they tend to be adversarial," naming Russia, North Korea and China. "So, candidly, it's hard for us to see Pakistan's actions as anything other than an emerging threat to the United States," he said. An official told Reuters that the threat posed to the US is up to a decade away. Finer's speech came a day after Washington announced a new round of sanctions related to Pakistan's ballistic missile development program, including for the first time against the state-run defense agency that oversees the program.
American Military News
05-06-2025
- Politics
- American Military News
CIA 'controls the president,' whistleblower warns
John Kiriakou, a Central Intelligence Agency whistleblower, claimed on Wednesday that the agency is able to effectively control U.S. presidents and advance the plans of the 'deep state' since agents often remain at the agency for decades and presidents only remain in power for four or eight years. During a Wednesday interview on 'The Tucker Carlson Show' with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, the former Central Intelligence Agency official claimed that the agents are able to carry out the plans of the 'deep state' in Washington, D.C. regardless of who is president since the agents retain their power far longer than presidents. 'I know we're getting far-field, and we will get back to your story, but it doesn't sound like, so if you look at the org chart, the president controls the CIA,' Carlson said. 'But you're describing a situation where the CIA kind of controls the president.' 'This is another problem. It's that presidents come and go every four years, every eight years. But these CIA people, they're there for 25, 30, 35 years,' Kiriakou interjected. 'They don't go anywhere. And so, if they don't like a president or if a president orders them to do something that they don't want to do, they just wait because they know they can wait him out, and then he's not going to be president anymore. They can continue on with whatever plan the blob or the deep state wants to implement.' READ MORE: Biden's new rule protects 'deep state' from Trump After his inauguration on January 20, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to end the weaponization of the federal government. As part of the executive order, Trump instructed the Director of National Intelligence to review the actions of the intelligence community under former President Joe Biden's administration. The president has also repeatedly promised to destroy the 'deep state' in Washington, D.C. 'Donald Trump took a lot of guff in his first term when he used on a regular basis the term 'deep state.' And I argued from the very beginning, it is a deep state. Maybe you don't like the terminology,' Kiriakou told Carlson on Wednesday. 'You don't have to call it the deep state. You can call it the federal bureaucracy. You can call it the state. But the truth is that it exists.' 'I would say by definition, you just described it, the president. By the way, the elected representatives who are the instrument of the population through which they control their government are perennial,' Carlson said. 'They come and go. The people who carry out those orders remain. So, over time, they are the ones with the power.' The DEEPSTATE'S WEAPONIZATION of the CIA & FBI. Presidents are believed to be the ultimate power and authority in government, but they serve their term and go. Then there are the people in government, intelligence, and other agencies who spend 25-30+ years in government. These… — The SCIF (@TheIntelSCIF) June 5, 2025
