logo
Who has the hand on Pakistan's nuclear button?

Who has the hand on Pakistan's nuclear button?

Time of India3 hours ago
Amid reports of India hitting
Pakistan
's nuclear-related military infrastructure during
Operation Sindoor
and US President Donald Trump repeatedly making claims about his intervention averting a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan,
John Kiriakou
, a controversial former CIA officer and whistleblower, has claimed in a viral video that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is under the control of an American general. "The command and control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has been placed under an American general by the Pakistani government,' Kiriakou said.
Kiriakou is known for publicly confirming the US government's use of waterboarding and other forms of torture during the post-9/11 "War on Terror". He was stationed in Pakistan in the early 2000s as part of the CIA's counterterrorism operations and managed CIA–ISI joint operations. During his time there, he played a key role in the capture of Abu Zubaydah, a senior member of al-Qaeda, in 2002. Zubaydah was one of the first high-value detainees captured after the 9/11 attacks. In 2012, he was charged under the Espionage Act for leaking the identity of a covert CIA officer to a journalist and was imprisoned. Kiriakou has since become an outspoken advocate for whistleblower protections and a critic of US intelligence practices.
Last month, a Pakistani security expert, Imtiaz Gul, ignited a controversy by claiming that Pakistan's strategically important Nur Khan airbase is under American control and even senior
Pakistan Army
officers are not allowed there. The airbase is also close to the Strategic Plans Division, which is said to be in charge of Pakistan's nuclear weapons.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Fungo nas unhas: um truque simples reduz facilmente
Acabe com os Fungo
Undo
India called Pakistan's nuclear bluff during Operation Sindoor, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar repeatedly saying that India will not submit to Pakistan's nuclear blackmail.
The control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has been a subject of a lot of debate ever since 1998 when it joined the ranks of nuclear powers after conducting atomic tests. Besides Kiriakou's claim, various theories have been doing the rounds. There is speculation that the US has an emergency plan ready for Pakistan's nuclear weapons while many think close military cooperation between the two countries suggests a degree of American control over Pakistan's nukes.
Live Events
You Might Also Like:
Does America have a plan to capture Pakistan's nuclear weapons?
America's plan to "snatch-and-grab" Pakistan's nuclear weapons
America's concerns over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal go decades back. It was reported by NBC News in 2011 that the US has a contingency plan to "snatch-and-grab" Pakistan's nuclear weapons, if and when the US President believes they are a threat to either America or its interests. Plans had been drawn up for dealing with worst-case scenarios in Pakistan, NBC news reported quoting several US officials, who said that ensuring security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons had long been a high US security priority even before 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Among the scenarios drawn by the report were Pakistan plunging into internal chaos, terrorists mounting a serious attack against a nuclear facility, hostilities breaking out with India, or Islamic extremist taking charge of the government or the Pakistan army.
NBC said in its 2011 report that the greatest success of the US war on terrorism, the military operation that killed Osama bin Laden in his safe house in Pakistan, had fuelled concerns about Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. The report said there were increasing suspicions among US officials that Osama had support within the ISI and the Abbottabad operation had emboldened those in Washington who believed an orchestrated campaign of lightning raids to secure Pakistan's nuclear weapons could succeed. In the aftermath of the bin Laden raid, US military officials testified before Congress about the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons and the threat posed by "loose nukes" - nuclear weapons or materials outside the government's control. Earlier Pentagon reports also outlined scenarios in which US forces would intervene to secure nuclear weapons that were in danger of falling into the wrong hands.
In an interview with NBC News in 2011, former Pakistan military ruler Pervez Musharraf had warned that a snatch-and-grab operation would lead to all-out war between the countries, calling it "total confrontation by the whole nation against whoever comes in". Pervez Hoodbhoy, Pakistan's best known nuclear physicist and a human rights advocate, too, said a US attempt to take control of Pakistan's nukes would be foolhardy. "They are said to be hidden in tunnels under mountains, in cities, as well as regular air force and army bases," he said. "A US snatch operation could trigger war; it should never be attempted."
Despite such comments, interviews with US officials, military reports and even congressional testimony indicated that Pakistan's weaponry had been the subject of continuing discussions, scenarios, war games and possibly even military exercises by US intelligence and special forces regarding so-called "snatch-and-grab" operations, the 2011 NBC News report said. "It's safe to assume that planning for the worst-case scenario regarding Pakistan nukes has already taken place inside the US government," Roger Cressey, former deputy director of counter-terrorism in the Clinton and Bush White House, had told NBC News. "This issue remains one of the highest priorities of the US intelligence community ... and the White House."
Pakistan's "emerging threat" to the US
American concerns over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal narrated in the NBC News report in 2011 must have only grown over time as Pakistan stockpiled more nukes and also achieved greater military power. A decade later, in 2021, a Brookings article mentioned the American plan to capture Pakistan's nukes: "Indeed, since the shock of 9/11, Pakistan has come to represent such an exasperating problem that the U.S. has reportedly developed a secret plan to arbitrarily seize control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal if a terrorist group in Pakistan seemed on the edge of capturing some or all of its nuclear warheads," wrote Marvin Kalb. "When repeatedly questioned about the plan, U.S. officials have strung together an artful, if unpersuasive, collection of 'no comments.'
Last year, the US was alarmed by a new development in Pakistan. A senior White House official said in December that nuclear-armed Pakistan was developing long-range ballistic missile capabilities that eventually could allow it to strike targets well beyond South Asia, making it an "emerging threat" to the US, Reuters reported. Deputy National Security Adviser Jon Finer's surprise revelation underscored how far the once-close ties between Washington and Islamabad had deteriorated since the 2021 US troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Speaking to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Finer said the number of nuclear-armed states with missiles that could reach the US homeland "is very small and they tend to be adversarial," naming Russia, North Korea and China. "So, candidly, it's hard for us to see Pakistan's actions as anything other than an emerging threat to the United States," he said. An official told Reuters that the threat posed to the US is up to a decade away.
Finer's speech came a day after Washington announced a new round of sanctions related to Pakistan's ballistic missile development program, including for the first time against the state-run defense agency that oversees the program.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bombay HC Dismisses Election Petitions Against Fadnavis, Mungantiwar & Other BJP Leaders
Bombay HC Dismisses Election Petitions Against Fadnavis, Mungantiwar & Other BJP Leaders

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Bombay HC Dismisses Election Petitions Against Fadnavis, Mungantiwar & Other BJP Leaders

Nagpur: In a setback to Congress, the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court on Friday dismissed multiple election petitions filed by its defeated candidates challenging the victories of Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis , senior BJP leader Sudhir Mungantiwar, and three other MLAs. The court ruled the pleas were not maintainable due to procedural lapses, including the petitioners' failure to be physically present during filing — a mandatory legal requirement. Justice Pravin Patil quashed five petitions filed by Congress candidates Prafulla Gudadhe, Girish Pandav, Satish Warjurkar, Subhash Dhote, and Santosh Singh Rawat. The pleas targeted the results from Nagpur South-West, Nagpur South, Chimur, Rajura, and Ballarpur constituencies in Vidarbha, respectively, alleging violations under Representation of the People Act and procedural irregularities in the 2024 assembly polls. "The petitions lacked essential particulars and did not comply with statutory requirements," Justice Patil observed, dismissing them summarily. In Gudadhe's plea, which specifically sought to annul CM Fadnavis's victory from South-West Nagpur, the court held that no evidence of corrupt practices or irregularities was demonstrated. Fadnavis won the seat by a margin of 39,710 votes. Petitioners' counsel Pavan Dahat and Akash Moon told TOI they would challenge the rulings in Supreme Court. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why! Techno Mag Learn More Undo "We are reviewing the judgment and will file appeals soon," he said. The legal move was part of a wider offensive by the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA), in which 27 losing candidates across Vidarbha filed similar petitions. Friday's verdict marks a legal and political setback for Congress, which accused the ruling party of misusing official machinery to swing elections. With this dismissal, Fadnavis, Mungantiwar, Chimur MLA Bunty Bhangadiya, South Nagpur MLA Mohan Mate, and Rajura MLA Deorao Bhongale all received legal reprieve as the court reaffirmed their victories. The petitioners had urged the court to declare victories of BJP legislators "null and void," citing non-compliance with mandatory electoral protocols by Election Commission of India. They argued ECI failed to issue a formal notification for using Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and withheld key election records like Form 17 and CCTV footage of strongrooms. They also alleged absence of VVPAT (Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail) verification, raising serious questions about transparency and fairness of the electoral process. Victories secured by BJP candidates in 2024 Maharashtra Assembly polls: (Vidarbha region): 1. Nagpur South-West Winner: Devendra Fadnavis (BJP) Defeated: Prafulla Gudadhe (Congress) Votes secured by Fadnavis: 1,20,214 Victory margin: 39,710 2. Nagpur South Winner: Mohan Mate (BJP) Defeated: Girish Pandav (Congress) Votes secured by Mate: 95,082 Victory margin: 22,563 3. Chimur (Chandrapur) Winner: Bunty Bhangadiya (Independent supported by BJP) Defeated: Satish Warjurkar (Congress) Votes secured by Bhangadiya: 78,145 Victory margin: 16,087 4. Ballarpur (Chandrapur) Winner: Sudhir Mungantiwar (BJP) Defeated: Santosh Singh Rawat (Congress) Votes secured by Mungantiwar: 1,05,211 Victory margin: 25,334 5. Rajura (Chandrapur) Winner: Deorao Bhongale (BJP) Defeated: Subhash Dhote (Congress) Votes secured by Bhongale: 88,576 Victory margin: 13,912

Inspired by Greta Thunberg, Sweden invented flight shaming, now it's desperately begging airlines to come back
Inspired by Greta Thunberg, Sweden invented flight shaming, now it's desperately begging airlines to come back

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Inspired by Greta Thunberg, Sweden invented flight shaming, now it's desperately begging airlines to come back

Sweden Flight Shaming Backfires as Country Drops Air Tax to Revive Economy- Sweden, the birthplace of the 'flight shaming' movement, has now reversed course by scrapping its aviation tax in hopes of reviving a struggling economy. The move, effective from July 1, 2025, marks a sharp departure from Sweden's climate-focused past, where flying was discouraged to reduce carbon emissions. The air tax, which ranged from 76 to 517 kronor (£5.50–£37.40) per passenger, had been in place since 2018, championed by the then centre-left government. But with Sweden's economy shrinking and regional aviation collapsing, the country is now welcoming airlines back—with open arms and tax breaks. The decision has triggered both praise from the aviation industry and disappointment from climate advocates. Why did Sweden scrap its air tax despite its eco-conscious reputation? Sweden's aviation tax was introduced at a time when environmental awareness was peaking. In 2018, the same year the tax was enforced, Greta Thunberg, then 15, launched her first school climate strike outside the Swedish Parliament. This led to a cultural wave known as 'flygskam' or flight shame, where people deliberately avoided flying to reduce their environmental impact. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Photos Captured the Exact Wrong Moment Read More Undo According to a 2019 survey, nearly 25% of Swedes were avoiding flights, up from 17% in the previous year. The impact was significant: Sweden's national airport operator, Swedavia AB, recorded a seven-month decline in passenger numbers in 2019. That year also saw the slowest growth in airline travel in a decade, while train travel through SJ, the national railway, soared to 32 million passengers as more Swedes opted for 'climate-smart' travel. What were the economic consequences of flight shaming in Sweden? Over the next seven years, international flights to and from Sweden dropped by a third. Smaller airports, especially in northern and remote regions, began to suffer. Ryanair completely exited the domestic market in Sweden, and Bromma Airport, near Stockholm, almost shut down due to lack of use. By 2025, only one regional airline, Västfly, was operating from Bromma. Live Events The situation worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic and a recession in 2023, followed by a 0.3% GDP contraction between April and July 2024. The new right-wing government, elected in 2022, responded by scrapping the air tax and announcing a £76 million investment into aviation infrastructure. Officials claimed there were 'few reasons to feel flight shame' in today's context. How did airlines respond to Sweden's tax reversal? The response from the aviation industry was swift and supportive. Ryanair reintroduced two aircraft to its Swedish operations and announced ten new routes. EasyJet welcomed the move, saying it would help keep flying affordable. Norwegian Airlines added new routes between Norway and Sweden. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) praised the decision, stating: 'Taxation of air passengers is counterproductive economically and ineffective environmentally.' The government now hopes the boost to the aviation sector will support regional development, increase connectivity, and restore consumer confidence. What does this mean for Europe's green aviation efforts? Sweden's reversal is being closely watched by other European countries that introduced their own versions of flight taxes or bans on short-haul flights: Germany raised domestic flight taxes by 75% in 2020. Belgium has a €10 boarding tax on short flights. The Netherlands imposes a €29.40 tax on every flight, no matter the distance. Denmark, as of January 1, 2025, charges 50DK (£5.73) for intra-Europe flights and up to 410DK (£47.55) for long-haul. France banned short domestic flights where train travel takes less than 2 hours 30 minutes. Spain is considering a similar ban that could cut domestic flight emissions by 10%. Still, critics argue these moves don't go far enough. Environmental group Ecologistas en Acción called Spain's proposal 'purely symbolic,' while others say broader, more enforceable bans are needed to meet global climate goals. Can aviation ever be green without hurting economies? This is the central question Sweden now forces the world to confront. The conflict between climate action and economic recovery is more visible than ever. Justin Francis, co-founder of Responsible Travel, commented: 'Some governments' short-term attitudes to regulating aviation have shifted, but the science hasn't. Aviation is still one of the fastest-growing sources of emissions.' Francis argues that taxing aviation fuel, rather than passengers, could be a more balanced approach. The proceeds, he says, should be directed toward low-emission aviation research and expanding rail networks. But until electric or hydrogen-powered planes become commercially viable, countries may struggle to reduce aviation emissions without disrupting connectivity, tourism, and regional economies. What's next for Sweden and Europe's aviation future? Sweden's U-turn offers a real-world lesson on the challenges of balancing environmental goals with economic pressures. The case will likely influence how other countries adjust or reinforce their aviation policies in the coming years. For now, it's clear that while climate ideals sparked the flight shaming movement, economic realities have the final say. FAQs: Q1: Why did Sweden end its flight shame policy and scrap the air tax? Sweden dropped its flight tax to support its economy and revive regional air travel. Q2: How has Sweden's flight shaming reversal affected airlines and travel? Airlines like Ryanair and EasyJet are expanding again as Sweden lifts the aviation tax.

Erdogan confident Turkey to be readmitted to US F-35 programme in stages
Erdogan confident Turkey to be readmitted to US F-35 programme in stages

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Erdogan confident Turkey to be readmitted to US F-35 programme in stages

(You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan expressed confidence Turkey would be readmitted to the US F-35 programme and receive the stealth fighter jets in line with "an agreement" with US President Donald Trump "I believe that Mr. Trump will remain loyal to the agreement we made. I think the F-35s will be delivered to Turkey step-by-step during his term," Erdogan told reporters while returning from a summit in Azerbaijan, the Anadolu state news agency reported Saturday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store