Latest news with #OpenAIChatGPT
Time Business News
19 hours ago
- Time Business News
A roundup of the best ChatGPT apps and how they stack up for work vs. personal use
The widespread adoption of AI-driven tools has brought ChatGPT apps into the daily workflows of professionals and casual users alike. Whether you're writing reports, automating emails, managing your calendar, or just asking for movie recommendations, ChatGPT apps have become powerful companions. But not all ChatGPT apps are built the same—and depending on whether you need an AI assistant for work or personal use, your ideal app may vary. Options for the best ChatGPT app tend to fall into two main categories: official OpenAI apps and third-party platforms that build on OpenAI's technology. The official OpenAI ChatGPT app (available on desktop and mobile) leads in reliability, feature updates, and model access—including the powerful GPT-4o model, which blends text, vision, and voice capabilities. It's perfect for users who want a no-frills, high-performance AI for drafting emails, generating reports, coding, and even handling customer support tasks. Other leading apps include Poe by Quora, which supports multiple AI models like Claude and Gemini alongside GPT-4. Poe is ideal for users who want variety and comparison. Meanwhile, apps like Chatbot for Google Sheets or Notion AI bring ChatGPT functionality directly into tools many teams already use. These integrations are work-focused, streamlining data analysis and content generation inside productivity suites. They're especially valuable for marketing teams, sales operations, and analysts. For personal use, options like Replika or offer more entertaining and emotionally engaging experiences. These apps allow users to interact with AI personalities in a conversational, human-like way—perfect for companionship, storytelling, or casual brainstorming. While these aren't ideal for formal work tasks, they do excel at simulating natural dialogue and helping users decompress or get creative in their free time. How they stack up for work vs. personal use depends largely on context and expectations. For example, the OpenAI ChatGPT app excels in work settings due to its clean interface, advanced features like file uploads and code interpretation, and access to plugins or custom GPTs tailored to business functions. It's also highly secure, a non-negotiable for enterprise users. Poe, on the other hand, bridges the gap—it can be effective for work if you're comparing model outputs or trying different tones and voices for content. However, its lack of deep integrations into enterprise tools may limit its utility for some users. Notion AI and ChatGPT browser extensions are more specialized. Notion's integration is excellent for internal documentation and collaborative editing, but less useful outside the Notion ecosystem. ChatGPT Chrome extensions are flexible and lightweight, offering AI assistance across web pages, emails, or even LinkedIn messaging, making them solid choices for multitaskers who jump between work and personal tabs throughout the day. When evaluating for personal use, entertainment-focused apps like and Replika shine due to their personalization and immersive experience. However, these apps are not built with productivity in mind and typically don't offer export options, formatting tools, or task-specific enhancements. In conclusion, the best ChatGPT app for you hinges on how you plan to use it. If your priority is work efficiency and advanced AI features, the official ChatGPT app or enterprise integrations like Notion AI are ideal. For creative exploration or social-style interactions, and Replika may better suit your needs. Hybrid users—those toggling between productivity and play—might find Poe to be the most versatile option. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Newsweek
5 days ago
- Politics
- Newsweek
Higher Ed's AI Panic Is Missing the Point
Senate Republicans are pushing a provision in a major tax-and-spending bill that would bar states from regulating AI for 10 years to avoid conflicting local rules. Colleges and universities are facing a parallel crisis: uncertainty over whether and how students should be allowed to use generative AI. In the absence of clear institutional guidance, individual instructors are left to make their own calls, leading to inconsistent expectations and student confusion. This policy vacuum has triggered a reactive response across higher education. Institutions are rolling out detection software, cracking down on AI use in syllabi, and encouraging faculty to read student work like forensic linguists. But the reality is that we cannot reliably detect AI writing. And if we're being honest, we never could detect effort, authorship, or intent with any precision in the first place. That's why I've stopped trying. In my classroom, it doesn't matter whether a student used ChatGPT, the campus library, or help from a roommate. My policy is simple: You, the author, are responsible for everything you submit. Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot app icons are displayed on a screen. Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot app icons are displayed on a screen. Getty Images That's not the same as insisting on authorial originality, some imagined notion that students should produce prose entirely on their own, in a vacuum, untouched by outside influence. Instead, I teach authorial responsibility. You are responsible for ensuring that your work isn't plagiarized, for knowing what your sources are, and for the quality, accuracy, and ethics of the writing you turn in, no matter what tools you used to produce it. This distinction is more important than ever in a world where large language models are readily accessible. We conflate linguistic polish with effort, or prose fluency with moral character. But as Adam Grant argued last year in The New York Times, we cannot grade effort; we can only grade outcome. This has always been true, but AI has made it undeniable. Instructors might believe they can tell when a student has put in "genuine effort," but those assumptions are often shaped by bias. Does a clean, structured paragraph indicate hard work? Or just access to better training, tutoring, or now, machine assistance? Does a clumsy but heartfelt draft reflect authenticity? Or limited exposure to academic writing? Our ability to detect effort has always been flawed. Now, it's virtually meaningless. That's why it doesn't matter if students use AI. What matters is whether they can demonstrate understanding, communicate effectively, and meet the goals of the assignment. If your grading depends on proving whether a sentence came from a chatbot or a person, then you don't know what the target learning outcome was in the first place. And if our assessments are built on presumed authorship, they're no longer evaluating learning. They're evaluating identity. There are already cracks in the AI-detection fantasy. Tools like GPTZero and Turnitin's AI checker routinely wrongly accuse multilingual students, disabled students, and those who write in non-standard dialects. In these systems, the less a student "sounds like a college student," the more likely they are to be accused of cheating. Meanwhile, many students, especially those who are first-generation, disabled, or from under-resourced schools, use AI tools to fill in gaps that the institution itself has failed to address. What looks like dishonesty is often an attempt to catch up. Insisting on originality as a condition of academic integrity also ignores how students actually write. The myth of the lone writer drafting in isolation has always been a fiction. Students draw from templates, search engines, notes from peers, and yes, now from generative AI. If we treat all of these as violations, we risk criminalizing the ordinary practices of learning. This requires a shift in mindset that embraces writing as a process rather than a product. It means designing assignments that can withstand AI involvement by asking students to revise, explain, synthesize, and critique. Whether a sentence was AI-generated matters far less than whether the student can engage with what it says, revise it, and place it in context. We should be teaching students how to write with AI, not how to hide from it. I'm not arguing for a free-for-all. I'm arguing for transparency, accountability, and educational clarity. In my courses, I don't treat AI use as taboo technology. I treat it as a new literacy. Students learn to engage critically with AI by revising in response to its suggestions, critiquing its assumptions, and making conscious choices about what to accept and what to reject. In other words, they take responsibility. We cannot force students to write "original" prose without any external help. But we can teach them to be responsible authors who understand the tools they use and the ideas they put into the world. That, to me, is a far more honest and useful version of academic integrity. Annie K. Lamar is an assistant professor of computational classics and, by courtesy, of linguistics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. She specializes in low-resource computational linguistics and machine learning. At UC Santa Barbara, she is the director of the Low-Resource Language (LOREL) Lab. Lamar holds a PhD in classics from Stanford University and an MA in education from the Stanford Graduate School of Education. Lamar is also a Public Voices fellow of The OpEd Project. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Cordoniq Winner of 2025 Globee Disruptor Awards for Enterprise AI Integration
Advanced multimodal AI integration for real-time business intelligence captures gold award SYRACUSE, N.Y., May 29, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cordoniq, the secure, vision AI-driven platform for business processes and collaborations, announced today it is a gold winner of the 5th Annual 2025 Globee Awards for Disruptors for Enterprise AI Integration. Cordoniq was recognized for its advanced multimodal AI integration for real-time business intelligence. The Globee Awards leveraged a data-driven evaluation process involving over 1,000 experienced professionals and industry leaders from across the globe. This rigorous and transparent approach ensures that only the most deserving nominations are recognized. "We are humbled to be awarded gold in the Enterprise AI Integration category," said Allen Drennan, Co-Founder and CTO of Cordoniq. "This affirms our leadership position empowering businesses to process and utilize data intelligence in real-time, enabling highly responsive decision-making." Cordoniq helps businesses go to market faster with AI-branded product deployment by offering real-time conduits for multimodal AI applications. Cordoniq provides the foundation to seamlessly incorporate advanced AI tools into their daily workflows, allowing businesses to automate, analyze, and optimize collaboration at scale: Our integrations are agnostic to a variety of AI models, such as OpenAI ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Meta Llama, Alibaba Cloud's Qwen and feed input data from a variety of sources — video, audio, images, text, documents, web content and more. It inputs efficiently and bi-directionally, for highly scalable and engaging Human-AI interaction, with low latency. With our multimodal AI integration, companies can easily expand the reach of products or services with speed to market, by providing a secure, AI-driven user experience with real-time data. We provide companies and departments such as government entities, training companies, risk and compliance departments and more the ability to integrate the vision AI model generative output back into the user experience, for interactive and real-time data intelligence. About Cordoniq Cordoniq is a secure, vision AI-driven platform that empowers organizations by integrating multimodal AI into business processes and collaborations. By leveraging real-time analytics and AI-generated outputs, Cordoniq delivers interactive, cohesive live experiences that enhance user engagement and data intelligence. Cordoniq provides pre-developed frameworks to accelerate time-to-market while ensuring nimble and powerful AI integration — from training, collaboration, governance, risk and compliance sessions — as well as many other use cases. For more information, please visit or join the conversation at LinkedIn, Facebook, and X. View source version on Contacts Media contact:Brenda ChristensenStellar PR818/ Sign in to access your portfolio
Newsweek
22-05-2025
- Newsweek
Illinois Limits Colleges' Use of ChatGPT
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Illinois lawmakers are seeking to limit the use of artificial intelligence at community colleges in the state. In a 46-12 vote, the Illinois Senate approved a bill that would bar community colleges from using artificial intelligence instead of human instructors to teach classes, the Capitol News Illinois reported on Thursday. Why It Matters The advent of artificial intelligence chatbots such as ChatGPT raised concerns at schools and colleges across the country about how easy it is for students to cheat. Some schools have forbidden the use of AI. But some colleges and professors have turned to AI to help teach classes. The New York Times recently reported that a student at Northeastern University demanded a refund on tuition fees after discovering her professor used ChatGPT to produce lecture notes for a class. Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot app icons are seen on a screen. Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot app icons are seen on a To Know House Bill 1859 amends the Public Community College Act so that "each board of trustees of a community college district shall require the faculty member who teaches a course to be an individual who meets the qualifications in the Illinois Administrative Code and any other applicable rules adopted by the Illinois Community College Board," according to a summary. It does not prohibit faculty members from "using artificial intelligent to augment course instruction," the summary says. But it prohibits colleges from using AI "as the sole source of instruction for students" in lieu of a faculty member. Some Republicans opposed the measure, arguing that it restricts the ability of local community college boards to offer courses in subjects where qualified human instructors are scarce, the Capitol News Illinois reported. State Senator Mike Porfirio, a Democrat and the bill's top sponsor in the Senate, said it was protecting the interests of students and human instructors. What People Are Saying State Senator Sue Rezin, a Republican, said, per the Capitol News Illinois: "I'm concerned that this bill will take local control away from the community college to be able to make decisions that are in the best interest of their students." State Senator Mike Porfirio said, according to the news site: "I think if anything we're guaranteeing that our students receive proper instruction and also that we acknowledge the role that instructors, faculty, staff play in students' lives." What's Next The bill returns to the Illinois House, which has to approve an amendment made in the state Senate before it can be sent to Governor JB Pritzker to be signed into law.
TECHx
29-04-2025
- Business
- TECHx
OpenAI ChatGPT Shopping Gets Smarter with New Update
Home » Latest news » OpenAI ChatGPT Shopping Gets Smarter with New Update OpenAI enhances ChatGPT Shopping with personalized product suggestions, reviews and direct links, offering a smarter and more seamless online shopping experience. This new feature makes it easier for users to find exactly what they want. It simplifies product discovery by offering tailored results based on user input. The change comes as OpenAI continues to grow its search capabilities. ChatGPT's browsing tool, introduced last year, is now one of its most used features. In the past week alone, it handled over 1 billion web searches. With this update, OpenAI is stepping further into the online search market. It presents a more user-focused option compared to traditional engines like Google. Unlike Google's ad-heavy results, ChatGPT delivers clean and relevant responses. OpenAI's growth has been rapid. In February, it surpassed 400 million weekly active users. This rise highlights strong user interest in AI-driven tools. Now, by making shopping easier through ChatGPT, OpenAI is aiming to reshape how people search and buy online. The OpenAI ChatGPT shopping update is part of a wider shift. AI tools are changing how users interact with the web, especially in areas like search and e-commerce. As the digital space evolves, OpenAI is betting on simplicity, speed, and relevance to win user attention.
