Illinois Limits Colleges' Use of ChatGPT
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Illinois lawmakers are seeking to limit the use of artificial intelligence at community colleges in the state.
In a 46-12 vote, the Illinois Senate approved a bill that would bar community colleges from using artificial intelligence instead of human instructors to teach classes, the Capitol News Illinois reported on Thursday.
Why It Matters
The advent of artificial intelligence chatbots such as ChatGPT raised concerns at schools and colleges across the country about how easy it is for students to cheat. Some schools have forbidden the use of AI.
But some colleges and professors have turned to AI to help teach classes. The New York Times recently reported that a student at Northeastern University demanded a refund on tuition fees after discovering her professor used ChatGPT to produce lecture notes for a class.
Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot app icons are seen on a screen.
Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot app icons are seen on a screen.What To Know
House Bill 1859 amends the Public Community College Act so that "each board of trustees of a community college district shall require the faculty member who teaches a course to be an individual who meets the qualifications in the Illinois Administrative Code and any other applicable rules adopted by the Illinois Community College Board," according to a summary.
It does not prohibit faculty members from "using artificial intelligent to augment course instruction," the summary says.
But it prohibits colleges from using AI "as the sole source of instruction for students" in lieu of a faculty member.
Some Republicans opposed the measure, arguing that it restricts the ability of local community college boards to offer courses in subjects where qualified human instructors are scarce, the Capitol News Illinois reported.
State Senator Mike Porfirio, a Democrat and the bill's top sponsor in the Senate, said it was protecting the interests of students and human instructors.
What People Are Saying
State Senator Sue Rezin, a Republican, said, per the Capitol News Illinois: "I'm concerned that this bill will take local control away from the community college to be able to make decisions that are in the best interest of their students."
State Senator Mike Porfirio said, according to the news site: "I think if anything we're guaranteeing that our students receive proper instruction and also that we acknowledge the role that instructors, faculty, staff play in students' lives."
What's Next
The bill returns to the Illinois House, which has to approve an amendment made in the state Senate before it can be sent to Governor JB Pritzker to be signed into law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business of Fashion
41 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Fashion Tech Boom 2.0
Listen to and follow 'The Debrief': Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Overcast Background: After years of disillusionment with fashion tech, investors are once again excited about its potential, but with a very different mindset to the hype-fuelled boom of the last decade. From AI-powered personal styling apps to virtual try-on tools and personalised search engines, a wave of start-ups is gaining traction – and big backing – by offering real technological solutions to long-standing fashion industry problems. In this episode, senior e-commerce correspondent Malique Morris joins The Debrief to explore how fashion tech is finally growing up, and which companies are leading this more grounded, results-driven wave of innovation. Key Insights: In the previous fashion tech boom, investors were heavily investing in e-commerce startups with little true innovation. 'DTC brands … positioned themselves as tech companies because they sold goods online, but there was nothing really revolutionary about them listing products on a website. And I don't know how investors didn't cop to that,' says Morris. Today's backers are more discerning, favouring startups with clear technical roadmaps and founders who can evolve their product in meaningful ways. Investor interest in fashion tech reignited thanks to the rise of generative AI. As Morris explains, venture capital had been sitting on the sidelines during a broader funding freeze, but AI's real-world applications reignited excitement. 'Startups like Daydream are building a platform for personalised search using AI tools from companies like OpenAI and Google, and they want to be the ChatGPT for fashion and be disruptive in the way that ChatGPT has changed how we use the internet,' says Morris. 'What was once a dream is now closer to being tangible and investors want to be the first ones in on that.' Today's investors are looking beyond flashy pitches and prioritising founders with real technical know-how. 'Something that is really separating the people who are just trying to raise money and not breaking through from those who are, are having some sort of technical experience, technical expertise,' says Morris. With the complexity of AI and other advanced tools, investors want to back teams that can build efficiently and with minimal lift. 'They want to back founders who know what they're doing,' he adds. While new fashion tech apps offer highly personalised experiences, their complexity may limit mainstream appeal. The question of scale is still unanswered: 'There may be a billion people out there who want to do that… There may only be a million. We don't know that just yet.' Additional Resources:
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Trump Floats Sending Elon Musk Back to South Africa, Would He Be Welcome?
Donald Trump has made several comments about the possibility of sending Elon Musk back to his native country amid their reignited feud over the president's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, but would he be welcome? Musk, the world's richest man, was born in South Africa but has previously said he "considers himself to be an American" and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2002. Last year, he became one of the most prominent supporters of Trump's presidential campaign, spending at least $250 million to support his bid, and ended up being made the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But the pair have since had a dramatic and public fallout – namely over Musk's criticism of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a major tax and spending package that passed the Senate with Vice President JD Vance's tiebreaking vote. It now heads back to the House. This week, Trump has said Musk would have to "close up shop and head back home to South Africa" if he halted government subsidies to his companies, and then later added that his administration would "have to take a look" at deporting Musk. The billionaire has a fractured relationship with his birth country's government, over longstanding issues with their race relations laws and the recent political firestorm over America accepting groups of Afrikaans people as refugees. Newsweek has broken down how likely Musk returning to South Africa might be and spoken to South Africans about whether he would be welcome back. But first, a recap on what exactly Trump has said and how Musk has responded. On Monday, Trump criticized Musk over the subsidies his companies have received on Truth Social, saying: "Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate. It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign. Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one. "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," Trump continued. "No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!" Musk responded to this on X, when he replied to Dalton Brewer, a Tesla owner in Minnesota, in the post, saying: "Just plain wrong. So disappointing." On Tuesday, while Trump was speaking to reporters outside the White House, a reporter asked if he was "going to deport Elon Musk." Trump answered: "I don't know, we'll have to take a look. We might have to put DOGE on is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon, wouldn't that be terrible?" "South Africa is a divided society so not everyone feels the same way about Elon Musk," said politics professor Sally Matthews, who specializes in African Politics at Rhodes University in South Africa. "But in general, he is not popular here," she told Newsweek. Indeed, when 50,000 South Africans were polled by PoliticsVideoChannel, between September 2024 and January 14 this year, they said Musk was the worst thing to come out of South Africa, ahead of apartheid, corruption and inequality. South Africa's Department of International Relations and Cooperation declined to comment when Newsweek asked whether Musk would be welcome back. Mayibuye Melisizwe Mandela, a member of the growing opposition party the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), told Newsweek: "This is South Africa and we no longer accept racists or people who see themselves as superior to others because of the pigmentation of their skin. That era is over. We don't care how rich you are. As long as you are racist, you are not welcome here." Mandela, the great-grandson of Nelson Mandela, previously spoke out against Trump, Musk and the Afrikaans refugee system to Newsweek. Ernst van Zyl, spokesperson for the Afrikaans civil rights group Afriforum, said: "Musk's proven skills and innovation capacity are very needed in South Africa." "However, he would certainly clash with the South African government over their strict racially discriminatory policies," he told Newsweek, "threats to private property rights like the Expropriation Act, and failure to take action against violent chants like 'Kill the Boer.'" Katia Beeden, a campaigner for "persecuted minority South Africans," and the former spokesperson for Amerikaners, a group that supports "disenfranchised South Africans seeking a new future in the United States," said: "I 100 percent believe that Elon Musk's rhetoric resonates with the majority of white South Africans living here." "Elon Musk was born here, his father still lives here," she told Newsweek. "So he has deep ties to the country. "Many of us in South Africa feel overlooked and ignored and we've been suffering in silence for years and we've been too scared to keep speak up because if we do speak up we're just called racists," she added. Matthews said that she believes it is "extremely unlikely" that Musk would be deported and doubted that Musk would even choose to return to South Africa in that instance. She pointed to a landmark ruling in May this year, when South Africa's Constitutional Court ruled that it is unlawful to strip South Africans of their citizenship just because they have acquired citizenship in a new country. "So, it is likely that Musk could return here if he wanted to, but I doubt he will," Matthews said. Newsweek has contacted the White House, Tesla and SpaceX via email for comment. Related Articles Elon Musk Eases Feud With Trump: 'Credit Where Credit Is Due'Elon Musk Responds to Trump's 'Back Home to South Africa' CommentsWhat Elon Musk's America Party Could Look LikeTrump Says Work Begun on Reopening Original Alcatraz After 'Alligator Alcatraz' Visit 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Chinese tech firms gaining fast on Silicon Valley in AI race: report
China is fast encroaching on the US' lead in the artificial intelligence race – raising concerns that Beijing could use the tech for strategic military advancements and the spread of disinformation, according to a report. Multinational banks, public universities and tech firms across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia have started to pivot to language learning models from Chinese firms like DeepSeek, according to a Wall Street Journal report. DeepSeek's bot triggered a massive stock sell-off in the US earlier this year amid claims that it took less time and a fraction of the cost to develop compared to American counterparts. Advertisement 4 Chinese firms are quickly encroaching on America's lead in the AI race, according to a report. AP Global banking giants HSBC and Standard Chartered have launched internal testing of the Chinese model, while Saudi Aramco, the world's largest oil company, recently installed the bot in its main data center, according to the Journal. American tech giants like Amazon Web Services, Microsoft and Google offer DeepSeek to customers – even as the Trump administration has banned the use of the Chinese model on government devices. OpenAI's ChatGPT is still the world's most popular AI chatbot, with 910 million downloads worldwide compared to DeepSeek's 125 million, according to researcher Sensor Tower. Advertisement But Chinese bots are winning over users with much lower prices. And while US firms tend to focus on headline-worthy breakthroughs, China's models are more consumer-friendly, according to the Journal. 'The No. 1 factor that will define whether the U.S. or China wins this race is whose technology is most broadly adopted in the rest of the world,' Microsoft President Brad Smith said during a Senate hearing last month. 'Whoever gets there first will be difficult to supplant,' Smith warned. Advertisement 4 OpenAI's ChatGPT is the world's most popular AI chatbot. REUTERS China is already exploring how it could exploit advances in AI for strategic military advances, according to papers published in military journals. If Beijing wins over the majority of users, its bots would serve as a powerful megaphone to cast out information reflecting its own view of the world. And, if China at some point stops cooperating with the US on safety and security measures, its unrestricted artificial intelligence could lead to unprecedented military and societal threats. Advertisement Chinese firms have already succeeded despite several hurdles, including a harsh clampdown on US chip exports. 4 OpenAI CEO Sam Altman speaks during a summit in June. Getty Images Those trade roadblocks could also hurt American tech giants like Google, Meta and Nvidia, the latter of which is estimated to lose out on $10 billion in revenue without sales of its H20 AI chip to Beijing, according to researcher Jefferies. It's a substantial change from just a few years back, when US investors in 2018 covered about 30% of $21.9 billion in funding for the Chinese AI sector, according to PitchBook. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! OpenAI has been focused on expanding its AI reach across Europe and Asia in order to preserve some industry dominance. 'We want to make sure democratic AI wins over authoritarian AI,' OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in May. China's lower price tags could pressure US rivals like OpenAI and Anthropic to justify their own prices. Advertisement 4 The Trump administration has slapped new export controls on AI chips. AP 'DeepSeek is overall the same quality but 17 times cheaper,' Oleg Zankov, co-founder of Latenode, which helps clients build custom AI tools, told the Journal. Many Chinese bots are also released as open-source models, meaning tweaks can be made, which has made them even more competitive. Advertisement Developers have created more than 100,000 derivative models based on Alibaba's flagship open-source model, according to Alibaba. And clients concerned about data security might also prefer open-source models that can be taken offline.
