Latest news with #Pataudi
Time of India
2 days ago
- Entertainment
- Time of India
Before becoming his Begum, Sharmila Tagore had ONE condition for the Nawab of Pataudi, Mansoor Ali Khan
Sharmila Tagore and Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi had a unique love story. Their romance began at a party. Pataudi proposed, but Tagore set a condition. She asked him to hit three sixes in a row. He did it and she agreed to marry him. Their interfaith marriage faced challenges. Both families had strong traditions. Before she became the Begum of Pataudi, Sharmila Tagore added a touch of drama to her real-life love story—one that could rival any Bollywood script. At the peak of her stardom in the 1960s, her romance with India's cricketing heartthrob Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi was already making headlines. But what many don't know is that before agreeing to marry the Nawab, Sharmila set a lighthearted yet bold condition—one that involved cricket, of course. What followed was a charming blend of romance, sportsmanship, and tradition-defying love. A match made at an after-match party According to reports, Sharmila and Mansoor dated for quite some time before deciding to tie the knot. The two reportedly met through mutual friends at an after-match party in Delhi, which Sharmila attended after watching a game—despite not knowing much about cricket back then. Interestingly, Tiger Pataudi, too, hadn't seen many of her films. The proposal with a twist As their romance blossomed, Pataudi eventually proposed. But Sharmila added a playful twist: she would only say yes if he hit three consecutive sixes in his next match. Amused by the condition, he laughed it off—but rose to the challenge and delivered exactly that on the field. True to her word, Sharmila said yes, and the two went on to have a grand wedding, marking the beginning of one of India's most iconic love stories. The veteran actress also reflected on the challenges she faced ahead of her marriage to Pataudi. Being an interfaith couple in the 1960s came with its share of scrutiny. She noted that both her family and Pataudi's came from strong cultural traditions—while her relatives had all married within the Bengali community, his family had followed the norms of their own circle. Keeping It simple despite the buzz Sharmila revealed that they simply informed their families of their decision to marry, without anticipating the deeper concerns it might stir. At the time, she was immersed in her film career, and Pataudi was busy with cricket, so they remained largely unaware of the tensions happening behind the scenes.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
08-07-2025
- Entertainment
- First Post
Saif Ali Khan's Rs 15000 crore property case: How the controversy began and why it may reignite old tensions in Nawab's family
The district court is now going to examine every detail of the case. Nobody from the Pataudi family has commented on the matter yet read more In a massive setback for Bollywood actor Saif Ali Khan, the actor recently lost out on properties belonging to the Pataudi family worth Rs 15000 crore as the Madhya Pradesh High Court declared them as 'Enemy Property.' They overturned a 1999 verdict favouring his great-grandmother, Sajida Sultan. As per India's Enemy Property Act, such assets are those left by individuals who migrated to Pakistan post-Partition (1947) or became citizens there—here, due to Sajida's brother moving to Pakistan. The government can now manage or seize them. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How did it all begin? We have to talk about Nawab Hamidullah Khan, the last ruling Nawab of Bhopal. He had three daughters: Abida Sultan, Sajida Sultan (the great grandmother of Saif Ali Khan, and Rabia Sultan. Under the Bhopal Succession to the Throne Act of 1947, his eldest daughter, Abida, was supposed to inherit his fortunes. But in 1950, Abida moved to Pakistan—ten years before her father passed away. That implied her inheritance could be seized under the Enemy Property Act. And Sajida Sultan was declared the legal successor. It is said (but not confirmed) that her marriage with Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi and his close ties to then-Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru helped secure her claim to the estate. What next in this controversy? The district court is now going to examine every detail of the case. Nobody from the Pataudi family has commented on the matter yet. Will this ruling create a sense of animosity or anger in the family? It also throws light on the legal system in the new and Independent India. What netizens are saying Oh so this property doesn't belong to him anymore? Any udea about that Delhi Pataudi house? Called for a complete retrial is the sessions of fight start again from the beginning? I think with this judgement it will affect the delhi case too unless it belongs to saif lineage. Here the bhopal properties were from inception where saif grandfather had three daughters where one of them shifted to Pakistan so government claimed these. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Yes he won't get any part of all these properties and it will all become government/india's property. Saif's grand aunt chose to move to Pakistan with her husband during partition so her share becomes enemy property. Are these Bhopal properties the only ancestral properties he had? I mean, does he not have any other ones that he can claim?
Time of India
07-07-2025
- Health
- Time of India
Kanpur zoo to reopen today
1 2 Kanpur: The zoo is set to resume operations from Tuesday, enabling visitors to view the animals. This reopening comes after receiving approval from the chief wildlife warden, following confirmation that all animals are infection-free. The zoo had to be closed when Pataudi, a lion brought from the Gorakhpur zoo for medical treatment, tested positive for bird flu at IVRI Bareilly, after which the zoo was shut down and classified as a red zone on May 13. The situation worsened with the deaths of a peacock and a Brahminy duck, with the peacock confirmed to have bird flu. After that, the Central Zoo Authority sent experts to evaluate the conditions who obtained samples of some other animals and sent them to the National Institute of High Security Animal Diseases in Bhopal. The results showed no presence of bird flu in the animals. Following standard procedures, further testing was conducted at both the National Institute of High Security Animal Diseases and IVRI Bareilly in several stages, all yielding negative results. Zoo director Kanhaiya Patel informed that the final test samples dispatched to the National Institute of High Security Animal Diseases on June 17 also confirmed the absence of infection, leading the authorities to authorise reopening of the zoo from Tuesday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cardiologists Recommend: Eat 1 Teaspoon Tonight – Wake Up With a Flatter Stomach Hollywood News | USA Click Here Undo Meanwhile, the zoo's safety protocols and procedures have been successfully implemented. All necessary sanitisation measures are in place, and strict hygiene standards will be maintained throughout the premises. Visitors must follow specific guidelines, including wearing masks and maintaining appropriate distance from animal enclosures. The zoo staff thoroughly cleaned and disinfected all areas, particularly the bird and feline sections. Enhanced monitoring systems have been established to quickly identify any potential health concerns among the animals. Regular health checks will continue to ensure the well-being of all zoo inhabitants. The zoo management expressed gratitude to various government agencies and health authorities for their support during the closure period. They also thanked the public for their patience and understanding during this challenging time.
Time of India
07-07-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Saif Ali Khan loses legal ground —What's next for the royal inheritance fight? Details inside
In a big setback for and his family, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has overturned a decades-old order that once secured their claim over the royal properties of Bhopal. For years, Saif, along with his mother and sisters Soha and Saba, were legally recognized as rightful heirs to these sprawling ancestral estates. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now But that status has now been thrown into uncertainty. The family has long laid claim to an impressive collection of properties passed down from the Nawab of Bhopal. These include some of the city's most valuable landmarks, like the Noor-Us-Sabah Palace Hotel, Saif's childhood home Flag Staff House, and thousands of acres of surrounding land. For nearly 25 years, a trial court ruling had upheld their ownership. But with this new decision, everything is back on the table. What exactly has the High Court decided? According to News18, the High Court's ruling has erased the earlier judgment that validated the Pataudi family's ownership. Justice Sanjay Dwivedi has sent the case back to the trial court, instructing it to review all the claims again and finish the proceedings within a year. Until a new verdict comes out, Saif and his family can't officially call these properties their own. This dispute isn't just about rival family claims. It also involves the Enemy Property Act of 1968, which allows the government to seize property belonging to those who migrated to Pakistan after Partition. In 2015, the Enemy Property Department began questioning whether the Pataudi family ever had the right to inherit what some officials argue should have been classified as 'enemy property.' Saif has been fighting that investigation ever since. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now What is the root of the dispute? To understand the controversy, you have to go back to Nawab Hamidullah Khan, the last ruling Nawab of Bhopal. He had three daughters: Abida Sultan, Sajida Sultan, and Rabia Sultan. Under the Bhopal Succession to the Throne Act of 1947, his eldest daughter, Abida, was supposed to inherit everything. But in 1950, Abida moved to Pakistan—ten years before her father passed away. That move technically meant her inheritance could be seized under the Enemy Property Act. Even so, Sajida Sultan—Saif's grandmother—was declared the legal successor. Many believe her marriage to Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi and his close ties to then-Prime Minister helped secure her claim to the estate. What happens next? With the High Court wiping the legal slate clean, the district court will now re-examine every detail of the case. The ruling has reignited old tensions within the Nawab's family and cast fresh scrutiny on how politics shaped royal succession in newly independent India. Until the court reaches a new decision, the Pataudi family's hold over the Bhopal estate remains in legal limbo.
News18
07-07-2025
- Entertainment
- News18
Saif Ali Khan's Royal Property Claim Worth Rs 15000 Crore In Jeopardy: 5 Key Questions Answered
Last Updated: The decision has reignited a complex legal battle rooted in princely succession laws, post-Partition migration, and the controversial Enemy Property Act. Bollywood actor Saif Ali Khan's claim to a sprawling ₹15,000 crore ancestral estate in Bhopal has hit a major legal roadblock. The Madhya Pradesh High Court has quashed a decades-old ruling that had earlier validated the Pataudi family's ownership of the royal properties inherited from the Nawab of Bhopal. The decision has reignited a complex legal battle rooted in princely succession laws, post-Partition migration, and the controversial Enemy Property Act. Here's what the case is about, and what the latest developments — five key questions answered: Bollywood actor Saif Ali Khan, along with his mother and two sisters, has been staking claim to a sprawling set of ancestral properties inherited from the erstwhile Nawab of Bhopal. These include high-value assets such as Noor-Us-Sabah Palace Hotel, Flag Staff House, and thousands of acres in and around Bhopal. The legitimacy of this claim, upheld by a trial court nearly 25 years ago, has now been thrown into question. What Has the Madhya Pradesh High Court Ruled? In a significant blow to the Pataudi family, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has overturned the 25-year-old order that validated their ownership of the Bhopal royal estate. Justice Sanjay Dwivedi has directed that the case be heard afresh by the trial court, with a mandate to resolve the matter within a year. Until then, Saif and his family cannot claim legal ownership of the properties. The challenge stems from both legal heirs of the Nawab's family and the Enemy Property Act, 1968. The latter empowers the government to seize properties of individuals who migrated to Pakistan after Partition. In 2015, the Enemy Property Department initiated an inquiry into how the Pataudi family was allowed to inherit what some allege should have been classified as 'enemy property." Saif Ali Khan had contested this probe. Who Were the Original Heirs and Why Is There a Dispute? The dispute traces back to Nawab Hamidullah Khan, the last ruling Nawab of Bhopal, who had three daughters—Abida Sultan, Sajida Sultan, and Rabia Sultan. As per the Bhopal Succession to the Throne Act, 1947, the eldest child was the rightful heir. But Abida Sultan migrated to Pakistan in 1950, ten years before the Nawab's death. Technically, that made the property liable for seizure under the Enemy Property Act. However, Sajida Sultan—Saif's grandmother—was declared the legal successor, reportedly due to her marriage to Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi and his close ties with then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. What Happens Next? With the High Court order wiping the legal slate clean, a district court will now re-examine the ownership claims in detail. The case reopens the long-standing rift within the Nawab family and brings fresh scrutiny to the political influence that shaped the royal succession in post-Independence India. Until a new verdict is reached, the Pataudi family's claim to the Bhopal estate remains legally unrecognized. First Published: July 07, 2025, 09:25 IST
