Latest news with #TechEnthusiasts
Geeky Gadgets
2 days ago
- Geeky Gadgets
AirPods Pro 3 Leaks REVEALED: New Price and More
The AirPods Pro 3 are set to bring a new level of innovation to the wireless earbuds market, combining advanced technology with practical enhancements. Designed to cater to both loyal Apple users and newcomers, these earbuds promise to deliver a superior audio experience. With a projected starting price of $280, the AirPods Pro 3 aim to justify their premium cost through a host of meaningful upgrades. Expected to launch in the coming months, they are poised to become a standout addition to Apple's product lineup. The video below from Matt Talks Tech gives us more details on the new AirPods Pro 3. Watch this video on YouTube. What's New in the AirPods Pro 3? Apple has introduced a range of significant improvements to the AirPods Pro 3, focusing on both functionality and user experience. These enhancements are designed to appeal to a wide audience, from casual listeners to tech enthusiasts. Key upgrades include: Revamped Design: The AirPods Pro 3 feature the first major design overhaul since the series debuted in 2019. While retaining the iconic in-ear form factor, the updated design emphasizes modern aesthetics and improved ergonomics. This refresh not only enhances comfort but also ensures a secure fit, making them ideal for extended use. The AirPods Pro 3 feature the first major design overhaul since the series debuted in 2019. While retaining the iconic in-ear form factor, the updated design emphasizes modern aesthetics and improved ergonomics. This refresh not only enhances comfort but also ensures a secure fit, making them ideal for extended use. H3 Chip for Superior Performance: At the heart of the AirPods Pro 3 lies the new H3 chip, which delivers enhanced processing power. This upgrade significantly improves active noise cancellation , creating a quieter and more immersive listening environment. Additionally, the H3 chip boosts sound quality, battery efficiency, and overall performance. At the heart of the AirPods Pro 3 lies the new H3 chip, which delivers enhanced processing power. This upgrade significantly improves , creating a quieter and more immersive listening environment. Additionally, the H3 chip boosts sound quality, battery efficiency, and overall performance. Bluetooth 5.4 Integration: The inclusion of Bluetooth 5.4 technology ensures faster and more reliable connectivity. This upgrade reduces latency, enhances audio streaming quality, and extends the connection range, making it easier to switch between devices or enjoy uninterrupted calls and music playback. The inclusion of Bluetooth 5.4 technology ensures faster and more reliable connectivity. This upgrade reduces latency, enhances audio streaming quality, and extends the connection range, making it easier to switch between devices or enjoy uninterrupted calls and music playback. Health Monitoring Features: Apple is expanding the functionality of the AirPods Pro 3 by incorporating health-focused sensors. These include heart rate monitoring and potential temperature tracking, transforming the earbuds into a versatile tool for tracking your well-being alongside delivering premium audio. Apple is expanding the functionality of the AirPods Pro 3 by incorporating health-focused sensors. These include heart rate monitoring and potential temperature tracking, transforming the earbuds into a versatile tool for tracking your well-being alongside delivering premium audio. Ultra-Wideband (UWB) U2 Chip: The addition of the UWB U2 chip enhances the precision of Apple's Find My feature. This technology allows users to locate misplaced earbuds with greater accuracy, reducing the frustration of lost devices and adding a layer of convenience to daily life. Release Date and Pricing Details The AirPods Pro 3 are widely expected to debut during Apple's annual September event, likely alongside the iPhone 17. If this timeline holds, the earbuds could be available for purchase by mid-September 2025. However, potential delays in production or supply chain disruptions could push the release to October or early November. Pricing for the AirPods Pro 3 is anticipated to start at $280 when purchased directly from Apple. While this price reflects the premium nature of the product, third-party retailers may offer discounts shortly after launch, providing opportunities for budget-conscious buyers to save. Why These Upgrades Are Significant The AirPods Pro 3 represent a calculated effort by Apple to maintain its dominance in the competitive wireless earbuds market. With sales of the AirPods Pro 2 showing signs of slowing, these upgrades are designed to reinvigorate interest and attract a broader audience. The combination of a redesigned form, advanced processing capabilities, improved connectivity, and health monitoring features positions the AirPods Pro 3 as a versatile and forward-thinking product. These enhancements are not just incremental; they address key user demands and industry trends. For instance, the integration of health monitoring features aligns with the growing interest in wearable health technology, while the improved noise cancellation and connectivity cater to users seeking a seamless and immersive audio experience. What to Expect Moving Forward The AirPods Pro 3 are set to redefine the standard for wireless earbuds, offering a blend of innovative technology and user-centric design. Whether you're drawn to the enhanced noise cancellation, the health monitoring capabilities, or the sleek new look, these earbuds are designed to meet a wide range of needs. As Apple continues to innovate, the AirPods Pro 3 stand as a testament to the company's commitment to delivering high-quality, versatile products. Stay tuned for Apple's official announcements in the coming months. With their anticipated release just around the corner, the AirPods Pro 3 are shaping up to be a must-have accessory for anyone seeking the next evolution in personal audio technology. Below are more guides on the AirPods Pro release date from our extensive range of articles. Source & Image Credit: Matt Talks Tech Filed Under: Apple, Gadgets News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Times
5 days ago
- Business
- Times
Universal basic income is not the answer if AI comes for your job
As artificial intelligence upends the world of work, brace for renewed advocacy of a universal basic income (UBI). Tech enthusiasts, certain AI will turbocharge productivity but at the cost of millions of jobs, see UBI as a necessary monetary cushion for technological unemployment. And their cause attracts strange bedfellows. Social democrats salivate at the prospect of having more stigma-free redistribution; libertarians hope UBI might supplant employment regulation and the means-tested welfare state. Yet UBI's most fervent supporters foresee much broader benefits. To many, UBI isn't just a palliative for creative destruction or even a welfare reform. No, its proponents claim a modest government-guaranteed income is the key to unlocking a freer, healthier, more entrepreneurial society. If only it were that simple. Interest from the tech world has enabled expensive randomised controlled trials of UBI-inspired policies in the US. The results are largely disappointing. • Germans happier — but not lazier — with extra €1,200 a month In the OpenResearch Unconditional Income Study, 1,000 low-income participants across Texas and Illinois were given $1,000 a month, no strings attached, for three years. A control group of 2,000 received $50. One working paper released this week confirms the findings of another last year: the policy was no silver bullet for most economic and social problems. Advocates hoped extra income for families would mean more attentive parenting, greater investment in children's education and reduced family stress. And yes, parents receiving more money reported smacking their kids less and spending $32 more on them each month, including for clothes and essentials. Yet this didn't translate into educational gains or improved behavioural outcomes. In fact, parents reported a jump in issues such as child hyperactivity and fights between children. The researchers speculate that the extra cash freed parents to monitor children more closely, so noticing these problems. But might more intense supervision — edging towards helicopter parenting — itself worsen these outcomes? Nor did parents themselves get lasting relief. Sure, there was a brief improvement in their mental health in year one, but this faded quickly. By year two, anxiety and stress were back where they started. Free cash might calm nerves temporarily, but it didn't buy lasting peace of mind. A paper last year on the same experiment poured cold water on the idea that a guaranteed income would free people to invest in their productive future, too. Recipients, on average, banked the extra cash and enjoyed more leisure time, reducing their earned income. Yet there was little evidence that they used those extra hours to find better job matches, invest in education, or start (rather than just thinking about starting) a business. Instead, passive dependency grew. Even health outcomes showed scant improvement, with self-reported disability rising somewhat. Predictably, UBI's most die-hard supporters have questioned these disappointing results. Is it really a test of 'universal' income if the cash isn't given to everyone, permanently, but targeted temporarily at a young group volunteering to trial? But their quibbles cut both ways. The main reason governments reject UBI out-of-hand is that it is prohibitively expensive. With 69.6 million people, giving everyone in the UK £1,000 monthly would cost £835 billion a year — almost four times the NHS budget. • Britain is broke: how inflation-linked debt costs us £60bn Trials like this, conveniently, never test the higher taxes required to redistribute such sums. And being targeted at those on low incomes to begin with, one suspects this trial's results are, if anything, biased towards overestimating any benefits of the policy. Surely the uncomfortable truth is that most economic and social problems are too complex to solve by handing out cash. Children's development, adult mental wellbeing, and accessing fulfilling work require robust institutions, skills, and countless other factors that money can't buy. Yes, cash definitely helps ease poverty, and this trial confirms that beneficiaries were able to spend and save more. Yet as UBI enthusiasm resurfaces, the results suggest that seeing taxpayer-funded cash handouts as the path to widespread happiness and self-actualisation isn't visionary; it's delusional. Ryan Bourne is an economist at the Cato Institute and editor of the book The War on Prices
Geeky Gadgets
5 days ago
- Geeky Gadgets
The Samsung Galaxy G Fold is Coming: Latest Leaks Spill Key Details
Samsung is preparing to reshape the foldable smartphone market with its highly anticipated trifold device, tentatively named the Galaxy G Fold. Expected to debut by late 2025, this innovative product is set to push the boundaries of mobile technology. However, its premium pricing and limited availability suggest it will cater to a niche audience, focusing on early adopters and tech enthusiasts rather than the mass market. Watch this video on YouTube. The Branding Evolution: Galaxy G Fold The naming of Samsung's trifold device has been a topic of considerable speculation. Initial rumors suggested the name Galaxy G Fold, inspired by Samsung's Flex G prototype showcased in earlier concept designs. However, recent trademark filings indicate the name Galaxy Z Trifold, aligning it with the established Galaxy Z series. This branding decision reinforces the device's identity within Samsung's foldable lineup, making sure consistency and recognition in a competitive market. By maintaining the 'Z' designation, Samsung emphasizes the device's connection to its existing foldable portfolio, which includes the Galaxy Z Fold and Galaxy Z Flip models. This strategic branding not only highlights the device's innovative nature but also strengthens Samsung's position as a leader in foldable technology. The Galaxy G Fold name signals a continuation of the company's commitment to redefining mobile experiences through innovative design and engineering. Innovative Design and Advanced Features The Galaxy G Fold is poised to introduce a innovative design that seamlessly combines portability with functionality. When fully unfolded, the device transforms into a 10-inch tablet, offering an expansive display ideal for productivity, gaming, and multimedia consumption. Folded, it features a compact 6.49-inch cover display, perfect for everyday tasks such as messaging, browsing, and quick interactions. At the heart of this device lies Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 Elite chipset, a next-generation processor designed to deliver exceptional performance. This powerful hardware ensures smooth multitasking, efficient resource management, and support for demanding applications. Samsung's expertise in flexible display technology is also expected to shine, with the use of advanced materials that enhance durability and provide a seamless folding experience. This builds on the company's achievements with previous Galaxy Z Fold and Flip models, setting a new benchmark for foldable devices. Additional features may include a robust hinge mechanism designed to withstand repeated folding, advanced multitasking capabilities optimized for the trifold design, and enhanced software integration to maximize the usability of the device's unique form factor. These innovations aim to provide users with a versatile and premium mobile experience. Launch Strategy and Market Positioning Samsung plans to launch the Galaxy G Fold in late 2025, starting with select markets such as South Korea and China. This phased rollout reflects the device's positioning as a premium product, designed to showcase Samsung's technological leadership rather than achieve widespread market penetration. By targeting specific regions initially, Samsung can gauge consumer interest and refine its approach before expanding availability. The exclusivity of the Galaxy G Fold is further underscored by its anticipated high price point. This aligns with Samsung's strategy of appealing to a select audience of early adopters and tech enthusiasts who prioritize innovation and exclusivity over affordability. While this approach may limit the device's reach, it highlights Samsung's focus on pushing the boundaries of mobile technology and solidifying its reputation as a pioneer in the foldable segment. Competing in a Specialized Market The foldable smartphone market remains a niche segment, with only a few manufacturers making significant strides. Huawei's Mate X series has set a high standard, offering formidable competition with its innovative designs and features. Other brands, such as Tecno, have introduced concept devices but have yet to achieve substantial commercial success. Samsung aims to differentiate the Galaxy G Fold through superior design, advanced functionality, and innovative hardware. By integrating a unique folding mechanism, a powerful chipset, and a versatile display, the device could establish a new benchmark for foldable smartphones. However, its success will depend on its ability to resonate with its target audience, particularly in a market where innovation often comes at a premium. The Galaxy G Fold's ability to stand out will also hinge on Samsung's ability to address practical concerns such as durability, battery life, and software optimization. These factors are critical in making sure that the device not only impresses with its design but also delivers a reliable and seamless user experience. Balancing Innovation with Accessibility For consumers, the Galaxy G Fold represents a blend of luxury and technological advancement. Its unique form factor and innovative features make it an attractive option for those seeking the latest in mobile innovation. However, its premium pricing and limited availability may pose challenges for widespread adoption, particularly among mainstream consumers. Samsung's strategy positions the Galaxy G Fold as a statement device, catering to a select group of users who value exclusivity and innovation. This approach mirrors broader trends in the luxury tech market, where products are often designed to showcase technological leadership rather than achieve mass-market appeal. By focusing on a niche audience, Samsung can maintain its reputation as a leader in foldable technology while continuing to refine its offerings for future iterations. As the foldable smartphone market evolves, the Galaxy G Fold could serve as a fantastic option for further advancements. Its innovative design and advanced features may inspire competitors to push the boundaries of what is possible, driving the industry forward and shaping the future of mobile technology. Expand your understanding of Samsung Galaxy G Fold with additional resources from our extensive library of articles. Source & Image Credit: Demon's Tech Filed Under: Android News, Mobile Phone News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Phone Arena
18-07-2025
- Phone Arena
This phone could've been the bold new flagship we needed
Nothing's third-generation phone doubles down on its visual identity with even more customizable LEDs, a distinct UI design, and a refined aesthetic that's unlike anything else in the Android space. It's easy to admire the ambition, and as someone who's craving something different, a break from the mold, I respect it. The Nothing Phone (3) wants to feel special, expressive, and fun in a sea of polished rectangles. But once you get past the unique presentation, it becomes clear that being different doesn't always mean being better, even more so when you're charging $800. We've tested the Phone (3) in-depth, comparing it to the best alternatives at its price, and the results aren't flattering. Whether it's the performance, camera quality, video capabilities, or even display brightness, Nothing's latest effort consistently lands behind the competition, sometimes by a significant margin. That makes it hard to recommend, no matter how much I'd like to root for the underdog. The two color options of the Phone (3). | Image credit — Nothing Let's start with the good. The design of the Nothing Phone (3) is undeniably striking, particularly for tech enthusiasts like us. The transparent back, enhanced Glyph lighting, and symmetrical borders still turn heads, and build quality remains top-notch. I dig it, as it reminds me of something from Star Wars. This phone was made to be seen and felt, not just also commendable that Nothing doesn't overload the phone with bloatware or visual clutter — the clean software skin and thoughtful haptics help it feel more premium than most mid-rangers. However, this attention to design doesn't change the fact that it's entering a segment ($800 and above) full of excellent phones that don't compromise on essentials, such as the Pixel 9, Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, and the iPhone 16. And that's where the Nothing Phone (3) stumbles, hard. The Phone (3)'s screen looks good indoors, but outdoor brightness is well behind the competition. | Image credit — PhoneArena Despite its sleek look, the Phone (3)'s display doesn't impress when it comes to real-world performance. It's a 6.7-inch OLED panel with good resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate — all specs that sound great on paper. But in our lab tests, it had the lowest brightness levels at 20% APL (just 1501 nits) among its peers, meaning visibility outdoors suffers compared to rivals like the Pixel 9 or Galaxy S25 , both of which push brightness well over 2000 nits. At the other end of the scale, its minimum brightness was the highest (2 nits), making it less comfortable to use in bed or dim lighting. A surprising saving grace was the color accuracy, which turned out to be the best compared to the competition. That said, this is something that can vary drastically between units, so it is definitely not a guarantee that all other Nothing Phone (3) devices will show such results. The chip performance presents a similar mixed-bag type of situation. With a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chip inside, the Phone (3) is finally using a flagship silicon — the first phone to use this chip. It easily beats the Pixel 9 's Tensor G4 and even Apple's A18 in some cases, but it is still nowhere close to the Snapdragon 8 Elite powering phones like the Galaxy S25 and OnePlus 13 . Our performance score confirmed the gap. The Phone (3) scored 7.6 in light tasks and 7.2 in heavy tasks. For comparison, the OnePlus 13 hits 9.0 in heavy workloads — a massive difference in responsiveness when gaming, multitasking, or using demanding apps. Despite stacked specs, the Phone (3) struggles with oversharpening, noise, and uneven image quality. | Image credit — PhoneArena On paper, the Nothing Phone (3) is stacked: it boasts a 50 MP main camera with a large 1/1.3" sensor and OIS, a 50 MP periscope telephoto lens with 3X optical zoom, and a 50 MP ultrawide shooter with a 114˚ field of view. Even the selfie camera is a high-res 50 MP sensor. It's one of the most spec-heavy camera arrays you'll find at this price — but unfortunately, the real-world results don't match the all cameras, we noticed aggressive oversharpening that made images look unnaturally crisp, especially in skin tones and textures. While the main camera is capable of sharp images thanks to its large sensor, the processing often strips them of depth and realism. The ultrawide shots showed decent consistency in color but lacked fine detail. The periscope zoom lens is a nice surprise in this segment, but results were hit-or-miss — with good sharpness at 3X, but poor dynamic range and visible noise in lower clear the hardware is there, but Nothing's tuning holds it back. In a side-by-side comparison, the Pixel 9a consistently produced more balanced, natural-looking photos with better dynamic range and color handling. The OnePlus 13R, despite fewer lenses, delivered more reliable results in both photo and video. And let's not even start comparing it to the Galaxy S25 or iPhone 16 . Big battery, underwhelming results. | Image credit — PhoneArena Battery life should have been one of the few areas where the Nothing Phone (3) holds its own, given it's massive 5150 mAh battery and tuned software. But in our Nothing Phone (3) review, it scored only 6.7. Our tests showed an estimated battery life of just 6h 45 min. That's only a tad better than the iPhone 16 's 6h 21 min and close to the Pixel 9 's 6h 48 min. This doesn't sound bad until you remember that the iPhone and the Pixel have much smaller batteries. Charging, on the other hand, is actually one of the Phone (3)'s bright spots. It supports 65W wired charging and 15W wireless, and in our test it delivered one of the fastest top-ups in its class (around 1 hour), beating out the Pixel 9 and iPhone 16 , and even outpacing the Galaxy S25 . That said, the OnePlus 13 still reigns supreme here with even faster speeds and better thermal control. It's clear that Nothing has a strong identity and a vision for what phones should be — playful, expressive, and thoughtful in their design. The Nothing phone (3) is the closest Nothing has ever come to a true flagship phone. But for most users, especially those spending $800 and more, the core experience is what truly matters, and it is not quite polished at the 'flagship level' in this case. The Nothing Phone (3) is — as I've put it several times now — a mixed bag. If you go and purchase it, there will undoubtedly be some things you love about it, but also an equal amount that you get annoyed by. I would have a much easier time recommending it if it cost $700, as that price difference would have made sense considering the lack of polish. As it stands right now, though, I feel this is a product that is not well-rounded enough to be in this category. One last thing worth noting — while I personally enjoy gadgets with a bold, industrial aesthetic, the Nothing Phone (3) 's design definitely won't appeal to everyone. This kind of look is a double-edged sword: distinctive and refreshing to some, off-putting to others. And as the price climbs, that edge only gets sharper — just like the pool of potential buyers, which inevitably gets smaller.
Geeky Gadgets
17-07-2025
- Geeky Gadgets
Is Building a Samsung Phone from AliExpress Parts Even POSSIBLE?
Building a Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra using parts sourced from AliExpress is an intriguing concept for tech enthusiasts. It offers the allure of a hands-on project and the possibility of saving money compared to purchasing a new or refurbished device. However, this endeavor is far from simple. It requires navigating a series of challenges, including sourcing compatible components, ensuring quality, and managing the complexities of assembly. Below is a detailed exploration of the process in a great new video from Phone Repair Guru, the obstacles you may encounter, and whether this DIY approach is worth pursuing. Watch this video on YouTube. Sourcing Components – A Balancing Act Between Cost and Quality The first step in building a smartphone is acquiring all the necessary components. For the Galaxy S22 Ultra, this includes critical parts such as the motherboard, display, cameras, battery, and smaller items like screws and adhesives. AliExpress provides a wide range of these components, but the quality and compatibility of the parts can vary significantly. Motherboard: As the most expensive component, priced at $174 CAD, the motherboard was functional but lacked the rigorous quality control associated with official Samsung parts. This raises concerns about long-term reliability. As the most expensive component, priced at $174 CAD, the motherboard was functional but lacked the rigorous quality control associated with official Samsung parts. This raises concerns about long-term reliability. Display: The screen, while functional, had thicker bezels and lower visual quality compared to the original. This compromises the premium experience expected from a flagship device. The screen, while functional, had thicker bezels and lower visual quality compared to the original. This compromises the premium experience expected from a flagship device. S Pen: Although included, the S Pen lacked Bluetooth functionality, significantly reducing its capabilities compared to the original accessory. These examples highlight the inherent risks of sourcing parts from third-party vendors. While some components may work adequately, others may fall short of the standards set by official Samsung products. This variability can lead to a final product that feels inconsistent and less refined. Assembly – Precision, Patience, and Problem-Solving Once all the components are gathered, the next step is assembling the device. This process demands a high level of precision and patience. It involves installing the motherboard, attaching the cameras, securing the battery, and aligning the display with the frame. However, the assembly process is far from straightforward and presents several challenges. Missing Parts: Some screws and smaller components were not included, requiring additional purchases or creative improvisation to complete the assembly. Some screws and smaller components were not included, requiring additional purchases or creative improvisation to complete the assembly. Adhesive Issues: Pre-installed adhesives complicated the process, particularly when aligning the screen with the frame. Misalignment can compromise the device's structural integrity. Pre-installed adhesives complicated the process, particularly when aligning the screen with the frame. Misalignment can compromise the device's structural integrity. Lack of Instructions: Many components arrived without detailed guides, forcing reliance on online tutorials and trial-and-error methods. This can be especially daunting for those without prior experience in smartphone repair. Even minor errors during assembly can lead to significant issues, such as a misaligned screen or improperly connected components. For individuals without technical expertise, this step can be both time-consuming and frustrating. Functionality Testing – Evaluating the Final Product After assembly, the device must be thoroughly tested to ensure it functions as intended. In this case, the phone powered on and was capable of performing basic tasks such as calling, texting, and browsing. However, several shortcomings became apparent during functionality testing. Vibration Motor: The vibration motor was non-functional, detracting from the overall user experience. The vibration motor was non-functional, detracting from the overall user experience. S Pen Limitations: The lack of Bluetooth functionality in the S Pen reduced its usability, particularly for advanced features. The lack of Bluetooth functionality in the S Pen reduced its usability, particularly for advanced features. Display Quality: The screen exhibited muted colors and lower brightness compared to an original Samsung display, further diminishing the premium feel of the device. While the phone was operational for basic tasks, these issues significantly impacted its overall performance and usability. The absence of premium features and the presence of functional gaps raise questions about the practicality of this DIY approach. Cost Analysis – Savings Versus Compromises The total cost of the components for this DIY build was $427.72 CAD, making it approximately $100 cheaper than purchasing a refurbished Galaxy S22 Ultra. However, the cost savings come with notable trade-offs that must be carefully considered. Time Investment: The assembly process is labor-intensive and requires a significant time commitment, especially for those unfamiliar with smartphone repair. The assembly process is labor-intensive and requires a significant time commitment, especially for those unfamiliar with smartphone repair. Quality Concerns: The variability in component quality introduces unpredictability, which can affect the durability and performance of the final product. The variability in component quality introduces unpredictability, which can affect the durability and performance of the final product. Functionality Gaps: Missing or subpar features, such as the non-functional vibration motor and lower-quality display, detract from the overall user experience. When compared to a refurbished device, which undergoes rigorous testing and quality assurance, the DIY approach falls short in delivering a comparable experience. The modest cost savings may not justify the time, effort, and compromises involved in this project. Is Building Your Own Galaxy S22 Ultra Worth It? Assembling a Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra using AliExpress parts is a technically feasible project, but it comes with significant challenges. While this endeavor may appeal to tech-savvy individuals or repair enthusiasts, it requires careful consideration of the potential drawbacks. Sourcing compatible components, navigating the complexities of assembly, and addressing functionality issues are all part of the process. The final product, though functional, lacks the polish, reliability, and premium feel of an original or refurbished device. For most users, the modest cost savings are outweighed by the time, effort, and compromises involved. If you are considering this DIY approach, it is essential to evaluate whether the potential drawbacks align with your goals and expectations. For many, purchasing a refurbished device may offer a more reliable and hassle-free alternative. Dive deeper into Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra assembly with other articles and guides we have written below. Source & Image Credit: Phone Repair Guru Filed Under: Android News, Guides, Mobile Phone News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
