Is Building a Samsung Phone from AliExpress Parts Even POSSIBLE?
Watch this video on YouTube. Sourcing Components – A Balancing Act Between Cost and Quality
The first step in building a smartphone is acquiring all the necessary components. For the Galaxy S22 Ultra, this includes critical parts such as the motherboard, display, cameras, battery, and smaller items like screws and adhesives. AliExpress provides a wide range of these components, but the quality and compatibility of the parts can vary significantly. Motherboard: As the most expensive component, priced at $174 CAD, the motherboard was functional but lacked the rigorous quality control associated with official Samsung parts. This raises concerns about long-term reliability.
As the most expensive component, priced at $174 CAD, the motherboard was functional but lacked the rigorous quality control associated with official Samsung parts. This raises concerns about long-term reliability. Display: The screen, while functional, had thicker bezels and lower visual quality compared to the original. This compromises the premium experience expected from a flagship device.
The screen, while functional, had thicker bezels and lower visual quality compared to the original. This compromises the premium experience expected from a flagship device. S Pen: Although included, the S Pen lacked Bluetooth functionality, significantly reducing its capabilities compared to the original accessory.
These examples highlight the inherent risks of sourcing parts from third-party vendors. While some components may work adequately, others may fall short of the standards set by official Samsung products. This variability can lead to a final product that feels inconsistent and less refined. Assembly – Precision, Patience, and Problem-Solving
Once all the components are gathered, the next step is assembling the device. This process demands a high level of precision and patience. It involves installing the motherboard, attaching the cameras, securing the battery, and aligning the display with the frame. However, the assembly process is far from straightforward and presents several challenges. Missing Parts: Some screws and smaller components were not included, requiring additional purchases or creative improvisation to complete the assembly.
Some screws and smaller components were not included, requiring additional purchases or creative improvisation to complete the assembly. Adhesive Issues: Pre-installed adhesives complicated the process, particularly when aligning the screen with the frame. Misalignment can compromise the device's structural integrity.
Pre-installed adhesives complicated the process, particularly when aligning the screen with the frame. Misalignment can compromise the device's structural integrity. Lack of Instructions: Many components arrived without detailed guides, forcing reliance on online tutorials and trial-and-error methods. This can be especially daunting for those without prior experience in smartphone repair.
Even minor errors during assembly can lead to significant issues, such as a misaligned screen or improperly connected components. For individuals without technical expertise, this step can be both time-consuming and frustrating. Functionality Testing – Evaluating the Final Product
After assembly, the device must be thoroughly tested to ensure it functions as intended. In this case, the phone powered on and was capable of performing basic tasks such as calling, texting, and browsing. However, several shortcomings became apparent during functionality testing. Vibration Motor: The vibration motor was non-functional, detracting from the overall user experience.
The vibration motor was non-functional, detracting from the overall user experience. S Pen Limitations: The lack of Bluetooth functionality in the S Pen reduced its usability, particularly for advanced features.
The lack of Bluetooth functionality in the S Pen reduced its usability, particularly for advanced features. Display Quality: The screen exhibited muted colors and lower brightness compared to an original Samsung display, further diminishing the premium feel of the device.
While the phone was operational for basic tasks, these issues significantly impacted its overall performance and usability. The absence of premium features and the presence of functional gaps raise questions about the practicality of this DIY approach. Cost Analysis – Savings Versus Compromises
The total cost of the components for this DIY build was $427.72 CAD, making it approximately $100 cheaper than purchasing a refurbished Galaxy S22 Ultra. However, the cost savings come with notable trade-offs that must be carefully considered. Time Investment: The assembly process is labor-intensive and requires a significant time commitment, especially for those unfamiliar with smartphone repair.
The assembly process is labor-intensive and requires a significant time commitment, especially for those unfamiliar with smartphone repair. Quality Concerns: The variability in component quality introduces unpredictability, which can affect the durability and performance of the final product.
The variability in component quality introduces unpredictability, which can affect the durability and performance of the final product. Functionality Gaps: Missing or subpar features, such as the non-functional vibration motor and lower-quality display, detract from the overall user experience.
When compared to a refurbished device, which undergoes rigorous testing and quality assurance, the DIY approach falls short in delivering a comparable experience. The modest cost savings may not justify the time, effort, and compromises involved in this project. Is Building Your Own Galaxy S22 Ultra Worth It?
Assembling a Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra using AliExpress parts is a technically feasible project, but it comes with significant challenges. While this endeavor may appeal to tech-savvy individuals or repair enthusiasts, it requires careful consideration of the potential drawbacks. Sourcing compatible components, navigating the complexities of assembly, and addressing functionality issues are all part of the process.
The final product, though functional, lacks the polish, reliability, and premium feel of an original or refurbished device. For most users, the modest cost savings are outweighed by the time, effort, and compromises involved. If you are considering this DIY approach, it is essential to evaluate whether the potential drawbacks align with your goals and expectations. For many, purchasing a refurbished device may offer a more reliable and hassle-free alternative.
Dive deeper into Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra assembly with other articles and guides we have written below.
Source & Image Credit: Phone Repair Guru Filed Under: Android News, Guides, Mobile Phone News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Walmart Is Selling a ‘Fantastic' $90 OBD2 Scanner for $23, and Shoppers Say It's ‘Very Easy to Use'
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. The only correct way to modify something as heinous as the XM is to lean into its absurdity. Honda's Anna Engine Plant is celebrating 40 years of manufacturing excellence by gearing up for an electrified future. The Bentley Continental GT Speed is a sight behold. The 2024 model was the last one with a W12 and this example is for sale on Exotic Car Trader with just 6,500 miles! Autoblog aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission. Check engine lights are never fun, but having the right tool on hand can make a frustrating situation far easier to deal with. Instead of waiting for an appointment or paying for a quick scan at the shop, a diagnostic scan tool lets you get answers instantly, right in your driveway. And we found an unbeatable deal on one at Walmart. The Cicpap OBD2 Diagnostic Scan Tool is currently on sale for just $23, which is over 74% off its regular price of $90. It's a compact, user-friendly tool designed to help drivers and DIYers alike identify engine issues, clear warning lights, and monitor real-time data without any technical expertise required. Whether you're trying to fix an issue yourself or just want to avoid unnecessary trips to the mechanic, this tool delivers serious utility at a very low cost. Cicpap OBD2 Diagnostic Scan Tool, $23 (was $90) at Walmart The scanner connects easily to your car's OBD2 port, typically found just below the steering wheel. Once plugged in, it reads diagnostic trouble codes, resets the check engine light or malfunction indicator light, and even retrieves your vehicle's VIN. It can check I/M readiness, track voltage, and display real-time data streams like engine coolant temperature and freeze frame snapshots. Designed to be beginner-friendly, it's equally useful in a home garage or on the go. Buyers say it performs far above expectations for something at this price point. One said, 'I tried this code reader for the first time, and it was very easy to use.' Another praised the value, saying, 'The quality to price ratio is insane.' While a third called it an 'amazing value for a fantastic product.' 'Operated flawlessly. Really simple to use. As soon as I plugged it in, it immediately identified the issue,' one shopper said. At this price, it's a small investment that could save you big in the long run. Flash deals at Walmart change every day. So act fast and head over there today to get your hands on the Cicpap OBD2 Diagnostic Scan Tool for just $23 while it's still a whopping 74% off. About the Author Andrew Koopman View Profile
Auto Blog
9 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Honda's Anna Engine Plant Celebrates 40-Year Milestone
EV vs hybrid vs gas: which pollutes more, which lasts longer, and which costs society the most in hidden health and climate damage? How two of the most popular electric SUVs for 2025 stack up across range, charging, technology, utility, and value. Honda's Anna Engine Plant has built more than 30 million engines Honda's Anna Engine Plant (AEP) celebrated 40 years of building engines and components for both foreign and domestic production on July 22nd. Located a stone's throw from the Village of Anna, the facility has expanded from a mere 200,000 square feet with 94 employees in 1985 to a massive 2.8 million square-foot campus that employs 2,900 people. Since its founding, AEP has built more than 32.5 million engines, as well as miscellaneous powertrain components. Going forward, AEP will play a major role in the automaker's electrified efforts by producing combustion engines, hybrid powertrains, and EV components on the same lines. Honda Anna Engine Plant produces 30-millionth engine — Source: Honda Anna Engine Plant is responsible for several notable engines AEP officially began operating in 1985, with motorcycle engines christening the new production facility. The engine plant expanded to automotive engine production the following year, starting with the Honda Civic's four-cylinder engine. Since then, the facility has produced more than 32.5 million engines, as well as various components for engines and transmissions. Anna Engine Plant associates assemble Honda's Atkinson-cycle hybrid engine — Source: Zac Palmer The 2.8 million square-foot production facility is the result of $2.9 billion in investments over the past forty years. In that time, AEP has produced several notable engines, including the 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine that's under the hood of the hybrid Civic, Accord, and CR-V. The engine plant also produces the turbocharged four-cylinder and V6 engines that power the Acura Integra, TLX, and MDX Type S models. AEP even produces the Honda Civic Type R's 315-horsepower 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine. From there, the engine is exported to Japan, where the hot hatch is assembled. The facility is also responsible for the 500-horsepower 3.5-liter twin-turbo V6 engine that powered the second-gen Acura NSX. Anna Engine Plant will play a crucial role in Honda's EV plans Honda already has a couple of EVs in its lineup, namely the Prologue and Acura ZDX, but the Japanese automaker is gearing up for expansion. In total, the company plans to invest $1 billion to retool its automotive production facilities, including the Marysville Auto Plant, East Liberty Auto Plant, and AEP, as part of the new Honda EV Hub. Once retooling is completed, AEP will add megacasting, friction stir welding, and Minimum Quantity Lubrication machining to its long list of production processes. The engine plant will play a vital role in the Honda EV Hub by producing the battery case used in Honda and Acura EVs. 2025 Honda Prologue Elite — Source: Honda Once EV production begins, the battery case created at AEP will be shipped off to the Marysville Auto Plant. There, it will be combined with the battery module to create the EV battery packs that power vehicles assembled at the Marysville and East Liberty Auto Plants. Notably, the production facilities will continue to produce traditional internal combustion engines and hybrid models alongside their EV counterparts. Honda is doing more than simply equipping their existing production facilities for EV production, though. The company is aiming to rethink the production process entirely, with a focus on worker-friendly practices, environmental responsibility, and efficiency. Once completed, the Honda EV Hub will produce the Acura RSX EV and other models from the Honda 0 Series that debuted at CES 2025. 2024 Acura ZDX Type S — Source: Acura 'We're not just retooling for electric vehicles,' Tim Stroh, Senior Program Manager of Production Engineering and Battery Case Project Leader at AEP, told Peak of Ohio. 'We are fundamentally rethinking how we approach production. The new layout is designed to be more human-friendly, with updated workspaces and processes that improve safety and efficiency. The addition of electric vehicle production capabilities requires not only new machinery but also a re-imagining of how we work together on the assembly line.' Honda has been operating in Ohio since 1979 While the Anna Engine Plant is celebrating 40 years, it wasn't the automaker's first manufacturing facility in Ohio. Honda's Marysville Auto Plant started out building motorcycles in 1979 before moving to automobile production in 1982. Today, Honda has five manufacturing facilities and is the largest employer in Ohio, with more than 12,000 employees on record. Source: Acura In addition to its five existing facilities, Honda is also establishing a new EV Hub to support the automaker's electrified efforts. Honda also plans to invest another $3.5 billion in a new EV battery plant in Fayette County, Ohio, as part of its joint venture with LG Energy Solution. 'Everything that Honda has accomplished at the Anna Engine Plant during the past 40 years has been achieved through the skills and commitment of our associates, and this will continue as we pursue an expanded form of flexible manufacturing in the future,' said Michael Tinch, AEP plant lead. 'As we maximize production of ICE and hybrid models, even while preparing for the future of EV production, I know our associates will continue to produce high-quality products that meet the needs of our customers.' 2023 Honda Civic Hatchback — Source: Joseph Pudlewski Final thoughts As an Anna local, I'm grateful to have the Honda engine plant in our area. It's definitely a unique part of the view from my front porch. On a more serious note, their involvement in the community, schools, and events can't be understated. With the automaker investing further into the plant's future, electrified or otherwise, I have little doubt that it will change anytime soon. About the Author Joseph Pudlewski View Profile
Auto Blog
12 hours ago
- Auto Blog
BMW's Iconic E39 M5 Almost Had The Unlikeliest Engine
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. View post: Walmart Is Selling a 'Very Sturdy' $400 Carport for Just $200, and Shoppers Say It's 'Worth the Price' View post: Your EV Battery Is Spying on You — New Research Exposes Yet More Hidden Privacy Risks The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a segment leader when it comes to EV charging speeds, outclassing competitors like the VW ID.4 with relative ease. Transitioning to V8 power for the M5 was far from a simple decision for BMW If asked to name the most outstanding quality of BMW's E39 M5, most fans would point to its legendary V8 engine, a high-revving beast of a power plant that cemented this M5 as one of the best sports sedans ever made. But the E39 M5 almost never had a V8 at all. BMW North America is currently celebrating its 50th anniversary with several intriguing stories related to the company's history, and one of these involves the two engine types considered before the E39 M5 actually got a V8. 0:06 / 0:09 2026 Audi A6 Avant debuts to fight BMW 5 Series Touring Watch More I6 And V6 Turbos Were Considered For E39 M5 The last M5 before the E39, the E34, used a 3.8-liter six-cylinder engine with 340 horsepower. However, it had reached its development limit, so BMW began exploring other options for use in the E34's successor. 'We had two opportunities: a V8 or a turbocharged six-cylinder,' said the E39 M5 Project Leader, Alex Hildebrandt. At the time, the M division was led by Karlheinz Kalbfell. 'We were at the end of the energy crisis in Europe, and there was some doubt about whether this kind of car would find further demand on the market,' Hildebrandt said. 'Kalbfell was eager to play this card of fuel efficiency, which didn't mean we wouldn't have powerful engines but that the efficiency of the engines should be outstanding in comparison to the power. There was no way to come to that with a V8, because in the end, eight cylinders have to be fed. We had a lot of discussions about turbocharging, but at the time turbocharging mainly added fuel consumption and power at the upper end of the rev range, rather than torque in the middle.' By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. — Source: Bring A Trailer At the time, BMW was intrinsically linked to naturally-aspirated engines, so turbocharging would have been a significant step away from that. It wasn't until 2006 that the N54 arrived, the first mass-produced turbocharged gas engine from BMW. A turbo V6 was also proposed, which would have been even more shocking, given BMW's preference for inline six-cylinder engines. In the end, the V8 was decided to be the 'best technical solution' for the E39 M5. The 394-horsepower S62 ended up being a masterstroke, especially paired with the involving manual gearbox. E39 Was Perfectly Balanced, But An Even More Vicious M5 Was Coming Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Going with the V8 proved to be a great choice for the E39 M5. It could hit 60 mph in just 4.8 seconds, but this car wasn't only superb in a straight line. 'It's one thing to throw a V8 into a four-door sedan and make it go fast in a straight line,' said Scott Doniger, who became BMW North America's M Brand Manager. 'A heavy front end typically unbalances a sedan, but the M5 didn't feel like a heavy sedan. The package just worked holistically, with phenomenal handling balance under acceleration or braking, and especially in cornering.' By the time production ended in 2003, a total of 9,198 E39 M5s were sold in the USA, proving that the M5's move away from six-cylinder power was a good one. It was followed by the insane E60 M5, a more flawed car but one with a sensational engine. This one had a 5.0-liter V10 known as the S85, and it was inspired by BMW's Formula 1 experience. Producing 500 hp and revving to 8,250 rpm, it again threw out the M5 rulebook. However, the E60 was let down by complex technologies and a poor reliability reputation. Had BMW not taken the technical leap that it did with the E39 M5, it may not have been as willing to take the V10 risk with the E60. Source: Bring A Trailer About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile
