Latest news with #Reddit
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- General
- Yahoo
Woman Kicks Out Mother-in-Law After She Picks New Name for Grandson That ‘Suits Him Better'
A woman says her mother-in-law has taken to calling her child a different name because she thinks it "suits him better" After repeatedly asking her not to, the woman finally told her mother-in-law to leave her home Now, she wants to know if she was overreacting — but Reddit users don't seem to think soA woman says she's kicked her mother-in-law out of her house after she insisted on using the wrong name for her newborn child. In a since-deleted post shared to Reddit, the 31-year-old woman writes that she and her husband recently had their first child — a boy they named Elijah. "We put a lot of thought into his name, we loved the meaning, and it just felt right," she writes. She notes that her mother-in-law "had no strong opinions about it at first. She didn't gush over it, but she also didn't object." Or so the couple thought. "The first time she met Elijah at the hospital, she looked at him and said, 'Oh little David you're so perfect,'" she recalls. "I thought I misheard her, so I ignored it. But then she said it again. I asked her, 'Who's David?' and she just smiled and said, 'Oh it just suits him better.' " The woman was "too exhausted from labor to argue," but over the next few weeks, her mother-in-law continued to call the boy David, even in text messages. "[She] kept calling him David, texting us things like 'How's my little David doing today?' or 'Give David a kiss for me!' I told her, firmly, that his name is Elijah. She laughed and said, 'Oh, I know! But I think he just feels like a David.' " The woman writes that neither she nor her husband knows anyone named David. "It's not a family name. There's no sentimental reason behind it. It's just a completely random name she decided to call my child, despite us telling her not to." At first, the couple tried to let it go, "hoping she'd stop if we ignored it." "But it only got worse," she writes. "When we FaceTimed her, she'd coo at him saying 'Grandma loves you, David!' She even started knitting a baby blanket with the name David embroidered on it." The "final straw" came when her mother-in-law joined them for a family dinner and kept referring to him as David in front of everyone else. "My sister-in-law asked, 'Wait… why do you keep calling him David?' and MIL just laughed and said, 'Because that's his name to me.' " "That's when I lost it. I said, 'No, his name is Elijah, and if you can't respect that, you don't need to be here,'" the woman writes. "She rolled her eyes and tried to wave me off, but I wasn't having it. I told her to leave. She looked shocked, but she left without much of a fight." Now, the woman's husband is upset with her. "He agrees that his mom was being weird and disrespectful, but he thinks kicking her out was 'too extreme' and that I should've just let it go," she explains. "MIL is now playing the victim, telling everyone that I'm 'keeping her grandson from her over a harmless nickname.' " Some family members think the woman overreacted, while others agree that the mother-in-law's behavior "was bizarre." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Commenters are less split, with many arguing that the mother-in-law was in the wrong for knowingly using the wrong name. "Your feelings are valid. I also find it odd that your husband thinks you overreacted, but you literally just told her to use the correct name or to leave," one commenter wrote. "It sounds like she made her choice and now she's upset with you." Another said the husband was the one in the wrong, suggesting the poster should give him a taste of his own medicine. "I think you should start calling him by another name to see how he likes it," they wrote. Read the original article on People
Time of India
an hour ago
- Entertainment
- Time of India
Stable Ronaldo announces engagement to long-time partner Boba during live stream with FaZe Clan members
(Image via @stableronaldoupdates/X & bobagrrl/Instagram) Twitch sensation and FaZe Clan member Rani 'Stable Ronaldo' just dropped a surprise bombshell, and no, it's not about a new stream or a Twitch ban. It's way more personal. He's officially engaged to his longtime girlfriend and Instagram influencer Boba! The announcement caught fans off guard during a casual stream, and the internet hasn't stopped buzzing since. From showing off the sparkly ring to shutting down the idea of a prenup, Ronaldo's all-in on love, and it shows. The Big Reveal Happened On-Stream While casually chatting with FaZe teammate Nick 'Lacy' during a live stream, Stable Ronaldo casually flexed a diamond ring. When Lacy asked about it, Ronaldo didn't hold back: 'I'm engaged, bro. You see the diamond?' The news instantly lit up the stream chat with excitement and congratulations from fans. What started off as a chill broadcast turned into a life update nobody saw coming. 'No Prenup. I Trust Her With My Life.' But what truly shook the internet was Ronaldo's stance on not signing a prenup. In his own words: 'I trust her with my life. What's mine is yours, baby!' It's a bold move in the creator world, where influencer relationships often end in headlines and drama. But Ronaldo's message was loud and clear — this isn't just for clout. From Twitch Chat to Real Life Goals If you've followed Stable Ronaldo even a little, you know his relationship with Boba has always been part of his online personality. She's shown up in his streams, his tweets, and apparently even his offline chat. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo But here's where it gets wholesome: Ronaldo revealed he popped the question on the beach during their one-year anniversary. In his words, 'She started putting more Ws in my offline chat, and that's how I knew she was the one.' Who Is Boba? If you don't already know her, Boba (aka bobagrrl ) is more than just an 'Instagram model.' She's got a following of her own, serves major looks, and has been part of Ronaldo's world long before this engagement buzz. Fans adore the way she hypes him up in streams and how down-to-earth she seems. Together? They're a whole vibe. Fans React: From Hype to Shock From celebratory tweets to spicy Reddit threads, the fan reactions have been wild. Some are cheering the 'W couple' era, while others are side-eyeing the no-prenup decision. But one thing's clear — everyone's watching. From Twitch streamer to fiancé, Stable Ronaldo just gave the internet a love story with gamer-core energy and zero legal safety nets. Whether you're here for the romance or just sipping the tea, one thing's for sure — this is one W he's owning IRL. Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Health
- Forbes
The AI Mental Health Market Is Booming — But Can The Next Wave Deliver Results?
AI tools promise scalable mental health support, but can they actually deliver real care, or just ... More simulate it? In April of 2025, Amanda Caswell found herself on the edge of a panic attack one midnight. With no one to call and the walls closing in, she opened ChatGPT. As she wrote in her piece for Tom's Guide, the AI chatbot calmly responded, guiding her through a series of breathing techniques and mental grounding exercises. It worked, at least in that moment. Caswell isn't alone. Business Insider reported earlier that an increasing number of Americans are turning to AI chatbots like ChatGPT for emotional support, not as a novelty, but as a lifeline. A recent survey of Reddit users found many people report using ChatGPT and similar tools to cope with emotional stress. These stats paint a hopeful picture: AI stepping in where traditional mental health care can't. But they also raise a deeper question about whether these tools are actually helping. A Billion-Dollar Bet On Mental Health AI AI-powered mental health tools are everywhere — some embedded in employee assistance programs, others packaged as standalone apps or productivity companions. In the first half of 2024 alone, investors poured nearly $700 million into AI mental health startups globally, the most for any digital healthcare segment, according to Rock Health. The demand is real. Mental health conditions like depression and anxiety cost the global economy more than $1 trillion each year in lost productivity, to the World Health Organization. And per data from the CDC, over one in five U.S. adults under 45 reported symptoms in 2022. Yet, many couldn't afford therapy or were stuck on waitlists for weeks — leaving a care gap that AI tools increasingly aim to fill. Companies like are trying to do just that. Founded by Sarah Wang — a former Meta and TikTok tech leader who built AI systems for core product and global mental health initiatives — BlissBot blends neuroscience, emotional resilience training and AI to deliver what she calls 'scalable healing systems.' 'Mental health is the greatest unmet need of our generation,' Wang explained. 'AI gives us the first real shot at making healing scalable, personalized and accessible to all.' She said Blissbot was designed from scratch as an AI-native platform, a contrast to existing tools that retrofit mental health models into general-purpose assistants. Internally, the company is exploring the use of quantum-inspired algorithms to optimize mental health diagnostics, though these early claims have not yet been peer-reviewed. It also employs privacy-by-design principles, giving users control over their sensitive data. Sarah Wang- Founder, Blissbot 'We've scaled commerce and content with AI,' Wang added. 'It's time we scale healing.' Blissbot isn't alone in this shift. Other companies, like Wysa, Woebot Health and Innerworld, are also integrating evidence-based psychological frameworks into their platforms. While each takes a different approach, they share the common goal of delivering meaningful mental health outcomes. Why Outcomes Still Lag Behind Despite the flurry of innovation, mental health experts caution that much of the AI being deployed today still isn't as effective as claimed. 'Many AI mental health tools create the illusion of support,' said Funso Richard, an information security expert with a background in psychology. 'But if they aren't adaptive, clinically grounded and offer context-aware support, they risk leaving users worse off — especially in moments of real vulnerability.' Even when AI platforms show promise, Richard cautioned that outcomes remain elusive, noting that AI's perceived authority could mislead vulnerable users into trusting flawed advice, especially when platforms aren't transparent about their limitations or aren't overseen by licensed professionals. Wang echoed these concerns, citing a recent Journal of Medical Internet Research study that pointed out limitations in the scope and safety features of AI-powered mental health tools. The regulatory landscape is also catching up. In early 2025, the European Union's AI Act classified mental health-related AI as 'high risk,' requiring stringent transparency and safety measures. While the U.S. has yet to implement equivalent guardrails, legal experts warn that liability questions are inevitable if systems offer therapeutic guidance without clinical validation. For companies rolling out AI mental health benefits as part of diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) and retention strategies, the stakes are high. No If tools don't drive outcomes, they risk becoming optics-driven solutions that fail to support real well-being. However, it's not all gloom and doom. Used thoughtfully, AI tools can help free up clinicians to focus on deeper, more complex care by handling structured, day-to-day support — a hybrid model that many in the field see as both scalable and safe. What To Ask Before Buying Into The Hype For business leaders, the allure of AI-powered mental health tools is clear: lower costs, instant availability and a sleek, data-friendly interface. But adopting these tools without a clear framework for evaluating their impact can backfire. So what should companies be asking? Before deploying these tools, Wang explained, companies should interrogate the evidence behind them. 'Are they built on validated frameworks like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), or are they simply rebranding wellness trends with an AI veneer?,' she questioned. 'Do the platforms measure success based on actual outcomes — like symptom reduction or long-term behavior change — or just logins? And perhaps most critically, how do these systems protect privacy, escalate crisis scenarios and adapt across different cultures, languages, and neurodiverse communities?' Richard agreed, adding that 'there's a fine line between offering supportive tools and creating false assurances. If the system doesn't know when to escalate — or assumes cultural universality — it's not just ineffective. It's dangerous.' Wang also emphasized that engagement shouldn't be the metric of success. 'The goal isn't constant use,' she said. 'It's building resilience strong enough that people can eventually stand on their own.' She added that the true economics of AI in mental health don't come from engagement stats. Rather, she said, the show up later — in the price we pay for shallow interactions, missed signals and tools that mimic care without ever delivering it. The Bottom Line Back in that quiet moment when Caswell consulted ChatGPT during a panic attack, the AI didn't falter. It guided her through that moment like a human therapist would. However, it also didn't diagnose, treat, or follow up. It helped someone get through the night — and that matters. But as these tools become part of the infrastructure of care, the bar has to be higher. As Caswell noted, 'although AI can be used by therapists to seek out diagnostic or therapeutic suggestions for their patients, providers must be mindful of not revealing protected health information due to HIPAA requirements.' That's especially because scaling empathy isn't just a UX challenge. It's a test of whether AI can truly understand — not just mimic — the emotional complexity of being human. For companies investing in the future of well-being, the question isn't just whether AI can soothe a moment of crisis, but whether it can do so responsibly, repeatedly and at scale. 'That's where the next wave of mental health innovation will be judged,' Wang said. 'Not on simulations of empathy, but on real and measurable human outcomes.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- General
- Yahoo
Woman Says Her Husband Always Oversleeps, and It Might Destroy Their Marriage
A woman and her husband got into an "extremely bad' fight over his habitual oversleeping Her husband has always had 'trouble' with mornings and often misses their shared commitments Having vented about him on Reddit, the woman, 35, was encouraged by commenters to end the relationshipA woman got into an 'extremely bad' fight with her husband over his penchant for oversleeping, and now she thinks her marriage is 'over.' The 35-year-old detailed her story on the popular 'Am I the A------?' Reddit forum. In her post, the woman explained that she and her 39-year-old husband have been together for 17 years, and he has 'always had trouble with mornings.' 'He'll set three to four alarms over the course of an hour-and-a-half, usually between 9 to 10 [in the morning], and sleep through all of them. He's super angry when he wakes up, whether I have a part in it or not,' she said, adding that they own a business together and that he will often 'sleep through their shared commitments' if she doesn't wake him up. The original poster (OP) said that her husband is often 'out tinkering in his shop' — sometimes until 5 a.m. — and drinks many beers while doing so. Recently, after a 'hard week,' the OP said that she and her husband agreed to spend an upcoming Sunday discussing their business and 'ongoing financial problems.' They planned to start the discussion at 10:30 a.m. However, the OP said that 10:30 a.m. came and went, and her husband continued to sleep. She finally attempted to wake him at 11:15 a.m. and told him that it seemed as though he was 'avoiding' the things they needed to discuss that day. The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! 'This turns into a one-hour fight where he tells me that he meant to set his alarm [and] it must not have saved. He also tells me that he is tired and shouldn't have to wake up on a Sunday," she said. She went on to reveal that 'the fighting got extremely bad' and left her 'sobbing' — so she packed her things and drove five hours to her parents. 'I think my marriage is over, and I keep thinking, 'Am I the a—--- for expecting him to keep his promise to wake up? Or am I just crazy for doing this 1,000-plus times?' ' she said at the end of her post. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The vast majority of commenters told the woman that she is in no way at fault in the situation — and that she made the right decision to leave. 'NTA [not the a------],' said one person, adding, 'You do not need to be putting up with this treatment. He is the one staying up so late and drinking so he feels like s--- all the time and can't meet his commitments. Why should you accept literally any blame? This dude is not good.' 'NTA … you made a decision together to be up at a certain time on Sunday. He was then upset when you tried to hold him accountable to his commitment,' someone else said. Another person said, 'NTA. He has a problem that he's not addressing. Whether it is drinking, sleep hygiene, insomnia, planning, or something else, it's his responsibility to manage it. At the very least, he should talk to his doctor.' The same person added, 'As for leaving, I think you did the right thing. You can drive yourself crazy trying to make someone see logic or your [point of view] when they won't hear you. At some point, the only thing you can do is draw a line and then act in self-preservation. It's up to him to decide if he's going to let this be a wake-up call or not.' If you or someone you know is struggling with substance abuse, please contact the SAMHSA helpline at 1-800-662-HELP. Read the original article on People
Metro
an hour ago
- Entertainment
- Metro
Discontinued 'best crisps to ever exist' are finally back after 20 years
After 20 years off the shelves, crisp brand Discos is bringing back its pickled onion flavour. Owned by KP Snacks, pickled onion Discos were last seen on supermarket shelves way back in 2005, but they'll make a highly anticipated return to UK supermarkets on August 27. The news comes after snackers begged KP to reintroduce the flavour — there was even a petition launched. One fan said on Reddit: 'Loved [pickled onion Discos] growing up. 'They replaced it with Prawn Cocktail many years ago and while it is nice… it does not hold a candle to the mouth watering taste orgasm of pickled onion discos.' Others shared the same enthusiasm saying: 'These were THE best crisps to ever exist. Point blank. Period.' Another even said they 'used to eat 5 packets at a time.' Kerry on X labelled pickled onion Discos 'the best crisps ever' while back in 2018, 13 years after the snack was last seen, @ScottMcGready wrote: 'I'm still really upset that @KPSnacks's pickled onion Discos got discontinued.' Another wrote: 'I am once again on my knees asking for pickled onion flavoured Discos to be brought back.' Amy Heap, marketing manager at Discos shared the excitement, saying: 'This legendary flavour has been a fan favourite for years, and its mouth-tingling tang is guaranteed to take your snack game to the next level. 'Whether you've loved them forever or you're just discovering their iconic punch, we can't wait for you to tear open a bag and try them.' While shoppers claim they used to spend just 20p on the snack, its returning at a cost of £1.35 for a 70g bag. But Discos aren't the only one to be bringing back some discontinued goodies. More Trending Maltesers confirmed that the white chocolate version of the iconic treat was making a comeback after 11 years, and it's now in stores. First launched in 2003, White Chocolate Maltesers were a fan-favourite before being discontinued in 2014 and people have spent more than a decade begging for them to return. A retro 80s sweet has also returned to supermarkets – Opal Fruits. Today they're better known by a very different name, as they were rebranded as Starburst in the late 90s. The sweets are being sold in 138g pouches containing strawberry, lemon, orange and lime flavours. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ View More » MORE: It's time to ditch Aperol — this is the ultimate summer spritz MORE: I helped create M&S picky bits — here's my hack for the ultimate dinner MORE: McDonald's just made major change to the Filet-O-Fish for first time in 50 years Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
