logo
Trump's attacks on international student enrollment could ultimately shake the economy

Trump's attacks on international student enrollment could ultimately shake the economy

CNN06-06-2025
The Trump administration's statements and actions aimed at curtailing the number of international students in the US have sent a chill of uncertainty through higher education institutions.
These American schools have become more reliant on the higher tuition paid by international students as state and federal support has waned. Now, their financial viability could be shaken.
That could have a negative impact on US-born students seeking a college education, and economists and researchers warn that the ripple effects could extend well beyond the lawns of college campuses: A drop-off in international students could reverberate through the US labor market and broader economy in years to come.
'The skill premium, as we call it, is very large, which is why highly educated workers earn so much more,' said Michael Lovenheim, a labor economist and professor at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations.
International students, he added, 'generate not only returns to themselves through higher wages, but they work in sectors that generate economic growth, they start businesses, they work in high-growth areas that generate more productivity and increase [Gross Domestic Product].'
And that economic impact, he said, is 'positive and large.'
During the 2023-24 academic year, 1.1 million international students were credited with supporting 378,175 jobs, half of which were at colleges and universities and the rest being in other sectors such as housing, food service, retail, transportation and insurance, according to NAFSA: Association of International Educators.
All told, that amounted to a record-high economic contribution of $43.8 billion, according to the member-based organization.
Reducing enrollment or hurting international students' desire to study in America, he added, will 'lessen our economic competitiveness in the medium run and maybe the long run as well, depending on how things play out.'
The Trump administration's efforts to limit international students have already affected the Global Migration Center, an interdisciplinary research center at the University of California, Davis, said center director Giovanni Peri, an economist and UC-Davis professor who has researched the economic impacts of international migration.
'The new cohort of students that are coming (from other countries), we've already lost a few of them because of the uncertainty of the funding and the visa that we're providing,' Peri told CNN in an interview. 'A couple of people who were from Europe decided to go to England.'
And the international students currently conducting research at the center are experiencing hardships as well, he added.
'They are really struggling with their funding; they are not traveling internationally. A couple of my students could not go to international conferences in the last couple of months because they were worried they would not have been able to come back' because of worries they'd get stopped at the border, Peri said.
The research itself, he added, has become harder with reduced funding.
'It took a long time for the US to establish itself as, by far, the strongest university environment in the world,' he said. 'But things change, and things can change in a more permanent way.'
If international students elect to instead study in Canada, Europe, Australia or other regions, that loss will ultimately damage the US economy, he said.
'The rate at which foreign students create firms in the United States after graduation is about four times as large as the rate at which Americans create,' Peri said, citing his research on the topic. 'So, there will be fewer companies created. There will be fewer scientists and engineers to fill other companies in the US; there will be less growth of companies, jobs, and lower income in many local economies.'
The potential business generation effect already is hampered by immigration restrictions or challenges, Peri noted.
In an earlier study, he and his colleagues found that because of immigration and visa restrictions, only 20% of international US Master's graduates remained in the US and worked for at least two years. There have been legislative proposals to give a green card to students who earn a degree in the US (a policy that Trump publicly supported), Peri said, adding that 'not only this has not happened, but we have made several steps in the opposite direction.'
'This is now a completely different world, but this idea of students who study in the US should be able, if the company makes an offer, to have a visa had such a consensus that was so broad and so bipartisan,' he said. 'Because everybody saw that the US helped these students and this human capital to be created and that some of the benefits could stay in the US if there is an option.'
If the Trump administration's policies and approach toward international students don't change significantly, these negative consequences could be felt in the broader US economy in two to three years, he added.
Not excusing the 'brutality' of the Trump administration's approach, recent events could drive a meaningful debate around the internationalization of the American student body, David Bell, a history professor at Princeton, wrote Tuesday in a New York Times opinion piece.
Bell noted that 1.1 million international students enrolled in the 2023-2024 school year — four times the enrollment 45 years ago.
'Like many large social changes, this one happened without much conscious planning or debate,' he wrote. 'Foreign students kept applying in ever greater numbers, and universities happily admitted them, since non-Americans receive merit- and need-based financial assistance at much lower rates than Americans do. It has taken Donald Trump's crude and vengeful swipe at Harvard to draw much attention to the subject.'
In a follow-up interview with CNN, Bell noted the potential trade-offs with expanding international enrollment: On one hand, universities can serve as engines for future economic growth and further global relationships; on the other hand, universities potentially could fall short when serving homegrown applicants.
'The past couple of decades, the trend has been very, very strongly toward a steady increase in the number of international students, and I think it may be worth asking whether we should be continuing with that increase, or should we keep (enrollment) at the current level or even decrease the level of international students slightly,' Bell said. 'Not doing anything precipitous, not doing anything brutal as the administration seems to be attempting to do, but simply keeping an eye on the situation and recognizing the trade-offs.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FIBRA Macquarie (DBMBF) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Performance Amid Macroeconomic ...
FIBRA Macquarie (DBMBF) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Performance Amid Macroeconomic ...

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

FIBRA Macquarie (DBMBF) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Performance Amid Macroeconomic ...

Consolidated Revenues: Record per certificate results in underlying US dollar terms. NOI (Net Operating Income): Record results driven by robust lease GLA performance. AFFO (Adjusted Funds From Operations): $30 million, an 8.6% increase year over year. Distribution Yield: Attractive dollarized cash yield of 8% with a mid 80% payout ratio. Leasing Activity: 1.3 million square feet executed, rental rates grew by 6.8% to $6.45 per square meter. Renewal Spreads: Achieved 28% on commercially negotiated leases. Industrial Occupancy: 94.8%, up 10 basis points sequentially. Retail Portfolio NOI Growth: 4.5% for the quarter. Retail Occupancy: 93.4%, up more than 130 basis points year over year. Real Estate Net LTV: Below 33% as of June 30. Liquidity: $420 million US. Debt Repayment: $50 million US during 2Q '25. FY25 AFFO Guidance: $115 to $119 million US. Cash Distributions Guidance: MXN2.45 per certificate for FY25. FX Assumption Update: Revised to MXN18.5 per US dollar from 20.5%. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with DBMBF. Release Date: July 25, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points FIBRA Macquarie (DBMBF) reported record per certificate results in key metrics such as consolidated revenues, NOI, AFFO, and NAV for the second quarter of 2025. The industrial portfolio maintained a high occupancy rate of 94.8% and achieved a 6.8% increase in rental rates, reaching $6.45 per square meter. The company successfully executed 1.3 million square feet of leasing activity with notable renewal spreads of 28% on commercially negotiated leases. FIBRA Macquarie's retail portfolio showed steady improvements with a 4.5% NOI growth and occupancy reaching a post-pandemic high of 93.4%. The company maintains a strong balance sheet with a real estate net LTV below 33% and robust liquidity of $420 million US, allowing for strategic growth and development opportunities. Negative Points Macroeconomic uncertainties, including tariff negotiations and geopolitical factors, are contributing to slower decision-making and impacting new leasing activities. The company faces challenges in larger Class A buildings due to tenants' hesitance in making significant CapEx decisions amid the current macro backdrop. There is a general softness in near-shoring markets such as Monterrey, Juarez, and Reynosa, which remain relatively weak. FIBRA Macquarie's development program faces potential risks related to increased land prices and infrastructure costs, which could impact yield on cost levels. The company is trading at a significant discount to its asset value, raising questions about potential buybacks and capital allocation priorities. Q & A Highlights Q: What is the current gap between your interest rents and the market trends for your industrial portfolio? A: Simon Hanna, CEO, stated that they achieved record spreads of 28% in the second quarter. They are on track to meet their goal of double-digit spreads for the year, with only 5% of scheduled expirations remaining. They expect to maintain solid double-digit spreads with the remaining leases. Q: Can you provide insights into the retail activity and its resilience to tariff noise affecting the industrial portfolio? A: Simon Hanna, CEO, mentioned that retail, which contributes about 15% of their overall NOI, had a strong quarter. They see more tailwinds than headwinds for the second half of the year, with expectations of resilient performance in key metrics like occupancy and rental rates. The recent peso appreciation has also been beneficial. Q: Could you comment on the commercialization for the FRISA JV in Tijuana? A: Simon Hanna, CEO, expressed excitement about the project, which is still in preparatory stages. The location is favorable for both manufacturing and logistics due to its proximity to labor and transport connections. Tijuana shows relative activity compared to other near-shoring markets, and they feel confident about going vertical there earlier. Q: Are there any risks to the yield on cost levels between 9% and 11% for your CapEx program? A: Andrew McDonald-Hughes, CFO, stated they remain confident in maintaining those levels despite increases in land prices and infrastructure costs. They expect the lower end of the range in active markets like Tijuana and Mexico City, with other markets trending towards the midpoint. Q: Are there any refinancing activities planned to extend maturities or optimize your debt structure? A: Andrew McDonald-Hughes, CFO, confirmed they are actively planning to extend maturities and optimize their debt structure, maintaining leverage guidance between 30% and 35% LTV. They see positive indications from debt markets and are confident in delivering solid results. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

EU chief to meet Trump in Scotland in push to avoid a transatlantic trade war
EU chief to meet Trump in Scotland in push to avoid a transatlantic trade war

CNBC

time14 minutes ago

  • CNBC

EU chief to meet Trump in Scotland in push to avoid a transatlantic trade war

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will meet with U.S. President Donald Trump in Scotland over the weekend, seeking to reach a framework trade agreement shortly before a 30% tariff on EU imports comes into effect. In a post on social media platform X on Friday, the EU's von der Leyen said she had agreed to meet with the U.S. president on Sunday "to discuss transatlantic trade relations, and how we can keep them strong." Trump later confirmed the meeting would take place as he arrived in Scotland on Friday evening, saying "we'll see if we can make a deal." "I think we have a good 50/50 chance. That's a lot," he added. It comes amid a sense of growing optimism about the prospect of a tariff breakthrough, with sources telling CNBC that the current base-case scenario for a deal includes a 15% tariff on EU imports to the U.S. Trump has threatened to impose tariffs of 30% on EU goods from Aug.1, prompting the EU to consider countermeasures as part of its response. The U.S. and EU have the largest bilateral trade and investment relationship in the world, representing almost 30% of global trade in goods and services, and accounting for 43% of global gross domestic product (GDP), according to EU figures. Trump's four-day and golf-heavy Scotland visit is also expected to see him hold an informal meeting with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Unlike the EU, the U.K. recently struck a trade deal with the Trump administration, one which is centered on a 10% tariff baseline on British goods arriving in the U.S. Hopes of the U.S. and EU averting a transatlantic trade war from Aug. 1 have been buoyed at least in part by the recent announcement of a framework agreement between the U.S. and Japan. The U.S.-Japan deal, which Trump described in a social media post as "perhaps the largest Deal ever made," includes a baseline tariff rate of 15%. Jack Allen-Reynolds, deputy chief euro zone economist at Capital Economics, said Friday that a similar framework for the EU might be seen as case where a bad deal is better than no deal. "Reports this week suggest that the EU and US are on the brink of agreeing a trade deal with a 15% baseline tariff on US imports from the bloc. It's hard to spin it as a good deal, but it would at least avoid much higher US tariffs and retaliation from the EU," Allen-Reynolds said in a research note.

China's Xi Makes Trump Wait for Leader Talks
China's Xi Makes Trump Wait for Leader Talks

Newsweek

time14 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

China's Xi Makes Trump Wait for Leader Talks

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The White House has been optimistic about the prospects for an in-person summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping—the first of President Donald Trump's second term. Yet analysts say the Chinese leader is likely holding out for concrete deliverables before agreeing to the high-profile meeting. All Eyes on Sweden Trump dramatically escalated the trade war with the world's second-largest economy in April, rolling out sweeping new tariffs that prompted China to respond with its own export duties and other measures. While Trump has said that "the confines of a deal" are in place ahead of a third round of talks between U.S. and Chinese negotiators, set for Sweden next week, several contentious issues remain unresolved. These include ongoing U.S. curbs on advanced chip exports to China and persistent geopolitical friction over influence in Asia and Beijing's threats toward Taiwan. Newsweek reached out to the White House and Chinese embassy in the U.S. via email for comment. Europe's Role Patrick Cronin, Asia-Pacific security chair at the Hudson Institute, told Newsweek: "A Xi-Trump summit is highly probable, but withholding final approval until Beijing can button down more information and as many concessions as possible is no doubt part of Xi's calculus." "What China and the United States can each negotiate with the EU will also help inform the China-US trade bargain that will be at the heart of any Xi-Trump summit," Cronin said. After months of efforts with dozens of countries, the White House recently secured a handful of deals with Japan, Vietnam, the Philippines and Indonesia, Cronin added. In a picture combination created on May 14, 2020, Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump are shown. In a picture combination created on May 14, 2020, Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump are shown. Dan Kitwood, Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images Among the deals Trump hopes to achieve is with the EU—a traditionally U.S.-aligned bloc that has become increasingly alienated by Trump's unpredictable trade moves and controversial domestic policies. Analysts say China has been seeking to exploit this rift and achieve a thaw in ties with Brussels that has deteriorated over issues like alleged Chinese market flooding with state-subsidized electric vehicles, human rights concerns and Beijing's support for Russia amid the war in Ukraine. Sean King, an Asia scholar and senior vice president at Park Strategies, told Newsweek: "PRC [People's Republic of China] leaders have long seen Europe as a comparatively easier mark, as the continent doesn't have America's Asian security concerns and obligations." He added, "It's probably better for Trump to first line up what he says are trade deals with friends and allies before going for the big one with Beijing." While European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's visit to Beijing this week yielded a memorandum of understanding on climate change and an agreement to facilitate rare-earth exports, analysts note that a fundamental shift in EU-China ties remains elusive. Timetable Uncertain U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, visiting Malaysia earlier this month for meetings with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi, said that "the odds are high" a Trump-Xi summit will take place by the end of the year. Rosemary Foot, professor and senior research fellow at the University of Oxford's Department of Politics and International Relations, told Newsweek it's unlikely Xi is counting on Europe as leverage in his dealings with the White House. "I think that it is to do with China's more general approach to the Trump administration which is to wait for some intention to offer a serious deliverable from the meeting and perhaps also to paint President Trump as supplicant," she said. Trump and Xi last met in 2019 at the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store