Latest news with #Peri
Daily Mirror
10-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Daily Mirror
Julia Bradbury opens up on TV wedding as she admits 'it was perfect'
Julia Bradbury has opened up on the "perfect" TV wedding she was a part of while hosting Today At The Great Yorkshire Show Channel 5's Julia Bradbury has revealed her involvement in an idyllic TV wedding while hosting Today At The Great Yorkshire Show. Julia teamed up with co-presenter Jules Hudson to host the programme, which is scheduled to air on Channel 5 on Thursday, 10 July, capturing all the action from Harrogate's showground. They were joined by a special guest, Peter Wright from Yorkshire Vet. Engaging in a thrilling assignment for the broadcast, Julia fearlessly scaled an 80-foot telegraph pole to share what she described as the show's "most romantic" narrative yet. The story involved Peri Dunford and Mark Jones, who became engaged at the 2024 Great Yorkshire Show. In an unconventional proposal, Peri popped the question to Mark while he was perched high upon the telegraph pole during his climbing competition. Julia exclaimed: "I decided to climb the pole as I wanted to immerse myself in what the most romantic story of The Great Yorkshire Show, I'm out of breath but it was worth it." Peri and Mark, hailing from Garstand near Preston, celebrated their wedding at this year's event, gracing our screens with tender scenes set to be featured in the episode, reports the Express. The couple's wedding stood out in true Yorkshire fashion, as their workhorses Tyne and Stinot donned bridesmaid roles, and television personalities Bradbury and Hudson had the honour of witnessing their vows. After attending the ceremony, Julia enthused, "I just love a wedding it was perfect," with both her and Jules enjoying their roles as special guests. Peri, glowing as a bride, shared: "It's been fantastic, we love the show and just wanted to get married here, it seemed like the perfect place with our horses." Rachel Coates, director of The Great Yorkshire Show, expressed her delight about a wedding held at the event: "Although this is not the first wedding we have hosted during the show it is in a unique location in the forest which is completely appropriate for a couple with such strong links to the forestry section." She added: "We are honoured that they have chosen this space to tie the knot and wish them a long and happy future together." The ceremony was graced by other television personalities too, including Rob and Dave Nicholson from Cannon Hall Farm, known for their appearances on Springtime on the Farm. The programme also features Julia's journey into the world of cheese alongside food connoisseur Nigel Barden, while Jules investigates the machinery sector. Catch the latest from the Great Yorkshire Show tonight and tomorrow at 8pm on Channel 5.
NDTV
05-07-2025
- Climate
- NDTV
Peri Peri Masala Corn: The Ultimate Monsoon Snack To Satisfy Your Chatpata Cravings
The monsoon season is here and so are the cravings! There's something about the rain that makes us want to snuggle up with a warm and comforting snack. While there are plenty of snacks to choose from, nothing beats the joy of savouring hot corn. Whether you like it plain or butter, it just makes the monsoon a lot better, doesn't it? If you wish to give it a spicy makeover, don't think twice and try this new peri peri masala corn. It's the perfect treat to brighten up a gloomy day. The rain might be pouring outside but with this delicious snack, you'll be feeling cosy and satisfied in no time. Let's dive into the recipe for this mouthwatering monsoon snack, shared by the Instagram page @eatdelicious_official. Also Read: How To Make Masala Corn Toast For A Quick Breakfast Why Peri Peri Masala Corn Is The Ultimate Monsoon Snack Monsoons call for something warm and comforting, and peri peri masala corn fits the bill perfectly. The combination of soft, boiled corn with a spicy kick of peri peri seasoning and a squeeze of lemon juice is absolute perfection. Plus, it's super easy to make. Whether you're looking for a quick snack or a side dish, peri peri masala corn is the ultimate monsoon treat that'll leave you craving for more. Is Peri Peri Masala Corn Healthy? Honestly, peri peri masala corn can be a pretty healthy snack option, depending on how you make it. Corn is a good source of fibre and essential vitamins. To make it even healthier, you can use less butter, opt for low-fat milk and control the amount of salt and seasoning. Enjoy it in moderation and you'll be good to go! How To Make Peri Peri Masala Corn | Masala Corn Recipe Making peri peri masala corn at home is pretty simple and straightforward. Follow these steps: Start by removing the husk of the corn and cutting them into halves. Heat water in a large vessel and add turmeric, salt and milk along with the cut corn. Let them boil for a few minutes. In the meanwhile, add butter, peri peri seasoning, oregano, chilli flakes, salt, lemon juice and coriander leaves to a bowl. Mix well. Take out the corn from the mixture and coat them generously with the prepared seasoning. Now, slightly roast them over a grill. Serve hot and enjoy! Watch the full recipe video below: View this post on Instagram A post shared by Eat Delicious (@eatdelicious_official) Pro Tips To Make Perfect Peri Peri Masala Corn: Want to take your peri peri masala corn game to the next level? Here are a few pro tips: Use fresh corn for the best flavour and texture. Don't over boil the corn as this can make it lose its crunch. Adjust the peri peri seasoning to your taste. You can always add more but it's harder to take it away once it's added. Add a squeeze of fresh lemon juice just before serving for an extra burst of flavour.
USA Today
13-06-2025
- Business
- USA Today
How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy?
How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy? Show Caption Hide Caption National Guard major general clarifies military's role in Los Angeles National Guard Major General Scott Sherman outlined the role of military personnel in Los Angeles and said troops will not conduct arrests. President Donald Trump's administration is stepping up deportation efforts in California with immigration raids at restaurants, traffic stops and routine legal check-ins. The immigration crackdown, while popular with voters in polls, has sparked protests in Los Angeles. Long term, economists warn that fewer immigrants could take a hit to the economy, prompting labor shortages and slowing economic growth. "Immigrants play a huge role in the California economy,' said Giovanni Peri, an economics professor at the University of California, Davis. Without immigrants, 'there will be less economic growth. Less opportunity, also, for local companies and American workers.' 'Wave of panic': Businesses are in crosshairs of Trump immigration crackdown Why the U.S. is 'immigrant dependent' The country's economy has become 'very immigrant dependent,' according to Christopher Thornberg, founding partner at Beacon Economics, a Los Angeles research and consulting firm. About 479,000 U.S.-born workers were added to the labor force over the last five years compared with 3.6 million foreign-born workers, according to an October report from the National Foundation for American Policy, a nonpartisan research organization. The report pointed to a spike in immigration and retirements, coupled with a slowdown in U.S.-born working-age population growth. In California, immigrants make up roughly one-third of workers and comprise an outsized share of the workforce in physically intensive sectors like construction and agriculture. Critics say these workers are lowering wages for American-born citizens or taking away jobs. But Peri said that doesn't pan out in the data. Immigrants may reduce wages for native-born Americans with competing skills, according to Harvard economics professor George Borjas, but it slightly increases the income of native-born citizens overall. A separate 2024 working paper co-authored by Peri found immigrants had no significant effect on wages for those born in the U.S. who are college educated and a positive effect on wages for their American-born peers who are less educated. Instead, Peri said immigrants are filling the holes in industries struggling to hire. Immigrants account for 28% of care workers in long-term care settings, according to the nonprofit health policy organization KFF. In California, immigrants make up 44% of manufacturing jobs and 40% of construction jobs, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank based in Washington D.C. Some of those jobs are held by undocumented workers. About 1.8 million people, or 17% of immigrants in California, were undocumented as of 2022, according to Pew. The vast majority – 1.4 million – had no legal protections through programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or active asylum claims. "It would be lovely to deal with this with an expansion of the legal immigration system,' Peri said. 'But lacking that, undocumented immigrants are doing a lot of these jobs. And losing some of them would make the situation worse.' Pushing away immigrants, Peri argues, prevents companies from growing and creating more jobs that would benefit U.S.-born workers. One 2024 analysis from Jamshid Damooei, executive director of the Center for Economics of Social Issues at California Lutheran University, found work from undocumented employees created an additional 1.25 million jobs in California. And because the vast majority of undocumented immigrants are not criminals, but people who have been part of their local communities for years if not decades, 'in the majority of cases, the effects of just indiscriminately deporting these people is going to have very little benefit for the American people,' Peri said. Revenue vs. cost It's true that immigrants add costs for the government; they benefit from public education, health services and other state-specific policies. But research generally finds immigration tends to raise the federal government's revenue more than its costs, with immigrants adding an estimated $1.2 trillion in federal revenues between 2024 and 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. State and local governments' costs tend to increase more than their revenues from a surge in immigration, but Peri said the rise in immigration is a net benefit overall. Even undocumented workers, Peri argued, boost the government's coffers because they pay a considerable amount of taxes. At the same time, they are ineligible for most federal benefits like Social Security and food stamps. Undocumented immigrants contributed $8.5 billion in state and local taxes in 2022, according to a 2024 study from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a nonpartisan think tank. Trump and Newsom: Trump's battle with Newsom, California expands beyond immigration What happens if the immigration crackdown continues? Thornberg doesn't expect Trump to deport every undocumented worker in the country, and views the crackdown in California as 'more of a blown-up spectacle' that 'may get tied up in the courts.' Already, Trump has said he would back off certain deportation efforts to avoid labor shortages in areas like agriculture and hospitality. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' Trump said in a June 12 post on Truth Social. 'Changes are coming!' While an immediate labor shortage is unlikely, Thornberg believes we're more likely to see people discouraged from coming to the U.S. in the years to come, resulting in a tighter labor market. That could mean higher wages for workers as companies step up recruitment efforts, but it would slow economic growth overall. Trump's efforts to constrain immigration during his first term played out in a similar fashion; by 2019, the unemployment rate had dropped to 3.5%, its lowest level since 1969, with earnings up 3.5% from 2018. Meanwhile, economic growth slowed to 2.3%, down from 2.9% the year prior, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Peri said a tight labor market could have ripple effects across the economy, such as driving up the cost to produce certain items. Companies may be more inclined to import cheaper goods at a time when the Trump administration is pushing for more U.S. manufacturing through tariffs. 'This could have a cascade of effects,' he said. 'There is no doubt at all that immigration and immigrants who do those simple, manual jobs are very important at making the economy go.'
Yahoo
06-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Trump's attacks on international student enrollment could ultimately shake the economy
The Trump administration's statements and actions aimed at curtailing the number of international students in the US have sent a chill of uncertainty through higher education institutions. These American schools have become more reliant on the higher tuition paid by international students as state and federal support has waned. Now, their financial viability could be shaken. That could have a negative impact on US-born students seeking a college education, and economists and researchers warn that the ripple effects could extend well beyond the lawns of college campuses: A drop-off in international students could reverberate through the US labor market and broader economy in years to come. 'The skill premium, as we call it, is very large, which is why highly educated workers earn so much more,' said Michael Lovenheim, a labor economist and professor at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations. International students, he added, 'generate not only returns to themselves through higher wages, but they work in sectors that generate economic growth, they start businesses, they work in high-growth areas that generate more productivity and increase [Gross Domestic Product].' And that economic impact, he said, is 'positive and large.' During the 2023-24 academic year, 1.1 million international students were credited with supporting 378,175 jobs, half of which were at colleges and universities and the rest being in other sectors such as housing, food service, retail, transportation and insurance, according to NAFSA: Association of International Educators. All told, that amounted to a record-high economic contribution of $43.8 billion, according to the member-based organization. Reducing enrollment or hurting international students' desire to study in America, he added, will 'lessen our economic competitiveness in the medium run and maybe the long run as well, depending on how things play out.' The Trump administration's efforts to limit international students have already affected the Global Migration Center, an interdisciplinary research center at the University of California, Davis, said center director Giovanni Peri, an economist and UC-Davis professor who has researched the economic impacts of international migration. 'The new cohort of students that are coming (from other countries), we've already lost a few of them because of the uncertainty of the funding and the visa that we're providing,' Peri told CNN in an interview. 'A couple of people who were from Europe decided to go to England.' And the international students currently conducting research at the center are experiencing hardships as well, he added. 'They are really struggling with their funding; they are not traveling internationally. A couple of my students could not go to international conferences in the last couple o f months because they were worried they would not have been able to come back' because of worries they'd get stopped at the border, Peri said. The research itself, he added, has become harder with reduced funding. 'It took a long time for the US to establish itself as, by far, the strongest university environment in the world,' he said. 'But things change, and things can change in a more permanent way.' If international students elect to instead study in Canada, Europe, Australia or other regions, that loss will ultimately damage the US economy, he said. 'The rate at which foreign students create firms in the United States after graduation is about four times as large as the rate at which Americans create,' Peri said, citing his research on the topic. 'So, there will be fewer companies created. There will be fewer scientists and engineers to fill other companies in the US; there will be less growth of companies, jobs, and lower income in many local economies.' The potential business generation effect already is hampered by immigration restrictions or challenges, Peri noted. In an earlier study, he and his colleagues found that because of immigration and visa restrictions, only 20% of international US Master's graduates remained in the US and worked for at least two years. There have been legislative proposals to give a green card to students who earn a degree in the US (a policy that Trump publicly supported), Peri said, adding that 'not only this has not happened, but we have made several steps in the opposite direction.' 'This is now a completely different world, but this idea of students who study in the US should be able, if the company makes an offer, to have a visa had such a consensus that was so broad and so bipartisan,' he said. 'Because everybody saw that the US helped these students and this human capital to be created and that some of the benefits could stay in the US if there is an option.' If the Trump administration's policies and approach toward international students don't change significantly, these negative consequences could be felt in the broader US economy in two to three years, he added. Not excusing the 'brutality' of the Trump administration's approach, recent events could drive a meaningful debate around the internationalization of the American student body, David Bell, a history professor at Princeton, wrote Tuesday in a New York Times opinion piece. Bell noted that 1.1 million international students enrolled in the 2023-2024 school year — four times the enrollment 45 years ago. 'Like many large social changes, this one happened without much conscious planning or debate,' he wrote. 'Foreign students kept applying in ever greater numbers, and universities happily admitted them, since non-Americans receive merit- and need-based financial assistance at much lower rates than Americans do. It has taken Donald Trump's crude and vengeful swipe at Harvard to draw much attention to the subject.' In a follow-up interview with CNN, Bell noted the potential trade-offs with expanding international enrollment: On one hand, universities can serve as engines for future economic growth and further global relationships; on the other hand, universities potentially could fall short when serving homegrown applicants. 'The past couple of decades, the trend has been very, very strongly toward a steady increase in the number of international students, and I think it may be worth asking whether we should be continuing with that increase, or should we keep (enrollment) at the current level or even decrease the level of international students slightly,' Bell said. 'Not doing anything precipitous, not doing anything brutal as the administration seems to be attempting to do, but simply keeping an eye on the situation and recognizing the trade-offs.'
CNN
06-06-2025
- Business
- CNN
Trump's attacks on international student enrollment could ultimately shake the economy
The Trump administration's statements and actions aimed at curtailing the number of international students in the US have sent a chill of uncertainty through higher education institutions. These American schools have become more reliant on the higher tuition paid by international students as state and federal support has waned. Now, their financial viability could be shaken. That could have a negative impact on US-born students seeking a college education, and economists and researchers warn that the ripple effects could extend well beyond the lawns of college campuses: A drop-off in international students could reverberate through the US labor market and broader economy in years to come. 'The skill premium, as we call it, is very large, which is why highly educated workers earn so much more,' said Michael Lovenheim, a labor economist and professor at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations. International students, he added, 'generate not only returns to themselves through higher wages, but they work in sectors that generate economic growth, they start businesses, they work in high-growth areas that generate more productivity and increase [Gross Domestic Product].' And that economic impact, he said, is 'positive and large.' During the 2023-24 academic year, 1.1 million international students were credited with supporting 378,175 jobs, half of which were at colleges and universities and the rest being in other sectors such as housing, food service, retail, transportation and insurance, according to NAFSA: Association of International Educators. All told, that amounted to a record-high economic contribution of $43.8 billion, according to the member-based organization. Reducing enrollment or hurting international students' desire to study in America, he added, will 'lessen our economic competitiveness in the medium run and maybe the long run as well, depending on how things play out.' The Trump administration's efforts to limit international students have already affected the Global Migration Center, an interdisciplinary research center at the University of California, Davis, said center director Giovanni Peri, an economist and UC-Davis professor who has researched the economic impacts of international migration. 'The new cohort of students that are coming (from other countries), we've already lost a few of them because of the uncertainty of the funding and the visa that we're providing,' Peri told CNN in an interview. 'A couple of people who were from Europe decided to go to England.' And the international students currently conducting research at the center are experiencing hardships as well, he added. 'They are really struggling with their funding; they are not traveling internationally. A couple of my students could not go to international conferences in the last couple of months because they were worried they would not have been able to come back' because of worries they'd get stopped at the border, Peri said. The research itself, he added, has become harder with reduced funding. 'It took a long time for the US to establish itself as, by far, the strongest university environment in the world,' he said. 'But things change, and things can change in a more permanent way.' If international students elect to instead study in Canada, Europe, Australia or other regions, that loss will ultimately damage the US economy, he said. 'The rate at which foreign students create firms in the United States after graduation is about four times as large as the rate at which Americans create,' Peri said, citing his research on the topic. 'So, there will be fewer companies created. There will be fewer scientists and engineers to fill other companies in the US; there will be less growth of companies, jobs, and lower income in many local economies.' The potential business generation effect already is hampered by immigration restrictions or challenges, Peri noted. In an earlier study, he and his colleagues found that because of immigration and visa restrictions, only 20% of international US Master's graduates remained in the US and worked for at least two years. There have been legislative proposals to give a green card to students who earn a degree in the US (a policy that Trump publicly supported), Peri said, adding that 'not only this has not happened, but we have made several steps in the opposite direction.' 'This is now a completely different world, but this idea of students who study in the US should be able, if the company makes an offer, to have a visa had such a consensus that was so broad and so bipartisan,' he said. 'Because everybody saw that the US helped these students and this human capital to be created and that some of the benefits could stay in the US if there is an option.' If the Trump administration's policies and approach toward international students don't change significantly, these negative consequences could be felt in the broader US economy in two to three years, he added. Not excusing the 'brutality' of the Trump administration's approach, recent events could drive a meaningful debate around the internationalization of the American student body, David Bell, a history professor at Princeton, wrote Tuesday in a New York Times opinion piece. Bell noted that 1.1 million international students enrolled in the 2023-2024 school year — four times the enrollment 45 years ago. 'Like many large social changes, this one happened without much conscious planning or debate,' he wrote. 'Foreign students kept applying in ever greater numbers, and universities happily admitted them, since non-Americans receive merit- and need-based financial assistance at much lower rates than Americans do. It has taken Donald Trump's crude and vengeful swipe at Harvard to draw much attention to the subject.' In a follow-up interview with CNN, Bell noted the potential trade-offs with expanding international enrollment: On one hand, universities can serve as engines for future economic growth and further global relationships; on the other hand, universities potentially could fall short when serving homegrown applicants. 'The past couple of decades, the trend has been very, very strongly toward a steady increase in the number of international students, and I think it may be worth asking whether we should be continuing with that increase, or should we keep (enrollment) at the current level or even decrease the level of international students slightly,' Bell said. 'Not doing anything precipitous, not doing anything brutal as the administration seems to be attempting to do, but simply keeping an eye on the situation and recognizing the trade-offs.'
