
Why US U-turn on climate goals could be India's moment for clean-tech leap
The global climate economy, into which India has been steadily integrating, is already feeling the tremors. But amidst the churn, India stands out as one of the few nations poised to gain.The retreat of the United States from its clean energy commitments has the potential to reshape global supply chains, redirect hundreds of billions of dollars in green capital and shift geopolitical influence over climate action. For India, which has been investing heavily in solar manufacturing, EVs, battery storage and green hydrogen, this unexpected vacuum in American leadership presents a strategic opportunity: to step into the role of a manufacturing base, innovation hub and investment magnet in the emerging green order. But whether India can truly seize the moment will depend on how quickly and decisively its government and industry move.The scale of the rollback in the US is staggering. The Senate bill—officially a sweeping tax and immigration package—includes provisions that render the IRA practically toothless. It ends federal tax credits for clean energy, electric vehicles, rooftop solar, home efficiency and clean manufacturing. It terminates the commercial clean vehicle credit and the consumer EV rebate. It phases out the clean energy manufacturing production credit beginning 2031. Simultaneously, the bill extends permanent credits for coal used in steel production and delays by a decade the implementation of a fee on methane leaks from oil and gas facilities. As a final blow, it rescinds funding for environmental justice, endangered species protection and low-carbon infrastructure in underserved communities.advertisementThe implications are as economic as they are environmental. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the Senate bill would add $3.9 trillion to the US deficit over a decade. According to Energy Innovation, a clean energy support entity, power generation capacity will fall by 300 GW by 2035, the US economy will lose $960 billion in cumulative GDP and more than half a million jobs will vanish.Others warn of graver consequences still. 'If the Senate reconciliation bill passes,' says Advait Arun, senior associate for energy finance at the Center for Public Enterprise, New York, 'the GOP has all but guaranteed that Americans will face blackouts and grid failures in the coming years This bill forcibly deindustrialises the country and severely reduces our shared standard of living.'For India, that collapse of confidence in American clean-tech policy opens three big doors: the redirection of climate capital, relocation of manufacturing capacity and repositioning of leadership in multilateral green platforms. First, the capital. Over $370 billion had been unlocked by the IRA, and vast pools of private equity, pension funds and climate-focused institutional investors had coalesced around the US clean energy story.advertisementWith tax credits repealed and grid modernisation shelved, much of that capital is now seeking stable, policy-backed alternatives. India, with its green bond framework, sovereign climate finance architecture and expanding production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes, fits the bill provided it can absorb the flows.Second, manufacturing. India's ambitions to build a self-reliant clean-tech manufacturing base—bolstered by the Rs 24,000 crore PLI (Production Linked Incentive) for solar and batteries, the Rs 19,744 crore Green Hydrogen Mission and state-level industrial parks—now appear more globally competitive than ever.Chinese dominance of the green manufacturing chain has long been acknowledged, but India has quietly emerged as a fast-follower, especially in areas like electric two-wheelers, distributed solar, and electrolyser manufacturing. With the US effectively sidelining itself, India is in prime position to become the supplier of choice for the Global South—and increasingly for Europe, Japan and Australia, all of whom are seeking diversified, democratic alternatives to Chinese green goods.It is here that the comparison with China becomes critical. China today controls over 80 per cent of the world's solar wafer and module production, dominates global battery supply chains and has unmatched scale in electrolyser manufacturing. Its mineral refining ecosystem for lithium, cobalt and rare earths is unrivalled.advertisementChinese firms have vertically integrated—from mining to manufacturing to deployment—giving them a cost advantage that few can compete with. However, this dominance has also created geopolitical unease. Western nations worry about overdependence on a single country for critical energy components. Supply chain disruptions during Covid-19 and rising trade frictions have only intensified those concerns.India, by contrast, is late to the scale game but arguably better positioned to serve as a diversified, democratic alternative. It lacks China's vertical integration, but offers political alignment with the West, cost-effective labour and a fast-improving logistics and manufacturing ecosystem.Crucially, India is not yet seen as a hegemon. It can position itself as a partner, not a replacement. Richard Black, director of policy and strategy at global energy think-tank Ember, captured this realignment well. 'Chinese factories are still going to be producing the clean energy goods in increasing demand around the world, with Indian companies in fast pursuit; and while the US government has just decided that it won't be a customer, it's also decided not to be a competitor,' he said.The third opportunity is diplomatic. India's credibility as a climate voice rose during its G20 presidency. Its leadership of the International Solar Alliance (ISA), the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) and the newly-formed Global Biofuels Alliance shows it can knit together broad coalitions around energy and sustainability. With the US retreating, India can step up as the principal advocate for an inclusive, just energy transition—one that prioritises affordability, access and employment, not just net-zero metrics.advertisementThe question is whether India is ready. Some parts of the answer are encouraging. The Indian clean-tech ecosystem is no longer in its infancy. Adani Green, ReNew Power and Tata Power Solar are among the world's largest renewable asset owners. Vikram Solar and Waaree Energies have ramped up module exports. Ola Electric, Mahindra and Tata Motors are pushing EV adoption deeper into Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities.Reliance New Energy and L&T are investing billions into green hydrogen and battery storage. Infosys, TCS and emerging players like Grid Edge are building AI-based smart grid solutions and energy management systems that can be exported to other developing countries.But India is not yet firing on all cylinders. Supply chains for critical minerals remain thin. EV penetration is still uneven. Financing for early-stage clean start-ups is sluggish compared to China or the US. Power evacuation infrastructure lags in key solar-rich states. Besides, the overall scale of capital needed to convert this opportunity is significant: industry estimates suggest India will need to mobilise Rs 2.5 lakh crore to Rs 3 lakh crore (roughly $30-35 billion) over the next five years to scale up manufacturing, build export zones and underwrite risk in frontier clean technologies. Much of that will need to come from global green capital—through sovereign funds, blended finance vehicles, and ESG (environmental, social and governance)-focused infrastructure trusts.It is here that policy must step in. A new Green Investment Platform, combining the balance sheets of IREDA, NIIF, SBI, and REC, can act as a one-stop shop for investors looking for certainty in Indian climate infrastructure. PLI 2.0 should be rolled out to include energy software, smart grids, carbon tracking systems, and AI-based energy optimisation—areas where India has a comparative advantage.Green SEZs, with fast-track clearances and export corridors, can be established in Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Odisha and Maharashtra. And perhaps most urgently, a 'Clean Innovation Migration Visa' could invite displaced US clean-tech entrepreneurs, engineers and researchers to set up in India's innovation clusters, including Hyderabad, Pune and Bengaluru.This is not idle speculation. American stakeholders themselves acknowledge what the bill has unleashed. 'This bill gives up on the present and future of American manufacturing,' said Mike Williams of the Center for American Progress, an independent policy institute. 'It kills investments in clean industries that have been driving domestic manufacturing growth This is a gift to other nations who are furiously working towards beefing up their clean-tech capacities.'Manish Bapna of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NDRC) added: 'This measure props up the dirty and expensive technologies of the past while strangling the clean energy investments creating millions of jobs Republicans are punishing the plentiful wind and solar power that can be quickly added to the grid.'India must remember that this opportunity, while monumental, is also fragile. The same global investors now fleeing US policy volatility are watching India's actions closely. Delay, fragmentation or over-centralisation could spook capital. Likewise, any backsliding on India's own climate targets, or politicisation of the clean energy transition, could blunt its credibility.But if India can maintain focus, scale up rapidly and speak with one voice on the global stage, it stands to gain not just market share but narrative power. In the 20th century, India missed the hardware revolution and caught up only late to the telecom boom. Clean-tech could be different. It could be the first global industrial transformation that India shapes from the front—technologically, economically and diplomatically.The US decision to gut its climate law may have dire consequences for the planet. But it has inadvertently thrown down the gauntlet. India must now decide whether it wants to lead this century's green industrial revolution or watch from the sidelines.Subscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Musk should stay out of politics, US Treasury Secretary Bessent says
Elaan Musk's new political party faced immediate backlash. Treasury Secretary questioned Musk's focus. Investment firm Azoria Partners delayed Tesla-linked fund launch. They cited conflict with Musk's CEO role. Musk's party aimed to unseat Republicans over Trump's spending bill. Trump threatened to pull government contracts from Tesla and SpaceX. Azoria CEO James Fishback criticized Musk's political ambitions. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads INVESTOR REBUKE Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A day after Elon Musk escalated his feud with Donald Trump and announced the formation of a new U.S. political party, the president's Treasury secretary said Musk should stick to running his investment firm Azoria Partners , which had planned to launch a fund tied to Musk's automaker Tesla, said it was delaying the venture because the party's creation posed "a conflict with his full-time responsibilities as CEO".Musk said on Saturday he was establishing the " America Party " in response to Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, which Musk claimed would bankrupt the on CNN on Sunday, Treasury chief Scott Bessent said the boards of directors at Musk's companies - Tesla and rocket firm SpaceX - likely would prefer him to stay out of politics."I imagine that those boards of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities," Bessent who served as a top adviser to the White House on trimming the size of government during the first few months of Trump's presidency, said his new party would in next year's midterm elections look to unseat Republicans in Congress who backed the "big, beautiful bill".Musk spent millions of dollars underwriting Trump's re-election effort and for a time, regularly showed up at the president's side in the Oval Office and elsewhere. Their disagreement over the spending bill led to a falling out that Musk briefly tried unsuccessfully to bill, which cuts taxes and ramps up spending on defense and border security, passed last week on party-line votes in both chambers. Critics argue it will damage the economy by significantly adding to the federal budget has said Musk is unhappy because the bill, which Trump signed into law on Friday, takes away green-energy credits for Tesla's electric vehicles. The president has threatened to pull billions of dollars Tesla and SpaceX receive in government contracts and subsidies in response to Musk's suggested Musk holds little sway with voters who, he said, liked his Department of Government Efficiency more than him."The principles of DOGE were very popular," Bessent said. "I think if you looked at the polling, Elon was not."Musk's announcement immediately brought a rebuke from Azoria Partners, which said on Saturday it will postpone the listing of its Azoria Tesla Convexity exchange-traded fund. Azoria was set to launch the Tesla ETF this CEO James Fishback posted on X several critical comments about the new party and reiterated his support for Trump."I encourage the Board to meet immediately and ask Elon to clarify his political ambitions and evaluate whether they are compatible with his full-time obligations to Tesla as CEO," Fishback Sunday, Fishback added on X, "Elon left us with no other choice."The White House did not respond to a request for comment on Musk's announcement, but Stephen Miran, the chairman of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers, defended the bill on ABC's "This Week"."The one, big, beautiful bill is going to create growth on turbo charge," Miran said.


Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Did cloud seeding cause Texas floods? Trump loyalist makes massive allegation amid Camp Mystic tragedy
Kandiss Taylor, a MAGA candidate running for Georgia's House seat, is facing backlash for spreading conspiracy theories about the flash floods in Texas and the tragedy that hit Camp Mystic and regions around the Guadalupe River. She suggested this week that the floods are a result of cloud seeding, tweeting: 'Fake weather. Fake hurricanes. Fake flooding. Fake. Fake. Fake.' Jody Fischer, director of flight operations for a North Dakota-based cloud seeding business, adjusts flares used for a seeding on a plane(AP) This comes as authorities confirmed that over 50 people have died in the Texas floods, including several children. At least 27 girls from Camp Mystic were still missing. Texas Governor Greg Abbott acknowledged that the summer camp, which had about 750 girls at the time floodwaters hit, was 'horrendously ravaged in ways unlike I've seen in any natural disaster'. Read More: Melania Trump's Texas floods post sparks outrage as she offers just two things to victims; 'You and your husband…' "The height the rushing water reached to the top of the cabins was shocking," he said in a post on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. However, Kandiss Taylor said she believes this is 'fake weather'. 'FAKE WEATHER. REAL DAMAGE. Hurricane Helene left me powerless for 16 days & caused $57K in damage. This isn't just 'climate change.' It's cloud seeding, geoengineering, & manipulation. If fake weather causes real tragedy, that's murder. Pray. Prepare. Question the narrative,' she claimed. When Taylor admitted that tragedy had struck Texas, one of her followers questioned whether she was walking back out of her earlier claims. 'I'm not walking back a thing. No one can control the way you raging liberals twist words. Brainwashed zombies," the Trump loyalist said. Her comments sparked severe backlash. 'Do your job Georgia… Is this the best you have got?' attorney Tracey Gallagher tweeted. Read More: Canyon Lake water level: Will the dam on Guadalupe River flood? Here's the latest 'Hey Texas. What do you think of this? She's running for congress as a Republican? Any thoughts?' former Rep Adam Kinzinger said. 'So the dead bodies floating in Texas are fake too? The homes ripped apart? The kids being pulled out of floodwater? You're a clown. Sit the hell down and stop embarrassing the human race. I guess not even Republicans care when Republicans are hit with natural disasters," commentator Thomas Mix posted. What is cloud seeding and does Texas do it? Cloud seeding is a weather modification technique that disperses substances like silver iodide into clouds to enhance precipitation, typically rain or snow, by encouraging water droplet formation. In Texas, cloud seeding is actively practiced, covering 31 million acres in regions like the Panhandle and South Texas, using aircraft to target convective clouds from April to September, funded by local water districts to combat drought and recharge aquifers.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Donald Trump's tax cuts could boost your paycheck—Here's a breakdown
President Trump's new tax law gives special breaks to workers, seniors, and homeowners — but only if your income is low enough. For example, servers and bartenders won't pay taxes on up to $25,000 of tips if they make under $150,000 a year (or $300,000 for married couples). Overtime pay gets a $12,500 deduction under the same rules. Seniors aged 65+ can claim a $6,000 tax bonus if they earn less than $75,000 ($150,000 for couples). These cuts start this year and expire in 2028. However, people earning above these limits get smaller deductions or none at all, so checking your income is crucial. Homeowners in high-tax states like New York or California get relief too. The law raises the deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) from $10,000 to $40,000 through 2029, but only for households earning under $500,000. If you buy an American-made car, you can deduct up to $10,000 in loan interest if your income is below $100,000 ($200,000 for couples). All these breaks depend on your 'modified adjusted gross income' (MAGI), which usually matches the number on line 11 of your tax return. The IRS uses this to decide who qualifies, and most people won't need complex calculations. The one piece of good news is that for 90% of taxpayers, MAGI is the same as your adjusted gross income (AGI). That's your total pay minus things like retirement contributions or student loan interest. Only Americans with foreign income or housing expenses might see a difference. To see if you qualify for the new breaks, check last year's tax return (Form 1040, line 11). If you're close to the income limits, you still have time to lower your MAGI for 2025. Putting money into a 401(k), IRA, or health savings account (HSA) reduces taxable income. Seniors over 70 years can also donate to charity directly from an IRA to shrink their MAGI. These tax breaks take effect this year! If your income is slightly too high, consider boosting retirement savings before December 31. Contributing $5,000 to a 401(k) could drop your MAGI below the $150,000 tip/overtime cutoff. But remember: Some cuts won't last. The overtime and tips deductions vanish after 2028, and the SALT cap drops back to $10,000 in 2030. While wealthy Americans get bigger permanent tax cuts, the new breaks help middle earners most. Still, critics warn Medicaid and food aid cuts could hurt low-income families, offsetting their small tax savings.