
Tech jobs aplenty in Dubai's AI boom – depending on your passport
Ameca, a humanoid robot, smiled and blinked at the crowd at Dubai AI Week 2025, a celebration of all things artificial intelligence. Landmark announcements marked the event, including a $545 million hyperscale data center to supply Microsoft and Dubai's first PhD program in AI.
AI engineer Nair, 29, felt inspired. Since moving to the United Arab Emirates last October from Kerala, India, she had applied to hundreds of entry-level jobs and faced rejections, scams and exploitative offers. Rest of World is not revealing her first name to protect her identity.
Now she remembered why she'd emigrated. 'Dubai is emerging as a global AI hub,' she told Rest of World. 'It was fascinating to see how companies are pushing the boundaries of what's possible.'
Tech workers like Nair are moving to the UAE, attracted by a Golden Visa programme that gives 10 years of residency to skilled professionals, no taxes, high salaries and the ease of setting up business, recruiters and tech professionals told Rest of World.
'The UAE ranks second only to the US in attracting top AI talent, with many of these experts now calling the UAE home,' Abdulla bin Touq Al Marri, UAE's Minister of Economy, said last year.
The UAE has positioned itself as the US's tech ally. During President Donald Trump's recent visit, it secured access to 500,000 of the most advanced Nvidia chips, critical for AI development. It also announced plans to build the largest AI campus outside the US in collaboration with American tech companies. And last year, Microsoft and Emirati AI firm G42 announced they are working together to create a 'skilled and diverse AI workforce.'.
The UAE's laser-sharp focus on AI makes it attractive for tech workers at a time when opportunities are shrinking in the West. More than 50,000 tech workers, mostly mid-level managers and developers, have been laid off in the US this year from about 100 companies, according to the layoff tracker Layoffs.fyi. There are also fewer openings for roles such as software developers, and many tech workers fear the Trump government's stringent immigration policies. Venture capital investment in startups, too, has cooled in the West.
But beneath the UAE's sheen of opportunity, the job market can pose challenges for tech workers depending on where they're from, workers and recruiters told Rest of World. Senior tech talent from the West are often headhunted for top positions at high salaries. Experienced AI experts from South Asia and Ukraine fill the lower ranks, for lower pay.
And young talent like Nair fall in a gray area of AI professionals who struggle to get hired. With a Master's in electronics engineering and specialisation in AI hardware from an Indian college and one year of work experience, she has been job-hunting for months.
'You get automatic rejections,' she told Rest of World. 'Companies want candidates with four to five years of experience for entry-level roles, or they hire through referrals.'
This is not due to a dearth of jobs. Dubai has more than 800 AI firms, most of them startups, according to the Dubai Center for Artificial Intelligence. Abu Dhabi has over 400 AI companies. Most of them plan to recruit this year.
But the UAE also has an 'abundance' of tech workers, according to a 2024 talent report by the UAE Ministry of Economy and immigration law firm Fragomen. Most of these workers are not qualified for specialised AI roles, the report said.
About 95% of 50,000 companies surveyed in the report said they hired tech professionals from outside the Middle East.
'There's not enough domestic university talent so we recruit candidates from India and Ukraine,' Vahid Haghzare, director of SVA Recruitment based in Dubai, told Rest of World.
The UAE is a 'global migration node', Froilan Malit Jr, a visiting scholar at American University in Dubai and an expert on migration to the Middle East, told Rest of World. It is a transit space for people from developing countries to gain experience before moving West, while Western professionals can leverage their expertise for higher pay and long-term residency in the UAE, he said.
Western professionals are attracted by Dubai's lifestyle perks, while Asian and Muslim tech workers appreciate a culture that's a mix of East and West, Malit Jr. said. 'It's a win-win: tax-free income, top schools, security, and cosmopolitan living.'
Workers get different salaries based on their years of experience, and also where they are from, he said. Workers from developing nations experience a 'citizenship penalty' and command a lower salary in the UAE than their western counterparts, Malit Jr. said.
'That's what triggers a lot of tech workers from the Global South to move to the West, and then return [to the UAE] with a new passport,' he said.
Jarkko Moilanen, head of data products at the Abu Dhabi Department for Government Enablement, which oversees the city's digital transformation, moved to the UAE in 2022 from Finland after being recruited as one of 200 global experts to help drive the effort.
'I needed a change,' said the 50-year-old AI professional, who has helmed transformations at various tech companies in Finland. A year later, he decided to stay long-term in the UAE and applied for a Golden Visa.
The nation has made relocation relatively frictionless, especially for AI-related specialists, developers and entrepreneurs. Dubai had issued an estimated 158,000 Golden Visas by 2023.
Moilanen said that he is incentivised to stay in the UAE rather than go back to Europe, which he perceives as being in economic decline. In contrast, Abu Dhabi has gone all in on AI, and plans to become the world's first AI-native government, laying the groundwork to fully automate and digitise government processes.
Moilanen said that he has also received multiple job offers from recruiters in Saudi Arabia, but has turned them down as he hopes to launch an AI and data business in the UAE.
'The data and AI combination here is hot. They have the money to execute fast,' he said.
AI startups are thriving in the UAE, with support from funds like Hub71, an Abu Dhabi-based incubator. In Dubai, Sandbox, funded by Oraseya Capital, supports existing startups, while the Dubai Future Accelerators helps companies collaborate with the government.
Entrepreneur Nidhima Kohli, originally from Luxembourg, recently launched her startup, The AI Accelerator, an online course meant to help entrepreneurs and executives use AI tools to improve productivity. She migrated to Dubai in 2022 and received a Golden Visa the following year.
'I've lived in London, Paris, and the US, but never felt as safe as in Dubai. It is international, people are approachable and happy to connect with you,' she told Rest of World.
She said she appreciates the ease of networking and setting up a business in the UAE. 'The UAE is putting money where its mouth is. They want to grow and not stifle innovation.'
But for less experienced workers from South Asia, like Nair, hurdles persist. She has seen many scam jobs on LinkedIn, including a recruiter who asked her to pay $1,000 for a certification course. She has also received exploitative offers. One company offered her 3,000 dirhams ($816) per month, much below market rate. Another asked her to work seven days a week, without paid leave or sick days.
Despite all the setbacks, Nair remains hopeful for the road ahead. 'I'm excited about the opportunities to grow, learn, and make a meaningful impact here.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
$16 million, no apology: Paramount settles Trump's '60 minutes' lawsuit
In a rare and stunning move, Paramount Global agreed to pay US President Donald Trump $16 million to settle a lawsuit over the editing of a 2024 60 Minutes interview with then Vice President Kamala Harris. The payment, announced quietly on Tuesday evening, marks one of the most significant capitulations by a major news organisation to a sitting president in US history. And it may be one of the clearest signals yet that the press is losing its most fundamental protections. 'Each settlement weakens the democratic freedoms on which these media organisations depend,' wrote Jameel Jaffer, head of the Knight First Amendment Institute. 'They create precedents… that will shape the way that judges and the public think about press freedom and its limits.' Paramount's settlement, which includes Trump's legal fees, comes with no apology. But it does include one unprecedented concession: future 60 Minutes interviews with presidential candidates will now come with full written transcripts. 'Another win for the American people,' a spokesman for Trump's legal team said, delivered by the president who is holding 'the fake news media accountable.' But the implications stretch far beyond a single interview. 'The deal is the clearest sign yet that Mr. Trump's ability to intimidate major American institutions extends to the media industry,' The New York Times wrote. Inside CBS, the mood was grim. Journalists at 60 Minutes had seen the lawsuit not only as frivolous but as a direct challenge to their ability to report freely. Scott Pelley, a CBS correspondent, called any settlement 'very damaging to CBS, to Paramount, to the reputation of those companies.' Veteran CBS reporter Lesley Stahl was even more blunt in an interview with the New Yorker. 'There aren't any damages. I mean, he accused us of editing Kamala Harris in a way to help her win the election. But he won the election,' she said. 'It is a frivolous lawsuit.' Still, Paramount folded. Why? Part of the answer lies in the network's fragile corporate situation. Paramount+, the company's flagship streaming service, is bleeding hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Its CEO was ousted and replaced with an awkward 'office of the C.E.O.' Its cable business is in long-term decline, and its stock has plummeted more than 70 per cent over the last five years. All this while the company is negotiating a high-stakes merger with Skydance Media, one that needs the blessing of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to go through. While FCC Chairman Brendan Carr publicly claimed the Trump lawsuit was unrelated to the FCC's review of the Skydance deal, others weren't so sure. The Times reported that some Paramount executives believed settling the lawsuit might smooth the path forward with regulators. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders warned that such a payout 'could be construed as a bribe' and suggested congressional hearings might follow. Even though the FCC regulates Paramount's 27 local stations and not CBS News directly, Carr has taken a notably aggressive stance toward liberal media outlets. He opened inquiries into NPR and PBS, questioned public broadcasting funding, and revived reviews into the programming choices of ABC and NBC. The lawsuit against CBS wasn't even about Trump himself, who didn't appear in the segment. Instead, Trump claims that 60 Minutes violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, a law typically used by consumers against false advertising. His claim centered on how CBS edited Kamala Harris' remarks about Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Twenty-one seconds of the Harris interview aired on Face the Nation, and seven different seconds on 60 Minutes. CBS said it was edited for time, a standard practice in television, but Trump argued that it was designed to sway voters towards the Democratic nominee. Legal scholars were baffled. 'CBS' speech is not commercial, It's news,' wrote Noah Feldman, a Harvard law professor for Bloomberg. 'If news on a network with advertising counted as commercial speech, the First Amendment as we know it would be gutted.' Yet the case found a home in Amarillo, Texas, where there's only one federal judge – Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee with a record of hardline rulings. But the CBS settlement wasn't an outlier. In recent years, Trump has extracted millions from media giants. Disney paid $15 million (plus $1 million in legal fees) over a defamation claim tied to George Stephanopoulos. Meta paid $25 million over Trump's Facebook ban. Trump still has pending suits against the Des Moines Register and even the Pulitzer Prize committee. In many cases, these lawsuits are legally shaky—but politically potent. At the Pentagon, former Fox News host Pete Hegseth, now Defence Secretary, reassigned press workspace away from outlets like Politico, NPR, NBC, and The New York Times in favour of Breitbart, One America News, and HuffPost – which hadn't even asked for a spot. Reporters weren't banned, but the message was clear. 'The opposition party is the media,' former advisor Steve Bannon told Frontline in 2019. On the campaign trail in 2022, Trump said he would jail reporters who refuse to reveal confidential sources, even joking about prison rape. 'When this person realises that he is going to be the bride of another prisoner shortly, he will say, 'I'd very much like to tell you exactly who that was,'' Trump warned at a rally. Then, in 2023, he called on NBC to be investigated for treason over its coverage of criminal charges he faces. Similarly, after a contentious 2024 debate, he called for ABC News to lose its license. 'They oughta take away their license for the way they do that,' he told Fox & Friends. Trump's campaign has already changed how some major outlets operate. Jeff Bezos of The Washington Post and Patrick Soon-Shiong of The Los Angeles Times both refused to endorse Kamala Harris in 2024, citing public mistrust in media and the political risks of alienating federal regulators. Inside The New York Times, leadership is bracing for more to come. Executive Editor Joseph Kahn told NPR, 'we shouldn't pretend that [press protections] are only vulnerable in a place like Hungary or Turkey. They are also vulnerable here.' And while Trump and his allies criticised the Biden administration for pressuring social media companies to remove offensive content, Trump is doing the same thing, just more aggressively. '[Trump] is demanding that a private company kowtow to him—or else,' wrote Reason magazine. 'But his chilling crusade against the press… is an assault on the values that distinguish a liberal democracy from one that elects autocrats.'


India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
ChatGPT helps US woman pay off her $23,000 credit card debt
An American woman has reportedly used ChatGPT as her financial advisor to pay off her credit card debt. Jennifer Allan, a realtor and content creator living in the US' Delaware, turned to the AI chatbot for help in paying off her $23,000 35-year-old told Newsweek that she "struggled with money her whole adult life".For a month, ChatGPT gave Allan daily tips and tasks to cut expenses and boost her "Not because I don't make enough, but because I was never taught financial literacy. I avoided budgeting, and I figured if I just kept working harder, I could overcome the problem. That worked... until it didn't," the US-based weekly news magazine quoted her as began to fall apart after her daughter's birth. "I shut down emotionally, and I used credit cards to keep our life afloat. We weren't living lavishly. We were just surviving. But the debt piled up while I wasn't looking," she told JENNIFER ALLAN FINALLY TURNED TO CHATGPT TO CLEAR DEBTAfter being inspired by online 30-day challenges, she decided to challenge herself to use ChatGPT every day for a month to pay off the debt — whether that was brainstorming side hustles or just giving her expenses a little structure, according to the day, the AI bot gave Allan a single money-saving or earning task — like cancelling a subscription, selling things on Facebook Marketplace, checking for unclaimed funds, or digging for spare change in bags and couches — which ended up making her over $100, the report of the biggest breakthroughs during the challenge was uncovering more than $10,000 in unclaimed or forgotten June, Allan shared a clip to her TikTok account, revealing she had hit day 30 of her challenge — and over the past month, had paid off $12,078.93 (Approximately Rs 10.08 lakh).ChatGPT also reportedly helped her save $600 AND TIKTOK'S CONSISTENT SUPPORT HELPED ALLAN STAY MOTIVATEDAllan attributed her motivation to ChatGPT's steady support."It wasn't some big financial hack," Allan told Newsweek. "It was the act of facing it every day — of tracking it, talking about it, looking at it every day. I stopped being afraid of my numbers. I built a debt tracker. I started sharing my journey publicly. And for the first time in my life, I didn't feel ashamed. I felt empowered, like I could conquer anything," she those facing debt and thinking about a similar step, Allan recommended: "Don't wait until you feel ready or 'smart enough' to start. You don't have to know all the answers — you just have to stop pretending it's not happening."advertisementShe advised making the process enjoyable, saying: "For me, using AI gave me a sense of structure without judgment, and TikTok allowed me to hold myself accountable because (the) community I had built was showing up every day waiting for the next task."- Ends
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
40 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US-Vietnam trade deal: Trump announces 20% import tariff, market access
US President Donald Trump has confirmed a new trade agreement between the United States (US) and Vietnam, under which a 20 per cent tariff will be imposed on Vietnamese goods entering the US. Trump made the announcement on Truth Social. He said that the agreement also includes tariff-free access for American products into Vietnamese markets. As part of the deal, Vietnam has agreed to a 40 per cent tariff on any goods that are brought into the country from elsewhere and then shipped to the US. This practice, known as transshipping, is often used to avoid existing trade restrictions. Notably, media reports have highlighted concerns that China has used Vietnam as a transshipment point for goods destined for the US. Great deal of cooperation: Trump He continued: 'The Terms are that Vietnam will pay the United States a 20 per cent Tariff on any and all goods sent into our Territory, and a 40 per cent Tariff on any Transshipping. In return, Vietnam will do something that they have never done before, give the United States of America TOTAL ACCESS to their Markets for Trade. In other words, they will 'OPEN THEIR MARKET TO THE UNITED STATES,' meaning that, we will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff.' Trump also added: 'It is my opinion that the SUV or, as it is sometimes referred to, Large Engine Vehicle, which does so well in the United States, will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam. Dealing with General Secretary To Lam, which I did personally, was an absolute pleasure. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' 'Just in time' deal The deal comes just days before a 90-day suspension on Trump's reciprocal tariffs is set to end. Once expired, those tariffs would have increased duties on imports from dozens of countries. Previously, Vietnamese goods entering the US faced a flat 46 per cent tariff under the Trimp administration's "reciprocal" measures.