Deep Intelligent Pharma Unleashes a New Era of AI-Driven Drug Development at Microsoft Build 2025
Built in partnership with Microsoft Azure O3, DIP's next-gen platform harnesses multi-agent AI swarms capable of performing scientific writing, statistical reasoning, document validation, and regulatory compliance with superhuman scale and precision. It directly targets one of the most expensive, slow, and error-prone challenges in pharma: the creation of clinical and regulatory documents.
'This isn't just an upgrade — it's a reinvention of how life science companies operate,' said Xing Li, CEO of DIP. 'We've turned months of expert labor into minutes of AI-driven intelligence — bringing speed, accuracy, and scientific depth into perfect alignment.'
A Paradigm Shift in Life Science R&D
The DIP platform is designed to eliminate the longstanding bottlenecks of pharmaceutical development:
Real Results, Real Impact
At Build, DIP showcased a live case study in which its AI-authored protocol for a novel cancer immunotherapy was approved by Japan's PMDA with zero revisions — in a single review cycle. The message was clear: generative AI isn't the future of pharma — it's happening now.
With over 1,000 pharma clients, 20,000+ submission projects, and 5 billion words processed, DIP is already trusted by industry leaders across Asia and beyond. And now, it's setting a new global standard for how data becomes discovery.
Transforming the Economics of Innovation
With drug development costs surpassing $2 billion per therapy and timelines stretching 10–15 years, DIP's AI orchestration radically accelerates innovation — helping companies reinvest resources into science instead of paperwork.
'This is AI that thinks like a scientist, writes like a regulator, and moves at the speed of discovery,' added Shinya Yamamoto. 'We're not just helping companies go faster — we're helping them aim higher.'
About Deep Intelligent Pharma
Founded in 2017, Deep Intelligent Pharma is a pioneering AI company with global offices in Japan, China, and Singapore. Its mission is to empower pharmaceutical and medtech innovators through intelligent automation, turning regulatory complexity into a catalyst for speed, scale, and scientific excellence. DIP has built agent swarms based on generative AI models with outcome based payment model in life science R&D.
Contact Info:
Name: Xing Li
Email: Send Email
Organization: Deep Intelligent Pharma
Website: https://x-doc.ai/
Release ID: 89160572
Should you identify any discrepancies, concerns, or inaccuracies in the content provided in this press release or require assistance with a press release takedown, we strongly urge you to notify us promptly by contacting [email protected] (it is important to note that this email is the authorized channel for such matters, sending multiple emails to multiple addresses does not necessarily help expedite your request). Our responsive team is committed to addressing your concerns within 8 hours by taking necessary actions to resolve identified issues diligently or guiding you through the necessary steps for removal. Our dedication lies in providing accurate and reliable information.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 days ago
- Business Insider
The gray area at the center of Microsoft's battle with OpenAI
The future of the most important partnership in technology depends on Microsoft 's access to the artificial intelligence powering ChatGPT. When OpenAI first demoed a breakthrough feature in May 2024, allowing users to talk to its AI just like a person, it looked as if the company did so in lock-step with its partner and investor, Microsoft. Soon after OpenAI demoed this voice capability for its new GPT-4o model, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella included it in a keynote speech at the company's Build developer conference. Behind the scenes, Microsoft had little knowledge of the feature until days before the demo, people involved in the matter told Business Insider. While the agreement between the two companies gives Microsoft access to OpenAI's technology, exactly what OpenAI has to share — and when — is sometimes a gray area. In this case, Microsoft had access to frequent updates of the core model at the time, but not the voice technology OpenAI built on top of it. Microsoft found out about the demo, and pressured OpenAI executives, including then-technology boss Mira Murati, to get access to the code so Microsoft could do its own announcement, the people said. The company did not want to appear flat-footed to investors, to whom the company has to justify its $13 billion investment in OpenAI, they said. The example illustrates the ongoing complexity of Microsoft's relationship with OpenAI, and why access to the AI startup's technology is a core issue as the companies renegotiate their agreement. OpenAI needs Microsoft's blessing for a corporate restructuring. To get that, OpenAI may need to convince Microsoft to change or give up some pretty sweet terms: Microsoft has access to much of OpenAI's technology, exclusive rights to sell it on Azure, first right of refusal to provide computing resources, and a revenue-sharing agreement worth billions of dollars. Lots of thorny details about points of contention in the negotiations have made recent headlines — a looming, existential clause OpenAI could activate to cut off Microsoft's access, a "nuclear option" reportedly considered by OpenAI executives to accuse Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior, and a report that Microsoft was prepared to walk away from the renegotiations. In response to those reports, Microsoft and OpenAI released a joint statement saying, "Talks are ongoing and we are optimistic we will continue to build together for years to come." People close to Microsoft's side of the negotiating talks tell BI the software giant is unlikely to walk away because it is deeply reliant on OpenAI's intellectual property, and the negotiations are an opportunity to improve and expand its access to this technology. It's all about IP Microsoft has significantly benefited from its arrangement to access the rights to OpenAI's intellectual property, both by selling it to customers through the Azure OpenAI service and creating its own products using OpenAI's technology, like its AI assistant Copilot. There are limits, however, to what the companies consider "IP." For example, Microsoft gets access to important aspects of OpenAI's models, like model weights that help determine AI outputs and inference codes that instruct the models on how to use data, the people said. Some things are excluded from what the companies consider IP, like product and user interface information, they said, and the point at which OpenAI must share any technology is up to interpretation. One person with knowledge of OpenAI's operations said the company doesn't have to share what it's developing until it's finished, which can be subjective. "You can make sure you share something with Microsoft as late as possible, so they can still simultaneously announce, but make it really difficult to build the same product on top of it," the person said. Plus, having access to the IP isn't the same as knowing how to use it. This has been harder than expected, several people told BI. OpenAI has grown frustrated with Microsoft's request to spell out the technology to its employees, people with knowledge of both companies said. Sometimes, Microsoft doesn't know what questions to ask of OpenAI. Microsoft formed a new AI organization two years ago and hired Mustafa Suleyman, the former Inflection CEO who cofounded the AI pioneer DeepMind, to run it. The hiring was meant as a hedge against OpenAI, after Nadella received pressure from Microsoft's board to diversify following instability at its partner startup and CEO Sam Altman's ouster. However, little has come of that in terms of replacing Microsoft's need for its partnership with OpenAI, the people said. Suleyman has completely rebuilt Microsoft's Copilot app. That effort has yet to achieve much growth for Copilot. His team is focused on building smaller models and has seen success with post-training existing models for new purposes, one of the people said. Overall, Microsoft isn't trying to build frontier models like those that would compete with GPT, and is instead putting resources toward OpenAI, they said. Microsoft is less worried about AGI, antitrust, Windsurf, or SoftBank Other points of contention that have made recent headlines are of less concern to Microsoft, the people with knowledge of Microsoft's position said. Included in the agreement is a clause that would allow OpenAI to declare what's called artificial general intelligence or "AGI," and cut off Microsoft's access to OpenAI's IP and profits. OpenAI defines AGI as "a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable works." While OpenAI could declare AGI, the concept is so open to interpretation that Microsoft could sue and easily tie the company up in a legal battle for years, the people said. There's another version of the clause, "sufficient AGI," that OpenAI could declare when it builds a technology capable of achieving a certain level of profits, but Microsoft has to sign off on that. Another apparent sticking point in the negotiations has centered on OpenAI's desire to acquire AI coding assistant startup Windsurf. Under the current agreement, that would give Microsoft access to Windsurf's technology. Microsoft has said it would agree to the acquisition, but Windsurf's CEO doesn't want the company's technology to be shared with Microsoft, one of the people said. While GitHub Copilot faces increasing competition from other AI coding assistants, access to Windsurf's technology is not a big desire for Microsoft, and the company might consider a carve-out of Windsurf IP in a new deal, the person said. OpenAI executives have reportedly considered accusing Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior. Microsoft is largely unconcerned about this, two of the people said. The existing deal was investigated by antitrust regulators, including the European Union and the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority. OpenAI's desire to restructure is in part motivated by a deadline from investor SoftBank that risks a percentage of funding if OpenAI can't close such a deal by the end of the year. OpenAI has said it struggled to fundraise due to its peculiar structure. SoftBank has a reputation for taking risks with its funding, and its CEO is keen on OpenAI, so some observers doubt SoftBank will follow through on its deadline to revoke funding if a new deal isn't reached.
Business Insider
3 days ago
- Business Insider
Inside the battle over Microsoft's access to OpenAI's technology
The future of the most important partnership in technology depends on Microsoft 's access to the artificial intelligence powering ChatGPT. When OpenAI first demoed a breakthrough feature in May 2024, allowing users to talk to its AI just like a person, it looked as if the company did so in lock-step with its partner and investor, Microsoft. Soon after OpenAI demoed this voice capability for its new GPT-4o model, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella included it in a keynote speech at the company's Build developer conference. Behind the scenes, Microsoft had little knowledge of the feature until days before the demo, people involved in the matter told Business Insider. While the agreement between the two companies gives Microsoft access to OpenAI's technology, exactly what OpenAI has to share — and when — is sometimes a gray area. In this case, Microsoft had access to frequent updates of the core model at the time, but not the voice technology OpenAI built on top of it. Microsoft found out about the demo, and pressured OpenAI executives, including then-technology boss Mira Murati, to get access to the code so Microsoft could do its own announcement, the people said. The company did not want to appear flat-footed to investors, to whom the company has to justify its $13 billion investment in OpenAI, they said. The example illustrates the ongoing complexity of Microsoft's relationship with OpenAI, and why access to the AI startup's technology is a core issue as the companies renegotiate their agreement. OpenAI needs Microsoft's blessing for a corporate restructuring. To get that, OpenAI may need to convince Microsoft to change or give up some pretty sweet terms: Microsoft has access to much of OpenAI's technology, exclusive rights to sell it on Azure, first right of refusal to provide computing resources, and a revenue-sharing agreement worth billions of dollars. Lots of thorny details about points of contention in the negotiations have made recent headlines — a looming, existential clause OpenAI could activate to cut off Microsoft's access, a "nuclear option" reportedly considered by OpenAI executives to accuse Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior, and a report that Microsoft was prepared to walk away from the renegotiations. In response to those reports, Microsoft and OpenAI released a joint statement saying, "Talks are ongoing and we are optimistic we will continue to build together for years to come." People close to Microsoft's side of the negotiating talks tell BI the software giant is unlikely to walk away because it is deeply reliant on OpenAI's intellectual property, and the negotiations are an opportunity to improve and expand its access to this technology. It's all about IP Microsoft has significantly benefited from its arrangement to access the rights to OpenAI's intellectual property, both by selling it to customers through the Azure OpenAI service and creating its own products using OpenAI's technology, like its AI assistant Copilot. There are limits, however, to what the companies consider "IP." For example, Microsoft gets access to important aspects of OpenAI's models, like model weights that help determine AI outputs and inference codes that instruct the models on how to use data, the people said. Some things are excluded from what the companies consider IP, like product and user interface information, they said, and the point at which OpenAI must share any technology is up to interpretation. One person with knowledge of OpenAI's operations said the company doesn't have to share what it's developing until it's finished, which can be subjective. "You can make sure you share something with Microsoft as late as possible, so they can still simultaneously announce, but make it really difficult to build the same product on top of it," the person said. Plus, having access to the IP isn't the same as knowing how to use it. This has been harder than expected, several people told BI. OpenAI has grown frustrated with Microsoft's request to spell out the technology to its employees, people with knowledge of both companies said. Sometimes, Microsoft doesn't know what questions to ask of OpenAI. Microsoft formed a new AI organization two years ago and hired Mustafa Suleyman, the former Inflection CEO who cofounded the AI pioneer DeepMind, to run it. The hiring was meant as a hedge against OpenAI, after Nadella received pressure from Microsoft's board to diversify following instability at its partner startup and CEO Sam Altman's ouster. However, little has come of that in terms of replacing Microsoft's need for its partnership with OpenAI, the people said. Suleyman has completely rebuilt Microsoft's Copilot app. That effort has yet to achieve much growth for Copilot. His team is focused on building smaller models and has seen success with post-training existing models for new purposes, one of the people said. Overall, Microsoft isn't trying to build frontier models like those that would compete with GPT, and is instead putting resources toward OpenAI, they said. Microsoft is less worried about AGI, antitrust, Windsurf, or SoftBank Other points of contention that have made recent headlines are of less concern to Microsoft, the people with knowledge of Microsoft's position said. Included in the agreement is a clause that would allow OpenAI to declare what's called artificial general intelligence or "AGI," and cut off Microsoft's access to OpenAI's IP and profits. OpenAI defines AGI as "a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable works." While OpenAI could declare AGI, the concept is so open to interpretation that Microsoft could sue and easily tie the company up in a legal battle for years, the people said. There's another version of the clause, "sufficient AGI," that OpenAI could declare when it builds a technology capable of achieving a certain level of profits, but Microsoft has to sign off on that. Another apparent sticking point in the negotiations has centered on OpenAI's desire to acquire AI coding assistant startup Windsurf. Under the current agreement, that would give Microsoft access to Windsurf's technology. Microsoft has said it would agree to the acquisition, but Windsurf's CEO doesn't want the company's technology to be shared with Microsoft, one of the people said. While GitHub Copilot faces increasing competition from other AI coding assistants, access to Windsurf's technology is not a big desire for Microsoft, and the company might consider a carve-out of Windsurf IP in a new deal, the person said. OpenAI executives have reportedly considered accusing Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior. Microsoft is largely unconcerned about this, two of the people said. The existing deal was investigated by antitrust regulators, including the European Union and the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority. OpenAI's desire to restructure is in part motivated by a deadline from investor SoftBank that risks a percentage of funding if OpenAI can't close such a deal by the end of the year. OpenAI has said it struggled to fundraise due to its peculiar structure. SoftBank has a reputation for taking risks with its funding, and its CEO is keen on OpenAI, so some observers doubt SoftBank will follow through on its deadline to revoke funding if a new deal isn't reached.
Yahoo
25-06-2025
- Yahoo
Wall Street's New Crypto Obsession: $100M Bet to Bring Binance's BNB to Nasdaq
A group of former Coral Capital executives is plotting a bold move that could give public investors direct exposure to the Binance (BNB) ecosystem. Patrick Horsman, Joshua Kruger, and Johnathan Pasch are reportedly close to raising $100 million through a Nasdaq-listed shell company they control, with plans to rename it Build & Build Corporation and start accumulating BNBBinance's native tokenas its primary treasury asset. According to investor materials reviewed by Bloomberg, the fundraising could close within weeks. If the deal lands, it would mark the first time a publicly traded firm anchors its balance sheet to BNB, borrowing a page from Michael Saylor's Bitcoin blueprint, Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with MSTR. The strategy taps into a wave of crypto accumulation by corporateskicked off by Saylor's firm, which now holds nearly $60 billion in Bitcoin (BTC-USD)and now expanding into alternative tokens. Recent examples include SharpLink's $425 million Ethereum-focused raise led by Consensys, and moves by firms like Janover and Upexi into Solana. But this BNB bet stands out. Binance launched the token in 2017 via an ICO that allocated 80 million tokens to its founding team, including former CEO Changpeng Zhao. Today, BNB sits at a market value of $87 billion, used for fee discounts on Binance and to power transactions across BNB Smart Chaina blockchain favored by crypto games and exchanges. Of course, this all comes with baggage. Binance and Zhao pleaded guilty in late 2023 to violating U.S. AML and sanctions laws, resulting in a $4.3 billion settlement and Zhao stepping down. That said, the regulatory winds may be shifting. Under Trump-era crypto optimism, the SEC recently moved to drop its lawsuit against Binanceoffering a potentially more favorable backdrop for this kind of public-market crypto exposure. If Build & Build pulls it off, it won't just be another crypto stock. It could be the first publicly traded BNB treasurypositioned squarely at the center of the Binance revival narrative. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
