Resort politics in municipal polls too as MCM councillors flown to Nepal
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Incidentally, Manesar was the only corporation where BJP didn't win the mayoral seat in the civic elections that were held earlier this year. An Independent, Inderjit Kaur Yadav, was elected mayor. So, there is intense jockeying for influence over the deputies. The two positions for which polls will be held are those of senior deputy mayor and deputy mayor.
Sources said the 12 councillors were flown off over the weekend to Pokhara and were accompanied by a senior BJP functionary, a loyalist of minister and Badshapur MLA Rao Narbir Singh.
An unspecified number was sequestered in other cities within India, the sources added.
According to party insiders, the councillors' group in Nepal was on its way back to the city on Monday and would reach either late night or early Tuesday morning. In case of the latter, they will directly go to the Manesar conference hall where voting is scheduled between 10.30am and 1.45pm.
Sources in BJP said the strategy was a preventive measure against any last-minute poaching or crossvoting.
"The risk of defections or councillors shifting loyalties under pressure is real. After the mayoral loss to an Independent candidate backed by Rao Inderjit Singh, we couldn't afford another setback," said a senior BJP functionary, referring to the tussle for influence between the Union minister and Gurgaon MP and Narbir.
Election for the senior deputy mayor and deputy mayor holds both symbolic and strategic importance because the mayor is a Rao Inderjit loyalist who prevailed despite intense campaigning for the BJP candidate by Narbir.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Eventually, seven BJP candidates were elected in the 20-member civic body. After the polls, seven Independent councillors joined BJP, taking the party's tally to 14 and putting it in a good position to call the shots in Tuesday's elections.
However, such numerical reassurances can prove ephemeral before crunch votes, so moving the flock to Nepal was thought to be the right move by Narbir's camp to ensure unity and minimise last-minute shifts, especially amid attempts by the rival faction to re-establish contact with some of the turncoats, sources said.
Photos of some of the councillors dining at a restaurant in Kathmandu and sightseeing in Pokhara have surfaced on social media, drawing comments about the need for such "extreme measures" in a municipality level election.
Narbir has, however, denied his role in Nepal trip for the councillors. "I'm not aware of any trip. There is election on Tuesday and all councillors will be there. I am sure BJP candidates will get the seats".
On rivalry with Rao Inderjit, Narbir said he is a senior BJP functionary and Union minister, and there are no such differences.
Parties or netas protecting their flock against horse-trading by herding them into hotels and resorts at faraway places ahead of crucial events like a confidence motion or a trust vote, or breaking away to form a new party or joining another, is not uncommon. But that happens at the state or national levels.
Maharashtra, Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh have seen episodes of MLAs being flown to luxury resorts in Goa, Rajasthan, and even hotels in Gurgaon.
During his power struggle with Ashok Gehlot, Congress's Sachin Pilot had led a group of MLAs to a hotel in Manesar.
For Tuesday's poll in Manesar, during which councillors will vote to elect the two deputies to the mayor, both sides exuded confidence on their numbers. According to BJP sources, consensus has been reached on fielding Praveen Yadav, councillor from Ward 12, and Reema Deepak Chauhan, councillor from Ward 2, for the posts. The rival bloc has not publicly disclosed its candidates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 minutes ago
- First Post
What does US import from Russia as Trump rants about India's oil trade?
As Trump threatens steep tariffs on India over its Russian oil imports, data reveals the US quietly continues to import billions worth of palladium, uranium, and fertilisers from Russia. While Washington criticises New Delhi's energy ties with Moscow, its own trade in strategic commodities with Russia raises questions about economic double standards read more Daily newspapers with covers, dedicated to the recent phone call of Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump, are laid out at a newsstand in a street in Moscow, Russia, February 13, 2025. File Image/Reuters US President Donald Trump has been threatening India with steep tariffs over its oil imports from Moscow even as trade data shows that the United States continues to engage in selective but significant imports from Russia — a country Washington has otherwise sought to isolate since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Most recently, Trump, in a series of online statements, accused India of buying heavily discounted Russian oil and profiting by reselling it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He threatened a hike in tariffs on Indian exports to the United States, going as far as proposing a 25 per cent duty and promising additional penalties. India reacted firmly to this public criticism. According to a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), India began purchasing oil from Russia only after its traditional energy suppliers diverted output to European markets post-2022. 'The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability,' the statement noted. 'It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion.' India has repeatedly justified its energy trade with Russia as necessary for maintaining stable and affordable energy costs for its domestic consumers. Hardeep Singh Puri, India's Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas, remarked in a recent CNBC interview: 'If people or countries had stopped buying at that stage, the price of oil would have gone up to 130 dollars a barrel. That was a situation in which we were advised, including by our friends in the United States, to please buy Russian oil, but within the price cap.' Even former US Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti had stated at a public event last year that 'we wanted somebody to buy Russian oil,' acknowledging Washington's prior encouragement of Indian purchases to stabilise global markets. The Indian government highlighted the continuing trade relationships between Russia and the United States, as well as the European Union, despite sanctions and political rhetoric. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Official data confirms that Europe and America have maintained selective imports of high-priority goods from Russia over the past few years. European Union-Russia trade The European Union's trade with Russia remains substantial. The EU's goods trade with Russia amounted to €67.5 billion ($78.1 billion) in 2024, and trade in services was worth €17.2 billion in 2023. E uropean LNG imports from Russia hit a record 16.5 million tonnes in 2024, surpassing the previous record of 15.21 million tonnes in 2022. Europe's commercial interactions with Russia cover a wide range of sectors including liquefied natural gas, fertilisers, mining products, industrial chemicals, iron and steel, and transport equipment. US-Russia trade The United States also maintained imports from Russia, particularly in strategic areas like nuclear fuel, precious metals, and agricultural products. American imports from Russia totalled approximately $3 billion in 2024, down from $36 billion in 2021, but key items continue to flow. According to the US International Trade Commission: Fertilisers : $1.1 billion in 2024. Palladium : $878 million. Uranium : $624 million. Aircraft engine parts: $75 million. Trade in services, on the other hand, showed resilience. In 2024, US services exports to Russia amounted to $1.3 billion, while imports were $384 million — resulting in a services trade surplus of $873 million, a 43 per cent rise over the previous year. From January to May 2025, US imports from Russia grew 23 per cent year-on-year to reach $2.1 billion, with palladium imports up 37 per cent, uranium up 28 per cent, and fertilizers up 21 per cent. Even the US Trade Representative acknowledges that critical imports such as uranium and palladium are shielded from full sanctions due to the lack of viable alternatives in the global market. A granular look at trade data reveals that the United States continues to purchase a wide range of products from Russia. These include industrial commodities, precious metals, chemicals, and agricultural items. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to customs and trade databases, the following were among the top imports in 2024: Fertilisers (urea, potassium chloride, and others) – $1.3 billion Precious metals (palladium, platinum, etc.) – $878 million Inorganic chemicals, including radioactive materials – $695.7 million Uranium hexafluoride for nuclear fuel – $624 million Aircraft parts and components – $75 million Wood and wood products – $89.4 million Machinery and reactors – $80.8 million Animal feed, residues from food processing – $39.9 million Base metals and cermets – $37.3 million Iron and steel products – $13.1 million Edible vegetables, fruits, and preparations – multiple categories totalling over $15 million Rubbers, plastics, and chemicals – Over $10 million Pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and essential oils – Over $2 million Footwear, textiles, toys, and watches – Combined total over $10 million Aluminum, copper, and nickel – Over $28 million combined Other miscellaneous imports – From raw hides to printed books and even live animals Despite claims that the United States and Russia conduct minimal business today, the facts reveal that trade persists in key areas. Also Watch: Fertiliser imports from Russia are also on the rise. Between January and May 2025 alone, the US brought in $806 million worth — 60 per cent more than during the same period in 2021. Uranium imports, too, were 147 per cent higher compared to early 2021, showing no signs of being phased out. 'Russia and the USA do almost no business together,' Trump had claimed. But the numbers tell a different story: trade has narrowed in scope, not vanished. While American imports of Russian crude oil — once valued at over $17 billion in 2021 — have nearly ceased, other categories like fish, nickel, and lead have also dwindled or stopped. Nevertheless, around 90 per cent of what the US still imports from Russia consists of just three categories: fertilizers, palladium, and uranium. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
6 years & counting: Amit Shah becomes longest-serving home minister; surpasses LK Advani's record
NEW DELHI: on Tuesday became India's longest-serving Union Home Minister, surpassing the previous record held by senior vetaran . Shah has completed a total of 2,258 days (approximately 6 years and 68 days) in office since he first assumed the role on May 30, 2019. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He achieved this milestone on August 5, the same date he had announced the abrogation of Article 370 in Parliament in 2019, ending Jammu and Kashmir's special status, according to news agency ANI. Before Shah, the longest tenures as home minister were held by Congress leader Govind Ballabh Pant and BJP leader Lal Krishna Advani. Advani served in this position for 2,256 days (from March 19, 1998, to May 22, 2004) and Govind Ballabh Pant served for 6 years and 56 days from January 10, 1955, to March 7, 1961. Shah served as home minister from May 30, 2019, to June 9, 2024, and was reappointed on June 10, 2024, continuing in the role. Additionally, he holds the distinction of being the country's first cooperation minister. Earlier, he also served as the home minister of Gujarat and held the position of BJP National President. At a recent NDA meeting, Prime Minister Narendra Modi praised Shah for his contributions and congratulated him on becoming the longest-serving home minister in India's history. Under PM Modi's leadership, Amit Shah's tenure as home minister has brought major changes to India's internal security.
The Print
16 minutes ago
- The Print
‘Bangladeshi language' row: Amit Malviya defends Delhi Police letter, Oppn slams BJP ‘mouthpiece'
'Delhi Police is absolutely right in referring to the language as Bangladeshi in the context of identifying infiltrators. The term is being used to describe a set of dialects, syntax, and speech patterns that are distinctly different from the Bangla spoken in India. The official language of Bangladesh is not only phonologically different, but also includes dialects like Sylheti that are nearly incomprehensible to Indian Bengalis,' Malviya wrote Monday. His long post on X, in which he also argued that there is 'no language called Bengali' that covers all its 'variants', triggered a backlash from leaders of the Trinamool Congress (TMC) and the Congress in West Bengal and the Northeast. New Delhi: Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Amit Malviya has defended a Delhi Police communique calling Bengali as a 'Bangladeshi language', saying it was 'right' to do so in the context of identifying infiltrators. He added that there is 'in fact, no language called 'Bengali' that neatly covers all these variants. 'Bengali' denotes ethnicity, not linguistic uniformity. He was responding to TMC supremo Mamata Banerjee's statement that the Delhi Police letter to the resident commissioner of the Banga Bhavan in the capital was 'scandalous, insulting, anti-national, unconstitutional'. 'Bengali, our mother tongue, the language of Rabindranath Tagore and Swami Vivekananda, the language in which our National Anthem and the National Song (the latter by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay) are written, the language in which crores of Indians speak and write, the language which is sanctified and recognised by the Constitution of India, is now described as a Bangladeshi language!!' Mamata had said. Malviya's statement, particularly his reference to Sylheti as 'nearly incomprehensible to Indian Bengalis', angered leaders in Assam's Barak Valley, home to a large population of Sylhetis, who are also present in significant numbers in Tripura, Meghalaya and West Bengal. In fact, in 1991, Kabindra Purkayastha, whose first language was the Sylheti dialect of Bengali, got elected to the Lok Sabha from Silchar, becoming the first ever BJP MP from Northeast. Even the current MP from Silchar—Parimal Suklabaidya—is from the BJP, which has won the seat five times since 1991. 'Disgraceful that the BJP's loud mouthpiece doesn't know the history of those of us who speak in Sylheti. PMO India needs to sack this incompetent and ignorant bigot. To say Sylheti is nearly incomprehensible to Indian Bengalis is a brainless statement coming from an empty vessel. Sylheti has been spoken & understood across India,' TMC Rajya Sabha MP Sushmita Dev, who represented Silchar as a Congress Lok Sabha MP in the past, said. Assam Congress president Gaurav Gogoi also slammed Malviya, saying the 'arrogance of the BJP' blinds them to the dehumanisation of the Bengali people of West Bengal and Northeast India. 'Today the BJP IT cell insults the Bengali language spoken by lakhs of people in Tripura, Meghalaya and the Barak Valley of Assam. First the BJP asks the Bengali people to declare themselves as Bangladeshis first through the CAA, and now the party insults their language as being foreign. The BJP do not want a united India. They are only interested in re-opening old scars,' Gogoi wrote on X. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: 'Jaitley was sent to threaten me, LS poll was rigged': Rahul's speech at Congress conclave raises storm
