logo
European shares fall on Trump's new tariff threats on EU and Mexico

European shares fall on Trump's new tariff threats on EU and Mexico

Time of Indiaa day ago
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
European shares fell on Monday, led by automobiles, as the U.S. President Donald Trump's latest threat to impose steep tariffs on the European Union and Mexico kept investors on edge.The pan-European STOXX 600 index was down 0.6% at 544.3 points, as of 0706 GMT. Other regional indexes also declined, barring the UK's FTSE 100, which was up 0.2%.Trump on Saturday threatened to impose a 30% tariff on imports from the EU and Mexico starting August 1, after weeks of negotiations with major U.S. trading partners failed to reach comprehensive trade deals.In response, the EU said on Sunday it would extend its suspension of countermeasures to U.S. tariffs until early August and continue to press for a negotiated settlement.Adding to the trade turmoil, on Monday, Italy's Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said in a newspaper interview that the EU has already prepared a list of tariffs worth 21 billion euros ($24.5 billion) on U.S. goods if the two countries fail to reach a deal.In the market, European automobile shares fell 1.4%, while retail sector was down 1%.Among individual stocks, AstraZeneca rose 1.9% after the drugmaker said its drug Baxdrostat met all the main and secondary goals of a late-stage study in patients with uncontrolled or treatment-resistant hypertension.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ICICI Prudential Life Q1 Results: Profit jumps 34% YoY as premiums rise, costs fall
ICICI Prudential Life Q1 Results: Profit jumps 34% YoY as premiums rise, costs fall

Economic Times

time30 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

ICICI Prudential Life Q1 Results: Profit jumps 34% YoY as premiums rise, costs fall

India's ICICI Prudential Life Insurance on Tuesday reported a 34% rise in first-quarter profit, helped by higher premiums from group policies and lower operating costs. ADVERTISEMENT The life insurer reported a profit after tax of 3.02 billion rupees ($35.2 million) for the quarter ended June 30, compared to 2.25 billion rupees a year before. Its net premium income grew 8% to 85.03 billion rupees, driven by a 20% jump in single premiums. Meanwhile, operating expenses decreased 10.1% aided by lower advertisement and sales related cost, the company said. Analysts said strong growth in group insurance plans during the April-June quarter boosted premium income for insurers. Group insurance policies cover a group of people under one contract and are generally utilised by firms for their employees. ADVERTISEMENT However, growth in market- or unit-linked insurance plans (ULIPs) slowed in the quarter hit by broader market volatility driven by uncertainty over the global impact of policy shifts under U.S. President Donald Trump. ULIPs, which have lower margins, accounted for 46.8% of ICICI Prudential Life's overall product mix, down from 51.4% a year earlier. ADVERTISEMENT Annualised premium equivalent sales, a key metric that gives annualised total value of all single premium and recurring premium policies, fell 5% to 18.64 billion rupees for the June quarter. Value of new business (VNB), or expected profit from new policies, fell 3.2% to 4.57 billion rupees for the quarter. ADVERTISEMENT The company's VNB margin rose slightly to 24.5% for the quarter, compared to 24% a year ago. This was supported by the company's reducing shares of its lower-margin, market or unit-linked insurance plans (ULIP). ADVERTISEMENT Peers HDFC Life Insurance and SBI Life Insurance are yet to report their quarterly results. ($1 = 85.7800 Indian rupees). (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)

Theobroma patisserie chain, built by Mumbai-based sisters, eyes Rs 2,410 crore deal with ChrysCapital
Theobroma patisserie chain, built by Mumbai-based sisters, eyes Rs 2,410 crore deal with ChrysCapital

Indian Express

time32 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Theobroma patisserie chain, built by Mumbai-based sisters, eyes Rs 2,410 crore deal with ChrysCapital

Pan-India patisserie chain Theobroma, founded by Mumbai-based sisters Kainaz Messman Harchandrai and Tina Messman Wykes, is likely to be acquired by private equity firm ChrysCapital for Rs 2,410 crore. According to The Economic Times, the homegrown private equity firm will reportedly purchase nearly 90 per cent of the company from its founding promoters, the Wykes family, and existing investor ICICI Venture. The remaining 10 per cent stake is expected to remain with the current shareholders. Born in a small kitchen in Colaba at a neighbour's request, Theobroma — Greek for 'Food of the Gods' — was founded in 2004 by the two sisters. It began as a modest café with just four tables in Mumbai's Colaba and has since grown into a leading patisserie chain with presence in over 30 cities across India. What makes Theobroma's journey exciting is the fact that it is a story of a family coming together and turning their dreams into reality. Kainaz, often described as the soul of Theobroma, began baking as a child, helping her mother, who ran a home-bakery called Not Just Desserts. A trip to France at 16 proved to be a turning point, inspiring her to pursue the culinary arts. She later graduated from Institute of Hotel Management (IHM) Mumbai and the Oberoi Centre of Learning and Development (OCLD) in Delhi, and went on to work as a pastry chef at the Oberoi Udaivilas. In 2004, she launched Theobroma as a cosy neighbourhood coffee shop in Colaba. The second outlet opened in Bandra in 2010 — and the rest, as they say, is history. Today, Theobroma is a household name, with its signature brownies becoming a mainstay across India.

Trump's copper tariff: Twisted logic won't help re-industrialize America
Trump's copper tariff: Twisted logic won't help re-industrialize America

Mint

time37 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump's copper tariff: Twisted logic won't help re-industrialize America

US President Donald Trump's proposed 50% tariff on copper imports is emblematic of his administration's incoherent approach to economic policy: Soaked in nostalgia for America's industrial past, it pursues strategies that will make it harder for US manufacturers to succeed now and in the future. Trump noted that copper 'is necessary for Semiconductors, Aircraft, Ships, Ammunition, Data Centers, Lithium-ion Batteries, Radar Systems, Missile Defense Systems, and even, Hypersonic Weapons, of which we are building many." So why would you then want to raise taxes on copper? Increasing the price Americans pay for copper makes the US a less desirable location for building aircraft, ceding advantage to competing producers in Europe, Brazil and Canada. It makes it harder to establish a domestic semiconductor manufacturing industry. It exacerbates the already dire state of the US shipbuilding industry, which is wholly reliant on protectionist policies. Also Read: Copper offers India a glowing hot opportunity: Now for a strategy The strategic value of copper might be a basis for protectionism if the US were getting its copper from hostile or unstable countries. But copper is not a rare earth mineral for which the US must rely on Chinese suppliers, nor is it like oil in the pre-fracking era, when the US had to import it from questionable regimes in the Middle East. The majority of US copper imports come from Chile, and the next two major suppliers are Canada and Peru. Meanwhile, America also has a robust domestic copper industry, which accounts for about half the copper used in the US. The majority of this copper comes from the swing state of Arizona, which may offer a narrow partisan rationale for copper protectionism. But there is no strategic problem with importing copper from friendly countries in the Western Hemisphere— and every reason to worry that deliberately raising the price of a widely used production input will hamper US competitiveness in crucial industries. This is, unfortunately, not an unusual consequence of Trump's trade policy: By applying taxes on intermediate goods, he is encouraging the US to specialize in resource extraction and primary commodities at the expense of complicated manufactured goods. Also Read: American puzzle: Trump's tariffs have resulted in an inflation paradox 'Industrial policy' functions by moving a nation's economy up the value chain. In the early days of the American Republic, for example, Alexander Hamilton worried that the US would continue to be a de facto economic colony of Europe. As a sparsely populated nation with abundant natural resources, a totally unregulated market might have caused America to specialize in exporting raw materials to Europe, which would in turn export manufactured goods back to America. As an alternative, he proposed protective tariffs to promote the growth of US industry. Trump borrows his own tariffs from the Hamiltonian tradition, but completely misses the larger logic of the programme and the altered nature of the modern economy. Over time, as the world has become richer and shipping has become cheaper, the cutting edge of manufacturing has become increasingly complicated. These days it's common to assemble a finished product from parts made in countries all around the world, with each part itself containing a staggering array of raw materials. Countries get richer by specializing at the more complex end of the spectrum. To the extent that you can boost US natural-resource production by eliminating low-benefit regulatory barriers, that's a win. But boosting the US copper-extraction industry at the expense of US copper-using industries is a recipe for de-industrialization. And much the same applies to Trump's obsession with protectionism for industries like steel and aluminium. For the US to be a manufacturing powerhouse, its industries need access to the cheapest possible inputs. Also Read: Chinese history shows how a closed economy could squander a nation's greatness It's also worth considering that even though 19th-century pro-industrialization politicians favoured tariffs, Trump is likely overrating their importance in promoting the growth of factories. One important manufacturing input, after all, is workers. The kind of quasi-open borders of the Gilded Age would probably not be a major boost to US manufacturing today. But a serious industrial policy would consider the case for a visa programme for skilled workers with experience in fields such as semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding. At a minimum, the goal should be to avoid actions that make things worse. Copper is important because it's used to make other stuff. The goal of US trade policy, not to say industrial policy, should be to help America become a better place to make stuff that the world wants. Trump's nostalgia economics is pushing the US further from that goal. ©Bloomberg The author is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store