This ChatGPT-4o prompt can help users organise their thoughts and uncover answers they might have missed
The idea is straightforward. When faced with a persistent problem, rather than requesting a direct solution, users invite ChatGPT to act as a thoughtful problem-solver.
The prompt goes like this: 'I'm having a persistent problem with [x] despite having taken all the necessary countermeasures I could think of. Ask me enough questions about the problem to find a new approach.' This approach shifts the focus from immediate answers to a process of exploration, where ChatGPT guides the user through a series of targeted questions.
This method has proven especially helpful for issues that seem resistant to standard troubleshooting. For example, many people struggle with iPhone battery drain, even after trying all the common fixes. Using this prompt, ChatGPT begins by asking about the device model, recent software updates, app usage, and the specific steps already attempted. Through this back-and-forth, the conversation often uncovers details that were overlooked, such as a problematic app, a background process, or a recent update causing the issue. How does it work?
What stands out about this approach is the way ChatGPT maintains focus, gathers relevant information, and avoids jumping to conclusions. The experience feels similar to working with a skilled support technician who listens carefully, asks precise questions, and only then suggests possible solutions - all this without any human interaction. This method not only helps identify the root cause of a problem but also encourages users to reflect on their own troubleshooting process - offering insights that may be missed otherwise.
The original Reddit thread was posted by u/speak2klein, who said, "What makes this so good is 4o's insane ability to ask the right follow-ups. Its context tracking and reasoning are miles ahead of earlier versions of ChatGPT." Many users have echoed this sentiment, noting that ChatGPT-4o's improved ability to remember context and reason through complex situations makes it a valuable tool for a wide range of challenges.
This style of prompting is not limited to technical issues. Users have found it useful for work projects, creative blocks, and personal decisions. By letting ChatGPT lead the conversation with questions, it becomes easier to break out of old patterns and see problems from a new perspective.
To try this approach, simply describe the problem and use the suggested prompt. ChatGPT will begin asking questions to gather more information, helping users organise thoughts and guide the discussion towards a possible answer. This process can reveal solutions that might not have been considered otherwise.
For those seeking a more interactive and thoughtful experience with ChatGPT-4o, this prompt is a reliable way to tap into the AI's reasoning abilities. Next time a problem seems unsolvable, consider using this method. The results may be more insightful and practical than expected.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Beware! Terrorists are studying our tools, adapting fast: ISIS-K reviews tech in ‘Khorasan'
In the summer of 2025, Issue 46 of ISIS-K-Linked English Language Web Magazine Voice of Khorasan', resurfaced online after months of silence. This time, it didn't lead with battle cries or terrorist poetry. Instead, the cover story read like a page from Wired or CNET: a side-by-side review of artificial intelligence chatbots. The article compared ChatGPT, Bing AI, Brave Leo, and China's DeepSeek. It warned readers that some of these models stored user data, logged IP addresses, or relied on Western servers vulnerable to surveillance. Brave Leo, integrated into a privacy-first browser and not requiring login credentials, was ultimately declared the winner: the best chatbot for maintaining operational anonymity. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For a terrorist group, this was an unexpected shift in tone, almost clinical. But beneath the surface was something far more chilling: a glimpse into how terrorist organisations are evolving in real time, studying the tools of the digital age and adapting them to spread chaos with precision. This wasn't ISIS's first brush with AI. Back in 2023, a pro-Islamic State support network circulated a 17-page 'AI Tech Support Guide' on secure usage of generative tools. It detailed how to use VPNs with language models, how to scrub AI-generated images of metadata, and how to reword prompts to bypass safety filters. For the group's propaganda arms, large language models (LLMs) weren't just novelty, they were utility. By 2024, these experiments bore fruit. A series of ISIS-K videos began appearing on encrypted Telegram channels featuring what appeared to be professional news anchors calmly reading the terrorist group's claims of responsibility. These weren't real people, they were AI-generated avatars. The news segments mimicked top-tier global media outfits including their ticker fonts and intro music. The anchors, rendered in crisp HD, delivered ISIS propaganda wrapped in the aesthetics of mainstream media. The campaign was called News Harvest. Each clip appeared sanitised: no blood, no threats, no glorification. Instead, the tone was dispassionate, almost journalistic. Intelligence analysts quickly realised it wasn't about evading content moderation, it was about psychological manipulation. If you could make propaganda look neutral, viewers would be less likely to question its content. And if AI could mass-produce this material, then every minor attack, every claim, every ideological whisper could be broadcast across continents in multiple languages, 24x7, at virtually no cost. Scale and deniability, these are the twin seductions of AI for terrorists. A single propagandist can now generate recruitment messages in Urdu, French, Swahili, and Indonesian in minutes. AI image generators churn out memes and martyr posters by the dozens, each unique enough to evade hash-detection algorithms that social media platforms use to filter known terrorist content. Video and voice deepfakes allow terrorists to impersonate trusted figures, from imams to government officials, with frightening accuracy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This isn't just a concern for jihadist groups. Far-left ideologies in the West have enthusiastically embraced generative AI. On Pakistani army and terrorist forums during India's operation against terrorists, codenamed 'Operation Sindoor', users swap prompts to create terrorist-glorifying artwork, hinduphobia denial screeds, and memes soaked in racial slurs against Hindus. Some in the west have trained custom models that remove safety filters altogether. Others use coded language or 'grandma hacks' to coax mainstream chatbots into revealing bomb-making instructions. One far left terrorist boasted he got an AI to output a pipe bomb recipe by asking for his grandmother's old cooking secret. Across ideological lines, these groups are converging on the same insight: AI levels the propaganda playing field. No longer does it take a studio, a translator, or even technical skill to run a global influence operation. All it takes is a laptop and the right prompt. The stakes are profound. AI-generated propaganda can radicalise individuals before governments even know they're vulnerable. A deepfaked sermon or image of a supposed atrocity can spark sectarian violence or retaliatory attacks. During the 2023 Israel-Hamas conflict and the 2025 Iran-Israel 12-day war, AI-manipulated images of children and bombed mosques spread faster than journalists or fact-checkers could respond. Some were indistinguishable from real photographs. Others, though sloppy, still worked, because in the digital age, emotional impact often matters more than accuracy. And the propaganda doesn't need to last forever, it just needs to go viral before it's flagged. Every repost, every screenshot, every download extends its half-life. In that window, it shapes narratives, stokes rage, and pushes someone one step closer to violence. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What's perhaps most dangerous is that terrorists know exactly how to work the system. In discussions among ISIS media operatives, they've debated how much 'religious content' to include in videos, because too much gets flagged. They've intentionally adopted neutral language to slip through moderation filters. One user in an ISIS-K chatroom even encouraged others to 'let the news speak for itself,' a perverse twist on journalistic ethics, applied to bombings and executions. So what now? How do we respond when terrorist groups write AI product reviews and build fake newsrooms? The answers are complex, but they begin with urgency. Tech companies must embed watermarking and provenance tools into every image, video, and document AI produces. These signatures won't stop misuse, but they'll help trace origins and build detection tools that recognise synthetically generated content. Model providers need to rethink safety—not just at the prompt level, but in deployment. Offering privacy-forward AI tools without guardrails creates safe zones for abuse. Brave Leo may be privacy-friendly, but it's now the chatbot of choice for ISIS. That tension between privacy and misuse can no longer be ignored. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Governments, meanwhile, must support open-source detection frameworks and intelligence-sharing between tech firms, civil society, and law enforcement. The threat is moving too fast for siloed responses. But above all, the public needs to be prepared. Just as we learned to spot phishing emails and fake URLs, we now need digital literacy for the AI era. How do you spot a deepfake? How do you evaluate a 'news' video without knowing its origin? These are questions schools, journalists, and platforms must start answering now. When the 46th edition of terrorist propaganda magazine, Voice of Khorasan opens with a chatbot review, it's not just a macabre curiosity, it's a signal flare. A terrorist group has studied our tools, rated our platforms, and begun operationalising the very technologies we are still learning to govern. The terrorists are adapting, methodically, strategically, and faster than most governments or tech firms are willing to admit. They've read the manuals. They've written their own. They've launched their beta. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What arrived in a jihadi magazine as a quiet tech column should be read for what it truly is: a warning shot across the digital world. The question now is whether we recognise it, and whether we're ready to respond. Rahul Pawa is an international criminal lawyer and director of research at New Delhi based think tank Centre for Integrated and Holistic Studies. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Samsung TV Plus adds four B4U Channels for free
Samsung TV Plus, the free ad-supported streaming television (FAST) platform, has expanded its content lineup with the addition of four popular channels from the B4U Network : B4U Movies, B4U Music, B4U Kadak, and B4U Bhojpuri. With this partnership, Samsung TV Plus now offers over 125 FAST channels. 'Our mission is to deliver unmatched access and exceptional value,' said Kunal Mehta, Head of Partnerships at Samsung TV Plus India. 'By introducing new FAST channels from B4U, we're enhancing access to the latest in entertainment while supporting advertisers with a premium, scalable platform.' The B4U Network, which reaches audiences in over 100 countries, is known for its extensive library of Hindi cinema, regional content, and music programming. The collaboration taps into India's growing Connected TV (CTV) market, where viewers are increasingly turning to smart TVs and streaming platforms for curated content. 'CTV is transforming how India consumes entertainment,' said Johnson Jain, Chief Revenue Officer at B4U. 'Our partnership with Samsung TV Plus allows us to reach broader audiences with top-tier movies and music, delivered seamlessly on a premium platform.' The new channels are available immediately on Samsung Smart TVs and compatible Galaxy devices, offering viewers a richer, more localized streaming experience—completely free of charge. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
The curious case of iPhones: Why a small gadget in your pocket is making US & China insecure about India
TIL Creatives Representative Image As over 300 Chinese engineers prepares their bags to leave Foxconn's iPhone plants in southern India this week, Beijing is quietly watching. For China, Apple's big bet on India is more than just a factory shift, it's a direct threat to its image of being the world's factory. At the same time, from across the Pacific, earlier this year, US President Donald Trump had a 'little problem' with Apple too. 'We are treating you really good, we put up with all the plants you built in China for years,' Trump said in May. 'We are not interested in you building in India.' He wanted Apple to bring those jobs back to American economies, both far bigger than India's, now appeared to be bothered with the same worry: what happens if India really does become Apple's new favourite factory floor? The US and China both see risk in Apple's supply chain pivot. For America, it challenges efforts to bring jobs home. For China, it threatens its stronghold on global high-tech manufacturing. Earlier this year, Foxconn, Apple's long-time assembler, had pressed ahead with a $1.5 billion display module plant near Chennai. The unit was slated to make the part under an iPhone's glass screen that controls touch and display Nadu's state government had approved the plan last October. Indian officials had expect it to add about 14,000 jobs, a tidy boost for India's growing electronics behind the scenes, China is now quietly tightening the screws. Bloomberg revealed yesterday that more than 300 skilled Chinese engineers who taught Indian workers how to run precision assembly lines have been asked by Foxconn to leave India. No official reason, just a quiet exit. The impact is anything but silent. These technicians brought decades of process know-how from Shenzhen's vast factories. Without them, Foxconn expansion plans in India may not go as smooth as it would have US, too, is not exactly cheering India's gain. When Trump launched his first China trade war in 2018, companies scrambled to find new bases. India was slow to catch up then. Now, as China battles rising costs, with new tariffs being imposed every other month, India has never looked more attractive for Trump's 'America First' pitch was brought to the forefront as he sought to charge exorbitant tariffs on every nation that sought to export to Americans. He insisted that Apple must also 'make in America.' For Apple, that's far from easy. US wages are high. Large-scale electronics assembly needs armies of trained workers. Those don't appear Apple chose to stick with its India plan. In May, officials told FT that by the end of next year, Apple aims to make all 60 million iPhones sold in the US in Indian plants. In 2024, India already produced 18% of global iPhone output. Counterpoint Research expects this share to reach 32% in 2025. During March-May, Foxconn exported iPhones worth $3.2 billion from India, with an average 97% shipped to the US, Reuters reported on June 13, citing customs data. India iPhone shipments by Foxconn to the United States in May 2025 were worth nearly $1 billion, the second-highest ever after the record $1.3 billion worth of devices shipped in March, the data Beijing has more to lose than just iPhone lines. It fears losing its edge in EV batteries, solar panels and key rare earth exports. Already this year, China has delayed shipments of specialised machinery to India and Vietnam. Now, ironically, that same tariff wall has cracked China's supply dominance—and opened the door for India. US tariffs on Chinese goods run as high as 145%, while most Indian goods face only 10%. Exemptions on key electronics like iPhones give India an edge in US. For Washington, this creates a dilemma: keep punishing China, or watch supply chains drift to India instead of coming home. Former Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale summed up the mood: China sees India's manufacturing rise as 'a direct threat, not just a parallel development.' India's phone surge didn't happen by accident. Foxconn, Tata Electronics, Corning, big names are pouring billions into Indian supply lines. FT reported Corning will soon start making Apple's scratchproof glass in Tamil own officials know what's at stake. 'We are looking at building the entire value chain in India itself,' said Ekroop Caur, secretary for electronics in Karnataka. The aim: not just assemble phones, but design and supply every vital isn't just a trade story. The way screws, screens and circuit boards move around the world now shapes how countries negotiate, from trade talks to climate pacts and military knows that whoever controls the factories holds the upper hand. When COVID lockdowns froze huge parts of China's manufacturing heartland, companies from California to Berlin realised the risk of putting too many eggs in one basket. According to a Wall Street Journal analysis, the shutdowns cost global electronics makers billions in missed shipments and forced Apple to rethink its near-total dependence on push into India is one answer to that risk. But China has other tools. By restricting exports of critical raw materials, like rare earth metals used in iPhones, wind turbines and guided missiles, Beijing reminds the world that supply chains can double as economic weapons. Just last year, China tightened controls on gallium and germanium exports, minerals vital for semiconductors and defence tech, Reuters tactic isn't new. Back in 2010, China briefly cut off rare earth supplies to Japan during a territorial dispute, crippling factories until Tokyo relented. Now, with the US and Europe pushing to 'de-risk' their dependence, China's leaders are signalling they can still squeeze the tap when clamp on Foxconn's engineers in India fits the same playbook. A senior Indian official, speaking to Bloomberg, confirmed that Chinese authorities are informally blocking export of key equipment and skilled workers to India's iPhone lines. No official reason. But the signal is clear, China wants to slow any rival that could dilute its manufacturing moves ripple far beyond trade. European leaders have linked secure supply chains to climate goals, arguing that building green tech like EV batteries and solar panels depends on stable flows of materials and parts. As reported by the Indian Express, India's Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar summed it up in June: 'The upending of global trade has focused our own minds on the need for correcting what I would call a certain skewed nature of our openness to the global economy.'China's talent clamp is the latest warning shot. By slowing India's learning curve, Beijing hopes to buy time. But India's window is open. There is no national election for a year. Global companies want out of China's grip. US tariffs slam China far harder than the moment is now. India's share of global phone exports has jumped from $250 million a decade ago to over $22 billion today. Most of that is Apple. The next big leap is to match China's scale.A few hundred engineers leaving might not sound big. But behind those exits sits a giant question: who controls the supply chain of tomorrow? If India cracks that code, despite the hold-ups, despite the politics, it won't just make iPhones. It will make itself impossible to ignore at the trade table. And that is what big economies fear a world splitting along new lines, where supply chains double as strategic weapons, India's iPhone story shows how a gadget in your pocket can reshape who calls the shots far beyond a factory floor.
