My problem with being a restaurateur? Flaky customers
It sounds heavy handed, but I wasn't surprised to read that Vincent had taken action – on missing customers, at least. For small, independent businesses, too many or too few customers showing up for a booking can have a big impact, in different ways.
If you book a table of eight and turn up with six, we could have reconfigured and given that table to someone else. Or someone might have turned up hoping for a walk-in of two and we've turned them away, which is sad for us because it's horrible turning people away. If the big table had just called and said, 'I'm really sorry but we're going to be six now,' it's annoying, but at least you can reset the tables.
A table turning up with too many people is annoying in a different way. I think we've had a table of nine that has suddenly been 14, which is 50 per cent more. Sometimes there is just genuinely not the space. Meanwhile, the people on the table are starting to get annoyed at you for not having room. What are we supposed to do?
Sometimes people don't understand that as a restaurant you have a responsibility to all of your diners and not just one table. A table of eight turning up with 12 or 13 changes the dynamic of the room. A huge table will sometimes take over the restaurant in a way that isn't fair on the rest of the diners.
I feel like restaurants are the final frontier of understanding that if you commit to coming you ought to pay. If you buy a theatre ticket and you can't make it last minute, you're not going to get your money back. The same with a massage or a ticket for an exhibition. For some reason that psyche doesn't apply to restaurants. Partly it's because you haven't paid for your meal upfront, although some restaurants now make you do that. People feel aggrieved about the notion of having to pay something to a restaurant if their plans change.
I sometimes wonder what people think restaurants make, money-wise. When you look at a waiter, or a chef, does anyone think they are living a life of luxury? None of us are rolling in it. Mostly we do this because it's a passion. One or two people not showing up might not seem like a big deal, but actually it is a big deal financially. A table of 10 dropping to a table of six is a 12.5 per cent service charge of those four people that none of the staff are going to see. I don't think people realise that someone's pay cheque is instantly reduced if fewer people than expected turn up.
The problem is definitely getting worse. A lot of customers lie about their reasons for not showing up, too. It is hard for us to negotiate that. Some restaurants make it very clear there are no exceptions. I don't know if I agree with that. Sometimes people genuinely have had an emergency. But sometimes people have a table of eight but one of their party is sick so none of them come, which is ridiculous.
Part of the problem is people being reluctant to call on the phone. When we opened Cafe Deco I refused to have an online booking system, because I was so depressed by the fact people were so scared to pick up the phone and speak to a human. I hated the few experiences I'd had when I'd gone in to book a restaurant and been directed to the online database.
Ultimately we had to move to a booking system because having to ring was putting off so many people coming. If you don't have to speak to someone, you don't have to take responsibility. If you're doing something that you know is going to be annoying for a restaurant, maybe if you don't have to speak to someone it's not so bad for you. The generation who started dining out before everything was digitised are better at ringing. It's the younger customers who are less considerate and less understanding of their commitment.
We have a cancellation fee; if you cancel with less than 24 hours notice, you'll get charged. For tables over six, we take a £30 deposit per head up front, which incentivises people to figure it out. If you turn up with more people than your booking, it's really annoying but we're not going to lose money unless we have no space and they all walk out, so we have no plans to implement a fee for that.
It's important to say that these cases are still the exception, rather than the rule. It just happens a bit too often. It doesn't give us the chance to give you the best experience, which is what our job is, and what we aim to do every time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
24 minutes ago
- Times
Neil Kinnock: Labour should bring in ‘wealth tax' to balance books
Sir Keir Starmer should introduce a wealth tax to fill the £5 billion hole in the finances left by the government's welfare climbdown, Labour's former leader Lord Kinnock has said. In a provocative intervention that will appeal to sections of the party's backbenchers, Kinnock said taxing the highest earners in the country would be popular with the 'great majority of the general public' and help Rachel Reeves fill her budget shortfall. He suggested that the tax could be levied on assets of more than £10 million and raise as much as £11 billion for the Treasury. He warned that the chancellor had become boxed in by her own words that ruled out further borrowing to cover day-to-day spending or raising income tax, national insurance or VAT. • Is reform of the welfare system still possible? 'Unless you are looking for other original sources of revenue in order to invest in public services and long term investment, then you are really jammed into a bit of a corner,' he told Sky News. However, Kinnock said that there were other 'pathways' to raise money that some within Labour were 'willing to explore' and that would 'commend themselves to the great majority of the general public'. He said: 'They include asset taxes in a period in which for the last 20 odd years in the United Kingdom, like quite a lot of other western economies, earned incomes have stagnated in real terms while asset values have zoomed. 'Even by going for, an imposition of two per cent (tax) on asset values above £10 million, say, which is very big fortune. The government would be in a position to collect £10 or £11 billion a year.' There are calls from the left of the party for Reeves to consider increasing taxes on wealth to pay for higher spending. Louise Haigh, the former transport secretary who quit the cabinet last year, has said that the tax system 'punishes earned income but barely touches the sides of the real driver of inequality — wealth'. Rachael Maskell, who was one of the leaders of the backbench Labour rebellion which forced the government to drop its welfare reform suggested that as much as £24 billion a year could be raised by equalising capital gains tax — and through income tax. Before the election, Reeves said that the government had 'no plans for a wealth tax'. • Keir Starmer's Labour as chaotic as Tories, voters say Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, warned on Sunday that the climbdown on welfare reform would impact other areas of government tax and spending. Downing Street sources told The Sunday Times plans to shelve the two-child benefit cap were 'dead in the water' while the likelihood of tax rises has increased. When asked if there was now less chance of the cap being scrapped given the costs that come with Tuesday's decision, Ms Phillipson told the BBC that ministers were 'looking at every lever and we'll continue to look at every lever to lift children out of poverty'. But she added: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make future decisions harder.' Reeves is looking at a number of potential tax-raising measures ahead of the budget, including a further freeze to income tax thresholds that would increase the number of people paying the higher rate of tax. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said that Reeves may need as much as £30 billion to cover the cost of reversals on welfare reform and winter fuel payments coupled with downgrades to economic growth forecasts. But the Treasury is likely to be reluctant to look at wealth taxes as it is feared this could increase the flight of the super-rich from the UK, damaging investment and growth. Reeves is already considering softening changes to inheritance tax that affect wealthy non-doms. Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, said a new wealth tax would be the 'worst thing to do'. He said: 'We've also seen around 10,000 to 15,000 high net worth individuals leave our country as a result of this government's policies. Now, some people, the socialists, might say, 'Well, who cares about that?' Well, the problem is that the amount of tax that those people have been paying requires about a third of a million people on average earnings, to cover that lost tax that's just gone straight out of the door. 'So the last thing we want to be doing now is piling further taxes on the wealth creators. We need to be, if anything, getting those taxes down, and empowering them to go out and do what they do best, which is creating jobs, and, you know, creating wealth and prosperity for our country.'
Times
24 minutes ago
- Times
Business live: Trump to send out tariff letters at noon
Alpha Group International, the London-listed financial services group chaired by Dame Jayne-Anne Gadhia, has extended the deadline for a firm offer from US rival Corpay. The company said it has 'held constructive discussions with Corpay, which are advancing, and believes that it is in the best interests of shareholders to continue this engagement'. The Takeover Panel has consented to moving the deadline from today until July 24. Corpay is a S&P 500 company. It has been in discussion with Alpha about a possible cash deal since May. PHP: The healthcare real estate investment trust has reported 'improving rental growth and stabilisation in yields', which it claimed underpinned valuation growth and was further evidence of an inflexion point in the cycle. Last month, the board of PHP recommended that shareholders accept a cash and share takeover bid from rival Assura, which then valued the business at £1.79 billion, dropping its previous recommendation for a rival bid from KKR and Stonepeak, the American private equity firms. Shell: In a brief trading update before publishing second-quarter results at the end of the month, the oil company said that 'trading and optimisation' revenues are expected to be significantly lower than in the first three months of the year. Plus500: The online trading group has reported a 4 per cent rise in revenue to $415.1 million in the six months to the end of June. The FTSE 250 group said it would announce new shareholder returns, comprising dividends and share buybacks, alongside interim results in August. The UK housing market was steady in June, with house price growth flat compared to a dip of 0.3 per cent in May, figures from mortgage lender Halifax showed. The average property price is now £296,665 compared to £296,782 last month. The annual rate of growth edged down to 2.5 per cent from 2.6 per cent in May. Amanda Bryden, Halifax's head of mortgages, said: 'The market's resilience continues to stand out and, after a brief slowdown following the spring stamp duty changes, mortgage approvals and property transactions have both picked up, with more buyers returning to the market Halifax said first-time buyer numbers have returned to pre-stamp duty change levels. Last week, rival mortgage lender Nationwide reported that house prices fell by the most in more than two years in June as an increase in stamp duty costs dampened demand. Property prices fell by 0.8 per cent month-on-month to £271,619. The annual rate of house price growth slowed to 2.1 per cent in June, from 3.5 per cent a month earlier. US President Donald Trump has announced that tariff letters or deals with multiple countries will be delivered later said on his social media platform Truth Social: 'I am pleased to announce that the UNITED STATES TARIFF Letters, and/or Deals, with various Countries from around the World, will be delivered starting 12:00 P.M. (Eastern), Monday, July 7th. Thank you for your attention to this matter! DONALD J. TRUMP, President of The United States of America.'Stock markets slipped in Asia amid concerns about the lack of detail. The dollar weakened against a basket of currencies. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN yesterday that Trump was going to be sending letters to some trading partners saying that 'if you don't move things along, then on August 1 you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level'. The president announced a 10 per cent base tariff rate on most countries in April and higher 'reciprocal' rates ranging up to 50 per cent, with an original deadline of this Wednesday. However, he also said levies could range in value from 'maybe 60 per cent or 70 per cent', and threatened an extra 10 per cent on countries aligning themselves with the 'anti-American policies' of the BRICS group of Brazil, Russia, India and China.
Sky News
34 minutes ago
- Sky News
What happens to your pension when you die?
What happens to your pension savings when you die depends on several factors, including whether you've reached retirement age, the type of pension you have, your marital status and the beneficiaries you have nominated. Strap in, this is quite complicated... but here's what you need to know… What happens to your state pension? It depends on whether you get the old or new state pension. If you reached state pension age before 6 April 2016, you are on the old state pension. You may be able to inherit some of your spouse or civil partner's state pension when they die. If you don't have a full national insurance record, you could top it up with your partner's eligible years - increasing your basic state pension. You may also be able to inherit part (generally 50%) of your spouse or civil partner's additional state pension or graduated retirement benefit. Contact the Pension Service to check what you can claim. Children or cohabiting partners are not entitled to anything. If you are on the new state pension, so post 6 April 2016, you can't make a claim for their national insurance qualifying years. However, if your partner built up more than the full amount of state pension, the additional amount is a "protected payment", half of which can be passed to your wife or husband. Private pensions - defined benefit Defined benefit pensions are now generally only available from public sector or older workplace pension schemes. This type of pension pays a retirement income based on your salary, and how long you made contributions to your employer's pension scheme. If this is the pension you have, the money paid to your beneficiaries will be outlined in the scheme's rules but often a spouse will receive around 50% of the money. If your children are under 23 and in full-time education, or mentally or physically impaired, they may also be eligible to get a percentage of the pension you were getting (or were due to get, if you die before pension age). "It's really important a couple checks whether or not an individual (particularly the spouse) will actually qualify for the spouse's pension if the person dies," Penny Cogher, a partner at Irwin Mitchell LLP, said. "They could have a very nasty shock if they don't qualify because they weren't married at the right time. "Some schemes provide children's pensions but there is no requirement to provide this." Private pensions - defined contribution Money left over in your defined contribution pension can be paid to beneficiaries in a few ways: Your beneficiaries can withdraw all the money as a lump sum; They can set up a guaranteed income (an annuity); They can also set up a flexible retirement income, called "pension drawdown". If you've chosen the annuity route (which we explain more here), it depends on which type you bought - a joint life annuity can be passed to a second person, whereas a single life annuity dies with you, though some offer guaranteed periods for a set period of time. If you chose drawdown (explained here), or for that matter, are still working, any money left can be passed on to family or whoever you wish. In most cases, the trustees who are appointed by the scheme will pay those you have nominated in your "expression of wish" form but they are not obligated to do so. "If somebody doesn't have an expression of wish, then the trustees will decide who receives your pension benefits, which may not align with the pension holder's wishes," said Gorkem Barron, from Lubbock Fine Wealth Management. Will it be taxed? Pensions are not currently subject to inheritance tax. But last year, the government extended the range of pension benefits that will become subject to inheritance tax from April 2027. Almost all lump sum death benefits will be subject to inheritance tax rules, as will unused drawdown funds. But remember, the first £325,000 of an individual's estate is exempt. And from 6 April this year, those seeking to transfer cash to pension schemes in the European Economic Area or Gibraltar will no longer be exempt from overseas transfer charges, as the government seeks to stop individuals reducing their tax liabilities by moving their pensions to another jurisdiction. Inherited pensions can also be subject to income tax - though the rules on this are a little convoluted. If you die before the age of 75, and are leaving money from a defined contribution pension pot or in drawdown, there's no income tax unless the lump sum and death benefit allowance has been exceeded. The lump sum allowance is £1,073,100 - anything over that is taxed at the beneficiary's marginal rates of income tax. If you die at 75 or over, anything you pass will be subject to income tax at the beneficiary's highest marginal income tax rate on any money they withdraw. With defined benefit pensions that leave a regular income to beneficiaries, there's usually no income tax - age doesn't come into play.
