EU Commission confirms ditching of AI liability and patents proposals
In its work program published last February, the Commission announced its plans to withdraw the two files because it saw 'no foreseeable agreement' being reached. Some MEPs and member states resisted the move, but this now seems to have been ineffective. They had six months to oppose the decision.
The spokesperson said on Thursday that 'having considered their views, the Commission has confirmed the withdrawal.'
The AI Liability rules were intended to offer consumers a harmonised means of redress when they experience harm arising from AI products or services. The rules were proposed in 2022, but no significant progress has been made since.
Some lawmakers pushed for its continuation, including Axel Voss (Germany/EPP), claiming that they wanted to address AI Liability as soon as the AI Act was signed off.
EU Tech Commissioner Henna Virkkunen said that the planned directive would have led member states to 'apply the rules in different ways'.
'We continue to listen to interested stakeholders, as we remain committed to having a balanced and fair regulatory environment of AI in the EU. We will be drawing lessons from the negotiations of the previous proposals," the spokesperson said.
Standard essential patents - key to tech products
The proposal on patents was further on in the decision-making process at the time when it was withdrawn.
In April 2023, the Commission published its plan for a regulation on SEPs, which are patents that protect the technology deemed essential in a technical standard or specification, used in the automotive, smart energy, and payment industry.
The rules were agreed by the Parliament in February 2024, before the Commission signalled this year it intended to withdraw the proposal, surprising many. Industry Commissioner Stéphane Séjourné told Parliament in April that the Commission withdrew the file with the hope to get a broader agreement.
The Commission now says that 'neither the Parliament nor the Council adopted a clear signal of support for the SEP Proposal.' Adding, that if 'circumstances change' the Commission will revisit its policy stance, and 'consider an adequate policy response. In the meantime, the Commission will continue to monitor market and international developments aimed at overcoming SEP licensing frictions.
Simplification
Scrapping these files fits into the simplification agenda of this Commission. Commissioner Virkkunen previously announced carrying out a digital fitness check, which will result in an 'omnibus' simplification package set to be presented on 10 December. The EU executive aims to identify reporting obligations in existing digital legislation that can be cut to ease pressure on enterprises, particularly SMEs.
Lawmaker Tiemo Wölken (Germany/S&D) said earlier this month that he will sue the Commission for lack of transparency regarding the two legislative files.
Wölken said that the withdrawal came after Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US Vice President JD Vance met at the AI Summit in Paris. Requests to get access to Commission documents regarding this process were not answered. He filed a lawsuit with the General Court of the European Court of Justice.
'My access to documents requests were primarily an opportunity for the Commission to clear up such rumours. But instead, they decided to delay my requests, which is why I now ultimately have no choice but to take legal action to bring clarity and to obtain the documents concerned,' Wölken said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Is this Swedish start-up the answer to Europe's ammunition shortage?
TNT, or trinitrotoluene, was first developed in the late 1800s in Germany. It was initially produced as a yellow dye and only 30 years after its invention were its explosive properties discovered. It is now the most commonly used military explosive. And, after years of underinvestment and rise in demand due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, in short supply in Europe. Sovereign defence is a hot topic right now, with the EU committing billions of euros in a bid to increase the bloc's military capacity. Some research suggests Russian ammunition production capabilities outweigh Europe's 4:1, though others think it could be as much as 6:1, and although Europe is home to some ammunition production giants such as Rheinmetall, BAE and KNDS, they don't produce their own TNT. In this episode of The Big Question, Joakim Sjöblom, CEO and co-founder of Sweden Ballistics (SWEBAL), sat down with Euronews' Mared Gwyn Jones to discuss increasing Europe's TNT production capacity, along with the economic and security benefits. Does Europe produce any TNT? There is currently one TNT producer in Europe, which is Nitro-Chem based in Poland, and much of their product is exported away from the EU. In April 2025, Nitro-Chem signed a $310 million (€269m) deal to supply 18,000 tonnes of TNT over a 3 year period, destined for the US military. It's estimated that Russia has an annual resource of 4.5-5 million artillery shells per year–with around 2M coming from allies North Korea. Europe's output was roughly estimated at 600,000 shells in 2023 and working together with the US, the 2024 output was estimated at 1.2million shells. The NATO deterrence philosophy is linked to the idea that the likelihood of conflict is significantly reduced if both parties are equally armed. There's around 10kg of TNT in every shell. In order to produce a comparable amount to Russia, Europe would therefore need a supply of roughly 50,000 tonnes of TNT. While Nitro-Chem produces a good amount of TNT for Europe, supplies aren't currently sufficient, and the bloc relies heavily on Asian producers. Joakim fears the consequences of relying on external producers and only one local producer. 'If we go back to the COVID pandemic, we saw that the UK was producing vaccines but they were applying an export ban to it,' he recalls. 'If something were to happen in Poland, I am very certain there would be an export ban on TNT. Same goes for the Asian country that is currently exporting TNT. If there's a conflict in their proximity, there will be an export ban.' China is one of the world's largest producers of TNT, although NATO countries exclude the country from their supply chains. Increasing TNT production in Europe Joakim's company SWEBAL is bringing TNT production back to Sweden and aims to be producing 4,500 tonnes per year of TNT at full capacity, enough for 400-450,000 shells by 2027. Whilst this isn't enough to plug Europe's shortfall, Joakim described it as a 'significant contribution' nevertheless. 'So Sweden used to have TNT manufacturing until 1998,' Joakim explained. 'But during this time when there was a lot of demilitarisation, you could refurbish TNT from the shells that you were demilitarising and the mining industry could get TNT almost for nothing. So there was no commercial incentive to run a TNT manufacturing plant in the 90s.' 'And now we're paying the debt for that,' he added. 'So we are actually building our plant 30 minutes from the old plant in Sweden and we're also building just three kilometres from the Alfred Nobel Dynamite factory, so we're building on very historical ground.' With the right planning, Joakim is confident the growing industry could not only increase the bloc's security, it could provide economic benefits too. 'European member states are spending €200 billion every year on defence material. More than 60% of that is purchased from American producers. 'If those components were to be manufactured in the EU, we would create more than 10 million jobs,' he added. SWEBAL is aiming for all of the machinery, materials and production in their supply chain to be sourced within a 550km radius. Not only is this good for the local economy, it helps to reduce lead time. Asian imports currently take over two months to arrive, as shipping is redirected around the Horn of Africa to avoid the Suez Canal. Building a European defence industry But while SWEBAL invests in scaling up production, is there significant funding for the European explosives industry? The EU's ReArm Europe 2030 plan could release up to €800 billion over the next four years, which includes a €150 billion loan instrument called SAFE (Security Action for Europe) to help member states prioritise homegrown companies. However, Joakim said procurement orders are not coming in from armed forces and member states as quickly as they are being asked to scale up. 'The risk profile is suboptimal right now. The industry needs to carry a lot of risk, which is a benefit as a new player in the industry, because we don't have the same shareholders to cater for and we don't have the same stock price that we consider on a quarterly basis,' he told The Big Question. 'My job here is to make sure that we prevent a future conflict, and making short-term profit is not high on my agenda.' Joakim also highlighted another limiting factor for the industry in Europe. 'One of the biggest risks that I see in the European military is that we are not harmonised. So intercompatibility: the tanks of this country should be compatible with ammunition from another country.' 'And in order to achieve that, the market also needs to evolve… To use a famous quote, 'you either have an army or you have another country's army in your country'. So I think the price we pay if we don't do it is going to be even higher.' The Big Question is a series from Euronews Business where we sit down with industry leaders and experts to discuss some of the most important topics on today's agenda. Watch the video above to see the full discussion on European TNT production.
France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
AI search pushing an already weakened media ecosystem to the brink
"The next three or four years will be incredibly challenging for publishers everywhere. No one is immune from the AI summaries storm gathering on the horizon," warned Matt Karolian, vice president of research and development at Boston Globe Media. "Publishers need to build their own shelters or risk being swept away." While data remains limited, a recent Pew Research Center study reveals that AI-generated summaries now appearing regularly in Google searches discourage users from clicking through to source articles. When AI summaries are present, users click on suggested links half as often compared to traditional searches. This represents a devastating loss of visitors for online media sites that depend on traffic for both advertising revenue and subscription conversions. According to Northeastern University professor John Wihbey, these trends "will accelerate, and pretty soon we will have an entirely different web." The dominance of tech giants like Google and Meta had already slashed online media advertising revenue, forcing publishers to pivot toward paid subscriptions. But Wihbey noted that subscriptions also depend on traffic, and paying subscribers alone aren't sufficient to support major media organizations. Limited lifelines The Boston Globe group has begun seeing subscribers sign up through ChatGPT, offering a new touchpoint with potential readers, Karolian said. However, "these remain incredibly modest compared to other platforms, including even smaller search engines." Other AI-powered tools like Perplexity are generating even fewer new subscriptions, he added. To survive what many see as an inevitable shift, media companies are increasingly adopting GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) -- a technique that replaces traditional SEO (Search Engine Optimization). This involves providing AI models with clearly labeled content, good structure, comprehensible text, and strong presence on social networks and forums like Reddit that get crawled by AI companies. But a fundamental question remains: "Should you allow OpenAI crawlers to basically crawl your website and your content?" asks Thomas Peham, CEO of optimization startup OtterlyAI. Burned by aggressive data collection from major AI companies, many news publishers have chosen to fight back by blocking AI crawlers from accessing their content. "We just need to ensure that companies using our content are paying fair market value," argued Danielle Coffey, who heads the News/Media Alliance trade organization. Some progress has been made on this front. Licensing agreements have emerged between major players, such as the New York Times and Amazon, Google and Associated Press, and Mistral and Agence France-Presse, among others. But the issue is far from resolved, as several major legal battles are underway, most notably the New York Times' blockbuster lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. Let them crawl Publishers face a dilemma: blocking AI crawlers protects their content but reduces exposure to potential new readers. Faced with this challenge, "media leaders are increasingly choosing to reopen access," Peham observed. Yet even with open access, success isn't guaranteed. According to OtterlyAI data, media outlets represent just 29 percent of citations offered by ChatGPT, trailing corporate websites at 36 percent. And while Google search has traditionally privileged sources recognized as reliable, "we don't see this with ChatGPT," Peham noted. The stakes extend beyond business models. According to the Reuters Institute's 2025 Digital News Report, about 15 percent of people under 25 now use generative AI to get their news. Given ongoing questions about AI sourcing and reliability, this trend risks confusing readers about information origins and credibility -- much like social media did before it. "At some point, someone has to do the reporting," Karolian said. "Without original journalism, none of these AI platforms would have anything to summarize." Perhaps with this in mind, Google is already developing partnerships with news organizations to feed its generative AI features, suggesting potential paths forward. "I think the platforms will realize how much they need the press," predicted Wihbey -- though whether that realization comes soon enough to save struggling newsrooms remains an open question.
LeMonde
a day ago
- LeMonde
Israeli PM Netanyahu in 'profound shock' over hostage videos released by Hamas
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed "profound shock" over videos showing two emaciated hostages in Gaza, with the EU also denouncing the clips on Sunday, August 3, and demanding the release of all remaining captives after nearly 22 months of war. Over the past few days, Hamas and its ally Islamic Jihad have released three videos showing two hostages seized during the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel that triggered the ongoing war in Gaza. The images of Rom Braslavski and Evyatar David have sparked strong reactions among Israelis, fueling renewed calls to reach a truce and hostage release deal without delay. A statement from Netanyahu's office late Saturday said he had spoken with the families of the two hostages and "expressed profound shock over the materials distributed by the terror organizations." Netanyahu "told the families that the efforts to return all our hostages are ongoing," the statement added. Earlier in the day, tens of thousands of people had rallied in the coastal hub of Tel Aviv to urge Netanyahu's government to secure the release of the remaining captives. In the clips shared by the Palestinian Islamist groups, 21-year-old Braslavski, a German-Israeli dual national, and 24-year-old David both appear weak and malnourished. There was particular outrage in Israel over images of David who appeared to be digging what he said in the staged video was his own grave. The videos make references to the dire humanitarian conditions in Gaza, where UN-mandated experts have warned a "famine is unfolding." 'Hamas must disarm' EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the images "are appalling and expose the barbarity of Hamas," calling for the release of "all hostages... immediately and unconditionally." Kallas said in the same post on X that "Hamas must disarm and end its rule in Gaza" – demands endorsed earlier this week by Arab countries, including key mediators Qatar and Egypt. She added that "large-scale humanitarian aid must be allowed to reach those in need." Israel has heavily restricted the entry of aid into Gaza. UN agencies, aid groups and analysts say that much of the trickle of food aid that Israel allows in is looted by gangs or diverted in chaotic circumstances rather than reaching those most in need. On Sunday, Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli fire killed nine Palestinians who were waiting to collect food rations from a site operated by the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Israeli attacks elsewhere killed another 10 people on Sunday, said civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal. 'Emaciated and desperate' Israeli newspapers dedicated their front pages on Sunday to the plight of the hostages, with Maariv decrying "hell in Gaza" and Yedioth Ahronoth showing a "malnourished, emaciated and desperate" David. Left-leaning Haaretz declared that "Netanyahu is in no rush" to rescue the captives, echoing claims by critics that the longtime leader has prolonged the war for his own political survival. In his conversations with Braslavski and David's families on Saturday, Netanyahu accused Hamas of "deliberately starving our hostages," and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said he was "initiating a special UN Security Council meeting on the issue of the Israeli hostages." Braslavski and David are among the 49 hostages taken during Hamas's 2023 attack who are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Most of the 251 hostages seized in the attack have been released during two short-lived truces in the war, some in exchange for Palestinians in Israeli custody.
