Palmerston North hydroponics retailer takes Reddit to court to take down posts and unmask user identities
Some of the posts, which are all live on a subpage of the website called r/NZtrees, where users generally share tips on how to grow cannabis, are almost three years old.
The case is being heard in the Palmerston North District Court where Cozens and Eales have sought an order for Reddit to take down the posts, to publish a correction, and to give the pair a right of reply in a way the court determines.
All these remedies are available to the court under the Harmful Digital Communications Act.
Cozens and Eales are also seeking an order that Reddit tell the court who the anonymous posters are, however, such an order can only be made to an Internet Protocol Address Provider (IPAP), also known as an Internet Service Provider.
Their application did not identify a specific IPAP that would be subject to the order if it were to be made by the court.
At a hearing on the matter held in March, Cozens told the court that Reddit was operating in New Zealand, but had no physical office in the country as far as he was aware.
'If Reddit is doing nothing to allow these posts to continue…then how are we allowing them to operate in NZ?' he asked.
'In the meantime, my business is suffering, and people have lost their jobs.'
Judge Stephanie Edwards advised at that hearing that there was an extent to which New Zealand law could apply overseas.
'There are plenty of companies that operate here that aren't based here,' she said.
Following the hearing, Judge Edwards ordered that a technical adviser be appointed to assess the feasibility of the orders Cozens and Eales were seeking, and how realistic it would be to enforce those orders.
Today, the case returned to court, and lawyers for Reddit submitted that it had proactively removed nine of the posts which they considered had violated its rules.
However, they advised that others remained up and Reddit would not be disclosing the identities of its users.
Advertisement Advertise with NZME.
Judge Edwards offered Cozens the opportunity to withdraw his claim on the basis that Reddit had removed some of the posts, and warned him that if he lost in court, he'd be liable to pay legal fees.
Cozens, who is self-represented, said he understood the potential consequences and opted to continue his case.
The court's technical adviser returned his report, but only ten minutes before the hearing began.
Given the parties and the judge had limited time to consider the report, Judge Edwards scheduled another hearing for a later date.
Cozens asked what would happen in the meantime, and claimed that he would continue to be the subject of abuse on the website.
He claimed he was getting 'hammered daily' by these kinds of posts, and Reddit doesn't do anything about it.
'The post is absolutely disgusting. I'm getting this daily, they're not.'
Reddit's lawyers offered to provide Cozens with a direct email to help him report posts and comments on the site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
34 minutes ago
- Newsroom
Online harm law is gameable and needs reform, ex-head says
The former head of New Zealand's online safety agency says the time is right for a review of cyberbullying legislation, with two recent cases against journalists showing how the system can be manipulated. Calls for a review are also supported by a senior editor at New Zealand's largest media outlet, who says Parliament should reconsider exempting journalists from the Harmful Digital Communications Act.
NZ Herald
10 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Christchurch man Shane Bell sentenced for years of sexual abuse and exploitation
'I am angry with him, with what he did to me.' He said Bell's actions had made him feel insecure. 'I could not trust other men, I thought they would do the same. I think he should go to jail for a long time - other teenagers should not have to go through this.' Bell, 49, sat expressionless in the Christchurch District Court as the teen and his father, flanked by supporters, struggled to contain their emotions at times during the sentencing hearing. The boy's father said he had a lot of trust in Bell being around his son. 'I don't have any trust in him now after what he has done to my son. I don't even like talking about him, as it makes me angry, what [he did] to my son. 'It has made me mindful of who I allow around my other kids, as I don't want this to happen to any of them. It has become a very traumatic experience.' He added that the experience 'has made me closer to my son, which I am grateful for'. The boy's father said the abuse had taken a toll on his family as they had to deal with residual trauma. The court heard the victim was extremely vulnerable, with a head injury, and Bell had taken advantage of him. A pre-sentence report indicated Bell was at high risk of reoffending, with distorted thinking and no display of remorse. Alongside charges of sexual connection with a young person and indecent acts with a young person, Bell faced charges of possessing hundreds of objectionable publications and making an objectionable publication that involved the victim. He would look after the victim, who would often spend time at Bell's house and stay overnight. Over 18 months, he performed sex acts on the boy and told him not to tell anyone. The victim was too scared to reveal what was happening. The boy told Bell it was illegal and tried to get away from him once, but Bell held him down. The victim believed Bell had committed the sex acts on him about 50 times. Bell also supplied the boy with cannabis and alcohol. Bell came to the attention of Polish authorities via a cellphone that had received child exploitation material, and in early 2023 the information was passed on to New Zealand police, who executed a search warrant on his home, seizing several devices. More than 1000 files were found on his laptop and cellphone, images involving young boys in a variety of sexual acts and a large array of animals being sexually violated. Bell's web history showed more than 100 searches for child exploitation material and bestiality. Also on his phone were photographs and videos of Bell and the victim. Bell was jailed for six years and three months at the Christchurch District Court. Photo / George Heard Judge Gerard Lynch described the offending as deplorable, vile and degrading. The judge said Bell had told authorities that if the victim had been unhappy with the offending, he would not have visited his home. Bell's main concern while in custody was with the wellbeing of his cats, Judge Lynch said. Bell was at high risk without treatment, and it had been noted that an intensive sexual treatment programme would be vital. Judge Lynch did not accept Bell's apology and sentenced him to six years and three months' jail. Bell was also placed on the Child Sex Offenders Register as part of his sentencing. Al Williams is an Open Justice reporter for the New Zealand Herald, based in Christchurch. He has worked in daily and community titles in New Zealand and overseas for the past 16 years. Most recently, he was editor of the Hauraki-Coromandel Post, based in Whangamatā. He was previously deputy editor of the Cook Islands News.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Thousands Of Kiwi Kids Harmed Online, And No One Is Accountable
Newly released police data confirms what B416 is hearing from the front lines of education, health and law enforcement: children in New Zealand are being harmed by social media, and no one is being held responsible. More than 2,000 children have been recorded as victims of harmful digital communications since it was introduced in 2015, according to data released to B416 under the Official Information Act. Three out of four victims are girls. Nearly 900 children were recorded as offenders under the Harmful Digital Communications Act (HDCA), but very few cases make it to court. The majority are handled informally, often through warnings or alternative action. The HDCA covers serious online harm, including emotional abuse, privacy breaches and sharing intimate images without consent. B416 spokesperson Dr Samantha Marsh, from the University of Auckland, says the figures reflect a system failing to keep pace with the scale of harm. 'This data backs up what we are hearing every week from schools, health professionals and those working in law enforcement: children are being harmed online, and the guardrails that should protect them are missing,' says Dr Marsh. 'We don't let 12-year-olds into nightclubs. Why are we letting them into algorithm-driven digital environments that are designed to manipulate and addict?' She says the majority of cases never make it to court not because the harm isn't real, but because the current laws are not fit for purpose. B416 is calling for a minimum age of 16 for access to social media, alongside stronger enforcement, platform accountability, and education. The campaign is encouraging those on the frontlines of this issue, including parents, teachers, health professionals, and young people themselves, to share their experiences as part of the current Parliamentary inquiry into social media and youth mental health. Submissions close on 30 July. 'Online harm is often hidden and there is shame for many around this. And this inquiry is a chance for families and young people to let lawmakers know how harmful things are for young people,' Dr Marsh said. Submit here:
