We Are the Oceans
One in three people relies on the oceans for their livelihood, yet they remain little-known, with neither global governance nor the financing needed for their preservation. The dangers they face are great and can be seen in the worrying numbers: more than 8 million tons of plastic end up in the oceans every year, according to a study in Science; more than a third of fish stocks suffer overfishing; while ocean acidification, rising sea levels and the destruction of marine ecosystems gain pace—direct consequences of climate change.
More than ever before, we must make sure that multilateral action is equal to the challenges of protecting the oceans.
Santo Amaro de Oeiras beach is covered by sea foam after the passage of Storm Martinho in Oeiras, Portugal, on March 20.
Santo Amaro de Oeiras beach is covered by sea foam after the passage of Storm Martinho in Oeiras, Portugal, on March 20.
PATRICIA DE MELO MOREIRA/AFP via Getty Images
France will be hosting the third United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC) on conserving and sustainably using the oceans, seas, and marine resources for sustainable development June 9 to Jun 13. For this crucial event, some 100 heads of state and government will converge, as well as tens of thousands of researchers, scientists, people of business and finance, activists and citizens from around the world. On this occasion, France's aim will be clear: protecting the oceans through tangible action.
Ten years after COP21 and the Paris Agreement, which established a binding global framework to limit climate change, this UNOC, in Nice, offers a historic opportunity. The "Nice Ocean Agreements" will form an international compact for conservation and sustainable use of the oceans, fully in line with the sustainable development goals adopted by the United Nations in 2015.
To make this work, the talks in Nice need to be action-focused and practical, not pie in the sky, but rather aiming for better governance, more financing and greater knowledge of the seas.
When it comes to governance, the Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ Agreement) is essential. The high seas, which represent more than 60 percent of the oceans, are currently the only space not governed by international law. The lack of oversight and common rules is causing a real social and environmental disaster, with massive hydrocarbon and plastic pollution, illegal and unregulated fishing techniques, and the taking of protected mammals. To end this legal vacuum, we need the BBNJ Agreement to come into force. To achieve that, it must be ratified by 60 countries.
The protection of the oceans also requires public and private financing and support for a sustainable blue economy. To continue enjoying the incredible economic opportunities offered by the oceans, we need to make sure marine resources can regenerate. In Nice, several commitments will be announced for global trade, shipping, tourism and investment.
Lastly, how can we protect what we don't know or understand sufficiently? We must enhance our knowledge of the oceans and share it better. Today, we are capable of mapping the surface of the Moon or of Mars, but the depths of the oceans—which cover 70 percent of Earth's surface—remain unknown. Together, we need to put science, innovation and education to work to better understand the oceans and raise public awareness.
The oceans are not just one more issue of environmental concern: they are everyone's business. Even as multilateralism becomes more challenging, we must not forget our shared responsibility. The oceans join us all together and are central to our future. Only Together, can we make the third UNOC a turning point for our peoples, for future generations and for our planet.
This conference is not about things that are far in the future or far from American shores.
It is important to remember that the United States has the world's largest maritime space. Through various scientific agencies, it produces highly valued knowledge for better understanding the oceans. Some U.S. companies are at the forefront of an innovative and sustainable blue economy and the US administration aims to revitalize its domestic maritime industries. The Ocean Caucuses in the Senate and the House are both bipartisan, a reminder that the challenges and opportunities of the oceans unite us all.
We look forward to welcome U.S. stake holders in Nice for that historical Summit.
Laurent Bili is the ambassador of France in the United States.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump says he's going to reduce Putin's 50 day deadline to end Ukraine war
WASHINGTON — President Trump said Monday he's looking to reduce the 50-day deadline he gave Russian President Vladimir Putin to stop the war in Ukraine. 'I'm disappointed in President Putin, very disappointed at him,' the president said ahead of his meeting with UK President Keir Starmer in Scotland. 'So we're going to have to look, and I'm going to reduce that 50 days — that I gave him — to a lesser number, because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen.' 3 Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. Getty Images 3 A Ukrainian rescuer works to extinguish a fire at the site of an aerial attack in Kharkiv on July 24, 2025, amid the Russian invasion in Ukraine. AFP via Getty Images Trump had threatened Putin on July 14 to negotiate a cease-fire with Ukraine in 50 days — or face brutal secondary sanctions that could ravage Russia's economy even more. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been open to meeting Putin to negotiate the end of the three-year war, but the Kremlin has been tepid about sending the Russian president to meet for direct talks, choosing to engage with lower staff first. The three Ukraine-Russia delegation meetings held in Turkey in the past few months have not successfully established a cease-fire, but have led to prisoner swaps. 3 Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, speaks with Vladimir Vladimirov, the governor of Stavropol Territory, during their meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Monday, July 28, 2025. AP Meanwhile, Trump has phoned Putin directly and has tried to be a mediator in the war between him in Zelensky. He's said that Putin tells him he wants to end the war, only to go on directing missiles strikes on Ukraine. 'We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever. You have bodies lying all over the street,' Trump went on in Scotland. 'And I say that's not the way to do it. So we'll see what happens with that.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Thailand and Cambodia agree to ‘immediate and unconditional' cease-fire, Malaysian PM says
Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to an 'immediate and unconditional' cease-fire in a significant breakthrough to resolve deadly border clashes that entered a fifth day, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said Monday. Anwar, who chaired the talks as head of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations regional bloc, said both sides have reached a common understanding to take steps to return to normalcy following what he called frank discussions. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai have agreed to an 'immediate and unconditional cease-fire' with effect from midnight local time Tuesday, Anwar said as he read out a joint statement. 6 Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet (L) and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai (R) shake hands as Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim (C) puts his arms around them following a press conference after talks on a possible cease-fire between Thailand and Cambodia in Putrajaya on July 28, 2025. POOL/AFP via Getty Images 'This is a vital first step towards de-escalation and the restoration of peace and security,' Anwar said. Military and officials from both sides will also hold meetings to defuse border tensions, he said. The foreign and defense ministers of Malaysia, Cambodia, and Thailand have been instructed to 'develop a detailed mechanism' to implement and monitor the cease-fire to ensure sustained peace, he added. Hun Manet and Phumtam hailed the outcome of the meeting and shook hands at the conclusion of the brief press conference. Hun Manet said he hoped that bilateral ties could return to normal soon so that some 300,000 villagers evacuated on both sides could return home. 6 Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to an 'immediate and unconditional' cease-fire in a significant breakthrough to resolve deadly border clashes, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said. Courtesy of Facebook user Chatchak Ratsamikaeo/AFP via Getty Images It is 'time to start rebuilding trust, confidence, and cooperation going forward between Thailand and Cambodia,' he said. Phumtham said the outcome reflected 'Thailand's desire for a peaceful resolution.' The fighting flared last Thursday after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. 6 Smoke rises from a convenience store at a gas station, amid the clashes between Thailand and Cambodia, in Kantharalak district, Sisaket province, Thailand, July 24, 2025. via REUTERS Both sides blamed each other for starting the clashes, which have killed at least 35 people and displaced more than 260,000 people on both sides. Both countries recalled their ambassadors, and Thailand shut all border crossings with Cambodia, with the exception of migrant Cambodian workers returning home. The Malaysian meeting followed direct pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, who has warned that the United States may not proceed with trade deals with either country if hostilities continue. 6 Both sides blamed each other for starting the clashes, which have killed at least 35 people and displaced more than 260,000 people on both sides. AP The joint statement said that the U.S. is a co-organizer of the talks, with participation from China. The Chinese and American ambassadors to Malaysia attended the meeting that lasted over two hours. The violence marks a rare instance of open military confrontation between ASEAN member states, a 10-nation regional bloc that has prided itself on non-aggression, peaceful dialogue, and economic cooperation. Evacuees from both sides of the border earlier prayed for a cease-fire deal. 6 Thai residents who fled their homes react at an evacuation center in Surin province, Thailand, on July 28, after hearing news about the cease-fire. AP At an evacuation shelter in Cambodia's Siem Reap province far away from the border, Ron Mao, 56, said she and her family fled their home a kilometer (0.6 mile) away from the front line when fighting broke out Thursday. They took refuge in a shelter but moved again to another camp further away after hearing artillery shelling. 'I don't want to see this war happen. It's very difficult and I don't want to run around like this,' she said. 'When I heard our Prime Minister go to negotiate for peace, I would be very happy if they reached the deal as soon as possible, so that I and my children can return home as soon as possible.' Thai evacuees echoed the sentiment. 6 Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai have agreed to an 'immediate and unconditional cease-fire' with effect from midnight local time Tuesday, Anwar (center) said as he read out a joint statement. AP 'I beg the government. I want it to end quickly,' said farmer Nakorn Jomkamsing at an evacuation camp in Surin hosting more than 6,000 people. 'I want to live peacefully. I miss my home, my pets, my pigs, dogs, and chicken,' the 63-year-old woman said. The 800-kilometer (500-mile) frontier between Thailand and Cambodia has been disputed for decades, but past confrontations have been limited and brief. The latest tensions erupted in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thailand's domestic politics.
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
There Are No More Reasons for U.S. Presence in Middle East
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu left Washington without a ceasefire deal for Gaza. Like U.S. efforts to broker an Iran nuclear agreement and end Houthi attacks in the Red Sea, the war in Gaza is yet another example of the United States being over-engaged and overconfident about a favorable outcome in the Middle East. Diplomacy is a good thing; so is encouraging stability across the Middle East. But instead of obsessing about fixing the region's problems, Washington needs to focus on vital U.S. interests, of which there are few in the Middle East. That means drawing down the majority of the 40,000 to 50,000 U.S. troops spread across 30 bases in the region. Throughout the 1980s, the United States had only two permanent bases in the Middle East. Aside from some short-lived ground operations, it largely stayed offshore with an occasional rotation of naval assets to protect the free flow of oil to global markets. Two vital interests—oil and terrorism—eventually brought U.S. forces on shore. Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait raised the danger of a single hegemonic power controlling global oil supplies. After deploying 540,000 troops to push Iraq out of Kuwait in the First Gulf War, Washington adopted a strategy of dual containment to prevent either Iraq or Iran from dominating the region. Around 25,000 U.S. troops were stationed permanently at new bases in the Persian Gulf throughout the 1990s. The September 11 terrorist attacks, related wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the 2014 rise of ISIS brought the next surge of troops. New U.S. bases emerged in Syria, Iraq, Jordan, and elsewhere. Troop levels soared at times to above 200,000. The big question now is: why are U.S. troops still in the Middle East? U.S. vital interests in the region are gone, but the forces stay. It makes no sense. Since 2019, the United States has been a net exporter of oil, meaning it's no longer dependent on the Middle East for its energy needs. Moreover, there are no regional hegemons on the horizon. Iraq is now a U.S. strategic partner. With the near-decimation of its regional proxies, a fragile economy, and battered missile defenses, Iran is weaker now than it has been at any point since the 1978–79 revolution. It has no capacity to make a bid—even with a nuclear weapon—for regional hegemony. The recent U.S. strikes against Iran prove challenges can be handled from offshore: bombers flew from Missouri, not from U.S. bases in the Middle East, to hit Iran's nuclear facilities. US soldiers inspect the site of reported Turkish shelling days earlier on an oil extraction facility on the outskirts of Rumaylan, in Syria's Kurdish-controlled northeastern Hasakeh province on October 28, 2024. US soldiers inspect the site of reported Turkish shelling days earlier on an oil extraction facility on the outskirts of Rumaylan, in Syria's Kurdish-controlled northeastern Hasakeh province on October 28, 2024. Delil SOULEIMAN / AFP/Getty Images Washington has an interest in maintaining open sea lanes in the region to ensure stable global oil prices. But it can handle that objective with something akin to the 1980s force posture, not the bloated ground presence we have now. U.S. access to a handful of strategically located naval bases in the Persian Gulf should do the trick. The terrorism threat is also mostly gone and capable of being handled by local actors. The ISIS caliphate was defeated in 2019 and al-Qaeda is extremely weak. Developments in post-Assad Syria have opened new avenues for regional states to work together in managing what remains of ISIS. The most influential ISIS and al-Qaeda affiliates aren't located in the Middle East and are almost exclusively local insurgencies incapable of posing a threat to the United States. In short, the issues—oil and terrorism—that have traditionally anchored the U.S. military presence in the Middle East for decades no longer offer good reasons to keep troops in the region today. Some might say we need to stay to protect Israeli sovereignty, counter China, or act as an insurance policy of some sort. None of these reasons hold up. Even after the events of October 7, 2023, Israel is more secure today than at any point since its founding due to the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria and the decimation of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. As a slew of new research shows, China has no plans or means to seize leadership in the Middle East. And staying "just in case" makes for an expensive insurance policy and gives unfriendly actors targets to fire at—U.S. forces in the region have been attacked hundreds of times in the last two years, including most recently by Iran. Sticking around "just in case" could also do more harm than good to regional stability. The reduction of U.S. forces in Syria helped unify the post-Assad Syrian state. Likewise, a 2019 U.S. decision to not retaliate after an Iranian attack on Saudi oil facilities contributed to Riyadh winding down its war in Yemen and normalizing relations with Iran. Who knows? Stepping back might even help bring a sustainable peace to Gaza someday. So let's get going. The sooner the U.S. draws down troops, the better. Will Walldorf is a Professor at Wake Forest University and Senior Fellow at Defense Priorities. He is currently writing a book titled America's Forever Wars: Why So Long, Why End Now, What Comes Next. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
