Rapper Silento gets 30 years after pleading guilty to killing his cousin
The 27-year-old rapper, whose legal name is Ricky Lamar Hawk, was sentenced to 30 years in prison, DeKalb County District Attorney Sherry Boston said in a statement.
Hawk also pleaded guilty to aggravated assault, possessing a gun while committing a crime and concealing the death of another. A murder charge was dropped as part of the plea agreement.
DeKalb County police found Frederick Rooks III shot in the leg and face in the early morning hours of Jan 21, 2021 outside a home in a suburban area near Decatur. Police said the found 10 bullet casings near Rooks' body, and security video from a nearby home showed a white BMW SUV speeding away shortly after the gunshots.
A family member of Rooks told police that Silento had picked up Rooks in a white BMW SUV, and GPS data and other cameras put the vehicle at the site of the shooting.
Silento confessed about 10 days later after he was arrested, police said. Ballistics testing matched the bullet casings to a gun that Silentó had when he was arrested, authorities said.
Rooks' brothers and sisters told DeKalb County Superior Court Judge Courtney L. Johnson before sentencing that Silento should have gotten a longer sentence, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.
The rapper was a high school junior in suburban Atlanta in 2015 when he released Watch Me (Whip/Nae Nae) and watched it skyrocket into a dance craze. Silentóo made multiple other albums, but said in an interview with the medical talk show The Doctors in 2019 that he struggled with depression and had grown up in a family where he witnessed mental illness and violence.
"I've been fighting demons my whole life, my whole life,' he said in 2019.
"Depression doesn't leave you when you become famous, it just adds more pressure,' Silento said then, urging others to get help. 'And while everybody's looking at you, they're also judging you.
"I don't know if I can truly be happy, I don't know if these demons will ever go away.'
Silento had been struggling in the months before the arrest. His publicist, Chanel Hudson, has said he had tried to kill himself in 2020.
In August 2020, Silento was arrested in Santa Ana, California, on a domestic violence charge. The next day, the Los Angeles Police Department charged him with assault with a deadly weapon after witnesses said he entered a home where he didn't know anyone looking for his girlfriend and swung a hatchet at two people before he was disarmed.
In October 2020, Silento was arrested after police said they clocked him driving 143 miles per hour (230 kilometers per hour) on Interstate 85 in DeKalb County.
Hudson said at the time of Silento's arrest in the killing of Rooks that he had been "suffering immensely from a series of mental health illnesses." – AP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BusinessToday
16 hours ago
- BusinessToday
Tun Mahathir Questions On 'Extensive' Number Of Police At Upcoming Rally
Former Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, and centenarian, has raised strong concerns regarding planned police actions, including extensive roadblocks, ahead of a major gathering scheduled for Saturday, July 26, at Dataran Merdeka. In a recent social media post, he questioned the justification and legality of such measures, alleging a 'deliberate abuse of power' by the current administration. The former premier acknowledged that organsers intend for the gathering to be peaceful and have warned participants against carrying weapons. However, he expressed skepticism about the police's stated intent for deploying an estimated 2,000 officers and implementing roadblocks – which police have reportedly indicated are for searching for weapons. 'In Alor Setar there were road blocks. So all roads to Kuala Lumpur will be blocked on 26th July,' Tun Mahathir claimed in his post, suggesting a widespread disruption. While conceding that the Constitution allows for roadblocks by the police, Tun Mahathir highlighted that it also 'stipulates that nothing should be done to obstruct the gathering.' He argued that the planned roadblocks could indeed obstruct the assembly. He further made a serious allegation, stating, 'However there will be certain groups who will carry weapons. They intend to show that the check at the blocks are justified.' This, he asserted, represents a 'kind of deliberate abuse of power,' drawing a parallel to the 'Yusoff Rawther case' and claiming it is 'typical of PMX,' a reference to the current Prime Minister. The Yusoff Rawther case refers to a civil sexual assault suit against the current Prime Minister, which has seen recent legal developments. Concluding his statement, Tun Mahathir asserted, 'No rule of the law. Only abuse of power.' The organisers of the rally have reiterated their call for participants to maintain peace and adhere to all laws during the assembly. Related
The Star
3 days ago
- The Star
Moving in the right direction
PETALING JAYA: The Federal Court's ruling that it is unconstitutional to criminalise protest organisers for failing to notify the authorities is a vital development for democracy, say activists. Amir Hariri Abd Hadi, who challenged the constitutionality of Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 (Act 736) in the apex court, said the landmark decision upheld the spirit of the Federal Constitution. 'It recognises that punishing peaceful organisers just for not giving notice goes against the spirit of the Constitution,' said the executive director of Mandiri, a youth movement working on civil rights and democratic participation. Describing the court's decision as a sign of progress, he said more must be done as far as reforms are concerned, as far as civil society groups are concerned. 'We are very open to working with the government. There are important concerns like the length of notice, how spontaneous assemblies are handled and how the police should facilitate and not obstruct peaceful gatherings. 'The process must be transparent and involve real public input,' said Amir, who resigned as Muda secretary-general in June. On July 1, the Federal Court ruled that Section 9(5) was unconstitutional. The decision was delivered in a constitutional challenge brought by Amir Hadi, who was charged with failing to provide notification to the police ahead of a protest organised in August 2022 in front of the Sogo shopping complex in Kuala Lumpur. The provision criminalised acts of organisers of peaceful assemblies who failed to notify police five days in advance, even if the assembly remained peaceful. The court ruled that such punishment was disproportionate and infringed on the right to peaceful assembly guaranteed under Article 10 of the Federal Constitution. Clause 9(5) stipulates that an organiser can be slapped with a fine of not more than RM10,000 for failure to notify the police, five days before the gathering. The ruling followed years of criticism from civil society and human rights organisations which called for the repeal of Section 9(5) and other restrictive provisions in the Act. Parti Sosialis Malaysia deputy chairman S. Arutchelvan said former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak should be credited for introducing Act 736 and Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad commended for reducing the 10-day notice requirement to five. 'The recent court ruling made it better. The current Madani government has put a moratorium on the requirement to inform premises owners,' he said. However, he said there are still weaknesses in Act 736, such as the right to protest not being accorded to children and foreigners. 'What if migrant workers are exploited?' he said. Former Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) commissioner Jerald Joseph said he was satisfied with the government's plans to improve protest rights in Malaysia. 'This is in tandem with minimum universal human rights standards. But it took a long time to get here,' he said, adding that the proposed amendments to the Act will give true meaning to the right of the people to assemble peacefully. In February, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 will be amended during this parliamentary session. He assured that the government will remove the problematic Section 11 which had been an obstacle to protests as it required the consent of the owner or occupier of the place of assembly. He said the Cabinet had imposed a moratorium on prosecutions under Section 9(5) as an initial step towards comprehensive reform of laws on the right to protest. Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said earlier this month that the ministry will table amendments to Section 11 of Act 736 in the current parliamentary session.
The Star
7 days ago
- The Star
Thai EC announces investigation into alleged Senate election fraud, 229 individuals facing charges
BANGKOK: The Election Commission (EC) on Thursday (July 17) announced that the 26th Investigation and Inquiry Committee, which has been investigating alleged collusion in the Senate election, has concluded its investigation. The committee has recommended legal action against 229 individuals, including 138 senators and 91 executives from the Bhumjaithai Party and its affiliates. The committee found credible evidence suggesting that these individuals were involved in securing Senate positions through fraudulent and unjust practices, violating the Organic Law on Senatorial Elections (2018), particularly Articles 70, 36, 62, 76, and 77(1). The investigation revealed that the actions of the accused were in direct contravention of the Constitution, specifically Article 113, which mandates that senators must not be biased or influenced by any political party. If the EC agrees with the findings, the matter could be referred to the Constitutional Court, which may result in the dissolution of the implicated political party. The next step in the process will see the case moved to the second phase, where the EC Secretary-General will provide a recommendation. It has been reported that the Secretary-General plans to delegate this task to the Deputy Secretary-General, as the Secretary-General himself is involved in overseeing national Senate elections, thus having a vested interest in the matter. The Organic Law on Senatorial Elections, particularly Article 76, prohibits executives of political parties, sitting MPs, and other political figures from engaging in activities that assist a candidate's election to the Senate. Those found guilty of such actions could face prison sentences ranging from 1 to 10 years, fines from 20,000 to 200,000 baht, and the court may order the disqualification of the accused from future elections. - The Nation/ANN
