
China retaliates against EU with a ban on European medical devices
European companies will be excluded if the budget for procurement is above 45 million yuan ($6.28 million), according to a notice from the Finance Ministry on Sunday with the restrictions in place the same day. The move will not apply to European companies that have invested in China and that manufacture goods in the country.
China on Friday imposed anti-dumping duties on European brandy, most notably cognac produced in France. While the duties on brandy include several exceptions for major brandy producers, China and the EU have multiple trade disputes across a range of industries. China protested after many European countries levied duties on EVs made in China. Since then, China has also launched investigations into European pork and dairy products.
In June, the EU announced that Chinese companies were to be excluded from any government purchases of more than 5 million euros ($5.89 million). The measure seeks to incentivise China to cease its discrimination against EU firms, the EU said, accusing China of erecting 'significant and recurring legal and administrative barriers to its procurement market.'
In response, China has said it had 'no choice but to implement countermeasures.'
'China has repeatedly expressed through bilateral dialogues that it is willing to properly handle differences with the EU through dialogue and consultation and bilateral government procurement arrangements,' said a statement from a spokesman with the Ministry of Commerce. 'Unfortunately, the EU has ignored China's goodwill and sincerity and still insisted on taking restrictive measures and building new protectionist barriers.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
AI is changing our world. At what point will it change our reality?
We aren't hapless figures in a false simulation, despite efforts to make that our new reality. A Pakistani crowd set fire to a Hindu temple. Chinese researchers experimented with a bat in a wet lab. An election worker donning a gay pride pin shredded election ballots. Palestinians are gratefully accepting U.S. aid in Gaza. All these events were caught on video, yet none is real. These videos are a result of a Time magazine analysis of Google's new Veo 3 artificial intelligence video model, a powerful new AI tool making 8-second videos that are uncomfortably realistic. AI videos have existed for years now, but this is on an entirely new plane, one that proves we've climbed out of the uncanny valley and summited a higher, scarier peak. While these videos are still clockable as AI, the technology will only get better, making it even more difficult to determine what's real and what's fake. In an age where misinformation already runs rampant, the line separating fact from fiction has become a blur. Advancements in AI will only erase it further by proliferating false realities until we find ourselves in a post-truth society. Post-truth refers to a situation where facts are no longer important in contemporary political and public debate. The concept is not so much used to suggest that the truth does not exist, but that facts have become secondary to our political point of view, according to ScienceDirect. By the time our social media feeds are littered with AI videos of political candidates saying things they never said and fake news moments pushing agendas to sway public opinion, it will be far too late. By then, the truth, the facts and reality itself will become secondary, a problem we're already seeing in education. Opinion: As a college professor, I see how AI is stripping away the humanity in education A generation of critical nonthinkers A New York article recently dug into AI's place in education and how many students are relying on AI to do all of their schoolwork. Capitalism has turned higher education into a means to an end, the latter being a high-paying job (hopefully). Students have no desire to pursue knowledge; they're fine with letting AI work and think for them. A generation averse to critical thought is primed to fall for AI trickery. It's scary to think that higher education, a place once conducive to the development of critical thought, problem-solving skills and creativity, is being infiltrated by a singular mechanism that undoes its very foundation. And what's to say of these students when they exit the four-year microcosm that is college after cheating their way through? Will pre-med students turn to ChatGPT to diagnose patients? Will future lawyers use AI to summarize cases and form arguments? Opinion: Is it me or ChatGPT? As AI grows smarter, I have a down-to-earth worry ‒ my job. AI not only invades political and educational spaces, but it chips away at our humanity in our most isolated, insular and vulnerable moments. AI therapy gaslights ChatGPT and other dedicated AI therapy chatbots have become a low-cost, accessible option for those seeking mental health assistance as our culture wrestles with loneliness and isolation. But computerized AI is not meant to offer meaningful support for the minutiae of human emotion. Behavior that rests on AI's unfounded ability to grasp our humanity leads to outcomes that range from futile to detrimental. A 14-year-old boy died by suicide after becoming emotionally dependent on an AI chatbot. ChatGPT convinced a man with past mental health diagnoses that he had fallen in love with an AI entity named Juliet. When confronted with the truth, he became violent, resulting in his being killed by police. His father used ChatGPT to write his obituary. Cases like these seem to be more common, paired with less deadly but equally unnerving impacts of AI use, like falling down rabbit holes of spiritual mania and unfounded clairvoyance. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. These scenarios all share similarities in that victims are gaslit to believe AI is a sentient being that understands them on a deeper level. They fall prey to confirmation bias and the spiritual psychosis that follows. The false reality spewed by AI becomes their all-encompassing truth. The way AI is discussed makes it seem like this is a necessary outcome, that there is nothing anyone can do to stop people from falling down AI's deadly rabbit hole of misinformation. Technological determinism posits that advancements in technology, including advancements in AI, are an inevitable process independent of human or societal interference. But who exactly benefits from leaving such a dangerous tool of misinformation unchecked? What is gained from blurring the line between fact and fiction? We aren't hapless figures in a false simulation, despite efforts to make that our new reality. Kofi Mframa is a columnist and digital producer for USA Today and the USA TODAY Network. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple takes fight against $587 million EU antitrust fine to court
By Foo Yun Chee BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Apple took a challenge against EU regulators to Europe's second highest court on Monday after they fined it 500 million euros ($587 million) earlier this year for breaching landmark rules aimed at curbing the power of Big Tech. The European Commission in a decision in April said the iPhone maker's technical and commercial restrictions that prevent app developers from steering users to cheaper deals outside the App Store breached the Digital Markets Act. ($1 = 0.8522 euros) Sign in to access your portfolio


Bloomberg
36 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Apple Appeals ‘Unprecedented' €500 Million EU App Store Fine
Apple Inc. appealed a €500 million ($580 million) fine from the European Union, calling the penalty 'unprecedented' and the regulator's required changes to its App Store as 'unlawful.' The European Commission announced the fine in April under its Digital Markets Act, saying that the iPhone maker ran afoul of rules related to allowing developers to steer users to make purchases outside of its store. In June, Apple changed its EU App Store policies to meet local requirements and avoid additional penalties.