India-US deal: Donald Trump's tariff threats an act of ‘arm-twisting'; UK pact a ‘trendsetter'
US President Donald Trump's recent tariff warnings to India have drawn sharp criticism from Indian trade experts, with Professor Rakesh Mohan Joshi, vice chancellor of the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT), likening them to 'arm-twisting' tactics.
In a strong statement as quoted by ANI, Professor Joshi said Trump was using tariff threats to push other countries, including India, into one-sided trade deals that could jeopardise domestic interests.
'He's forcing countries to buy energy, forcing countries to buy some technology, aircraft and defence equipment just to balance the trade,' Professor Joshi said, referring to similar deals the US had recently struck with the EU, Indonesia and the Philippines.
In these agreements, the US imposed tariffs but secured free market access in return, including mandatory procurement of American goods, he explained.
Opening Indian dairy and agriculture sectors would spell disaster
Focusing on the ongoing India-US bilateral trade agreement (BTA) negotiations, Professor Joshi warned against conceding to US demands for duty-free access to Indian dairy and agricultural markets. 'We produce more than double the milk that America produces,' he noted.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Senior Living Homes in Dhaka May Surprise You
Senior Living | Search Ads
Undo
'If duty-free access is given to the US, it would devastate our dairy sector and leave farmers at the mercy of God.'
Joshi pointed out the stark contrast between agriculture in the two countries. 'In America, agriculture is a commercial enterprise. In India, it is about livelihood. I compliment our negotiators for resisting pressure on these sensitive sectors,' he said.
India-UK FTA praised as model agreement
While criticising the US approach, Joshi lauded the India-UK Free Trade Agreement as 'balanced and win-win.' He described the FTA as a 'trendsetter' that reflects long-term diplomacy and mutual trust. 'It is not by threatening or arm-twisting that you can strike a deal,' he asserted.
Under the India-UK deal, duties have been reduced on 90% of UK products entering India, while 99% of Indian products enjoy lowered tariffs in the UK market. 'This agreement sets a benchmark the world must learn from,' Joshi added.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘It will impact states': Karnataka CM after US imposes 25 percent tariff and penalty on India
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Friday said that the United States' decision to impose a 25 per cent tariff, along with an additional penalty on India for importing oil from Russia, would affect not just the nation but also the individual states. Trump signed a fresh executive order imposing revised tariffs for 70 countries, including India and Pakistan, in a move that is expected to strain global trade relations further.(PTI) "It will impact the state also, and the whole country at large. I will discuss this issue with the concerned Minister," the Chief Minister told reporters. Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge expressed concern over the development, saying he hoped the central government would re-engage in dialogue with the United States to mitigate the tariff hike. Priyank Kharge said, "This is something that we might have to live with, but we'll see how it impacts. I'm hopeful that the central government will get its act together, get to the negotiating table, and do something practical that ensures the business thrives as usual. Hopefully, this time they'll be able to convince their friend Donald Trump to ensure that the tariffs are not this huge." US President Donald Trump on Wednesday made a shocking statement on his social media platform Truth Social after the announcement of 25 per cent tariffs against India and threatened an additional "penalty" for importing Russian oil. "I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India; their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world." Trump said. Trump signed a fresh executive order imposing revised tariffs for 70 countries, including India and Pakistan, in a move that is expected to strain global trade relations further. Tariffs imposed on India's neighbouring countries are less than India's 25 per cent, except for Myanmar at 40 per cent. The new tariffs for Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, and Sri Lanka are 19%, 15%, 20%, 19%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. The new tariffs, outlined in a sweeping order signed on Friday (IST), will come into effect from 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on August 7. The executive order states that the revised tariffs are aimed at addressing the national emergency declared earlier under Executive Order 14257. Trump noted that he had "recently received, among other things", new information and had determined it "necessary and appropriate" to impose additional ad valorem duties on the goods of certain trading partners. These new duties will replace those previously imposed under the same order, as amended. Other countries on which the US imposed tariffs are higher than India include Iraq (35 per cent), Laos (40 per cent), Libya (30 per cent), Serbia (35 per cent), South Africa (30 per cent), Switzerland (39 per cent), and Syria (41 per cent). Countries that imposed lower tariffs than India include the UK (10 per cent), Vietnam (20 per cent), Taiwan (20 per cent ), and South Korea (15 per cent), to name a few. The order by Trump stated, "I have determined that it is necessary and appropriate to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 14257 by imposing additional ad valorem duties on goods of certain trading partners".The executive order further directs that these changes will apply to goods entering the US for consumption or withdrawn from warehouses on or after the effective date. However, goods already in transit before the deadline, loaded on vessels and en route before August 7 and entering the US before October 5, 2025, will not be subjected to the revised duties but will instead continue under the previously applicable tariff rates under the amended Executive Order 14257. The government told the Parliament on Thursday that it is examining the impact of the recent events and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in the lower House of Parliament a day after Trump announced the tariff. He later made a similar statement in the Rajya Sabha. Goyal said the Ministry of Commerce and Industry is holding talks with exporters, industries and all stakeholders and gathering information on their assessment of this issue.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Best of BS Opinion: India must not bend the knee before Trump's tariffs
Hello, and welcome to the Best of BS Opinion, our distilled wrap of today's Opinion page. Our lead columnist Shyam Saran makes a forceful case for standing up to the United States' geopolitical arm-twisting using tariffs as leverage. Not resisting now will lead to bigger demands in the future, he warns, and could had long-term consequences for India's national security, credibility, and influence. There will certainly be a price to pay, and India should be prepared, not by closing off its economy but by making it more outward-looking. As it is, the US' tariffs will only have a modest impact on India's GDP, a price the country should be willing to pay. In fact, he says, India should follow its Look East policy more vigorously because that region wants India to be a counterweight to China. It should also become part of the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership, where currently neither China nor the US is present. Insulating the nation from the vagaries of Trump's policies may be best served by this initiative, he says. It is not easy steering Indian democracy in live action: witness the often-raucuous scenes that play out on our screens when Parliament is in session. Yet, it is a role that Harivansh Narayan Singh has in the past played to near-perfection, writes Aditi Phadnis. As deputy chairman of the Rajya Sabha, he was unerringly fair, always putting principle over party. It also helped that he was unfailingly polite. A former journalist who is credited with the turnaround of Bihar Prabhat, his politics hewed close to former Prime Minister Chandra Shekhar, who was a major political influence in his life. With the Vice President's position falling empty with Jagdeep Dhankhar's abrupt resignation, political circles are abuzz with names of likely candidates for the second-highest position in the republic. It is no surprise that Singh's name is among them - a win would redefine his political career. India, and the rest of the world, is trying to figure Donald Trump out so as to survive him until the midterm elections in the US two years from now. Before that, India must look find ways to protect itself from his monumental irrationality. But first, we must also look within at the bipolarity within the Indian 'establishment' - which encompasses government and its multi-faceted support base, including social media and TV studio experts, write Shekhar Gupta. From being euphoric about our closeness to the US and India finally gaining its rightful place at the world table, the Indian establishment is now reverting to Cold War-level suspicion of Uncle Sam and playing hurt victim. The other element of bipolarity exists within the establishment itself, he points out: even as the Prime Minister and others are acting quietly and prudently, working the levers behind the stage, the support base is the exact opposite, in a constant state of anger and hurt. There is something about nostalgia that makes us want to revisit the past, no matter how long ago. We all go back at least once to our school or college or hostel, just to soak in our memories one more time. The recent box-office success of Indian movies upon a re-release seems to prove that point. Sandeep Goyal pulls on that thread and wonders if a rerun of brand campaigns that have had a successful first innings would work the second time around. Recalling some of India's most iconic ad campaigns - Gold Spot's 'The Zing Thing', Parle's 'Melody itni chocolatey kaise bani', and Tata Sky's 'Isko laga daala to life jhinga-la-la, to name just a few - he bats for a second coming of such memorable ads. There are caveats, though: Tinkering with the original might backfire spectacularly, as Cadbury's gender-reversed re-run of Dairy Milk showed. Chintan Girish Modi, pens a heartfelt ode - ironically, in prose - to the legendary Eunice de Souza, poet extraordinaire and teacher at the equally famous St Xavier's College in Mumbai. August 1, when this column was written, is also de Souza's birthday and is commemorated by the college as Poetry Day, a rare incidence of anyone celebrating either a poet or a teacher, or as in this case, both. Modi recites parts of her poems, and is struck by her distinctive voice, and even more by her freedom with - and within - the language, unencumbered by the need for obscure allusions and pretentious references.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump sacks labour statistics chief hours after job report showed a grim image
US President Donald Trump fired the federal government official who is in charge of the Labour statistics. The sacking came just hours after US job data revealed that the employment growth stalled this summer read more A sign advertising job openings is seen while people walk into the store in New York City, New York, U.S., August 6, 2021. Reuters File US President Donald Trump fired the federal government official who is in charge of Labour statistics. What was concerning was the fact that the news of the official's sacking came just hours after US job data revealed that the employment growth stalled this summer, prompting accusations that he is 'firing the messenger'. Soon after the White House made the firing official, the president claimed that Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of labour statistics, had 'faked' employment figures in the run-up to last year's election. Trump accused McEntarfer of forging numbers in a bid to boost former US Vice President Kamala Harris's chance of victory in the 2024 US Presidential Elections. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Dimayed by the latest figures, Trump went on to claim: 'Today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad'. However, he gave no evidence to support his allegations and insisted that the US economy was, in fact, 'BOOMING' on his watch. US Job report paints a grim picture On Friday, the US employment report raised questions about the state of the labour market since Trump's return to the office. 'We need accurate job numbers,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' Shortly after the report was released, the Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) confirmed in a brief statement that McEntarfer had been dismissed and William Wiatrowski, the agency's deputy commissioner, would serve as acting commissioner. It is pertinent to note that Trump's abrupt announcement came as administration officials scrambled to explain a lacklustre employment report. Not only did job growth in the country fail to meet expectations in July, but the previous estimates in May and June were also revised significantly lower. The president went on to accuse the bureau of trying to hide accurate statistics. However, his move garnered criticism among experts. 'Trump is firing the messenger because he doesn't seem to like job numbers that reflect how badly he's damaged the economy,' said Lily Roberts, managing director for inclusive growth at the Centre for American Progress, a think tank. 'Politicising our country's collection of data on what's going on in the economy … will make it harder to create an economy that makes sure everyone has a good job,' added Roberts. 'Borrowing from the authoritarian playbook fuels more uncertainty that will cost Americans for years to come.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, Paul Schroeder, executive director of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, described the president's allegation as 'very damaging and outrageous'. 'Not only does it undermine the integrity of federal economic statistics, but it also politicises data which needs to remain independent and trustworthy. This action is a grave error by the administration and one that will have ramifications for years to come," he added. The veteran who was dismissed It is pertinent to note that McEntarfer is a widely respected economist and veteran employee of the federal government. In the past, she had worked at the US Census Bureau under George W Bush and at the US Census Bureau under Barack Obama, Trump and Joe Biden. In January 2024, McEntarfer was confirmed to the post by the US Senate. In a letter also signed by organisations including the American Statistics Association and a string of senior economists, they said there were 'many reasons' to confirm McEntarfer as commissioner of labour statistics, citing her 'wealth of research and statistical experience'. She was ultimately confirmed by a vote in the Senate, with 86 votes cast in favour and eight against. Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer was 'outrageous but not surprising', said Julie Su, former acting US labour secretary under Biden. 'He hates facts, so he blames truth-tellers.' 'The US needs and deserves trustworthy economic data', added Su. 'This is a pathetic attempt by the president to gaslight everyone about the consequences of his disastrous economic policies.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
