Windsor deal an opaque mess, says Democratic Unionist Party leader
The rules governing the operation of the
Windsor Framework
are 'ineffective, opaque and overly bureaucratic' and give Northern Ireland's politicians little opportunity to influence decisions,
Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) leader Gavin Robinson
has said.
Speaking to the House of Lords Northern Ireland scrutiny committee in Westminster, the DUP leader was scathing of the agreement reached between the European Union and the United Kingdom in February 2023.
It amended the previously agreed Northern Ireland Protocol and governs post-Brexit trading rules, though unionists complain bitterly that many British companies will no longer sell products to Northern Ireland customers because of the extra rules.
Speaking of an announcement expected on Thursday about the availability of veterinary medicines in Northern Ireland, Mr Robinson said the current strategy being followed by the British government made little sense.
READ MORE
British prime minister Keir Starmer has already made clear he will keep rules governing food and animal security in line with European Union rules, which should mean no extra curbs on the drugs available to Northern farmers.
'We know what the direction of travel will be, even if we do not like it,' said Mr Robinson, yet London's actions will ensure that some drugs will not be sold in Northern Ireland for a year, or more, even though they meet all safety standards.
Telling peers that he does not 'have a lot of faith' in the Windsor deal, Mr Robinson said it frustrates 'the ability for ordinary, routine and at times complex and serious engagement to either satisfy, resolve or ameliorate' some of its harmful effects.
It could not ever be effective until the imposition of European Union rules 'without the consent of any elected unionist in Northern Ireland, without the consent of party colleagues in Westminster' was resolved, he went on.
The House of Lords committee, chaired by the cross-bench peer Lord Carlile, has been holding a series of hearings to investigate in detail the operation of the framework agreement.
Meanwhile, an independent report on the operation of the Windsor deal from the former Labour Northern Ireland Secretary of State Paul Murphy, which was started following a Stormont Assembly vote in January, is set to finish shortly, the meeting heard.
Lord Murphy has been tasked with examining the effect it has had on social, economic and political life in Northern Ireland, and on the United Kingdom's internal market, and to make recommendations.
While paying a personal tribute to the former Labour secretary of state, the DUP leader, however, questioned his independence, saying he is required to advance only ideas that have cross-community backing in Stormont.
However, the SDLP's Stormont leader of the Opposition, Matt O'Toole, questioned the value of some of the measures that were taken to coax the DUP back into Stormont government last year.
One of them, the East-West Council, designed to improve connections between different parts of the UK, could not be put at the same rank as the institutions created under the Belfast Agreement, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, June 30th: On a new approach to house building, beating gridlock and free speech
Sir, – Average car usage in Ireland is about 15,000km per annum, each car using 1,000 litres of petrol, or 9,000 kWh equivalent. Most new houses, being remote from public transport, are occupied by families with two cars, meaning 18,000 kilowatt hours are expended on their travel needs, or about four times the energy consumption of a 100sq m house. Achieving high thermal performance standards for houses comes at a significant cost, but any economies in terms of energy usage are utterly outweighed by the concomitant reliance on private car transport. In this regard, it would be just to re-evaluate dwellings and include the average necessary transport energy associated with each dwelling before awarding a rating. READ MORE The process of determining where houses are to be built largely founders on the issue of marketability, where every design decision is taken primarily with a view to meeting a contrived set of needs, as articulated by estate agents representing the 'average family': this need not be so. Ireland has many not-for-profit systems for delivering housing: housing associations, housing co-operatives, local authority social housing. Some encourage end-user participation in the process, but rarely to a sufficient degree. It is opportune to question the market-led provision of dwellings. Advanced systems of co-operative housing exist in Zurich, Vienna and throughout Europe. One method of facilitating end-user participation in housing co-operatives would be the reintroduction of long-term ground rents by the State on the extensive land bank which is in State ownership, moderating construction costs; by amortising the cost of land over, say, 60 years, one significant component of the cost of dwelling provision is addressed. Much of the historic core, and inner suburbs, of Dublin was built by small-scale developers, typically carpenters and masons, who built short terraces on leased land. There is a case for arranging that large-scale housing development of, say, more than six dwellings be undertaken only by Approved Housing Bodies, such as housing associations and co-operatives. In order to address the imbalance in the nature and quality of housing, a moratorium could be placed on the acquisition of housing development land by developers, leading to a moderation in the cost of construction land, and a plurality of housing. – Yours, etc, PAUL ARNOLD, Ranelagh, Dublin. Sir – Most working mornings, the M50 grinds to a near halt, particularly during the peak hours of 7:30-9am. It's a familiar frustration for thousands of commuters. But, in recent weeks since schools closed for the summer holidays, the difference has been striking; traffic flows more freely, journeys are shorter and the usual stress on drivers has eased noticeably. This pattern is neither new nor surprising. Yet it raises an important question: has the Government seriously studied how school-related traffic contributes to daily congestion and, more importantly, what might be done to reduce it? One possibility that deserves serious attention is the provision of free and reliable bus transport for post-primary students. Such a policy could yield multiple public benefits. Fewer school drop-offs would reduce overall traffic volumes and vehicle emissions, making our roads safer and cleaner. Parents, no longer tethered to school run routines, could commute more efficiently, lowering stress and increasing productivity. Moreover, when older students travel independently, they gain resilience, confidence and a stronger sense of personal responsibility – skills that serve them well beyond the school gates. In short, smarter transport policies for young people could create a ripple effect of benefits across Irish society, from reduced pollution and road congestion to healthier family routines, to better outcomes for students themselves. I believe we need to ask, are we investing in the right systems to get us and our children to where we need to go? – Yours, etc, DR BRIGID TEEVAN, Aughrim, Co Wicklow. Costs over aesthetics Sir, – 'Cost', announces Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers, will 'take priority over 'aesthetics' in future State infrastructure projects' (News, June 27th). Ah yes, we have identified Dublin city's most pressing problem – too many beautiful (but costly) buildings springing up all over the place. Despite the implication inherent in this ludicrous statement, I am wracking my brain to think of a single visually appealing edifice that either the State or private enterprise has constructed in the past 60 or 70 years. I can quite easily, however, recall at least 20 beautiful, architecturally significant heritage structures that the State (through the working apparatus of local government) has seen fit to destroy and the ugly, flimsy, grotesquely expensive, wasteful eyesores that replaced them. The idea that the State has ever prioritised how beautiful a building is over what it costs is gaslighting of the first rank. As your excellent guide to 'Who owns Stephen's Green' (June 7th) illustrated in minute detail, the sad fact is that the State, city councils and local government haven't given a second thought to 'aesthetics' since some time around the turn of the century. The result is there for us all to see in the pitiful hodgepodge of architectural styles and general dereliction on display across the capital. – Yours, etc, SIMON O'NEILL, Bray, Co Wicklow. Contactless travel Sir, – I've been following the discussion of various contactless payment travel options from Cambridge to Belfast to Berlin to Corfu. I'm currently visiting Luxembourg where all public transport is free all of the time for everyone. No complicated payment system and citizens and visitors are rewarded for using a more environmentally sustainable transport option. – Yours, etc, DARA HOGAN, Greystones, Co Wicklow. Missing you already Sir, – Joe Duffy has retired, sending our best to him. But Ireland has lost its therapist and now there's no one to call to say how much we'll miss the man we called about everything. – Yours, etc, FIONA HICKEY, Ashbourne, Co Meath. Play that again, Van and Neil Sir, – Last Thursday I fulfilled a lifelong ambition by hearing Neil Young and Van Morrison live in concert. Like many people in that cold field in Malahide, I've been enjoying their music for nearly 50 years. As your reviewer said, their voices have never sounded better and both men were surrounded by amazing musicians (' Neil Young and Van Morrison at Malahide Castle: Decades on, these voices have never sounded better ,' June 27th). This made it all the more disappointing that each chose to sing so many songs – albeit great songs – that many of their audience didn't know. We were wet, we were cold, some of us have bad backs, sore hips, were afraid to sit (even for the very few hours that the grass was dry) in case we couldn't get up again, but we felt no pain during Gloria and Harvest Moon and Old Man. There just weren't enough of the songs that brought us to Malahide in our droves. These wonderful artists are still producing great new music and that, in itself, is inspirational. But could we not have heard a few more of the songs that have been inspiring us all of our adult lives? Some part of me feels that we, their lifelong fans and audience, deserved more consideration. The opportunity may never come again. It really would have been a marvellous day for a moondance... – Yours, etc, MÁIRÍN O'KEEFFE, Drumshanbo, Co Leitrim. Ireland and EU membership Sir, – Philip Brady (Letters, June 28th) comments that maybe it's time for those countries that feel as strongly as Ireland about the Gaza situation to take unilateral action. Does he also think that on other matters where there is no agreement that again countries can go it alone? The whole point of the EU is we act in a united way for the benefit of all. The UK did not like this stance and took the ultimate action and ended up leaving. We cannot have our cake and eat it with regard to our membership of a union that has made a huge difference to the country. It's a slippery slope he advocates to only do those things that we agree with and ignore those we do not like. We may be an island, but we are also part of Europe and while the decisions made can be unpalatable at times, that's what we signed up for when we joined the EU. We are a member of the EU and in it for the long haul, we can still shout loud and strong to have things changed from the inside, unlike our neighbour. –Yours, etc, JOHN BERGIN, Oxton Wirral, England. Sir, – Surely I am not the only one who feels we are compromising too much to humour the US administration? Last week, a two-pronged assault on global safety was launched: the defunding by the US of the global vaccine alliance, and the redirection of 5 per cent of Nato members' budgets into military spending. We have endless evidence that weapons tempt their owners to use them. Having lived in the Global South and seen people's bodies severely damaged, or their lives cut off, by disease that is preventable by vaccination, while learning from pandemics how swiftly viruses cross borders, to cut vaccination programmes and development is to sow death. No one is safer today. And although the cost to our economies of standing up to bullies may be great, the value of life is priceless. – Yours, etc, WENDY PHILLIPS, Co Dublin. Free speech and working in the US Sir, – Fifty-two years ago, The Irish Times published my letter deploring US complicity in the coup against Salvador Allende in Chile. Four years later I was granted a student visa to pursue a PhD at Harvard; I've subsequently married an American, had children and grandchildren here and obtained US citizenship. In 2025, my excoriation of US actions would likely forestall my obtaining a US visa. So much for our vaunted First Amendment, and our pontifications about freedom of speech. – Yours, etc, GERARD S HARBISON, United States. Sir, – Reading Geraldine Gregan's letter regarding social media and US visas (Letters, June 25th), I was returned to the memory of my arrival in New York in 1985: How sweet is recall of innocence – and equally sweet – that of innocence lost. Let me explain: Soon after I arrived, I enrolled and completed the bartending course with the American Bartending School, with the promise of referrals to jobs on offer at that time, spring 1985. The school sent me for an interview at Charlie O's in Manhattan. I arrived and waited for my interview . The manager walked in, looked at me, and without even approaching me, or interviewing me, he said to his assistant manager: 'He's fine, give him a schedule.' Likewise at the Department of Motor Vehicles, I presented my British learner permit, with the expectation of getting a US learner permit. The lady glanced at my UK document. 'That'll do, we'll send you a licence,' she said. Soon after, it arrived. I relate these stories to present a time when there was a certain innocence, and what I felt was an endearing sense of trust, all of which changed on September 11th, 2001: Innocence lost! As I taught an English literature class at La Salle Academy, suddenly, the 13-year-old students raced to the windows. In the near distance were those monstrous planes. The persistent odour of burning and smoke hung in the air for many months. America changed. Documents now scrutinised, checked every six months, even when in the same job for years. I look back sweetly at those casual times when documents got just a glance and getting hired to do a job was uncomplicated. While I acknowledge the need for stringent security measures since that fateful day, I feel that now in the Trump era, the scrutiny goes too far – files and more files, with information gleaned from phones and from sources that are not the government's business to probe. Long-established US citizens are not exempt or safe from investigation. Am I over-stretching to suggest images of East Germany's Stasi with warehouses full with thick and ever thickening files on the population's lives? Having said all that, America is and will always be for me, a sweet and satisfying memory. – Yours, etc, PADDY FITZPATRICK, Cathedral Ave, Cork. Hospital appointments Sir, –Recently a woman I know, who has a long-term serious illness, had an 8.30am hospital appointment, although she lived more than three hours' drive from the venue. This meant that she had to get up at an unearthly hour and drive there, mostly in winter darkness on secondary roads, adding to the stress and danger of having a traffic accident. The alternative would have been for her to drive the previous day and seek accommodation for the night in a hotel or B&B nearer to the hospital, adding to the cost, but reducing the stress somewhat. Surely it is not beyond the bounds of possibility for planners to come up with a system that allows those patients who live further from the hospital to have appointments scheduled for later in the day? This wouldreduce the stress and the danger of motor accidents and, in some cases, the cost of an overnight stay, a cost that can be quite considerable for some patients. – Yours, etc, BOBBY CARTY, Templelogue, Dublin.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on UK politics: budget trouble for the Labour government
Last July, Keir Starmer may have secured a victory in the UK general election on a scale comparable to what Tony Blair achieved with New Labour in 1997, but that is where the similarities end. Blair inherited a growing economy and a benign global backdrop, which ensured an extended honeymoon period for his party. Starmer took on an economy that was already struggling due to the fall-out from Brexit and a highly uncertain global backdrop. This meant the briefest of honeymoon periods. In last October's budget, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, raised £40 billion in taxes, mainly through a £25 billion rise in employers' national insurance and hikes in capital gains and inheritance taxes. Her critics warned that these measures would weigh on growth. If there is one thing that the UK needs, it is growth. However, next October's budget is shaping up to be even more contentious. Earlier this month, Reeves unveiled £300 billion in spending increases to cover the remainder of the parliamentary term to 2029. She claimed that will be fully funded based on current growth levels, which would obviate the need for further tax rises, particularly on working people. But this is looking increasingly unlikely and pressure is building ahead of the October budget. READ MORE Starmer has caved in to pressure from 120 rebel Labour MPs who had vowed to vote against the Welfare Reform Bill in parliament this week. The Bill had aimed to save £5 billion annually through changes to disability and sickness-related benefit payments, but the cuts will now only apply to new applicants. This means limited savings, meaning cash will have to be found elsewhere. It had been assumed that the size of the Labour party's win would give it at least two terms in government, but this is no longer a certainty. The biggest beneficiary of its woes has been Nigel Farage's Reform Party with its uncosted populist policies. A prolonged period of political instability looks likely, which will have much wider consequences, particularly for Ireland.
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Nato's new defence spending commitment aims to reverse decades of military decline
In cash terms, The Hague Defence Commitment, as it's to be known, agreed last week , will add roughly $1 trillion a year to the common defence of the Nato military alliance, according to US president Donald Trump . But cash alone is never enough. As critical in military terms are the new capability targets the deal will activate, triggering increased cross-border standardisation, improved technical co-operation and more operational integration, aimed at readying the West for war with Russia within five years. On Trump's insistence, the European alliance members plus Canada agreed to increase their defence budgets from the current 2 per cent to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 – 3.5 per cent on 'hard military spending' and another 1.5 per cent on related civil costs such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. That's why, as the 32 leaders who comprise Nato's decision-making North Atlantic Council were doing their best not to fall out with Trump over the spike in cost, behind the scenes the military planners who assess risk were calculating what strategic difference the extra trillion will make. READ MORE With military efficiency, a 10-page briefing, ' Future-proofing Nato's industrial capacity: how the decisions at the summit will strengthen the allied defence industry ', was circulated in the summit's closing hours, underpinning the imperative to reverse '60 years of progressive decline' in spending. Although the alliance was set up in 1949 as a post-second World War collective security network, it's worth remembering that with the end of the cold war, however, many of the allies switched their spending away from defence to modernising their societies, in what became known as 'the peace dividend'. [ Hostile actions 'are real and accelerating': is Russia already at war with the West? Opens in new window ] Consequently, faced with rapidly diminishing activity, defence companies on both sides of the Atlantic underwent a series of mergers and acquisitions, leading to consolidation in the defence sector. The 51 significant defence manufacturers that remained at the end of the cold war merged into 'the big five' – Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, RTX and Northrop Grumman. Here, European multinationals such as Airbus and missile systems developer, MBDA, emerged. Everything changed, however, in February 2022 with Russia's 'full-scale and brutal invasion of Ukraine', which reminded the allies that 'although the Euro-Atlantic area is not at war, it is not at peace either'. The reality, maintains Germany's chief of defence, Gen Carsten Breuer, is that a full-scale attack on a Nato member is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Moscow, he says, has been producing at least 1,500 battle tanks a year, with a significant build-up of missiles, artillery shells and drones as well, not all of which are earmarked for the war in Ukraine . His assessment, shared by other military experts in the region, goes as far as to conclude that the 'most vulnerable' area for an attack would be the Suwalki Gap, a largely unpopulated corridor in northeast Poland where Poland meets Lithuania, Belarus and Russia. The military experts' briefings to their political leaders have been uncompromising. 'Individually, all of them understand the urgency of the threat that is approaching Nato', says Gen Breuer, who adds he believes Russia could attack by 2029. [ If Russia is indeed planning an attack against a Nato state, distance and neutrality will provide no defence Opens in new window ] Given that threat, Nato's new capability targets involve co-investment, co-development and co-production to make the alliance 'more lethal' as secretary general Mark Rutte put it. And that collaboration will by global – reaching far beyond its 32 member states. Nato's four Indo-Pacific partners – Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea, known as the IP4 – will be critical to that 'enhanced co-operation'. So too will its partnership with the EU, where the political and cultural links are already close and often overlapping. The aim overall is achieving a 'new coherence' in dealing with a familiar enemy. [ The Irish Times view on international politics: law of the jungle taking hold Opens in new window ]
