
Friends, family could perform weddings without getting ordained under Michigan bill
Michigan couples planning their weddings could have a family member or friend officiate a ceremony without needing any kind of religious authorization under legislation that recently passed the Michigan Senate.
The proposal would also expand the list of elected officials who can perform marriages in the state. The bills in the package passed the Michigan Senate June 10, with support of every Democratic lawmaker in the chamber and three Republicans: state Sens. Jon Bumstead of North Muskegon and Michael Webber of Rochester Hills, along with Senate Minority Leader and GOP gubernatorial candidate Aric Nesbitt of Porter Township.
Under current state law, marriages in Michigan can be solemnized by judges, mayors, county clerks and religious practitioners. Because Wayne County is so large, the law allows employees of the clerk's office to also perform marriages.
Township supervisors, state lawmakers and civil celebrants would be added to the list statewide under the bill approved by the Michigan Senate. The legislation defines a civil celebrant as someone who is at least 18 years old and "works in accordance with the wishes of the client couple."
Sixty-one percent of Michigan adults identify as Christians, 6% identify with other religions and 31% of Michigan adults are religiously unaffiliated, according to the Pew Research Center's 2023-24 U.S. Religious Landscape Study Interactive Database.
By enabling judges and some local officials to solemnize marriages, current state law allows for non-religious marriage ceremonies in Michigan.
"But a lot of people don't want somebody they don't know conducting the most important ceremony in their life," said bill sponsor state Sen. Veronica Klinefelt, D-Eastpointe, in a June 3 hearing on her legislation. As a workaround, an officiant chosen by a couple will go online and pay a fee to obtain a certificate as an ordained minister. This new legislation would allow a couple's chosen officiant to skip that step.
State Sen. Kevin Daley, R-Lum, who opposed the legislation, characterized it as a blow to marriage. "Allowing just anybody to officiate a wedding will further weaken what should be a very serious undertaking," he said. "I'd be glad to support legislation to require real training to become a wedding officiant, thus adding an extra layer of dignity and importance to the proceedings."
A separate bill voted on by the Michigan Senate would increase the fine for violating the state's marriage license law from $100 to $500.
Michigan's marriage rate has steadily declined since 1970, according to data from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. It reached a low in 2020 of 8.4 individuals married per 1,000 residents during the COVID-19 pandemic, but marriage rates have not bounced back to pre-pandemic levels.
In order for the legislation to land on Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's desk, the GOP-controlled Michigan House would have to approve the bills passed by the state Senate.
Contact Clara Hendrickson at chendrickson@freepress.com or 313-296-5743.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Michigan bill to expand who can perform weddings passes Senate
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
NEC Director Hassett: We're on track for the 'big beautiful bill' to pass the Senate
Kevin Hassett, National Economic Council director, joins CNBC's 'Squawk on the Street' to discuss expectations for the Senate passage of President Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' whether the bill could increase the U.S. budget deficit, and more.


Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Supreme Court will take up Republican challenge to campaign finance restrictions
The Supreme Court will take up a challenge brought by Republicans that aims to strike limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with individual candidates. Why it matters: The case gives the high court an opening to further chip away at campaign finance restrictions erected decades ago. The law's supporters argue without the restrictions, large donors could sidestep individual contribution caps. Driving the news: The justices said Monday they would review a ruling from an appeals court that upheld a decades-old federal election law provision on coordinated party expenditures, one that the Supreme Court itself affirmed in 2001. The justices will hear oral arguments in the case in the fall. Coordinated party expenditure limits vary depending on a state's voting age population and the office sought. By the numbers: In 2025, the expenditure limits range from $127,200 to $3,946,100 for Senate nominees. For House races, the caps are $127,200 in states with only one representative and $63,600 in all other states. Catch up quick: The National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee filed the lawsuit in 2022, joined by then-Sen. JD Vance and former Rep. Steve Chabot, another Ohio Republican. An appeals court upheld the provision, citing the Supreme Court's 2001 ruling in the FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee case. Zoom out: The Trump administration noted to the court in a May brief that while the Justice Department has "a longstanding policy of defending challenged federal statutes," it believes this is "the rare case that warrants an exception to that general approach."


Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Admin Issues New Tariff Warning As July 9 Deadline Looms
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned Monday that countries negotiating trade deals with the United States could still face steep tariff hikes on July 9, even if talks are ongoing. Speaking to Bloomberg Television, Bessent said any decision to extend the deadline would rest solely with President Donald Trump, who has previously signaled flexibility but has not committed to a delay. If no agreements are reached, the current 10% tariff rate on many imported goods is set to revert to Trump's previously announced range of 11% to 50%. Bessent said he expects "a flurry" of deals in the days leading up to the deadline but cautioned that nations perceived as stalling could face the full brunt of the tariff increases. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks to reporters following a Senate Republican luncheon, in the U.S. Capitol on June 27, 2025 in Washington, DC. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks to reporters following a Senate Republican luncheon, in the U.S. Capitol on June 27, 2025 in Washington, DC."We have countries that are negotiating in good faith," he said, "but they should be aware that if we can't get across the line... we could spring back to the April 2 levels." This story is breaking. More to follow.