Gaza: Madrid Gathers European, Arab Countries to Halt Israel's Genocide
The meeting of the 'Madrid Group' comes as Israeli Occupation Forces' (IOF) intensify their genocidal bombardment of innocent civilians in the Palestinian enclave.
Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manual Albares said that his country urges an arms embargo against Israel to end its assaults in Gaza.
The aim of the gathering that brought together 20 countries and international organizations in the European country is to pressure Israel to stop its genocidal war, 'which no longer has any goal,' Albares said.
Israel is losing on the diplomatic ground as countries in the European Union that it had long considered close allies have been joining the international bloc condemning IOF assaults and its humanitarian and food aid blockade on Gaza.
Albares further spoke of the possibility of imposing targeted sanctions on parties 'who obstruct the two-state solution.'
Speaking to reporters at Sunday's meeting, the Spanish FM said the gathering aimed to halt what he described as Israel's 'inhumane' and 'senseless' genocide on Gaza.
'The last thing the Middle East needs right now is weapons,' he noted, adding that 'silence in these moments is complicity in this massacre…'
Ministers and senior representatives from organizations and countries in Europe — including France, the UK, Germany, and Italy — and the Arab world took part in the meeting, in addition to Brazil and Turkey.
France and Saudi Arabia are set to preside over a UN conference on June 18 to address Palestinian statehood. According to reports, French President Emmanuel Macron plans to urge participants to 'work toward implementing the two-state solution.'
Mounting calls against Israel's genocide
The last weeks have seen mounting calls on the international community to take action against Israel to stop. Following Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's vow to take 'full control of all of Gaza,' many have said that now is the time for world governments to force the Israeli government to order the end of its troops' genocide assaults on the Palestinian enclave.
Last Monday, the UK, France, and Canada joined forces in a strong shift of their policy towards Israel. They warned of targeted sanctions if Israel does not halt its genocidal actions and allow for the immediate entry of food and humanitarian aid to Gaza.
In a joint statement, the three countries lamented Israel's intensified expansion plan for Gazans, saying it is 'illegal and undermine[s] the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of both Israelis and Palestinians.'
Also lamenting the inhumane situation in the war-torn enclave, the UK slammed Israel for denying 'essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population.' Such behavior is 'unacceptable and risks breaching International Humanitarian Law,' the UK government fumed in the statement.
Israel's expansion of its genocidal war will lead to 'permanent forced displacement,' the three countries said in their joint statement, condemning the move as a blatant 'breach of international humanitarian law.' Tags: Gaza and Israelgaza genocideGenocide GazaSpain
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![Sahara : When Algeria sides with a Zionist to undermine Morocco [Editorial]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Far.yabiladi.com%2Ffiles%2Farticles%2Fyabiladi.e18af44351b6c8ed5c192cff180af42220250708155843.webp&w=3840&q=100)
![Sahara : When Algeria sides with a Zionist to undermine Morocco [Editorial]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic-mobile-files.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com%2Fyabiladi.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Ya Biladi
an hour ago
- Ya Biladi
Sahara : When Algeria sides with a Zionist to undermine Morocco [Editorial]
مدة القراءة: 2' In recent days, Algerian state media (notably APS) have eagerly amplified John Bolton's call for a revival of a self-determination referendum in Western Sahara. The former neoconservative hawk, known for his hardline opposition to the United Nations, unwavering support for Israel, and aggressive stance toward the Arab world, is now being portrayed - through Algeria's official voice - as an unlikely ally on one of its core foreign policy issues. The irony is glaring, and this alignment raises more questions than it answers. John Bolton is a symbol of political Zionism in Washington, a champion of moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, a vocal supporter of U.S.-led wars in the Middle East, and a staunch advocate for Israeli interests. He embodies everything the Algerian regime claims to oppose: Western imperialism, aggression against Arab nations, and most of all, Israeli policies toward Palestinians. Yet Algiers, which touts its support for Palestine as a cornerstone of its diplomacy, has chosen to celebrate the very man who stands in ideological opposition to those values. Palestine Sacrificed on the Altar of the Polisario This isn't just an ideological contradiction, it reflects a clear hierarchy of priorities. By aligning itself with Bolton's position, Algeria shows that it is willing to sideline its historic commitments whenever the chance to undermine Morocco presents itself. The Palestinian cause, often waved at Pan-African, Arab, or Non-Aligned summits, becomes secondary to Algeria's fixation on the Sahara. It's a logic reminiscent of temporary alliances in conflict zones, where sworn enemies unite against a shared foe. But here, it's not a desperate wartime pact, it's a calculated diplomatic move. Algeria, which presents itself as a champion of anti-imperialist solidarity, is symbolically aligning with an ideologue whose worldview is the very antithesis of its stated doctrine. And it's not even doing so in the name of national security, but to prop up a separatist movement that has been steadily losing international traction. Worse still, Bolton is calling on Algeria to make financial concessions to benefit Trump and American corporations. Realpolitik or Rank Inconsistency? Some analysts, like those quoted by El Independiente, frame this as realpolitik, a pragmatic strategy where ideology takes a back seat to national interest. Fair enough. But that framing doesn't erase the glaring contradiction of a regime that claims to be a fortress of Palestinian solidarity while publicly legitimizing one of the most outspoken proponents of American Zionism. Algeria, which regularly condemns Morocco's normalization with Israel, now finds itself echoing figures who helped craft that very normalization across the Arab world. This strange convergence feels less like a calculated strategy and more like a revealing slip. The Algerian regime appears increasingly willing to set aside all its red lines, including its foundational anti-Zionism and anti-colonialism, for the sake of opposing Morocco. And perhaps that's the real takeaway from this episode: in certain diplomatic battles, the masks eventually fall. Algeria's support for the Polisario seems, now more than ever, less about the principle of self-determination and more about a deeply entrenched hostility toward Morocco.
Ya Biladi
an hour ago
- Ya Biladi
Polisario turns to UK NGO to counter British media reports on Iran and terrorism links
In the United Kingdom, the task of countering terrorism accusations against the Polisario Front has been taken up by Adala UK, a British legal NGO led by Sidi Ahmed Fadel. A Sahrawi activist, Fadel is a regular participant in meetings of the UN Fourth Committee and sessions of the UN Human Rights Council. Disputing the content of a recent article published by The Telegraph, the association strongly condemned what it described as a «mischaracterisation of the Polisario Front as a terrorist organisation». «We express our deep concern and strong objection to the article recently published by The Telegraph, which calls for the proscription of the Polisario Front as a terrorist organisation and attempts to link the movement with acts of terrorism and instability», the NGO stated in a letter addressed to the newspaper's editor-in-chief. UK Government Pressed on the Issue In its response, Adala UK pointed the finger at Rabat, claiming the article in question «fails to address the serious and ongoing human rights abuses committed by Moroccan authorities in occupied Western Sahara». It's worth noting that the Polisario has previously attempted to distance itself from controversial statements and reports. In May, the group sought to downplay calls, published in some Spanish media and allegedly made by one of its self-styled «ministers», urging attacks on tourists and investors in the Sahara. Similarly, the Polisario dismissed a La Vanguardia article published in June that reported the presence of Sahrawis from the Tindouf camps among the leadership of terrorist groups operating in the Sahel. In its July 1st article, The Telegraph claimed that «Iran has just reached another stage in its terrifying war against the West. Britain needs to proscribe the Polisario Front as a terrorist organisation». This call was echoed by several political figures, including former UK Defence Secretary Liam Fox and Irish Senator Gerard Craughwell. The issue was formally raised in a written question by Conservative MP Charlie Dewhirst to the British Home Secretary. On May 14, Dan Jarvis, the UK's Minister of State for Security, issued a cautious response: «Whilst the Government keeps the list of proscribed organisations under constant review, we do not routinely comment on intelligence and security matters, including whether or not an organisation is under consideration for proscription».
Ya Biladi
6 hours ago
- Ya Biladi
Polisario turns to UK NGO to counter British media reports on Iran and terrorism links
In the United Kingdom, the task of countering terrorism accusations against the Polisario Front has been taken up by Adala UK, a British legal NGO led by Sidi Ahmed Fadel. A Sahrawi activist, Fadel is a regular participant in meetings of the UN Fourth Committee and sessions of the UN Human Rights Council. Disputing the content of a recent article published by The Telegraph, the association strongly condemned what it described as a «mischaracterisation of the Polisario Front as a terrorist organisation». «We express our deep concern and strong objection to the article recently published by The Telegraph, which calls for the proscription of the Polisario Front as a terrorist organisation and attempts to link the movement with acts of terrorism and instability», the NGO stated in a letter addressed to the newspaper's editor-in-chief. UK Government Pressed on the Issue In its response, Adala UK pointed the finger at Rabat, claiming the article in question «fails to address the serious and ongoing human rights abuses committed by Moroccan authorities in occupied Western Sahara». It's worth noting that the Polisario has previously attempted to distance itself from controversial statements and reports. In May, the group sought to downplay calls, published in some Spanish media and allegedly made by one of its self-styled «ministers», urging attacks on tourists and investors in the Sahara. Similarly, the Polisario dismissed a La Vanguardia article published in June that reported the presence of Sahrawis from the Tindouf camps among the leadership of terrorist groups operating in the Sahel. In its July 1st article, The Telegraph claimed that «Iran has just reached another stage in its terrifying war against the West. Britain needs to proscribe the Polisario Front as a terrorist organisation». This call was echoed by several political figures, including former UK Defence Secretary Liam Fox and Irish Senator Gerard Craughwell. The issue was formally raised in a written question by Conservative MP Charlie Dewhirst to the British Home Secretary. On May 14, Dan Jarvis, the UK's Minister of State for Security, issued a cautious response: «Whilst the Government keeps the list of proscribed organisations under constant review, we do not routinely comment on intelligence and security matters, including whether or not an organisation is under consideration for proscription».
