
TMC Leader Shot In Bengal's Cooch Behar; Party Blames BJP, Saffron Camp Refutes
Trinamool Congress leader Raju Dey was shot at by unidentified assailants in West Bengal's Cooch Behar district late Thursday night and is currently in stable condition.
A leader of the Trinamool Congress was injured and admitted to a hospital after he was shot at by unidentified assailants in West Bengal.
The incident happened in the Coochbehar district of the state, near the Jhinaidanga area, at nearly 11 pm on Thursday.
The TMC leader was identified as Raju Dey, the ' karmadhyaksha ' of Cooch Behar Block 2 Panchayat Samity.
'The bullet struck his right shoulder. He was taken to a nearby hospital by party workers and his condition is stated to be stable," news agency PTI quoted a police officer as saying.
The miscreants, who came in a car, fled, leaving behind the vehicle, which has been impounded, the police said.
Meanwhile, the ruling TMC alleged that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was behind the attack on Dey.
However, the saffron party rubbished the charge, terming the attack a result of TMC's infighting.
Further investigations into the case were underway.
In another incident, Bengal mass education extension and library department minister Siddiqullah Chowdhury's car was attacked on Thursday.
Following the incident, Chowdhury expressed outrage and alleged the attack was carried out by the members of his own party, the Trinamool Congress.
Earlier, the CBI filed a supplementary charge sheet against TMC MLA Paresh Paul and councillors Swapan Samaddar and Papiya Ghosh for criminal conspiracy and murder in connection with the killing of BJP leader Avijit Sarkar during post-poll violence in West Bengal in 2021.
In its second supplementary charge sheet filed before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sealdah, on Monday, the CBI also named 15 others under Indian Penal Code Sections related to criminal conspiracy (120-B), murder (302) and disappearance of evidence (201), among others in connection with the case.
First Published:

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Yellow Line delay: BJP slams Bengaluru Metro, Congress attacks Centre
Bengaluru: The long-delayed Yellow Line of Namma Metro, meant to link RV Road with Electronics City, has become the latest flashpoint between BJP and the ruling Congress over why the Rs 7,000-crore corridor remains idle despite being physically complete for over two years. With just three out of the required train sets delivered, and a fourth expected by late July, the line's opening has been repeatedly pushed — from 2021 to 2022, and now tentatively to Aug 2025. That too hinges on two pending clearances: the independent safety assessment (ISA) for the line's signalling system, and a statutory inspection by the commissioner of metro rail safety (CMRS), likely only after July 15. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru BJP has called for a "Citizen March" Saturday, accusing the Congress govt and BMRCL of misleading Bengalureans with missed deadlines. Bangalore South MP Tejasvi Surya, along with other senior party functionaries, including R Ashoka, are slated to meet BMRCL MD Maheshwar Rao at 9.30am demanding accountability. Surya said: "This line was supposed to open in 2021. Then in 2022. Then before the 2024 elections. Now they say July. No one knows when it will actually open. People are stuck in traffic while a fully built Metro line sits unused. BMRCL is taking Bengalureans for granted." But Congress has pushed back sharply — turning the spotlight on the BJP-led Centre, which jointly funds BMRCL and oversees key safety and administrative clearances. State transport minister Ramalinga Reddy said: "BJP ruled Karnataka for four years and at the Centre for 11. Why haven't they ensured coach supply or fast-tracked CMRS inspections? They should hold their own govt accountable." A Congress delegation is also scheduled to meet the BMRCL MD at 9am Saturday, demanding that the Centre expedite the remaining approvals and train supply to prevent further delays. The 19-km elevated Yellow Line, which passes through one of Bengaluru's most congested corridors, is expected to ease traffic for lakhs of commuters. 1-hour disruption on Purple Line Metro services on the Purple Line will be partially disrupted Sunday, due to scheduled maintenance work between Indiranagar and Baiyappanahalli stations. As per BMRCL, operations between Swami Vivekananda Metro Station and Baiyappanahalli will be halted for one hour from 7am to 8am. All other stretches of the Purple Line, including Challaghatta to Indiranagar and Baiyappanahalli to Whitefield (Kadugodi), will function as usual.


India Today
43 minutes ago
- India Today
Nitin Gadkari's app-cab reform: Drivers to get care, customer is the king
In India's booming app-based cab economy, often the only thing that matters for the consumer is not the technology or the car but the most-ignored cog in the wheel: the driver. Whether you step out grinning or groaning from an Ola/Uber ride depends on that crucial factor—how was the driver?Now, the Union ministry of road transport and highways, under Nitin Gadkari, seems to have finally accepted this elementary truth more than ever before. The newly revised Motor Vehicles Aggregator Guidelines 2025, published recently, take into account mental health reviews for drivers as well as how much their work schedules can be stretched, among other things. For an industry defined by long hours, fickle pay and frequent confrontational customers, it can be a game new guidelines, revised from an earlier set in 2020, say drivers will also get better insurance cover: Rs 15 lakh as term insurance and Rs 7.5 lakh for health, a big jump from the earlier Rs 10 lakh and Rs 5 lakh, respectively. It's a long overdue correction for a workforce that hasn't had access to the safety nets available to employees in the more formal bottomline: when drivers are safer, healthier and more secure, they are better able to serve customers; the roads get safer too. This has been underpinned by a growing acceptance within government that it is the people, as opposed to the infrastructure, that shape passengers' experience. That said, the refreshed and forward-looking 2025 regulations are not exactly mandatory. Transport may be on the Concurrent List of the Indian Constitution, but there's precious little the Centre can do to compel a state into legislating on transport matters. So it would be for each state government to either accept or adjust the recommendations. BJP-ruled states will probably fall in line, but others may hesitate, stall or even ignore the changes. It is, therefore, a wishlist with all the good there are several good upgrades in the guidelines as well, such as the way data is to be treated by the aggregators, as per the new Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Aggregators are now required to keep for a finite time—mininum three months, maximum two years—data generated by the Indian app on Indian servers and in compliance with the Indian data laws. It is part of a shift away from casual data-governance practices that used to be the norm, especially in the gig also a green nudge. Previously, states had the option to offer incentives for electric vehicles purchased within aggregator fleets. The rules now require action: at least 5 per cent of an aggregator's fleet must be electric within the first year of the notice, and that number must double in the second year. It's an aggressive play in a sector that has been slow to see EV adoption, largely because of the erratic charging infrastructure and higher out-of-pocket costs. Also, the demise of BluSmart has been a may finally have some bite. For instance, customers can now know the break-up of fares before booking their rides, ending opaque pricing that often left riders in the dark. If it takes the driver more than five minutes past promised time, riders will have a clear right to cancel the ride without penalty. Also, passengers are meant to be compensated if a driver cancels for no good training and safety protocols are improved as well. The old guidelines addressed gender sensitisation only. But the new ones say drivers have to learn about sexual harassment and how to protect the vulnerable—children and seniors and women. The guidelines stress there should be a clear way to escalate complaints in the the gulf between policy and practice remains wide. Aggregator platforms, known for finding ways to sidestep worker protections in the gig economy in the name of technological neutrality, are likely to slow down on implementing the more stringent rules. And unless state governments have the political will for enforcement, these may well remain on all in all, by making the driver the centerpiece of the ride-hailing equation, the government is signalling a new norm. While it could still be a bumpy ride, a lot of the potholes look set to be filled should the states play to India Today Magazine- EndsTune InMust Watch


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
What forced BJP reversal on ‘Hindi as 3rd language' orders for Maharashtra govt schools
Political analysts ThePrint spoke to said the move to scrap two contentious Government Resolutions (GR) was driven by the potential political fallout as the BJP feared a backlash ahead of local Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) polls amid a growing movement in favour of Marathi and against the imposition of Hindi. But the rollback has also surprised many, given the Mahayuti's historic mandate. Mumbai: The Bharatiya Janata Party-led (BJP) Mahayuti government's decision to scrap a controversial order mandating Hindi as the default third language in government schools across Maharashtra from Class 1 has been welcomed by academicians and the Opposition. Moreover, the government was also forced to blink as a rare public show of unity by the estranged Thackeray cousins could give a fresh lease of life to their parties, especially the Shiv Sena (UBT), which is battling for survival ahead of the polls. 'In Mumbai, it is a revival game for Uddhav Thackeray and if both the Thackerays had come together, it would have impacted the BJP in the BMC polls as Marathi votes would have consolidated. Marathi voters vote differently for the BMC polls as against the Lok Sabha or Vidhan Sabha. They still hold Thackeray in their DNA,' political analyst Abhay Deshpande told ThePrint. Both Thackerays saw the GRs as an opportunity to regain lost ground by tapping an emotive issue and planned a mega protest rally on 5 July, which could have galvanised support and given them a platform to possibly form an alliance for the polls, said analysts ThePrint spoke to, adding that public opinion was mobilising against the government on the Hindi imposition issue. 'This topic created a social movement and public opinion, which was going against the government. An undercurrent was brewing. This helped the political opposition come together because uniting on linguistic topics is easier. Though their space is smaller or weaker, it definitely would have helped alter the narrative,' said Ajinkya Gaikwad, a professor of politics in Mumbai. Though the government has withdrawn the GRs for now, it has announced that it will form a committee under economist and former Rajya Sabha MP Dr Narendra Jadhav, who will study the issue and recommend a way forward. However, stakeholders ThePrint spoke to said the move was a face-saving exercise by the government. 'Why form a committee if the government has said it is taking back the GR. This looks like it's being done to avoid a backlash in the BMC polls,' said Mahendra Ganpule, former vice-president of the State Headmasters' Association. 'There is also a question mark on the appointment of the committee head. He is an economist, but what are his credentials in school education? If the government had brought in experts on child psychology or an education expert, then we would have accepted it,' he added. Also Read: 5 reasons Thackeray cousins Raj, Uddhav may bury hatchet, rally behind 'Marathi manoos' plank Marathi manoos plank Linguistic identity has always been an emotive issue in Maharashtra. When it was formed on 1 May 1960, the state went through a series of violent protests under the Samyukt Maharashtra movement with different parties and ideologies coming together to keep Mumbai within the state on linguistic lines. One of the prominent figures leading this fight was Prabodhankar Thackeray, Raj and Uddhav Thackeray's grandfather. And it was on the Marathi pride and manoos issue that Bal Thackeray formed the Shiv Sena in 1966. It resonated amongst the Marathi-speaking population and has always been a dominant and emotive issue in the state since. 'Maharashtra has a history where communists and socialists came together on the issue of language to form the Samyukt Maharashtra movement. And the BJP is well aware of it. So this is an emotive issue, which can cross ideological lines. If it had blown out of proportion, it would have been difficult for the BJP to control,' said Gaikwad. He also said that although Hindi has been at the core of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) ideology, the decision to reverse the move could have been driven by political compulsions. 'Maybe, looking at local polls, there could have been some internal communication between the RSS and the BJP to backtrack on the movement. Although the upper class and middle class of the Marathi population do not come on the road, but even for them, this language issue is a matter of pride, which could reflect in votes. This could be the reason they revoked the GR,' he said. But Deshpande said the RSS and BJP continue to back the broader 'one nation, one policy' idea in which Hindi plays a central role. For the BJP, making Hindi a compulsory third language just ahead of the local body polls would have been a huge risk, especially after both Thackerays came together on the issue. Although the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) just secured around 2 percent vote share in the Maharashtra assembly elections, it still has a voter base in Mumbai, especially in Marathi-speaking pockets. Raj Thackeray has a history of violence against the Hindi-speaking population and has never deviated from his core Marathi identity issue. Uddhav Thackeray's immediate response to a united rally with Raj energised the cadre on both sides, giving the issue momentum. Posters and banners of them coming together adorned the streets of Mumbai last week. Social media chatter showed massive support for the cousins. According to estimates by political parties, Mumbai has nearly 34 percent Marathi voters, followed by 19-20 percent Muslims, 17-18 percent north Indians, and 15 percent Gujaratis and Marwaris. Marathi voters have primarily been divided between both the Shiv Senas, the MNS and the BJP, whereas the marginalised section from this base has been a Congress vote bank. So if both Thackerays come together on the Marathi issue, it could further consolidate this base, which the BJP cannot afford. 'In all of this, they did not expect Raj and Uddhav to come together immediately. In this case, the BJP had expected Raj Thackeray to grow politically, which would have then divided the votes of Marathis, but they did not want both Thackerays coming together and a Marathi consolidation,' said Deshpande. 'Besides, the BJP does not just want to fight the BMC polls, but is also looking at the other 28 municipal corporations across the state. So this would have impacted them in rural Maharashtra,' he added. But Deshpande also said that the Shiv Sena (UBT) has to tread carefully, as any alliance with the MVA could disturb the newer voters it attracted after joining the MVA. '2nd GR was afterthought due to political backlash' Apart from Marathi and English medium schools, Maharashtra has seven other mediums of instruction: Hindi, Sindhi, Gujarati, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and Urdu. Maharashtra has long followed a three-language policy, especially in non-Marathi and non-English medium schools. The state has 2.11 crore students in the education system. Of this, 1.94 crore students are learning in Marathi and English schools. For English and Marathi medium schools, the third language was introduced in Class 5. According to the GR released in April, Hindi was made a mandatory third language from Class 1. However, after much uproar and backlash from civil society, the government introduced a second GR in June, which said that Hindi wouldn't be mandatory but a default language. This meant that if more than 20 students in a class opted for another language, the school would offer it. Otherwise, the school would have to teach Hindi. 'Many rural schools don't have enough students. So this GR was anyway misleading. If the government was serious, then it shouldn't have taken out the second GR after the backlash over the first. This taking back of the GRs and forming another committee just looks like an afterthought because of political backlash and environment,' said Ganpule. Academicians questioned the need to impose Hindi as the third language from Class 1. 'What is the need to teach students from Class 1 so many subjects. By teaching them Hindi at such an early age, we are not carrying out any revolution,' said Gayatri Lele, a professor at a Mumbai college. Those ThePrint spoke to also said that they were not opposed to Hindi as a language per se. Hindi is widely spoken in Maharashtra, be it in Vidarbha or parts of Marathwada. Besides, the Hindi film industry was born in Mumbai. But what they question is the need for students to learn Hindi compulsorily at such a young age. 'In our state, especially in rural schools, every class might not have 20 students. So, according to their second GR, by default, they would learn Hindi,' said Bhausaheb Gawande, former joint director of the education department of Maharashtra. 'Nobody is against Hindi in Maharashtra as such. We have absorbed Hindi into our culture. In fact, in Vidarbha, many people speak Hindi. People here watch Hindi movies; so it is not against Hindi but the imposition,' he added. 'Young kids feel burdened if it is imposed. Why do that when we already have a three-language policy from Class 5? This unnecessarily created a rift between people.' However, the government is trying to defend itself by saying that the National Education Policy (NEP) recommendations of the Raghunath Mashelkar committee were accepted by Uddhav Thackeray's MVA government in 2020-21. The committee's report suggested introducing Hindi from Class 1. 'When they were in power, they accepted the Raghunath Mashelkar committee report and now they are opposing Hindi. Uddhav Thackeray should be named palturam,' Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis said at a function to elect the BJP state president Tuesday. Uddhav defended himself, saying that the report was made for higher education and though some of the recommendations regarding Hindi were in place, his government did not accept it by issuing a government resolution. Gawande said there were only passing references to making Hindi compulsory from Class 1 in the Mashelkar committee report because the entire report was on higher education. Stakeholders said they would monitor how the new committee's functioning, especially whether it engages with all stakeholders. They added that the fight to not have a third language from Class 1 will continue. Until then, all eyes are on the Thackeray cousins' 5 July rally in Worli, billed as both a victory rally and a show of strength after the rollback. (Edited by Sugita Katyal) Also Read: Why Kerala is at peace with Hindi. It's not like Tamil Nadu