German exports to US tumble as Berlin urges quick trade deal
Exports to the United States, Germany's largest trading partner, fell by 7.7 percent compared to April to 12.1 billion euros ($14.2 billion), federal statistics office Destatis said.
The drop left German exports to the United States at their lowest level since March 2022, came after the initial April announcement by Trump of sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs.
The punitive reciprocal rates which could see EU exports hit with a flat 20 percent tariff were first suspended until July 9, before Washington extended the pause till August 1.
Overall, Germany exported a total of 129.4 billion euros' worth of goods in May, a drop of 1.4 percent on the previous month.
Analysts surveyed by financial data firm FactSet had expected the trade barometer to stagnate.
ING bank analyst Carsten Brzeski said May's fall likely reflected a reversal of earlier 'frontloading' after American customers had rushed to get orders in before announced tariffs could take effect.
'This effect has now dissipated,' he said, adding that 'the risk of (more) tariffs hangs like a sword of Damocles over German and European exporters'.
The White House on Monday said it had sent letters to more than a dozen countries detailing the tariffs they would face if they did not reach new trade agreements with Washington by August 1.
Ongoing trade tensions threaten new pain for export powerhouse Germany, whose economy is already reeling from high production costs and intense Chinese competition in sectors from cars to machine tools.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz last week called on the EU to strike a 'quick and simple' bargain with the United States, saying Germany's 'key industries' needed clarity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
Trump pledges permanent solution to Gaza war
Shafaq News – Washington US President Donald Trump on Tuesday vowed to end the war in Gaza, calling it 'a tragedy,' and announcing that his administration is working toward a permanent resolution. During a Cabinet meeting, Trump confirmed that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would return to Washington later in the day for talks focused exclusively on Gaza. On Ukraine, Trump praised the country's resilience and revealed that the US had supplied Kyiv with $300 billion in aid and advanced weaponry. He criticized NATO partners for not matching US support and said his administration may impose additional sanctions on Russia. 'I'm not happy with Putin—this war is killing too many people, including his own soldiers,' he remarked. Turning to China, Trump claimed the former US airbase in Bagram, Afghanistan, is now under Chinese control, calling it a strategic failure. Still, he noted a recent improvement in bilateral ties and said he maintains direct communication with President Xi Jinping. On trade, Trump warned that all countries must comply with new US tariff rules by August 1, claiming that American tariffs remain far lower than those imposed on the US. He added that Washington may move to impose new duties on European Union states within two days. Trump also reiterated his demand that allies such as South Korea and Japan increase their financial contributions to US military support. Addressing domestic issues, Trump took aim at New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, suggesting potential federal intervention. 'We have tremendous power at the White House to run places when we have to,' he said. 'Maybe we'll have to straighten New York out from Washington… we're going to make New York great again.'
Memri
2 hours ago
- Memri
It Is Necessary To Discuss How The West's Relations With Russia Will Be Built After Putin
More than three years have passed since Russia's full-scale escalation against Ukraine began. The events of February 2022 were not just another stage in a geopolitical game, but a real watershed that radically changed both the world map and the very structure of Russian society. Anti-Western sentiments, which were previously used by the authorities as a tool of political propaganda, have now deeply penetrated the daily lives of millions of Russians, becoming an integral part of their worldview. For a huge segment of the population, reconciliation with the West is no longer just an undesirable option – it has become categorically unacceptable, impossible. This deep conviction is the result of many years of targeted work by the Russian propaganda machine, which has significantly strengthened its positions and methods of influence in recent years. State media and high-ranking officials tirelessly broadcast anti-American and anti-European rhetoric, turning it into a powerful tool for internal mobilization and legitimization of the Kremlin's actions. Any statement, even the most insignificant, by Western politicians, any careless utterance, is instantly seized upon and used as evidence of Western hostility and as justification for Russia's aggressive policies. Elvira Kikhareva "The Transition To Pragmatic Relations Is Possible Only If The West Offers Specific Mechanisms For Interaction" A classic example of such manipulation is the statement by former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, now the head of European diplomacy, about the potential for Russia's disintegration.[1] Regardless of the context and Kallas' true intentions, this statement was instantly seized upon by Russian propaganda and presented as irrefutable evidence of Western plans to destroy Russia. Such statements, even if they do not reflect the real policies of the West, strengthen the conviction of Russian citizens in the inevitability of conflict, the inevitability of confrontation and the complete impossibility of any compromise. This creates an extremely difficult situation in which the question of future relations between the West and Russia after Vladimir Putin's departure becomes especially relevant and acute. A simple containment strategy based on the accumulation of military power and sanctions pressure is unlikely to be effective in the long term. On the contrary, it may strengthen the sense among Russians of inhabiting a besieged fortress and further strengthen support for the authorities, who appear in the eyes of the population as the only defenders from a hostile outside world. It is necessary to take into account that Russian society is now highly polarized. There are groups of the population for whom anti-Western sentiments are not simply a consequence of propaganda, but deeply rooted convictions formed over decades. Changing these convictions will take a long time and will require not only political but also socio-economic transformations within Russia. Any attempt by the West to impose its conditions on Russia without taking these internal processes into account risks leading to even greater isolation and confrontation. Any actions require pre-prepared ground for a change in the course of the future Russian government. The transition to pragmatic relations is possible only if the West offers specific mechanisms for interaction. Three years of rash decisions not only provoked unprecedented Western sanctions, but also radically changed the Kremlin's geopolitical priorities. From a strategy focused on partial integration into the Western system, Russia made a sharp turn to building an alternative, primarily Eastern, vector of development. The three pillars of the new Russian foreign policy were strengthening allied ties with irreconcilable opponents of the West, strengthening economic cooperation with the states of the "Global South" and, finally, unprecedented rapprochement with China. Sanctions pressure pushed for active building of relations with states that traditionally have tense relations with the West. Partnership with Iran, North Korea, and Yemen, although not clear to many, pragmatically pursues several goals: gaining access to technology, bypassing Western sanctions, and demonstrating readiness to resist Western dominance. At the same time, Moscow is actively increasing its presence in Africa, Latin America, South Asia, and the post-Soviet space, offering these countries an alternative to the Western development model. Here, Russia is counting not only on expanding markets for its goods, but also on access to cheap resources. However, the effectiveness of this tactic remains questionable, given Russia's own limited economic capabilities and competition from other global players. "Thanks To Cooperation With China, Russia Has Gained Access To Alternative Financial Systems" The most significant change in Russian foreign policy has been the unprecedented rapprochement with China. If before 2022, relations between the two countries were rather pragmatic, now the Kremlin is demonstrating a readiness to significantly increase economic and political dependence on Beijing. China, the largest consumer of Russian energy, has become a real lifeline for the Russian economy under the blow of sanctions. Thanks to cooperation with China, Russia has gained access to alternative financial systems, bypassing the restrictions imposed by the West. This cooperation extends not only to energy, but also to other areas: technology, investment, infrastructure projects. However, this dependence is fraught with significant risks: economic vulnerability to China can limit the country's sovereignty and lead to unequal relations in the long term. Although the Kremlin views this dependence as an investment in confronting the United States and strengthening its influence on the world stage, the long-term consequences of this choice remain unpredictable. There have also been major changes in the circles of the Russian elite influencing the "climate" within the country. Those close to Putin increasingly understand that 2022 was a real disaster, and many officials want to gradually move away from the president's mistakes. The main thing for them is to be sure that the West will react positively to this. But it will be difficult for the West to change its tone and develop a common opinion on Russia – because the views in different European capitals differ greatly. Nevertheless, Western politicians dissatisfied with Trump's policies could begin to develop at least a new security concept for relations with Russia. One possible step is to conclude arms-control agreements and establish communication channels that will help avoid conflicts. In such agreements, arms restrictions, a ban on tactical intervention, and the creation of coordination mechanisms are important. But not only defense security, but also the transformation of economic relations will move the dead point. Without serious economic changes, it is unlikely that trade with Russia will be restored quickly. But if this happens, both sides will win: Russia will reduce its excessive dependence on China, and relations with the West will become more balanced. However, cooperation is possible only after the hostilities cease. Arms control is possible when the situation in eastern Ukraine stabilizes. In addition to the steps listed, it is important to establish a dialogue with Russian society and the elite, to show that the Kremlin, not the West, initiated the isolation. Those officials, scientists, AND representatives of culture and sports who are not engaged in propaganda should be allowed free entry to Europe, lifting visa restrictions. It also needs to be explained to Europeans that the responsibility for the breakdown in peaceful relations lies not with all Russians, but with the specific actions of the leadership, which brought the country to such a difficult situation. "The Lack Of A Common Plan To Prepare For The Future" It is necessary to discuss now how relations with Russia will be built after Putin, although Europe is currently experiencing a serious crisis. It may seem that it is too early to think about the post-war order – after all, there is a war going on. But preparing for the future and thinking through different scenarios is very important in order to prevent further escalation of the conflict. Finally, Putin has not appointed a successor for himself – most likely, he wants to retain power for himself. Most likely, the next leader will be weaker, thus starting a struggle between political groups within the country. It will be similar to the period after Stalin's death, when power passed to a group of experienced politicians who gradually moved the country towards pragmatism and greater freedoms. The main problem now is the lack of a common plan to prepare for the future. The crisis in the United States showed that rapid changes are possible, and the same could happen in Russia after Putin. If nothing is discussed, the conflict between Russia and the West will continue. The idea of reconsidering the approach to relations with Russia is not just theoretical reasoning. Regardless of how the authorities in Moscow are currently behaving, the presence of specific proposals from the West could influence the situation inside the country right now and increase the chances of softening the tough policy. *Elvira Vikhareva is a renowned Russian opposition politician based in Russia. In 2023, she was poisoned with heavy metal salts.
Rudaw Net
4 hours ago
- Rudaw Net
US delists Syria's HTS as 'terrorist' group, maintains Nusra Front alias label
Also in World US revokes 'terrorist' designation for Syria's HTS Kumzari-Kurdish connection sparks speculation of shared heritage Kurdistan should do more for special needs students, says wheelchair-bound grad UN nuclear watchdog inspectors leave Iran A+ A- WASHINGTON DC - The US revoked the Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) designation for Syria's Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) on Tuesday, but the group 'remains identified as an alias of Al-Nusrah Front,' which is still listed as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT), a State Department spokesperson told Rudaw. The revocation of the FTO designation for HTS is 'effective July 8,' the spokesperson confirmed, adding that the State Department is currently "reviewing our remaining terrorist designations related to HTS and Syria, in accordance with the President [Donald Trump's] promise to deliver sanctions relief to Syria.' In a memo dated June 23 and published on Monday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated, 'In consultation with the Attorney General and Secretary of the Treasury, I hereby revoke the designation of Al-Nusrah Front, also known as Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (and other aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.' Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Secretary of State may revoke an FTO designation at any time, particularly if circumstances have changed or if the revocation supports US national security interests. Nusra Front, also known as Jabhat al-Nusra, was formed in 2012 as al-Qaeda's affiliate in Syria and in 2016, it rebranded as Jabhat Fatah al-Sham (JFS) and claimed to break from al-Qaeda, though ties were suspected to have continued. In 2017, JFS merged with other groups to form HTS. The US designated Nusra Front an FTO in December 2012 due to its links to al-Qaeda in Iraq and its activities in Syria. The designation, later updated to include JFS and HTS. Following a rapid offensive in early December, a coalition of opposition forces led by the now-dissolved HTS - then headed by Ahmed al-Sharaa - toppled the regime of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad. Sharaa was in late January named Syria's interim president and has since upped efforts to normalize diplomatic relations with the international community, long severed under Assad's rule. US Secretary of State Rubio's revocation of Nusra Front and HTS's designation as an FTO notably came a week after the US President terminated Washington's comprehensive sanctions program on Syria. Trump had announced the move in mid-May as part of a broader strategy to normalize ties with the new Syrian leadership and 'to give them a chance at greatness,' he said during a speech in Riyadh. The State Department spokesperson told Rudaw on Tuesday that the revocation of HTS's designation as an FTO aligns with Trump's May announcement, which 'signified a turning point for Syria's reintegration into the global community and economy.' The decision, the spokesperson continued, marks 'an additional step towards fulfilling the President's vision of delivering sanctions relief for the Syrian people,' which is 'a critical element of a new relationship between Syria and the United States. 'The President is providing the Syrian government with the chance to promote peace and stability,' the spokesperson added. 'This is about opening up incredible opportunities around the region for peace and security.' Since the fall of Assad in December, the US has taken several steps to ease sanctions on Syria. In January, the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued General License 24, authorizing specific humanitarian and essential service transactions. This was followed in late May by General License 25, which broadly authorized transactions across all sectors of Syria's economy - including investment, financial services, and petroleum trade - as well as re-engagement with the Commercial Bank of Syria. Also in May, the State Department issued a 180-day waiver under the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act, removing a key legal obstacle to reconstruction and economic engagement. However, targeted sanctions against individuals linked to the Assad regime, terrorism, and human rights abuses remain in effect.
