France's Macron calls for world order ‘based on law' in Vietnam
HANOI - French President Emmanuel Macron called on May 26 for the preservation of a world order 'based on law', as he started a tour of South-east Asia, a region caught up in the confrontation between the United States and China.
Mr Macron said a rules-based order was necessary at 'a time of both great imbalance and a return to power-driven rhetoric and intimidation', as he met his Vietnamese counterpart Luong Cuong in Hanoi.
He presented France as a reliable alternative for Vietnam, caught between Washington, which is threatening to impose trade levies, and Beijing, an important trade partner with which it is also embroiled in territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
'With France, you have a familiar, safe, and reliable friend ... and in the period we are living in, this alone has great value,' Mr Macron said during a meeting with Mr To Lam, the secretary-general of the Communist Party and Vietnam's top leader.
The two countries signed around a dozen agreements on May 26, including in the field of nuclear power, which Hanoi is keen to develop as it seeks to meet soaring energy demands while reducing carbon emissions.
Budget airline Vietjet also announced an order for 20 widebody Airbus A330-900 planes, doubling its purchases of the model from the aviation giant in a deal worth an estimated US$8 billion (S$10.27 billion).
'It is truly a new page being written between our two countries... a desire to write an even more ambitious page of the relationship between Vietnam and France, between Asean and the European Union,' Mr Macron said.
Call to raise rights issue
Mr Macron arrived in Hanoi late on May 25, the first stop of a six-day trip that will take in Indonesia and Singapore.
After paying tribute on May 26 at a Hanoi war memorial to those who fought against French colonial occupation, Mr Macron had lunch with Mr Lam at the capital's Temple of Literature, where the two watched a traditional music and dance performance.
Mr Lam is considered the most powerful leader in Vietnam, a one-party state which tolerates no dissent and moves quickly to suppress any criticism.
Ahead of Mr Macron's first official visit to the country, Human Rights Watch (HRW) pressed him to voice concerns about 'the Vietnamese government's worsening rights record'.
Vietnam has more than 170 political prisoners who have been charged and convicted under 'draconian laws' that criminalise free expression and peaceful activism for human rights and democracy, HRW said.
A public appeal would be out of character for the French president, who regularly says he prefers to raise sensitive issues behind closed doors.
Vietnam on 'front line'
Mr Macron hopes to sell Hanoi his offer of a 'third way' between Washington and Beijing.
'Vietnam is really on the front line of all the tensions that are growing in the South China Sea,' a senior French diplomatic official told AFP.
Hanoi shares Washington's concerns about Beijing's increasing assertiveness in the contested waterway, but it has close economic ties with its giant neighbour.
Vietnam has also been threatened with a hefty 46 per cent tariff by US President Donald Trump as part of his global trade blitz.
Mr Macron's 'Indo-Pacific strategy' – which proposes a third way to the countries of the region – has gained new relevance due to Mr Trump's trade war, according to the aide.
He said the president was 'defending the idea of international trade rules, we don't want a jungle where the law of the strongest prevails'.
Vietnam has been careful to follow its own balancing act between China and the United States.
It has adopted a 'bamboo diplomacy' approach of seeking strength through flexibility, or looking to stay on good terms with the world's major powers. AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
13 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Media regulator calls on lawmakers to protect British public service TV in age of YouTube
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Britain's public broadcasters risk becoming an 'endangered species' in an age of video streaming websites such as YouTube, says the country's media regulator, Ofcom. LONDON – Britain's media regulator has called for fresh legislation to protect the nation's established public broadcasters such as the BBC from online video streaming services owned mainly by foreign companies. 'Public service media has a long and proud tradition in the UK. It delivers duly impartial and trusted news and original programmes which reflect British culture and bring the country together,' stated a July 21 report issued by Britain's media regulator, the Office of Communications, or Ofcom. But according to Ofcom, the country's public broadcasters risk becoming an 'endangered species' in an age of video streaming websites such as YouTube. The answer, the regulator claims, is to compel global streaming companies to give higher prominence to content produced by British public broadcasters, so that such material can be more easily accessible to British audiences. Ofcom's proposal for a set of new measures including fresh legislation has taken many media specialists in London by surprise, and it is far from certain that the measures will find favour with the British government. Still, the proposals are broadly in keeping with efforts undertaken by many countries, including Singapore, to ensure that their national public media providers can survive in a global information landscape increasingly dominated by a handful of often US-owned video streaming companies. YouTube is a subsidiary of Alphabet, which is also the parent company of Google. Public service broadcasters in the UK comprise the tax-funded BBC – the oldest global broadcaster, affectionately referred to by the British as 'Auntie' – as well as five other ad-funded networks that hold broadcasting licences. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Judge asks prosecution for more information on Kpods in first case involving etomidate-laced vapes World In landmark opinion, World Court says countries must address climate change threat Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents Sport Bukayo Saka the difference as Arsenal beat AC Milan at National Stadium Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore Over 1.15 million Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 have claimed SG60 vouchers Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him In 2024, the BBC's revenues totalled £5.9 billion (S$10.2 billion), primarily derived from the £174.50 compulsory licence fee it collects from all UK households, as well as the royalties earned from selling its content to other global broadcasters. ITV, the biggest of the ad-supported British public networks, netted revenues of £4.1 billion in 2024. These are large sums, but the obligations on British public broadcasters are equally significant. Their output must be accessible nationwide without additional payment. They are also required to commission a large quantity of British-related drama and documentary material, encourage the growth of local talent, promote national media industries, offer special programmes for children, the elderly, and various ethnic minorities, and provide a continuous and comprehensive news service. This last task is both hugely expensive and unattractive to advertisers and commercial sponsors. Yet, no such obligations apply to major global streaming companies, such as Netflix, Disney+, or Amazon's Prime Video, which can concentrate their resources on producing only content that is profitable or stands to increase their fee-paying audiences. In its latest report, Ofcom acknowledged that global streaming companies can also 'contribute substantially to British culture and public debate'. The regulator singled out Netflix's Adolescence, a 2025 hit drama series about crime in a small British town, which prompted a national debate about juvenile delinquency and the relationships between teenage boys and girls. Nonetheless, the Ofcom report pointed out that such media gems are rare. Most of the global streaming companies' material has little reference to the UK, is not explicitly produced for UK audiences and remains behind paywalls. All British public broadcasters have launched their streaming services, either through their own specifically designed platforms, such as the BBC's iPlayer, or in association with other streaming providers. However, these are increasingly marginalised by the sheer power of foreign-owned streaming platforms, which not only take away audiences but also eat into the advertising markets that sustained many public broadcasters. Ofcom has long followed these developments with growing concern. Initially, the regulator's attention focused on ensuring that new streaming devices entering the market do not exclude the streaming platforms of British public broadcasters. A new Media Act came into effect in 2024, designed to ensure that the apps of public broadcasters are automatically included in all the smart TV devices sold in Britain; these are TV sets with integrated web connections. However, this legislation does not extend to video-sharing platforms, a sector dominated by YouTube. And this omission is now considered critical by Ofcom. According to research conducted by the regulator, 43 per cent of children aged four to 17 watch YouTube weekly, far more than those turning to any British public broadcaster. And less than a fifth of the material available on YouTube is made in the UK, Ofcom claimed. The watchdog suggested British broadcasters should 'work urgently with YouTube' to make sure their content is 'prominent and easy to find' on the video sharer's website. It also wants YouTube to offer more news and children's programming from British public broadcasters. The regulator added there is 'a strong case' for the government to consider a law to make that happen. 'If children do not turn to public service media content as they get older, the future of (this media) is at risk,' Ofcom's report concluded. British media bosses welcomed the initiative. But the reaction of the British government was more muted. 'We welcome Ofcom's Public Service Media Review and we will now consider its recommendations,' a spokesperson for Britain's Department for Culture, Media and Sport said on July 22. One reason for this cautious response is that after the introduction of the 2024 Media Act, there has been little official appetite for further legislation. However, a more powerful consideration is the potential reaction of US President Donald Trump to any measure that imposes further obligations on American companies providing digital services. Mr Trump is already angered by plans of many European governments to tax the profits of US-owned digital platforms. And with 'The Donald' scheduled to arrive in the UK at the end of this week for a round of golf, the last thing anyone wants is a further row over the treatment of YouTube.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
US State Department probes Harvard over visiting scholar programme
Find out what's new on ST website and app. The State Department's probe is part of a continuing crackdown on the elite institution. WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump's administration on July 23 launched an investigation into Harvard University's ability to sponsor visiting students and academics, part of a continuing crackdown on the elite institution. Since taking office in January, Mr Trump has repeatedly accused Harvard and other top US universities of having a 'liberal' bias, accusing some of 'anti-Semitism' to cut federal funding and demand greater oversight. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the latest investigation would examine whether the university was complying with regulations in the Exchange Visitor Programme. That included probing whether the university was 'conducting their programmes in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States.' 'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students,' he said in a statement. Harvard has so far defied Mr Trump's calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity.' Mr Trump has cut federal grants for Harvard and tried a host of different tactics to block the institution from hosting international students. The administration has sought to remove Harvard from an electronic student immigration registry and instructed embassies to deny visas to international students hoping to attend the Massachusetts-based university. The administration insists its moves are legally justified over Harvard's failure to protect Jewish students, particularly amid campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza. Harvard has sued the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies to block the efforts, arguing they are illegal and unconstitutional. The Ivy League institution has also sued to restore more than US$2 billion (S$2.5 billion) in frozen funds. A Harvard spokesman did not immediately respond to a request from AFP for its response to the State Department investigation. AFP
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Republicans end House session early to avoid Epstein probe votes
WASHINGTON: Republican leaders in the US House of Representatives on Wednesday (July 23) ended the legislative session a day early, sending lawmakers on summer recess to avoid politically risky votes tied to the Justice Department's decision to close its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The financier, who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, remains a flashpoint in US politics. Earlier this month, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Epstein's so-called 'client list' did not exist and confirmed he died by suicide, findings that outraged many on the political right. Democrats sought to force a vote to compel release of the full case files, but Republicans, unable to unify, opted to cancel Thursday's proceedings. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the break would provide 'space' for a resolution. Democrats accused Republicans of avoiding a politically explosive issue. MAGA BASE REACTS ANGRILY TO CASE CLOSURE Representative Jim McGovern, the top Democrat on the Rules Committee, said the Republican about-face betrayed voters. 'Donald Trump made a big deal out of this case,' he told MSNBC. 'Now… they want to bury it.' The Justice Department's July 7 memo has sparked backlash from Trump's base, which has been told for years that a cover-up protected prominent Democrats. MAGA-aligned lawmakers and media figures — many of whom built their profiles pushing Epstein-related conspiracy theories, have expressed frustration with Trump for dismissing their concerns. Some of Trump's critics pointed to his long history with Epstein, including social appearances during a 15-year friendship that ended in 2004. The White House denied a Wall Street Journal report that Trump once contributed a "bawdy" letter to Epstein's 50th birthday celebration. TRUMP AUTHORIZES NEW RELEASES, MAXWELL SUBPOENA LOOMS Facing mounting pressure, Trump authorised Bondi to release 'credible' information and urged courts to unseal related grand jury transcripts. Bondi's deputy, Todd Blanche, said officials were seeking a meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking. Republicans on the House Oversight subcommittee have already voted to subpoena Maxwell to testify at her Florida prison. 'We have to send a message to these dirtbags that this is not acceptable behavior,' said Representative Tim Burchett, who introduced the motion. Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to two state felony prostitution charges as part of a widely criticised plea deal. The agreement was negotiated by a US attorney who later served in Trump's cabinet.
