Amazon Recall Update: Fatal Warning Issued Nationwide
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has issued recall notices for four products sold online—principally via Amazon—due to serious safety hazards.
The recalls underscore concerns about safety oversight for products marketed by third-party sellers on e-commerce platforms, particularly for children's products with potentially hazardous defects.
Three of the four recalled products pose potentially life-threatening hazards.
Newsweek contacted CPSC via online form on Friday for comment.
List of Recalls
Magnetic Floating Stackers toys
The stackers contain magnets that can loosen and detach from the toy, posing an ingestion hazard to children.
The stackers contain magnets that can loosen and detach from the toy, posing an ingestion hazard to children.
CPSC/CPSC
The recalled magnetic floating stackers toys violate the mandatory standard for toy magnets because they contain magnets that can loosen and detach from the toy, posing an ingestion hazard to children, the CPSC said.
When high-powered magnets are swallowed, the ingested magnets can attract each other or other metal objects and become lodged in the digestive system. This can result in perforations, twisting and/or blockage of the intestines, blood poisoning and death.
Remedy: replace
Recall date: July 31, 2025
Units: 22,850 (Additionally, about 1,977 in Canada and about 190 in Mexico)
KidKraft Farm to Table Model Play Kitchen
Children's clothing can get caught on the plastic or metal hooks posing a strangulation hazard.
Children's clothing can get caught on the plastic or metal hooks posing a strangulation hazard.
CPSC/CPSC
If young children are climbing on the counter or crawling through the opening at the back of the play kitchen, their clothing can get caught on the plastic or metal hooks meant to hold toy kitchen accessories such as play pots and pans, posing a strangulation hazard. One death has been reported.
Remedy: Repair
Recall Date: July 31, 2025
Units: About 192,000
Amazon Basics Premium Foam Eurotop Mattresses
The recalled mattresses violate a mandatory flammability standard for mattresses, posing a fire hazard and risk of serious injury or death to consumers.
The recalled mattresses violate a mandatory flammability standard for mattresses, posing a fire hazard and risk of serious injury or death to consumers.
CPSC/CPSC
The recalled mattresses violate a mandatory flammability standard for mattresses, posing a fire hazard and risk of serious injury or death to consumers, the CPSC said.
Remedy: Refund
Recall Date: July 31, 2025
Units: About 2,700
An Amazon spokesperson told Newsweek in a statement on Friday regarding the recalled mattress: "Our customers' health and safety is of the utmost importance to us. Amazon notified customers alerting them of this Safety Notice and provided clear instructions for mattress disposal, as well as refunds for their purchase. Customer safety remains our top priority throughout this process."
Leatherman Charge Plus and Charge Plus TTi Multi-Tools
The tip of the knife blade does not fully fold into the handle, posing a laceration hazard.
The tip of the knife blade does not fully fold into the handle, posing a laceration hazard.
CPSC/CPSC
CPSC said that the tip of the knife blade does not fully fold into the handle, posing a laceration hazard.
Remedy: Repair
Recall Date: July 31, 2025
Units: About 17,000
What People Are Saying
Amazon says on its recall site: "Our Product Safety Team proactively investigates and addresses reported safety complaints and incidents to ensure customer protection from potential product-related safety risks. We closely monitor public recall alert websites and receive notifications from vendors and sellers. Upon discovering a product recall, we immediately halt affected product offerings and promptly inform both customers and sellers involved about the recall."
What Happens Next
Consumers who purchased recalled products are urged to discontinue their use immediately and follow instructions for returns, replacements or refunds as detailed by the manufacturers or sellers.
Anyone with potential safety concerns is advised to review the official CPSC recall database and consult Amazon's recalls page for continued updates.
The CPSC also encourages consumers to report any problems with recall processes directly on its website.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
34 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Nationwide Recall for Product Sold at Walmart, Target Due to Injuries
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A major recall involving the Cosco 2-Step Kitchen Stepper has been issued nationwide. The recall affects approximately 302,000 units sold at Walmart, Target, Home Depot, Lowe's, BJ's Wholesale Club, and several major online retailers. Sales took place from February 2021 through July 2025, with prices ranging from $56 to $70. An additional 11,000 units were distributed in Canada. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the recall after reports of injuries stemming from a faulty safety bar, urging consumers to stop using the product immediately and contact Dorel Home Furnishings for a free repair kit. The Consumer Product Safety Commission warned: "The safety bar can detach or break while in use, posing serious fall and injury hazards to consumers." Newsweek contacted Dorel Home Furnishings' listed press representative and Cosco's recall unit via email on Sunday, outside of normal business hours. Cosco 2-Step Kitchen Stepper. Cosco 2-Step Kitchen Stepper. CPSC Why It Matters This recall highlights ongoing product safety concerns in the U.S. consumer market, particularly with household goods sold through major national retailers. Recalls for products found at popular chains like Walmart and Target directly affect millions of American households and underscore the importance of regulatory oversight on items intended for everyday domestic use. What To Know The recall involves Cosco 2-Step Kitchen Steppers manufactured by Dorel Home Furnishings Inc., also known as Cosco Home and Office Products, based in Columbus, Indiana. The affected folding step stools include model numbers 11349WHG1E, 11349GRN1E, 11349NVY1E, 11349WHG2, 11349GRN4, 11349GRN12, 11349WHG12C, 11349WHG12W, 11349WHG4F, and 11349CBWH4T. These steppers were available in white/gray, green, navy, and blue, and feature the Cosco logo molded onto the handle. Model numbers can be found on a label on one of the stepper's arms. The recall was prompted by 34 reports of the safety bar detaching or breaking, including two incidents that resulted in head injuries, CPSC's alert said. Consumers are advised to stop using the safety bar and keep the product away from children until the repair has been completed. The recalled steppers were sold at a wide range of major retailers including Target, Home Depot, Lowe's, Walmart, BJ's Wholesale Club, and online platforms like Amazon, Wayfair, and Overstock. Consumers should cease use of the safety bar and store the stepper out of children's reach, the recall said. Dorel is offering a free repair kit, which includes a sliding locking mechanism for the safety bar, installation instructions, and an updated warning label. The repair kit and shipping are provided at no cost. To receive a repair kit, consumers can contact Dorel toll-free at 888-628-3778 (8 a.m.-6 p.m. ET, Monday-Friday), email recall@ or visit and click on "SAFETY NOTICES." Additional recall information can be found on the official CPSC page. What Happens Next Consumers are instructed to stop using the safety bar function of affected Cosco 2-Step Kitchen Steppers and keep them out of reach of children until the repair kit is installed. Dorel Home Furnishings has committed to distributing free repair kits and will continue to provide information and support regarding the recall. The CPSC encourages consumers to report any additional incidents or problems through its website.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Are You the 'Attractive' One? Here's How It Secretly Shapes Your Love Life
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. In relationships where one partner is perceived as more conventionally attractive than the other, insecurities, validation struggles, and social perceptions can, at times, complicate things. Licensed clinical professional counselor Katrina Gelazius and licensed marriage and family therapist Daniel Moultrie both told Newsweek that a perceived imbalance in conventional attractiveness can significantly affect how partners relate to each other and to the outside world. This adds an additional burden to relationships on top of the trials and tribulations that couples face. While attraction itself is subjective, the influence and emotional consequences of societal beauty standards, the experts said, can be profound. But couples who prioritize mutual respect and communication can overcome those challenges. "Being in a relationship where one partner is significantly more or less conventionally attractive than the other can introduce challenges," Gelazius told Newsweek. "While attraction is subjective and extends far beyond physical appearance, societal perceptions of beauty can still shape the relationship in meaningful ways." External Judgment Illinois-based Gelazius said that a common pressure comes from external scrutiny. Friends, family, and even strangers may comment on or silently judge perceived differences in appearance, framing it as a mismatch. This type of unsolicited commentary can sow self-doubt and insecurity. "This can fuel insecurity in the less-conventionally attractive partner, who might question why their partner chose them, while the more-attractive partner could worry that they are only valued for their looks," Gelazius said. She added that these situations can introduce subtle power dynamics into the relationship, especially when one partner experiences more social privilege as a result of how others perceive their appearance. Emotional Strain Moultrie, who practices in California, told Newsweek that such perceived imbalances can trigger deep-seated psychological patterns, especially in people with histories of insecure attachment or past rejection. "For the less-conventionally attractive partner, internalized beauty standards may cause feelings of inadequacy, low self-worth, or anxiety about being 'good enough,'" Moultrie said. "This can lead to fears of abandonment." Moultrie added that the more-conventionally attractive partner may face a different kind of pressure—one rooted in guilt, frustration, or the expectation to provide constant reassurance. "They may feel guilt or frustration if attraction becomes a point of tension or resentment," he said. These dynamics often bring projection and transference into the relationship, where partners interpret neutral behaviors through the lens of their insecurities. Moultrie said that the less-attractive partner might project insecurities onto their partner, interpreting neutral behaviors as rejection. Meanwhile, the more-attractive partner may become the recipient of idealization and suspicion. Subjectivity and Self-Perception For both experts, the key issue is not an objective difference in attractiveness but rather how each person sees themselves and each other within the framework of cultural norms. "These dynamics are typically shaped less by actual differences in attractiveness and more by how each partner perceives themselves and each other," Moultrie said. Attachment styles and self-esteem, often rooted in early life experiences, influence how these perceptions manifest. But they also provide a path for growth. "In couples therapy, it is common to see that these perceived imbalances can either fracture connection or serve as an opportunity to deepen intimacy," Moultrie said. Building Stronger Foundations Gelazius said that open communication can mitigate the negative effects of societal judgments and help couples find stability. "A strong emotional connection, mutual respect, and shared values can overshadow societal judgments," Gelazius said. "The less-conventionally attractive partner may find reassurance in being loved for their personality, while the more-attractive partner might cherish a relationship where they are valued for more than just their looks." Stock photo: A young woman walks ahead of partner on beach and looks back while holding hands. Stock photo: A young woman walks ahead of partner on beach and looks back while holding hands. Getty Images She emphasized the importance of discussing insecurities openly, setting boundaries against external opinions, and regularly affirming each other's worth. Moultrie agreed, stressing that emotional safety and mutual validation are more powerful indicators of a healthy relationship than physical appearance. "Emotional understanding, respect, and secure attachment styles are stronger predictors of health than physical attractiveness alone," Moultrie said. Some people have taken to social media to share how they have found dating someone they perceive as more attractive than themselves. On April 30, Instagram user @notwildlin posted a lighthearted video where he described himself as "punching"—slang for believing one's partner is more attractive in their eyes. The creator joked about a recent night out when other clubgoers implied his girlfriend was more attractive than him and invited others to share if they also felt they were "punching." The post drew attention for its humor but also opened up a wider discussion among users about how people see themselves within their relationships. Newsweek reached out to @notwildlin for more information. The conversation reflects a broader awareness of how beauty standards can shape relationships. And while humor might be the entry point for some, therapists said that the underlying emotional truths deserve attention. "When both partners feel valued, and emotionally safe, disparities in conventional beauty lose their power," Moultrie said. Have you noticed any red flags that made you end a relationship? Let us know via life@ We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Powerful interview reveals overlooked impact of global energy transition: 'Every electric vehicle carries Indigenous blood in their batteries'
Powerful interview reveals overlooked impact of global energy transition: 'Every electric vehicle carries Indigenous blood in their batteries' Intense global demand for "energy transition minerals" is impacting Indigenous communities. According to Inside Climate News, Indigenous leaders are speaking out about the industrial mining threatening to devastate their ancestral lands if mining companies proceed unabated. Activist Edson Krenak spoke with ICN about the industry's presence. He said it brings "contamination, forced removals, displacement, violence and modern-day slavery." Krenak grew up witnessing mining in his Brazilian homeland. Rivers once central to his people's culture are now "dead" after massive waste spills. "Communities like mine were torn apart," he said. "The Krenak people were among the most criminalized for defending their territories. We faced brutal repression." Research from the University of Queensland has revealed the ubiquity of mining. It found that over 54% of all global mining projects are on or near Indigenous territories. This amounts to over 2,700 mining projects worldwide. These lands hold vital minerals, including copper, lithium, and nickel. Indigenous stewardship has protected them and their biodiversity for decades. The pursuit for cleaner energy is critical, but as the interview conducted by Inside Climate News shows, it must not be at the expense of human rights or the environment. Mining expansion into Indigenous areas without consent or oversight leads to ecological damage — deforestation, water pollution, and habitat destruction to name a few. It also threatens Indigenous cultures, languages, and traditional livelihoods. The industry-Indigenous conflict challenges the shift to a sustainable economy. "Now, the lithium companies have received permits from the state government," Krenak said, "They've set their sights on this reserve and are pressuring local authorities to pass laws that would reduce the size of the protected area to just one-third of its original size. We've been working for two years to protect this area. We're exhausted." Krenak argued that extracted minerals from Indigenous lands are a catch-22. Minerals power faraway "sustainable cities" and offer an opportunity to get off the never-ending wheel of oil and gas pollution, but they also create new "sacrifice zones" in order to obtain what's needed. The same can be argued for obtaining more and more fossil fuels, but it does not change the effects on communities targeted for battery materials. Materials for batteries, unlike the drilling for oil and gas and coal, do at least allow for continued use for years upon years, and even when expended, around 95% of those materials are at least recyclable — whereas for fossil fuels, 535 times more tons of materials are extracted per year, all of which are just burned into the air and must be harvested again and again. That is the endless cycle that must be broken. So a shift to batteries that can be powered by the sun and wind and beyond is an improvement, and it's why the transition to electrification and renewable power is worthwhile. It also allows for the operations of virtually all devices being used to read this article right now. But it must be done responsibly, and advancing science leading to batteries requiring less difficult materials to obtain is incredibly important. So too is continued investment in battery recycling technology and associated facilities, such as Redwood Materials, founded by Tesla co-founder JB Straubel. Do you think fracking should be illegal in America? Yes — everywhere Yes — in most areas In some areas No Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Indigenous communities are advocating for their rights and a fair energy transition. They demand that principles like Free, Prior, and Informed Consent are upheld. FPIC is the right to approve or reject projects on their lands. Activists continue to raise global awareness with international forums and power centers. Growing recognition of these issues is prompting stricter regulations and transparent supply chains. Policies would also call for greater accountability from mining companies, governments, and consumers. Supporting organizations that champion Indigenous rights and ethical sourcing practices is crucial, Krenak argued. It follows that it's important to know the origins of materials in our clean energy transition; solutions for our planet cannot inadvertently create new injustices or environmental harms elsewhere. As Krenak told ICN, "Every electric vehicle carries Indigenous blood in their batteries. This is not a clean energy transition." Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the the daily Crossword
