Dáil apology to be made to family of 2011 hit-and-run victim Shane O'Farrell
A public apology is to be made in the Dáil to the family of hit-and-run victim Shane O'Farrell by Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan next week.
Mr O'Farrell (23) died after being knocked off his bicycle in Co Monaghan in 2011 by a man with multiple convictions.
His mother, Lucia O'Farrell, and relatives have been campaigning for a public inquiry to be established into the events that led to the man who caused her son's death being in a position to do so.
Zigimantas Gridziuska, who was driving the car that hit Mr O'Farrell, was out on bail at the time of the fatal incident. He had 42 previous convictions, including road-traffic offences, theft and heroin possession.
READ MORE
A ruling from Monaghan Circuit Court in January 2011 meant the Lithuanian national should have been in jail at the time of Mr O'Farrell's death. However, he remained on bail despite being arrested on both sides of the Border for various crimes.
In 2013, Gridziuska pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court of failing to stop his car at the scene of the incident on August 2nd, 2011. He received a suspended sentence of eight months on condition he leave Ireland and return to Lithuania.
Ms O'Farrell, her husband Jim and their four daughters met Mr O'Callaghan in March and afterwards said they were 'hopeful' a public inquiry would be set up into the case.
When in opposition in 2018, Mr O'Callaghan introduced a private member's motion calling for a fully public inquiry into Mr O'Farrell's death. It was passed by both the Dáil and the Seanad. A scoping inquiry in 2023 recommended against holding a public inquiry and Mr O'Callaghan recently said he could not ignore that decision.
He told the Dáil in March that he would instead consider asking the Oireachtas justice committee to examine the scoping inquiry's recommendations.
Ms O'Farrell said there was 'no point putting us through another process' like that as the scoping inquiry did not answer why Gridziuska was out on bail when he killed her son.
'We need a transparent public inquiry to look at all of the facts, to see why he was at liberty,' she said.
In a statement on Saturday, a spokesman for Mr O'Callaghan said he met the O'Farrell family in March and 'listened carefully to what they had to say' and reflected on the matters raised.
'Minister O'Callaghan will address the Dáil on Tuesday 27th May regarding an apology to Shane O'Farrell and his family. Time has been provided so that members from across the House can contribute,' she said. 'The Minister will not be making any further comment before addressing the Dáil.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
37 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Judge strikes out assault charge against law professor and barrister Diarmuid Phelan
A judge has dismissed an assault charge against law professor and barrister Diarmuid Phelan, saying the man would not get a fair trial. Mr Phelan (57), also known as Diarmuid Rossa Phelan, who lectures at Trinity College Dublin, came before Judge William Aylmer at Wexford District Court on Monday in a special application to have the charge dismissed given the delays in bringing the case to hearing. Mr Phelan, who was in court, appeared on a charge of allegedly assaulting neighbour Kevin McHale at Reedstown in Tacumshane, Co Wexford, on August 26th, 2021, causing him harm. The case had been adjourned a number of times, with Monday set aside as a special day for hearing. READ MORE Mr Phelan had been acquitted of murdering 35-year-old Keith Conlon at Hazelgrove Farm, Kiltalown Lane, Tallaght, Co Dublin, earlier this year. Justin McQuaid, defending, told Wexford District Court that while the assault took place on August 26th, 2021, Mr Phelan was not notified of a complaint until December 15th when Garda John Coughlan texted him. Potentially critical video evidence was not available to exonerate Mr Phelan because he had not been notified of the complaint in time, Mr McQuaid said. The court also heard that a previous allegation made against Mr Phelan had proven to be false when gardaí looked at dashcam footage from his car on the same day. He said Mr Phelan had denied assaulting his neighbour, saying he was acting in self defence. Under cross-examination by Mr McQuaid, Gda Coughlan told the court that on the date in question the wife of Mr McHale made contact with gardaí. Gda Coughlan said the injuries suffered were 'minor'. He told the court how on October 29th, 2021, he received a medical report stating that Mr McHale had received abrasions to the face and had complained of tenderness to the left side. According to the garda, on November 23rd, 2021, the accused showed him a shirt which he wore on the day of the alleged assault that was torn and had buttons removed. Garda Coughlan said the accused was never arrested, but by agreement had on February 2nd, 2022, attended Wexford Garda Station. He made a statement denying he had assaulted Mr McHale and that Mr McHale was the aggressor. Gda Coughlan said there had been a history between Mr Phelan, who owned a farm, and Mr McHale, with Mr Phelan alleging his land had been trespassed upon going back to 2000. The court heard there had been complaints about trespassing and interfering on the land dating back years. Gda Coughlan blamed his workload for the delay in notifying Mr Phelan sooner of the allegation. Mr Phelan told the court he owned a farm, both in Dublin and Wexford, but primarily lived in Dublin. He said the assault proceedings had been very stressful, adding to the stress of the murder trial which he said was 'very traumatic' and 'horrific'. The two were interwoven, he said. The day after Mr Phelan was charged with the murder of Keith Conlon, Gda Coughlan made a statement about the assault allegation and sent a file to the DPP the following day. Mr Phelan said he first heard he was being charged with assaulting Mr McHale during the bail hearing in the High Court in Dublin for the murder charge. He told the judge he thought the matter was over after meeting and discussing it with Gda Coughlan the previous December. In his ruling, Judge Aylmer cited the absence of CCTV footage, saying that Gda Coughlan had been told there was possible footage of the alleged assault, but did not seek to obtain it. The judge said the footage was not available to the accused to support his defence at this trial and that he was satisfied on the evidence before the court it was not possible for Mr Phelan to have a fair trial. He stuck out the charge of assault against Mr Phelan.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Eight domestic violence calls go unanswered by Free Legal Advice Centres every day due to lack of resources
At least eight calls a day from people experiencing domestic violence do not get answered by the State's Free Legal Advice Centres (Flac) because of a lack of capacity. The agency's telephone information and referral line provided legal information to 11,434 people last year. Chief executive Eilis Barry said they only had the capacity to respond to 21 per cent of the estimated 53,103 calls received last year, which included about 2,000 in relation to domestic violence. Flac provides legal advice to people who could not otherwise afford it. Launching the organisation's annual report for 2024, Ms Barry pointed out that the Legal Aid Board receives €12.64 million in funding. However, she added: 'To put that in perspective, the State spends €99 million on the horse and greyhound industry.' READ MORE She said it is 'incredibly difficult to achieve change in the area of legal aid', suggesting this is 'due to a misperception that legal aid is about more money for lawyers'. Ms Barry said: 'There's a failure to view civil legal aid as the vital public service it is.' The agency provided 3,731 legal advice consultations in 2024, a 14 per cent increase on 2023. The largest proportion of these consultations, 32.1 per cent, related to family law. Employment was second with 27.8 per cent of cases. Flac also provided advice in several other areas including housing, landlord and tenant issues, will and probate matters, immigration, discrimination and neighbour disputes. It is calling for legal representation to be available in claims before the Workplace Relations Commission, for social welfare appeals and for Rental Tenancies Board cases. This is currently not allowed under State-supported legal schemes. The agency noted instances of employees trying to represent themselves at WRC cases while employers hired legal teams. It is also seeking special legal centres for the needs of groups such as the Traveller community. Its current service is 'completely overrun with claims of discrimination and in relation to housing', Ms Barry said. Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan said at the launch that he recognised the need for 'further and greater resources in the civil legal aid scheme'. He pointed out that under Migrant Pact regulations, due to come into force next June, the State will need to increase funding 'just to provide legal assistance or legal counselling for people that are going through the international protection process'. He has received a Government-commissioned review of the system of legal aid and intends to publish both majority and minority reports shortly.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Trinity College can be named in case taken by student who apologised for plagiarism
The High Court has lifted an anonymity order allowing Trinity College Dublin and the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland to be named in a legal case against them taken by a pharmaceutical student found to have plagiarised his colleague's work. The third-level student has been granted High Court permission to pursue his legal action against the college, which twice made findings of plagiarism against him. He claims he should not have been put before a fitness-to-practise committee. The student, who retains his anonymity, took legal action against the Provost, Fellows and Scholars of the University of Dublin, Trinity College Dublin and the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland, which regulates the country's pharmacists. READ MORE At the High Court on Monday, Mr Justice Garrett Simons said the anonymity order granted to the two respondents in December by Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty could be lifted. Rosario Boyle SC, for the student, said there was no opposition to the naming of the college or the society, but applied for her client's anonymity to remain in place. The application to lift the student's anonymity was brought by Patrick Leonard SC, for the respondents, who submitted that the student should be treated the same as any other person before the court. Ms Boyle said the student, who is in his 20s, was two exams away from completing his qualification, and is challenging the internal proceedings at Trinity. She said he was subject to professional and peer recommendations to work, which could be affected if his name was published. Ms Boyle said there was an unfairness in her client being submitted to a fitness-to-practise review which was commonly a process used for professionals. Her client had admitted making 'academic' errors and has references from pharmaceutical professionals that he would make a 'brilliant' pharmacist, she said. 'As of this minute, your client is not in good standing,' said Mr Justice Simons, who added that the student could be vindicated in the public domain by the court action taken if it was successful. Mr Justice Simons adjourned the matter to October 20th and told Ms Boyle to find an analogy or case law to show him that graduated pharmacists have a right to anonymity based on potential damage to a livelihood due to allegations made against them. In September 2023, the student attended a plagiarism investigation by the college. He told the investigators that he had attended an exam with a bundle of notes that also contained material provided by another student in his year. The student asserted that he did not realise he had been transcribing directly from another student's notes in the exam, and apologised. The investigating committee said that even if the plagiarism was unintended, it was still an offence. The student's legal submissions claim that the university's policy outlines that cases of plagiarism should generally be dealt with under the disciplinary regulations, and not under the fitness-to-practise policy.
