Isuzu may move small-truck production to US from Japan
Isuzu exports more than 10,000 small trucks to the US each year from its Fujisawa plant near Tokyo.
The company says it is considering to move production of the vehicles to a factory it plans to build in the US state of South Carolina.
Isuzu says it would maintain production at Fujisawa by making vehicles for other markets at the facility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
Trump moves up Russia-Ukraine ceasefire deadline to Aug. 8
US President Donald Trump has said Russia must agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine by August 8, moving a previous deadline forward. Trump has been threatening to add to sanctions on Russia and impose high tariffs on the country's trading partners if it does not agree to a deal. He previously said the deadline was moved from early September to early August. On Tuesday, Trump said Russia has "10 days from today." But he added, "I don't know if it's going to affect Russia," because Russian President Vladimir Putin " wants to, obviously, probably keep the war going." Trump said, "But we're going to put on tariffs and the various things that you put on." Trump expressed irritation at the lack of prospects for a ceasefire as Russia continues to attack Ukraine. Regarding the impact new tariffs could have on the oil market or prices, Trump said he is not worried about it. He said he would boost domestic oil production to offset any effects. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday Russia is aware of Trump's remarks. He noted that the country is continuing its special military operations. He declined to give an assessment of Trump's comments.
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan's Nikkei Stock Average Treads Water as Central Bank Meetings, Tariff Deadline Loom
TOKYO, July 30 (Reuters) – Japan's Nikkei share average ended morning trade flat on Wednesday after spending most of the session slightly lower, as investors braced for a three-day period that will see policy decisions from the Federal Reserve and Bank of Japan, followed by U.S. President Donald Trump's deadline for trade deals. The Nikkei .N225 entered the midday break little changed at 40,682.14. Of the index's 225 components, 148 rose and 77 fell. The broader Topix .TOPX rose 0.35%. The Fed sets rates on Wednesday, and while policymakers are widely expected to stand pat, investors will be watching closely for signs that an interest rate cut may be on the way later this year. Similarly, the BOJ is seen keeping policy steady on Thursday, but markets will search for clues on when the central bank is likely to resume rate hikes. On Friday, most U.S. trade partners that have not agreed deals with Washington will receive higher tariff rates. 'There are still a lot of uncertainties over tariffs, and that's going to limit the upside for stocks,' said Maki Sawada, an equities strategist at Nomura Securities. As a result, 'there's no particular sense of direction' in Japanese stock trading currently, she said. Airline ANA Holdings 9202.T fell 3.8% to be the Nikkei's biggest percentage decliner following its earnings report after the market closed on Tuesday. Earnings also weighed on chip-testing equipment maker Advantest 6857.T, which slipped 1.8%. Sumitomo Pharma 4506.T surged nearly 16% to be the biggest percentage gainer.
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
U.S. could resist COSCO inclusion in CK Hutchison port sale
The proposed inclusion of Chinese shipping giant COSCO in Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison's contentious global ports sale is a potential win for Beijing in a strategic sector, but the deal is far from final and could face resistance from Washington, sources and analysts say. Since the deal was announced on March 4 to sell 43 of CK Hutchison's ports in 23 countries, including two along the Panama Canal, to a consortium led by U.S. firm BlackRock and Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte's family-run shipping company MSC, it has sparked a firestorm of criticism from China. While the U.S. government might oppose the inclusion of state-run COSCO in the consortium over perceived geopolitical risks posed by Chinese influence, bringing in the shipping giant could provide a more level playing field rather than one company being dominant, said a person with knowledge of the deal. The complex deal would require approval from around 50 jurisdictions involved, and it would take at least two years for the process to be completed, sources and analysts said. There was no immediate response from the White House, COSCO and CK Hutchison to requests for comment. At a time of festering global trade tensions between China and the U.S., the deal showcases the growing rivalry between both sides for maritime influence in the strategic commercial shipping sector that has been dominated by China in recent decades. U.S. President Donald Trump had earlier called for the removal of Chinese ownership in the Panama Canal — now used for more than 40% of U.S. container traffic valued at $270 billion annually. Following months of pressure from Beijing, including Chinese state media lambasting the move as a betrayal, and various Chinese government departments saying they would conduct a legal review, CK Hutchison announced on July 28 that a Chinese investor was being courted. It also said changes to the composition of the consortium and structure of the transaction would be necessary to secure regulatory approval. Two sources with knowledge of the matter said the investor was COSCO — a shipping and ports conglomerate that is now one of the world's dominant, vertically integrated marine transportation firms. While any stake by COSCO is not yet clear, a triparty agreement with BlackRock and MSC would alleviate China's national security concerns and have its blessing, the sources said. "The potential acquisition of Hutchison Ports is driven by the strategic need to secure key port resources amid global competition and U.S.-China tensions," JPMorgan wrote in a research report. The report also noted that while the inclusion of COSCO would "relieve some concerns by the Chinese government, thus boosting the likelihood of a green-light scenario," not all ports in the original agreement might be included. COSCO is requesting a bigger stake while the other parties in the consortium are keen to keep it a minority, the sources said. China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Guo Jiakun, told reporters on Monday in response to a question on the deal that Beijing "will conduct lawful regulation, firmly safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, and uphold justice and fairness in the market." A deal involving COSCO would be a "loud reaffirmation of China's geopolitical influence across the global maritime trade and transport sector, and of its effective leverage in trade negotiations with the U.S.," Isaac Kardon, Senior Fellow for China Studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said. "Beijing's disapproval clearly forced Hutchison to back off and change tack — and not merely in the optics of the transaction, but in its basic structure and national ownership." Should the deal proceed, it would be a crucial off-ramp for CK Hutchison, with the Americans wary of COSCO's growing maritime heft that could undermine U.S. national security. There could also be further blowback amid ongoing and complex bilateral trade talks. Some analysts say the Panama ports, in particular, will be a focus for the Trump administration, and could be taken out of the transaction to meet U.S. strategic interests. "The inclusion of this behemoth Chinese central state-owned enterprise as an owner seems like it should be a non-starter for the Trump administration seeking to strip Chinese control and restore some kind of American suzerainty over the Canal Zone," added Kardon. The CK Hutchison assets up for sale span the globe, including ports in Rotterdam in the Netherlands, Barcelona in Spain, Felixstowe in the United Kingdom, Mexico, Poland and the Bahamas — enlarging Beijing's global shipping networks and options at a time of great trade and tariff uncertainties. "At the moment they (Beijing) are in a place generally where they want to assert themselves and say, hey, don't mess with us," said Andrew Cainey, a senior associate fellow with the Royal United Services Institute, a defense and security think tank, in London. "If the U.S. were to come back and object to it, China could try to block the deal or demand more (from CK Hutchison)."
