logo
Adrian Chiles's first time at Glastonbury: ‘The peace-and-love control knobs get turned up to 11'

Adrian Chiles's first time at Glastonbury: ‘The peace-and-love control knobs get turned up to 11'

The Guardian29-06-2025
I thought I would never go to Glastonbury, and that was fine with me. Six years ago, I wrote about how it was my idea of hell, my event 101. Ever since then, for reasons known only to themselves, my Guardian handlers have been badgering me to come. They wore me down. They got me to Glastonbury.
What was my problem? Well, while I knew I would love a lot of the music, there are some creature comforts I won't be without. Nothing fancy – my personal hygiene bar is rather low; going without a shower for a few days holds no fear for me. All I insist upon is a clean bog and a bed on which to sleep, neither of which are easy to find at Worthy Farm.
The odd thing with Glastonbury is that even those who love it will also tell you terrible things about it. Murder when it's hot. Misery when it's wet. Chaotic, confusing, can't get near the stage. Flip-flops? You must be mad – your feet will be covered in filth! The toilets? God, they're – retch – awful. But you must go, they would all conclude. Must I? Apparently so.
As the weekend neared, my anxiety ratcheted up. In one stress dream, I was bundled, protesting, on stage to introduce Self Esteem. Weird. In another, I was up there in a spelling competition trying to spell arboretum. Weirder still.
On the radio, I sought listeners' advice for a Glastonbury virgin. The first text in read: 'Baby wipes, baby wipes and baby wipes.' I bought some baby wipes. Someone else said: 'Make sure you get your drugs tested at the back-of-house testing sites.' I'll be sure to do that – and if my atorvastatin turns out to be knock-off, I'll be speaking to my pharmacist in the strongest terms. Rob, 49, got in touch to say it would be his first time too, and he was more nervous than excited.
My daughters, both of whom would be there, said things like: 'Don't do anything strange,' and: 'Don't do anything embarrassing.' They both asked, sweetly enough, if I had any friends going, because they didn't want anyone saying: 'We just saw your dad walking around on his own.' Parenting is about the journey from being the carer to being the cared for. This has been the weekend my children and I crossed that Rubicon. Are you OK? Have you eaten? Did you bring your sun cream? Toilet paper? Surely it should be me asking these questions, not struggling to answer them.
To dodge the traffic, I decided to travel on my motorbike. That way, if it was really awful, I could attempt an exit à la Steve McQueen in The Great Escape. It turned out to be a good decision: I swept right up to the gate, trundled into the secure bike compound and parked alongside the incredibly few motorbikes in there. Bingo. It's the way to go. So there I was, a Glastonbury first-timer not even into the festival proper, already offering dad advice on how to do it better.
Fifty-eight is decidedly late to lose your virginity at anything. This weekend felt like going to a Doctor Who convention without having seen an episode of Doctor Who, or taking up skiing having never trodden on snow. Last summer, I went on a cruise for the first time and it was the same then – everyone apart from me seemed to know the ropes. All at sea, then and now.
At first, I always seemed to be walking in the opposite direction to everyone else. On one occasion, a river of people marching in the same direction blocked my way. Ill-advisedly, I tried to dance across the general flow. There was an obvious lesson: chill out, Grandad, and go with that flow.
I'm not a grandfather, by the way, but I felt like one there. While it was not exactly a youthful crowd, 95% of them appeared to be younger than me. Anxiously, I scanned around for someone, anyone, to make me feel young again, or at least not so old. There were the odd one or two, but not many. 'Shed Seven,' someone said to me. 'You should have been at Shed Seven. Everyone there was ancient.' Damn, that would have been a good place to start.
Instead, I broke my duck at Alanis Morissette. 'What's Alanis Morissette?' asked my younger daughter. Fair question, given she wasn't even thought of when Jagged Little Pill came out. So how come I seemed to be the oldest one there, too? I certainly felt more than seven years the senior of Alanis, who looked no different on Friday than she did back then.
I picked up a particular vibe about the Glastonbury crowd. It was in the look on everyone's faces, the way they walked, the very set of their jaws. I would characterise it as a mix of pleasure and pain, excitement and exhaustion. By the time I turned up, everyone already looked a bit knackered. Happy, no doubt, but knackered. And this was only Friday afternoon. Blimey. What is this, a funfest or an endurance test? 'Both!' said everyone to whom I posed this question. As one young woman said to me, with feeling: 'The highs are high, but the lows are very low.' Right, I get it now: no pain, no gain. I can work with that, I thought. Once I understood what this Glastonbury caper was all about, I could engage.
Pain was certainly something I experienced listening to Busta Rhymes. Without wishing to sound as old as I felt, his act seemed to involve a lot of shouting. Go with the flow, I reminded myself. I put my arms in the air when commanded by the great man to do so. I even endeavoured to move them backwards and forwards in time with everyone else. God loves a trier.
I got a text from a friend, Max, a Glastonbury old hand who turned out to be there busting some rhymes, too. My daughter, seeing a chance to get shot of me, led the way to him. Picking your way through a crowd is a skill this festival novice lacks. She yelled at me to keep up with her. This was easier for her to say than for me to do: she is quite small, with small feet, whereas I'm quite big, with correspondingly big feet. It is tricky to make brisk progress without knocking a drink – or the drinker – over, or causing lasting damage to fingers or toes. This must happen all the time, with all sorts of pushing, shoving and bad blood ensuing.
I asked Max how often fights broke out. 'At Glastonbury? Never,' he said. And this, astonishingly, seems to be the case. All this chaos, intoxicants of all kinds and general exuberance, yet no trouble at all. Miraculous. OK, there have been political blows exchanged, but that is different. In terms of physical skirmishing, there will have been more nonsense on your high street this weekend than on the whole Glastonbury site.
Max suggested we go to see Self Esteem on the Park stage. She had managed to start without me introducing her. And she was brilliant, really properly brilliant. With the help of nothing more than some warmish lager, my mate Max and this gifted woman from Rotherham, I felt a perfect high. I even, incredibly, bumped into Rob, who had texted in to my radio show that it was his first time. We agreed it was all very nice. Yes, this was great. But, as I had been warned, every high is followed by a low.
I had a look at Loyle Carner, who was just wrapping up on the Other stage, then called it a day. It was only then, back in my tent, that I realised I had got something very wrong. Two years ago, Lana Del Rey's microphone was cut because she overran her headline slot. From this, I had drawn the conclusion that the organisers took their curfews and noise abatement responsibilities very seriously. Quite right, too. I assumed everyone else would be turning in now, too. I honestly thought my sleep would be disturbed by nothing louder than the sound of fellow campers snoring or, at worst, having sex.
How very wrong I was. The snoring or sex would have needed to have been loud indeed to break the infernal racket that banged on for hours, all over the site. Why did they cut poor Lana's mic if this aural pandemonium goes on all night anyway? Sleep came only as dawn approached, and fitfully. Truly, the God that is Glastonbury giveth and taketh away.
I rose early to commence the search for some highs to make up for the night's bottomless lows. For reasons of vanity, the previous evening I had dispensed with the compression sock I am always supposed to wear on my left leg. Now, I was paying a price for that, so, odd though it looks when I'm in shorts, back on it went. I was too tired to be anything other than my authentic self.
I chanced upon the Glade stage, where a modest but appreciative crowd were swaying in a relaxed fashion to the sound of – and I quote from the programme – Channel One's Mikey Dread bringing roots, rock and reggae vibrations with MC's vinyl and dubplates. Even though I'm familiar with more than half of those words, this didn't mean a lot to me. Still, what's not to like about a slow, heavy reggae beat? Among the swayers there were a good few blokes my age – at last! – shifting their weight from foot to foot. I stood there a while, enjoying it, and, almost despite myself, found my weight tentatively shifting from foot to foot.
Then, two very odd things happened. First, the prodigious, dungeon-deep bass slightly changed pitch. I was astonished, not to say alarmed, to find that this – and I'm sorry not to spare you this detail – made my testicles throb in time with the music. I couldn't work out if the other blokes were feeling the same thing. Perhaps Mikey Dread had just found my frequency. Look, I don't mind a bit of something different late at night, but at lunchtime on a sunny Saturday, I wasn't ready. Gingerly, I started to edge my way out, only for something even odder to happen.
I was stopped by a petite woman, around my age, who shouted something in my ear that sounded like 'DVT'. I thought this was some reference to my cursed compression sock, but it turned out she had said 'DMT'. Specifically: 'You need to smoke some DMT,' which presumably is what was emanating from the thing she was waving under my nose. I thanked her very politely, but refused. It became clear that this was an extremely good decision. 'The effects of DMT take hold almost immediately when smoked. Users may feel like they are instantly transported to another universe,' I read. Crikey. 'Within five minutes … users may experience increased blood pressure, rapid heartbeat and dilated pupils.'
Relieved but shaken, I went off to the Healing Fields. There, a nice chap from Dorset calmed me with instructions on how to carve a heart into a square of Maltese limestone. All this before lunch. There really is something for everyone in this place.
The sun got hotter, the crowds thickened and still, to my increasing admiration, not a temper frayed. The sheer good nature of everyone in attendance started to feel almost absurd. My daughter told me to meet her at the Other stage, where she said I would enjoy Beabadoobee – no, me neither. But she was right, I did. It was all getting nicer and nicer.
Word reached me of fire and brimstone elsewhere ahead of the Kneecap gig. It came across like news from a distant planet where they did things differently. I neither saw, heard nor felt anything along those lines anywhere I ventured all weekend.
By the time Pulp took to the Pyramid stage, the peace-and-love control knobs were turned up to 11. Sensing the softening of my heart, my colleagues took the opportunity to force me into silly hats and whatnot. Everyone sang along. Everyone danced. Even me, nearly. The Red Arrows flew over. What next? Santa? To my consternation, I got a bit tearful. I give in. Glastonbury is a good thing. Anything that makes the world feel this nice has to be a seriously good thing.
To anyone who has been scathing about Glastonbury without having attended – as was the case with me – I humbly suggest your cynicism would not survive the reality of being here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The late Queen was the victim of multiple pranks at the hands of her favourite son Prince Andrew, royal insider reveals
The late Queen was the victim of multiple pranks at the hands of her favourite son Prince Andrew, royal insider reveals

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The late Queen was the victim of multiple pranks at the hands of her favourite son Prince Andrew, royal insider reveals

Queen Elizabeth II was the victim of multiple pranks at the hands of her favourite son Prince Andrew. The Duke of York's mischievous behaviour towards his mother was revealed by Robert Lacey in his book Battle Of Brothers. His practical jokes included putting itching powder inside his mother's bed and creeping behind a member of the Queen's Guard and tying their shoelaces together. The prince's most dramatic stunt involved climbing on the roof of the palace to change the direction of the TV aerial so the Queen could not watch her favourite horserace from Sandown Park. Despite his naughty actions, it is likely that Andrew was able to get away without any repercussions due to his coveted position as the late Queen's favourite son. Their close relationship was believed to have been because of the timing of Andrew's birth during the Queen's reign. The Duke of York was born in 1960, eight years after the Queen was crowned, while Charles and Anne had been toddlers when their mother became the monarch. This meant that, during their formative years, Elizabeth was busy on royal tours and learning to navigate her new role as Queen. But by the time Andrew was born, she had grown into her role much more and was therefore able to take a much active role in his, and younger brother Edward's, upbringing. For example, Elizabeth was able to even pick up the two boys from school in her own car and even attend sports days. A royal insider previously told the Telegraph, that Elizabeth liked Andrew because he was 'straightforward' and could make her 'laugh and raise the family's spirits'. On the other hand, she found Prince Charles 'emotionally complicated'. Meanwhile, Andrew's military service during the Falklands Wars was a source of great pride for his parents and made the prince the darling of the press. However, Prince Philip had a much less warm relationship with Andrew. Royal author Ingrid Sewell wrote in her book, My Mother And I, that Philip 'berated' Andrew for being 'pointless' and he believed the Duke of York 'failed to reach all his family's expectations'. In stark contrast to his relationship with the Queen, Andrew is known to have a more distant relationship with his older brother, with Charles going as far to claim in 2019: 'The problem with my brother [Andrew] is that he wants to be me.' Royal aides have gone as far as to claim that Andrew 'looked down on Charles' and 'thought he would make a much better king than his eldest brother'. His rude behaviour also extends to members of royal staff, with an aide telling royal expert Tom Quinn in his book, Gilded Youth, that Andrew 'was always curt to the staff and dismissive of them – he treated them as if we were living in the Middle Ages.' In 2022, Andrew was accused of 'overbearing' and 'verbally abusive behaviour' towards Palace staff. Former royal protection officer Paul Page has claimed he personally made three separate complaints to the Palace during the time he worked in the Royal Protection Command from 1998 until 2004. Speaking to The Sunday Mirror, Mr Page said that he is aware of 'at least a dozen' other reports made by colleagues about the Duke of York. 'The Palace has a problem because there are instances and evidence of Prince Andrew being overbearing and verbally abusive,' he told the newspaper. Mr Page alleged his complaints during his time working for the Palace were ignored because senior courtiers wanted to avoid agitation. While for many years Andrew was celebrated as the royal family's 'scallywag', Lacey wrote that the Prince's 'dubious choice of business contacts' have 'came to shadow his reputation'. This culminated in Andrew stepping down from his role as a working member of the royal family following his infamous interview with BBC Newsnight about his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. More recently, there was further controversy when it was uncovered that he unknowingly struck up a friendly relationship with an alleged Chinese spy. It was even reported that Andrew extended an invitation to the man, known as H6, to visit Buckingham Palace. The man was later banned from Britain by the Government on national security grounds. Since stepping down, Andrew has been involved in an ongoing scuffle with Charles over the Royal Lodge. Located in the leafy countryside surrounded by greenery, the Royal Lodge, which Prince Andrew shares with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, is just three miles from Windsor and 25 miles from London. Charles reportedly wants his younger brother to move out of the lavish 30million Royal Lodge, which has been in the family for centuries, and into Frogmore Cottage, the former residence of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. But moving Andrew hasn't been easy, as a 75-year contract he signed in 2003 means that he can continue living there, as long as he can afford the cost of upkeeping the 30-room mansion. Speaking of Andrew's potential move to Frogmore in January this year, Royal expert Ingrid Seward said: 'It's going to cost him a tenth of what it costs him at Royal Lodge, but that's not how Andrew thinks. He has serious delusions of grandeur and he thinks he needs to live in a house like that. 'If King Charles wants him to leave Royal Lodge, well he's going to have to use persuasion, because legally he can't move him out as he's rented it from the Crown Estate. 'If he can't keep up the roof and the outside and all the things a big house needs, he could be in contravention of his lease and that's the only way he could be moved out.'

Heartbreaking tributes to ‘little ray of sunshine,' 13, who was ‘always happy & smiling' after her sudden death
Heartbreaking tributes to ‘little ray of sunshine,' 13, who was ‘always happy & smiling' after her sudden death

The Sun

time8 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Heartbreaking tributes to ‘little ray of sunshine,' 13, who was ‘always happy & smiling' after her sudden death

THE family of a teen who tragically died suddenly have paid tribute to the young girl praising her as a 'quirky ray of sunshine." Robyn Lott died suddenly, aged 13, on July 14, family members have since launched a GoFundMe to cover the funeral costs. 3 Her mother, Alison Ward, led tributes for the tragic teen describing her as an animal lover who was passionate about fashion. The devastated mum has received an outpouring of support from people who knew Robyn. Robyn's family have asked that those attending the funeral wear casual clothing. People have also been asked to wear ears and tails if they wish, with these accessories often worn by Robyn. Only family flowers are being requested but people are being asked to donate teddy bears, which will be donated to charity, if they want. Devastated mum Alison said: 'She was an angel. Her smile lit up the room and she was always smiling and happy – she had this brightness inside her as she was one of those bright, happy people. "She was also very quirky and didn't 'follow the crowd'. She was her own person and she owned that. 'She was a little ray of sunshine and my absolute world. We would often blast music, dance around the kitchen and sing at the top of our voices – my phone is full of selfies of us doing silly, funny things. 'Robyn loved animals. We have a lot of pets and she has always been close to them. "She loved fashion and she used to dress up and accessorise when she was little – she was so creative and loved drawing. She had her own style and was so unique – she wasn't one to follow the crowd or any particular trends." 3

From Diana's 'rock' to Royal outcast: Inside Paul Burrell's betrayal of the Firm - as royal butler's upcoming tell-all book promises new bombshells
From Diana's 'rock' to Royal outcast: Inside Paul Burrell's betrayal of the Firm - as royal butler's upcoming tell-all book promises new bombshells

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

From Diana's 'rock' to Royal outcast: Inside Paul Burrell's betrayal of the Firm - as royal butler's upcoming tell-all book promises new bombshells

He's known to many for his high-profile trial where he was cleared after being accused of stealing and selling items belonging to Princess Diana 's estate - as well as for appearing as a contestant on I'm a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here! Paul Burrell joined the household of Prince Charles and Diana at Highgrove House in 1987 after working as the Queen's footman, later becoming the Princess' butler and remaining in this role until her death. Burrell became a close confidante of the Princess - but the family's perception of him soured shortly after Diana's passing in 1997. William and Harry accused Burrell of a 'cold and overt betrayal' after he published his memoir A Royal Duty - which contained a raft of private revelations. According to Harry's witness statement in his High Court battle with Mirror Group Newspapers, the Prince took the view that his mother's former butler was an attention-seeking, self-interested 'two-faced sh**'. And now the man Diana once called her 'rock' is set to release a third 'intimate' memoir, promising to reveal stories he felt he couldn't share while the late Queen was still alive. His book The Royal Insider – with a picture of himself and Diana on the cover – is due out in September. The Princes are now bracing themselves for what he might reveal as he vows to 'speak candidly about the tensions that simmered' during his time at the Palace – 'including the breakdown of Charles and Diana's marriage and his own complex relationship with Princes William and Harry'. The publishers, Sphere, said: 'It is only in the wake of the Queen's passing Burrell feels he can finally tell his story in full.' Burrell's was woken in January 2001 by police officers who asked if he had any items from Kensington Palace in his home. He was arrested and his home was raided, revealing rooms filled with paintings, drawings, china and photographs that clearly belonged to Diana. Other items included signed photographs of the Princess, her daily personal notes to William at school and clothes belonging to her - including a blue-ribboned hat she'd worn during her visit with Prince Charles to South Korea in 1992. That year, Burrell was charged with theft of a total of 310 items, reportedly worth £5million, which were said to have been stolen from Kensington Palace, the Princess' former London home. He denied any impropriety and maintained the items were given to him by Diana. The case against him had proceeded on the basis that he had not told anyone that he had kept items belonging to the Princess. But the prosecution barrister said that it had emerged that Burrell had met with the Queen privately in December 1997 where he mentioned that he had taken some of the Princess's papers for safekeeping. In April of that year, the police outlined the possible charges and said that they were investigating whether Burrell had been selling some of the items. Later in September, a letter from Burrell's solicitor requested a meeting to discuss Burrell's life and service with the Royal Family, but this was declined as The Queen was not actively involved with the case. In the autumn of 2001, The Queen's private secretary was told informally that the police had told Charles that they had evidence that Burrell had been selling items from the Princess's estate. However, in the following year this was made clear during the trial that, contrary to their earlier advice, the police had no evidence that Burrell had been selling the items in question. On October 25, 2002, the Queen, Charles and Prince Philip had driven together to St Paul's for a memorial service for the victims of the Bali bombing. Driving past the Old Bailey, she asked why a crowd was standing outside. Charles answered that Burrell was on trial. The Queen was apparently unaware that he was being prosecuted. Then she mentioned that, some years before, Burrell had sought an audience with her to explain that he was caring for some of Diana's papers, and she had agreed that he should do so. Given the importance to the prosecution case of the question of whether or not Burrell had told anyone that he had taken items from Kensington Palace, the relevance of this information was realised and quickly drawn to the attention of the police. The front page of Daily Mail is pictured from September 11, 2006, featuring Rebecca English's report that Paul Burrell was accused of 'stooping to an unprecedented low' by claiming Princess Diana's sons had failed to defend her memory The prosecution barrister, William Boyce QC later told the Old Bailey: 'In all the circumstances, the prosecution has concluded that the current trial is no longer viable because it has proceeded on a false premise that Mr Burrell had never told anyone that he was holding anything for safekeeping. 'The prosecution consider that if the defence were to apply for the jury to be discharged, although it would be a matter for My Lady, the prosecution could not oppose that application'. After hearing submissions from the prosecution and defence, the judge dismissed the jury and told Burrell he was free to go on November 1, 2002. If the trial had continued, the former butler would have been called to give evidence and may have faced questioning about his time in the Queen's employment as well as Princess Diana's. Outside the court, Mr Burrell said: 'The Queen has come through for me. I'm thrilled, I'm so thrilled.' In his tell-all memoir Spare, Harry described how he learned of Burrell's book about Diana when he was working as an unpaid farmhand in Australia aged 19 in 2003. He wrote that he received a package from Buckingham Palace, which was full of memos from the Palace communications team about 'a delicate matter'. 'Mummy's former butler had penned a tell-all which actually told nothing,' he said. 'It was merely one man's self-justifying, self-centring version of events. 'My mother once called this butler a dear friend, trusted him implicitly. We did too. Now this. 'He was milking her disappearance for money. It made my blood boil.' Harry wrote that he wanted to fly home to 'confront' Burrell but Charles and William talked him out of it, saying all they could do was 'issue a united condemnation'. Burrell hit back at criticism from Harry in Spare, saying he doesn't recognise 'the young man I see today'. Appearing on Australian breakfast show Sunrise, Burrell said: 'I first met him in his mummy's tummy. I don't recognise the young man I see today. That's not the boy I knew. 'What I see now is an angry, petulant, privileged prince who is constantly blaming other people and not taking accountability on his part.' Before A Royal Duty was published, Princes William and Harry issued a joint statement calling the book 'a cold and overt betrayal.' While Harry and William rarely see eye-to-eye these days and a joint statement is unlikely, the upcoming publication will likely bring back unhappy memories of the period surrounding their mother's death for the two men.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store