Parkland and FSU shooting survivors urge Florida lawmakers to uphold gun laws
Students impacted by both the Parkland and recent FSU shootings are urging Florida lawmakers to preserve and strengthen gun laws.
They rallied at the Capitol this week, warning against a rollback of reforms like the gun-buying age increase and red flag laws.
With the legislative session nearing its end, their plea adds urgency to a debate rekindled by tragedy.
ORLANDO, Fla. - Students impacted by both the Parkland and recent FSU shootings are urging Florida lawmakers to preserve and strengthen gun laws.
What we know
Following last week's deadly shooting at Florida State University (FSU), student activists — many of whom were also affected by the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School — are urging lawmakers to maintain and strengthen Florida's gun control laws. The renewed advocacy effort comes as the Republican-controlled legislature considers rolling back some of the reforms enacted in the wake of the Parkland tragedy.
Two people were killed, and six others injured in the FSU shooting. The suspect, a 20-year-old student identified as Phoenix Ikner, remains hospitalized and has not yet been formally charged. Investigators say he used a handgun that once belonged to his stepmother, a sheriff's deputy.
What we don't know
Authorities have not detailed Ikner's motives for the FSU shooting, and it's unclear how he accessed the firearm or whether warning signs were missed. While the suspect couldn't legally purchase a rifle under current Florida law, the process by which he came into possession of the handgun is still under investigation.
It also remains uncertain whether the recent events will influence any legislative changes before the current session ends on May 2. Although the Florida House passed a bill to lower the minimum age for purchasing firearms to 18, its future in the Senate is now in question.
The backstory
In 2018, following the Parkland shooting that killed 17 people, Florida passed a sweeping gun reform bill with bipartisan support. The law included raising the minimum age to purchase firearms to 21 and implementing red flag laws to allow courts to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed a threat.
This response was driven in large part by student-led activism that mobilized nationwide and changed the political conversation around gun violence. Many of those same voices are now rallying once again — this time as college students — to protect those hard-won policies.
What they're saying
Florida's current political climate is testing the durability of post-Parkland reforms. With Republicans holding a supermajority in both chambers, Democrats and activists are facing an uphill battle to pass or even get hearings on new gun control proposals.
The emotional weight of repeated school shootings is fueling a renewed movement among students, who view the recent violence not as isolated incidents but as a symptom of broader legislative inaction.
"No one should ever have to experience a school shooting — let alone two — just to have to beg lawmakers to care enough to stop the next one," said Stephanie Horowitz, a survivor of the Parkland shooting and now a graduate student at FSU.
"It wasn't as deadly as it could have been," said FSU junior Logan Rubenstein. "And to me, that's because of the laws that we passed after Parkland."
"When it comes to life and death, it's important to do the right thing," Rubenstein added, urging lawmakers to resist repealing the state's gun restrictions.
"Today I rise and ask for a moment of silence for my Seminole family, as we mourn those lost and the many lives that have been changed forever," said Republican Sen. Corey Simon, visibly emotional on the Senate floor.
"I am begging them to do something like we did after the horrific Parkland shooting," said Democratic Sen. Tina Polsky at a rally outside the Capitol.
"We're not trying to make this political. We are trying to save lives," added Democratic Rep. Anna Eskamani, encouraging student activists to keep pressing lawmakers.
What's next
The Tallahassee Police Department said the suspected FSU gunman, Phoenix Ikner, will be charged in the campus shooting once he is released from the hospital.
STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 35 ORLANDO:
Download the FOX Local app for breaking news alerts, the latest news headlines
Download the FOX 35 Storm Team Weather app for weather alerts & radar
Sign up for FOX 35's daily newsletter for the latest morning headlines
FOX Local:Stream FOX 35 newscasts, FOX 35 News+, Central Florida Eats on your smart TV
The Source
This story was written based on information shared by the Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
4 Blue States Where Energy Costs Could Go Up the Most Under Trump's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill'
The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (OBBB), signed into law on July 4, contains policies that will increase oil and gas leasing and repeal clean energy tax credits. This will result in higher energy costs — costs that will be passed on to consumers. Wholesale electricity prices are expected to increase 25% by 2030 and 74% by 2035. Electricity rates paid by consumers are expected to increase between 9%-18% and household energy costs are anticipated to go up $170 annually by 2035. Find Out: Read Next: Many Republican-led states are expected to bear the brunt of higher energy costs primarily because, unlike some Democrat-led states, they generally don't have their own policies to develop renewable energy. But a few blue states should brace for impact. A new analysis by the Energy Innovation Policy & Technology, LLC found that four majority Democrat states will be among the 20 to see the biggest annual increases to household energy costs by 2035. 4. Colorado Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$310 Learn More: 3. California Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$320 2. Maryland Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$350 1. Minnesota Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$410 More From GOBankingRates 3 Reasons Retired Boomers Shouldn't Give Their Kids a Living Inheritance (And 2 Reasons They Should) This article originally appeared on 4 Blue States Where Energy Costs Could Go Up the Most Under Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
Buzz Feed
an hour ago
- Buzz Feed
People Who Switched Political Parties Explain Why They Left
Political affiliation in America is supposed to be a choice, but for most people, it functions more like inheritance — passed down through family, geography, and social networks without much active deliberation. Yet that assumed loyalty can fracture, sometimes gradually, sometimes in a single moment that forces a fundamental recalculation of where you actually stand. When u/Deimos7779 asked people who've switched political parties to explain what drove that shift, the responses revealed something deeper than personal conversion stories. They exposed the fault lines where personal experience collides with institutional politics — where the gaps between stated values and actual policy become impossible to ignore. From economic realities to military service to local governance, these accounts map the pressure points where political identity breaks down and rebuilds itself. Here's what pushed 29 people to abandon their political home — and what that says about the state of American democracy: "I was raised conservative, spent 27 years in the military. Got retirement jobs with other conservatives. I considered myself a moderate conservative. After I was laid off from a very well-paying job, I chose not to work. After a couple of months, I got bored and took a job stocking shelves in a local grocery store. Getting to know my coworkers REALLY opened my eyes. These folks were barely getting by. I mentioned I needed a root canal; their response was that it would be cheaper to get it pulled. Everyone was a paycheck away from homelessness, took multiple bus rides to and from work, and on Medicaid providers. I realized that a large portion of people were barely surviving, and things needed to change." "My stepmother had come from privilege and spent her life around privileged conservative Catholics. Then she decided to use her degree in psychology to help treat inmates and drug addicts. It took less than a month for her to realize the system really is rigged against the poor. All the criminals were born poor and never had a chance. Things she knew white people did and got a slap on the wrist for, she met multiple people of color serving long prison terms for. And this wasn't just based on their side either — she had all of their files and knew everything the state could know about them. Later, when she went to her church and started asking people to she had a crisis of faith for a bit, after no one wanted to live up to Jesus's ideals and help the poor." "My come-to-Jesus moment was when I found out some district in Pennsylvania (I think) was trying to end their free lunch program because too many kids were racking up debt. Some rich millionaire, a rags-to-riches kind of guy, offered to cover all the debt, but the superintendent refused, saying, 'The kids need to learn a lesson.' I flipped my shit so hard over that, I basically became radicalized instantly. I wasn't a hardcore Republican, but one of those edgy centrist types. Children being fed is my 101 principle. And if we, the richest nation, can't even give our kids a damn sandwich, then what the fuck are we doing?" "As a kid, my dad had a union job, so we were a few notches above poverty. I grew up hearing about lazy people, single moms, etc., but I was always told you'd make it if you just worked hard. While working low-end jobs, I met the hardest working people you can imagine, but things were never going to get better for them." "For me, it was because I was brought up as a fiscal and rule-of-law, constitutional-integrity conservative. As I got into my late 20s, I began to see that the Republican party was just as bad at blowing money and was worse at dealing with party member corruption (even before Trump). It was completely over when Trump got elected. I couldn't wrap my head around why anyone who was a conservative like me could EVER support Trump. It turns out that the number of people who actually care about the principles of an ideology is quite low. The vast majority is just, 'My tribe red, ug ug ug.'" "I grew up in a family that voted one way and one way only because 'that's what we do.' My mom even admitted that she picked her political party because that was what her great-grandmother — who died when she was a teen — picked. My mom still votes that way, but I don't think she realizes that her party is not what it originally was when she started voting. And if you listen to her long enough, you realize that her ideals don't align with them. But she will never admit that. Ironically, most of the family in my generation is the opposite of what our parents are." "I was a staunch Republican supporter in my youth because my dad was, because his dad was. But my first real experience with politics was watching the George H. Bush team tell me the sky was green ten times a day, and I realized these were not good people. My dad made the same decision at about the same time." "I moved from Republican to Independent because my party was ignoring and demonizing scientists and doctors in favor of religion and ideology, costing the lives and ruining the education of my fellow Americans." "As one of my coworkers said, 'I was a Reagan Republican my whole life. Now, I'm a fucking centrist, and my views haven't changed.'" "Voted Green to save the environment. Green Party won. Green Party did absolutely none of the things they promised and instead damaged the economy. Never voting for them again." "I was raised in a very conservative area, to the point that I remember being told the one girl in my grade who had Democratic parents was being abused because they were exposing her to those ideals. I naturally am an adventurer, so I went far away to college. Just meeting other people and cultures completely dismantled that entire structure within a year." "I went to college. Met new people and developed a profound sense of empathy. Going into the military later only strengthened my views." "I grew up in a conservative household in a red state. I then went to college and joined the Army, and that completely changed my view on social issues. What you do with your life isn't my concern. We all just want to be happy and loved. I vote left now (I also owe Obama a huge apology; he was a great president). I'm not happy with the Democratic Party either, but the right has lost their damn minds and I want no part of that." "After this last presidential election, I changed my party affiliation from Democratic to undeclared, not because I can see myself voting for a Republican, but because the Democratic Party needs to know that our confidence in them is badly damaged." "I realized I was voting for a label, not values. I started paying attention to policy over party." "When I was 18, I decided I was a Libertarian — thanks in large part to a high school teacher who fed us a bunch of shitty ideas via Ayn Rand books. Then, I turned 22 and realized the 'social freedom' aspect of the Libertarian Party was complete bullshit. Now, I typically vote for the Democratic Party, while lamenting a lack of more progressive candidates." "I tried to actually do research and talk to people of specific groups instead of consuming only what pundits and YouTubers told me." "I was pretty apolitical but Republican for 10 years. I switched to Independent after their COVID response and the first impeachment. I switched to Democratic after January 6." "My mom was in the Navy her whole life and mostly apolitical, but bought into 'Republicans = military support' propaganda from the Reagan years. She wasn't a big Trump fan — albeit she doesn't really watch the news — but voted for him in 2016 because it's just what she does. During COVID, she decided she wasn't going to vote. Then, after January 6, she decidedly turned against Trump. When he formally got the nomination, she actively worked against him." "I was and still am a Democrat. However, I went from extremely left to moderate because there is a certain level of leftist orthodoxy where it's literally impossible to have an open conversation without being shouted down. My issue isn't really the ideas so much as the absolutism — there's no room for dissension. I feel like people who are extreme on either end of the spectrum have more in common with each other than people who are a little more moderate. I feel like there's this attitude where there's no room for compromise, so we have to burn it all down — both far right and far left say that kind of thing." "Trump the first time. I served my country in combat, came home broken, but found my way in law enforcement. I had a sense of brotherhood again and was helping people while also protecting them. All that shattered when Trump was elected and empowered the far-right radicals by not speaking against them. Suddenly, I was standing the line at protests and riots, being told to protect the cowards waving Nazi flags, hiding behind the police. It kept getting worse and worse as the far right felt more empowered, culminating on January 6. And then he got elected again and pardoned those traitors! I can ignore all the other illegal stuff this administration is getting away with and calling it politics, but any party that continues to back a traitor who doesn't even try to hide it, is not a party I want to be affiliated with. This is not the America I fought and continue to fight for." "I was a single-issue voter in my first election, coming from a religious background. After having learned more about the world — namely capitalism, healthcare, and LGBTQ+ issues — I became a voter of the left and have never looked back." "I have a very religious friend. His wife was also very religious. When they got pregnant, they were informed it was a high-risk pregnancy and presented with their options. They discussed it and decided to proceed with the pregnancy. Sadly, his wife died in childbirth. The baby did make it, however. Years later, we were talking, and the subject of abortion came up. He shocked me by saying he was now pro-choice. I inquired what brought that on, and he explained that while he is still very much against abortion, he realized that was his opinion. He said the thing that allowed him to ultimately accept and be at peace about his wife's death is the fact that they were able to discuss it and make the choice that was right for them. He said that he simply cannot condone depriving others of the ability to have those discussions and make those choices, even if that meant their choices may be different from his own." "I went from Republican to Independent because I was for fiscal responsibility and liberal on social issues. I do not even recognize the Republican Party I once belonged to." "I moved from a Democrat to an Independent because the Democratic Party has villainized straight white males, and I am a straight white male." "Well, I have always been an Independent — or rather had been — until Bernie, so I registered Democratic to vote for him in the primary. The DNC completely obliterated that in the following months and years. I am now an Independent again and no longer believe either of these parties are the way forward." "I was raised liberal and was super liberal until COVID. That changed everything, including seeing how my fellow liberals act when you have a differing opinion. Now, I am a Libertarian and more right-leaning. I will never go back. That being said, both sides are full of it, definitely do not have the public's best interest in mind, and are corrupt." "Winston Churchill was attributed with saying: 'If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.' That was pretty much me, and that is why I changed my political affiliation to conservative." "Grew up a Republican in Oklahoma. Joined the Navy. Met LOTS of folks from all over the world. Fought alongside most of them. Fought against a few others. The common trait those I fought against had was a hypocritical eye toward authority — it was bad unless they were in charge. This was a mindset I grew up around with my rural parents, but not my World War II veteran (overseas deployed) grandparents. I never understood it. Unfortunately, it took root in American society, pushed by people like Newt Gingrich, the NRA, the 'Moral Majority,' and Faux News. Karl Rove drove me to switch parties while running the Bush campaign. During the 2000 South Carolina primary, he talked about how McCain (Vietnam War POW and scion of a multi-generational Navy family) fathered a 'Black child' in an extramarital fling — it was an outright appeal to racists for their votes! Never mind the fact that said daughter was a child from Bangladesh the McCains had adopted. I was done." Taken together, these accounts reveal that political identity is far more fragile — and more responsive to lived experience — than our polarized discourse suggests. The moments that break political loyalty aren't always abstract ideological shifts but visceral encounters with institutional failure that force a reckoning between stated principles and actual practice. And more and more Americans are actively renegotiating their political identities as traditional party boundaries prove inadequate to the challenges they actually face. So, have you ever found yourself questioning your political affiliation? What moment or experience made you reconsider where you stand? Share your story in the comments below!
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Republicans and Democrats call for more information on Epstein case
Trump and many of his allies vowed to release a trove of files in the case, including a so-called 'client list' that many involved in the case insist never existed. But the release of some documents earlier this year offered no new revelations. And the Justice Department said this month that it had closed the case and would not release more documents, concluding that there was no client list. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up One of Epstein's former lawyers, Alan Dershowitz, said in an interview on 'Fox News Sunday' that the grand jury testimony was unlikely to contain the information that has most interested Trump's supporters. Advertisement Trump has encouraged his base to move on. But the backlash seemed to be on his mind Sunday morning, when he accused 'Radical Left Democrats' of exposing the 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax.' Burchett also took up Trump's argument Sunday, saying that Democrats had the chance to release the materials when former president Joe Biden was in office. Advertisement At the same time, Burchett is one of 10 Republicans who have signed on to an effort to force a vote on whether the administration should release the files. The procedural maneuver would require a majority of House members, and Burchett said he was not sure if it would succeed. 'I have no earthly idea,' he said on CNN. 'You know this town buries secrets.' Democrats in Congress have seized on the divide that has opened up between Trump and his supporters, trying to force votes on measures that call for the release of Epstein-related files and pressing for hearings. They have rejected Trump's efforts to redirect the blame to them. 'The president blaming Democrats for this disaster, Jake, is like that CEO that got caught on camera blaming Coldplay,' said Senator Amy Klobuchar, Democrat of Minnesota, to CNN's Jake Tapper, referring to a viral video that showed the married CEO of a tech company with his arms around a woman who is not his wife. Klobuchar, instead blamed the public's clamoring for the files on right-wing politicians, including Trump, who she said had sown distrust in federal prosecutors over the case. 'People have a reason that they want to know what's in there,' Klobuchar said. 'They believe the president when he said there's stuff in there that people should see.' Several former federal prosecutors told the Associated Press that the Justice Department request to unseal grand jury transcripts in the prosecutions of Epstein and his former girlfriend, imprisoned British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, is unlikely to produce much, if anything, to satisfy the public's appetite for new revelations about the financier's crimes. Advertisement Attorney Sarah Krissoff, an assistant US attorney in Manhattan from 2008 to 2021, called the request 'a distraction.' 'The president is trying to present himself as if he's doing something here and it really is nothing,' Krissoff told the Associated Press in a weekend interview. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche made the request Friday, asking judges to unseal transcripts from grand jury proceedings that resulted in indictments against Epstein and Maxwell, saying 'transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this Administration.' Krissoff and Joshua Naftalis, a Manhattan federal prosecutor for 11 years before entering private practice in 2023, said grand jury presentations are purposely brief. Naftalis said Southern District prosecutors present just enough to a grand jury to get an indictment but 'it's not going to be everything the FBI and investigators have figured out about Maxwell and Epstein.' 'People want the entire file from however long. That's just not what this is,' he said, estimating that the transcripts, at most, probably amount to a few hundred pages. 'It's not going to be much,' Krissoff said, estimating the length at as little as 60 pages 'because the Southern District of New York's practice is to put as little information as possible into the grand jury.' 'They basically spoon feed the indictment to the grand jury. That's what we're going to see,' she said. 'I just think it's not going to be that interesting. ... I don't think it's going to be anything new.' This article originally appeared in
