Human Rights Commissioner Says The Cost Of Limiting Gender Rights Under Legislation will be people's lives
Press Release – Human Rights Commission
International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, Intersexism & Transphobia (IDAHOBIT) on May 17 is a global day to raise awareness and advocate for the rights of LGBTQIA+people. This year's theme is The power of communities.
A sense of belonging and being part of a community are vital for each of us. Community is where we find support, understanding, and a sense of home.
International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, Intersexism & Transphobia (IDAHOBIT) on May 17 is a global day to raise awareness and advocate for the rights of LGBTQIA+people. This year's theme is 'The power of communities'.
'It is a reminder of the importance of connection and collective action when human rights are threatened. Rainbow people are part of every community and like everyone, often identify with more than one,' says Disability Rights Commissioner and Rainbow Rights spokesperson, Prudence Walker.
'Community support and advocacy can help create safe and accepting environments for everyone to live authentically, to be ourselves.'
However, recent developments in Aotearoa and overseas raise concerns about increasing discrimination against some groups.
'Attacks on the rights of trans, non-binary, and intersex people internationally are having ripple effects here in Aotearoa. I don't believe that is who we are as a country. We have data that shows the overwhelming majority of New Zealanders believe that trans people should be protected from discrimination,' says Walker.
'The laws of other countries are not our laws. Those are not our values.' Trans and non-binary people in Aotearoa already experience disproportionately high levels of psychological distress due to discrimination, barriers to healthcare and threats to their safety. Legislation that threatens to limit rights about gender identity can compound this further, and will likely impact cis women, intersex people and children too. There will be particular impacts for Māori, Pasifika and other Indigenous peoples who have always had diverse expressions of gender and sexuality. Te Tiriti o Waitangi affirms the right of tangata whenua to uphold tino rangatiratanga over their sexuality, gender, gender expressions, and sex characteristics.
Equal Employment Opportunities Commissioner and Women's Rights spokesperson, Professor Gail Pacheco, says inclusion of trans women in the definition of 'woman' is not only protected under international human rights standards, but it's crucial for wellbeing.
'All people deserve to have a sense of belonging. The Commission acknowledges and celebrates the diversity of women in Aotearoa and the value and strength that diversity brings to our communities,' says Pacheco.
The date of May 17 marks the anniversary of the World Health Organization's decision in 1990 to declassify homosexuality as a mental illness. 'While we've come so far together since those dark days, even now many people still live in fear of existing as their authentic selves,' says Walker. 'We cannot go back to a time when discrimination against Rainbow people was normalised in legislation and in public attitudes. The cost is people's lives and it's unacceptable.'
'Trans, non-binary, and intersex people are taonga and have existed forever. They will continue to do so with the same rights as others, including to be free from discrimination, violence and abuse,' she adds. 'Communities can use their power to support everyone's sense of identity and belonging, and to speak out against harmful legislation. We owe it to ourselves and to future generations to create a society that values inclusivity, equality, human rights, and lives of dignity for all.'
Notes:
• The Commission published a guide to 'Trans Rights and Human Rights' last year to help transgender people access this information
• More data about trans and non-binary people's experiences can be found in the
Counting Ourselves Health Survey.
• The United Nations treaty body, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) has made it clear that 'women', as that term is used in CEDAW, includes trans women, and accordingly, all the rights and protections in CEDAW extend to trans women.
• While Te Kāhui Tika Tangata Human Rights Commission can't make findings or decide if the law has been breached, it can help by providing information and support and in some cases can offer a dispute resolution process for complaints.
If someone has experienced unlawful discrimination, they can make a complaint via our website or by contacting us on 0800 496 877 or infoline@tikatangata.org.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
UNFPA Report: Fertility Crisis Is Rooted In Denied Choices, Not Birth Rates
BANGKOK, 25 June, 2025 – The real fertility crisis gripping countries across Asia and the Pacific is not about birth rates being too high or too low – it is about people being denied the power to make choices about their own bodies, futures, and families. This is the core message of UNFPA's 2025 State of World Population report, ' The real fertility crisis: The pursuit of reproductive agency in a changing world ', launched in Asia and the Pacific at the Third Asia and the Pacific Ministerial Conference on Civil Registration and Vital Statistics in Bangkok, today. 'This isn't a crisis of 'too many' or 'too few' births – it's a crisis of denied choice,' said Pio Smith, UNFPA Regional Director for Asia and the Pacific. 'We cannot assume that birth rates reflect people's desires when so many are held back by gender inequality, economic pressure, or lack of access to healthcare, information, and services. Fertility rates may fluctuate, but the universal right to reproductive freedom must remain constant.' The global report finds that rising economic insecurity, unaffordable housing, and unpaid care burdens are deterring people from having the number of children they want, even in countries with accessible health services. In contrast, early marriage, lack of contraceptive access, and social stigma still drive unintended pregnancies across Asia and the Pacific. UNFPA warns against both simplistic and coercive responses to population shifts, such as baby bonuses and fertility targets, noting that these measures are not only ineffective but violate human rights by denying individuals and couples the right to reproductive freedom and choice. Instead, governments are urged to focus on rights-based solutions by: Investing in affordable housing, decent jobs, and parental leave Expanding access to the full range of reproductive health services and accurate information Offering better choices for parenthood to single people and discriminated groups, including people with disabilities and LGBTQIA+ individuals Tackling restrictive workplace norms and gender stereotypes Gender inequality also remains a persistent barrier to reproductive autonomy. Women are often pushed out of the workforce due to caregiving responsibilities, while men face stigma for taking on active parenting roles. A tailored mix of economic, social, and political measures is needed across countries to help people start or grow the families they want. As countries across Asia and the Pacific navigate complex demographic shifts, UNFPA stands ready to support with evidence, technical expertise, and a shared commitment to realizing rights and choices for all.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Rights Aotearoa Applauds Human Rights Commission's Powerful Stand Against Regulatory Standards Bill
Rights Aotearoa warmly welcomes the impressive and authoritative submission from Te Kāhui Tika Tangata | Human Rights Commission on the Regulatory Standards Bill. The Commission's return to formidable analytical strength is a significant and encouraging development for the entire human rights sector in Aotearoa. Its submission masterfully deconstructs the Bill's profound threats to our constitutional framework, perfectly articulating the core concern that the Bill attempts to create a false and dangerous hierarchy of human rights. This aligns precisely with Rights Aotearoa's analysis that the Bill selectively elevates narrow economic and property-based principles over fundamental social, cultural, and environmental rights that protect the well-being of all New Zealanders. We commend the Commission for reinforcing the fundamental truth that there is no hierarchy of human rights, and that all human rights are indivisible. The Commission's detailed critique—covering the Bill's constitutional overreach, its complete disregard for Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and its flawed, undemocratic process—provides an unassailable case for its complete rejection. This submission is a testament that even though the Chief Human Rights Commissioner does not meet the statutory requirements for the job, the Commission's legal team, led by their extremely capable Chief Legal Officer, are highly talented. The commission's work provides a powerful, unifying voice for all who are dedicated to defending a fair, just, and democratic Aotearoa, and we are proud to stand alongside them in calling for this dangerous Bill to be withdrawn. The Human Rights Commission must be protected at all costs against voices—like those of ACT MP Todd Stephenson—who call for its dissolution. Rights Aotearoa's submission can be found here:
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
Have Your Say On 30-year Plan For NZ's Infrastructure Investment
The New Zealand Infrastructure Commission, Te Waihanga, has revealed its first look at how New Zealand needs to invest to get the roads, hospitals, schools and other infrastructure we will rely on to live and thrive over the next 30 years. The Commission's draft National Infrastructure Plan looks at the infrastructure New Zealand already has and how factors like an ageing population and climate change will drive future demands. It shows what we should be spending and makes recommendations for how we can get better results from this investment. Te Waihanga CE Geoff Cooper says that compared to other high-income countries, New Zealand already spends a greater percentage of GDP on infrastructure but is in the bottom 10 percent for the value we get from that spend. "To ensure New Zealanders are getting the infrastructure services they need, it's critical that we get smarter about how we invest. "A National Infrastructure Plan can help, showing where our infrastructure dollar will have the greatest impact in meeting New Zealand's future needs," says Cooper. We need to be ambitious "Some of our most essential infrastructure has already been built, but we're not always good at looking after it. Overall, we should be spending around 60 percent of our infrastructure investment on looking after what we've already got," says Cooper. The way we invest in new infrastructure will also need to change: We will need more investment in our hospitals. An ageing population means a greater need for hospitals. At the same time, we'll see a relative reduction in demand in the need for new schools and university buildings. We will need to invest more in electricity. To reach net zero by 2050 we need to increase electricity use by over 60 percent, boosting electricity-using industries and replacing fossil fuel use across the economy. We will see changes in how we invest in land transport. Investment in land transport - our roads, public transport, and railways - has increased over the past 20 years. In many parts of the sector, the pace of investment is expected to moderate as the population ages and the relative importance of income growth as a demand driver eases. The cost of responding to natural hazards will rise as we build more infrastructure to higher standards and bring forward renewals following a rising prevalence of extreme weather events. Improving our infrastructure planning "As we have heard from many in the sector, infrastructure policy and investment has experienced a lot of churn in recent electoral cycles. This perceived 'stop-start' approach can be costly for large projects and ongoing investment programmes. "The draft Plan provides recommendations on how we can get a more consistent and affordable approach and clear the way for delivering the infrastructure we need. It also makes recommendations on how we can better prioritise taking care of what we've got and optimise maintenance cycles so that we have more for new infrastructure. These changes can give the sector the certainty it needs to plan ahead, improve productivity, and create the jobs needed to maintain and deliver our infrastructure," Cooper says. Identifying projects that can make a difference The draft Plan shares the results of the first round of the Infrastructure Priorities Programme (IPP). The IPP takes proposals through an independent process to prove they offer bang for buck and meet a critical need. "While endorsed proposals aren't guaranteed funding, they give decision-makers confidence that these proposals have been independently assessed. "Proposals in the IPP were submitted to the Commission by central government, local government and the private sector. "We expect the list to grow as we receive submissions over future rounds," Cooper says. We want to hear from you "We want the National Infrastructure Plan to help build common ground about our areas of need and what is affordable for Kiwis, giving the Government of the day guidance for making decisions about infrastructure. "This is too important not to get right and too big a job to do alone. This is why we're seeking feedback now, while the Plan is still a draft. Tell us what you think and what we've missed." You can read more and have your say on our website ( this page will be updated from 10am Wednesday 25 June): Some key facts Over the last 20 years New Zealand's average spend on infrastructure is 5.8% of GDP. Crown investment as a share of GDP accounts for about 40% of this, or 2.5% of GDP. More recently, between 2010 and 2019, New Zealand spent more per capita than any other OECD country on infrastructure. The quality of our infrastructure lags, relative to what we spend on it. High-level comparisons suggest that New Zealand has among the lowest infrastructure spending 'bang for buck' in the OECD. We estimate that for most sectors, simply renewing and replacing what we have will consume the majority of our investment dollars over the next 30 years. For most sectors, this is 60% of infrastructure investment on average, but can be up to 80% in some sectors like education. After spending on renewals and replacements, we will have between 2% and 3% of GDP left over for new and improved infrastructure each year, or about $10 to $12 billion per year on average. For central government, this is between 0.5% and 1% of GDP. In dollar terms, this is about $3 to $4 billion per year on average across all types of infrastructure central government provides. The draft Plan is underpinned by a number of technical reports that have also been published on our website. The Commission has also released assessment information from round one of the Infrastructure Priorities Programme.
