Kerala chief ministers, their overseas medical voyages — a historical route map
While the move sparked political criticism over the state of Kerala's public healthcare system, it also aligns with a historical pattern of chief ministers, cutting across party lines, turning to foreign countries for treatment.
Rare exceptions included CPM's E K Nayanar and CPI's P K Vasudevan Nair, who are perhaps among the few state CMs who never travelled abroad for medical treatment.
The practice dates back to the pre-1990 era when left leaders, particularly from the CPI and CPM, preferred the erstwhile Soviet Union for higher medical care. Two of Kerala's most iconic communist chief ministers — E M S Namboodiripad and C Achutha Menon — travelled to the USSR for treatment during their time in office. Back then, the country was seen as a trusted destination, both ideologically and diplomatically, especially by left leaders.
However, the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s brought a shift in preferences. The US emerged as the new destination of choice, not only due to its advanced medical infrastructure but also because of the presence of a large number of Keralite doctors in its hospitals.
Among the first to make this transition was Congress leader and former Chief Minister K Karunakaran. After surviving a car accident in the 1990s, Karunakaran was flown to the US for specialised treatment.
In 2000, CPM veteran V S Achuthanandan, who later became the CM in 2006, found himself at the centre of a political storm when he flew to London for medical care. His trip became a key talking point during the UDF's campaign for the 2001 assembly election.
The Congress-led UDF trod a similar path. Former Chief Minister A K Antony travelled abroad for medical purposes after stepping down as Union defence minister. His successor, Oommen Chandy, too, underwent surgery in Davos, Switzerland, after slipping on snow during a visit to the World Economic Forum (WEF). Chandy sought further treatment in the US and Germany, though not during his tenure as chief minister.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What becomes of Republicans who cross King Donald?
DONALD TRUMP'S One Big Beautiful Bill act (BBB) is a Frankenstein's monster of hand-outs, carve-outs, tax cuts and ideological splurges and purges. Independent analysis suggests it will increase America's deficit , stunt the economy and hit the poorest hardest. A recent poll by YouGov and The Economist found that just over one in three Americans support the bill. Elon Musk, a big Republican donor and a former 'first buddy' of Mr Trump, is so unhappy that he is proposing to create a new political party. Even so, only five Republican members of Congress voted against it—fewer than any budget of Mr Trump's first term. Since becoming president for the first time in 2017, Mr Trump has reshaped the Republican Party in his image. Loyalty comes before all else in the Trump Party: Republicans who cross him could find themselves on the receiving end of a social-media rant or, worse, facing a Trump-endorsed primary challenger. After Thom Tillis (pictured) voted against the BBB , Mr Trump took to Truth Social, his social-media platform, to condemn the senator from North Carolina, calling for a loyalist to run against him. Mr Tillis chose to withdraw from his re-election campaign altogether. His exit is a boon for Democrats who hope to win his seat next year. After combing through 52,792 of the president's social-media posts, The Economist has identified 30 Republican members of Congress whom Mr Trump has publicly scorned or sought to displace since his first inauguration (see chart 1). Of those 30, ten went on to resign or decide not to run for re-election, including Mr Tillis. Nine faced a Trump-endorsed primary opponent. Five are standing for re-election in 2026. The data is reminiscent of the famous epigram 'divorced, beheaded, died; divorced, beheaded, survived'. Of course, the parallel to Henry VIII is unfair. Unlike the murderous English monarch, Mr Trump shows clemency. He publicly reconciled with seven of the 30 (although the feud resumed in four cases). The president's ire has been directed at one in 20 Republicans who have served in the past eight years. That this number is not greater can be credited to the fear instilled by six occasions when a candidate endorsed by Mr Trump defeated a Republican incumbent. By this method, he dispatched four of the ten House Republicans who voted to impeach him in 2021, along with Representatives Mark Sanford, an early critic, and Bob Good, a hard-right conservative caught on tape implying that Mr Trump was not a 'true conservative'. His endorsement is so valuable that one Republican congressman from Kentucky took to airing ads in south Florida, aimed to reach Mr Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort. The president's ability to dislodge unfriendly colleagues is not absolute. Three Republicans have survived a Trump-endorsed challenge. Nancy Mace, a congresswoman from South Carolina, survived by embracing Mr Trump, recanting her previous, mild criticisms. Two of the remaining Republicans who supported Mr Trump's second impeachment—Senator Lisa Murkowski and Representative Dan Newhouse—defeated primary opponents under voting systems which allow voters to cross party lines. Ranked-choice voting in Alaska and the two-round system in Washington state meant they could draw on support from sympathetic or tactical Democrats and independents. Mr Trump appears to understand the limits of his powers. He has notably avoided feuding with Representative David Valadao of California, and despite calling her 'absolutely atrocious' in 2022 he has been relatively muted about Senator Susan Collins of Maine. Although both of them voted for his impeachment, they also represented constituencies that leaned towards the Democrats (Mr Valadao now represents a more Republican-leaning district). Maine uses ranked-choice voting and California uses a two-round system. Mr Trump's strategic restraint could be to preserve his record. 'I am 42-0 over the last two cycles and never even tried to run up the score,' he said of his endorsements in 2022. For their part, Democrats are happy to enjoy the red-on-red scraps. In 2022, Nancy Pelosi, then Speaker of the House, made the controversial decision to use Democratic campaign funds to boost pro-Trump Republicans. Though arguably corrosive for democracy, in a narrow sense the gamble paid off. In three of the six races where Mr Trump unseated his critics, the Republican replacements went on to lose the general election. Be careful what you wish for Republicans in competitive districts have to weigh the risks of crossing Mr Trump against the risks of being too closely associated with him as voters' dissatisfaction rises. Mr Trump's loyal base, who vote in Republican primaries, are pitted against moderate general-election voters. This dynamic is a gift for the Democrats, who have a narrow path to regaining the Senate in next year's midterm elections (see chart 2). In North Carolina, Mr Tillis will probably be replaced by a less popular Republican nominee. In Texas, the state's scandal-plagued hard-right attorney-general leads primary polls by double digits, taking advantage of the president's attacks on the incumbent senator, 'hopeless' John Cornyn (to use Mr Trump's epithet). The fracas substantially improves Democrats' chances of winning the two states, which are key to their Senate prospects. Mr Trump has made himself inextricable from the Republican Party. This gives him a lot of power. But from a tactical point of view, he can still be a liability for his party. What-becomes-of-Republicans-who-cross-King-Donald- What-becomes-of-Republicans-who-cross-King-Donald- What-becomes-of-Republicans-who-cross-King-Donald- What-becomes-of-Republicans-who-cross-King-Donald- What-becomes-of-Republicans-who-cross-King-Donald-
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Tunnel vs transit: Bengaluru's infrastructure debate on social media heats up amid traffic woes
Bengaluru's social media fraternity is debating two massive infrastructure projects amid continuing traffic congestions: the proposed underground tunnel network for private vehicles and the expanding Namma Metro system aimed at mass transit. Social media users debated which Bengaluru needs more, the Namma Metro or the proposed underground tunnel network system, to ease its ongoing traffic woes.(X) READ | 'Unworkable': Experts on tunnel highway network proposed in Bengaluru to ease traffic congestion The tunnel road project — estimated to cost ₹19,000 crore — envisions an underground network between Hebbal and Silk Board, intended to ease surface traffic by creating a high-speed corridor exclusively for private vehicles, mostly cars. In contrast, the Namma Metro, along with the long-anticipated suburban rail project, is being pitched by many urban planners and citizens as a more inclusive, sustainable solution to the city's transportation crisis. READ | 'Bound to fail': Tejasvi Surya slams ₹18,000 crore Congress-backed tunnel project in Bengaluru Social media took the wheel in looking at the future of mobility in Bengaluru, arguing that the city's focus should be on enhancing public transport instead of creating infrastructure that encourages more private vehicle use. A resident's post on the issue took the internet by storm, raising the question of both the metro and the tunnel road being built on the same corridor. 'Know this Bengaluru. City can neither afford nor does it makes sense to build both metro and Tunnel Rd on same corridor. Metro serves all. Tunnel Rd? Cars only. Great cities have great metros and aren't car dependent. Stop the Tunnel Road. Complete metro & suburban rail first,' the post read. READ | ₹19,000 crore loan for tunnel? Bengaluru MP PC Mohan lists 13 better ways to spend the money The post amassed 17,000 views and over 300 likes. Several users agreed, with one writing, 'Lived in Bengaluru for years. The traffic is already a nightmare. We need mass transit that serves everyone, not just those who can afford cars.' 'We need suburban Rail immediately,' another posted. On the other hand, some disagreed, with a user replying, 'Have metro above tunnel. Think hybrid design concept.'
NDTV
24 minutes ago
- NDTV
Tensions Brewing In BJP Coalition In Tripura? Tipra Motha Chief Meets Governor
Agartala: Tipra Motha Party (TMP) chief Pradyot Kishore Manikya Debbarma held a meeting with Governor Indra Sena Reddy Nallu on Sunday, a day after his colleague said the party was contemplating withdrawing support from the ruling BJP-led coalition in the state. The high-profile engagement came hours after former chief minister and BJP MP Biplab Kumar Deb visited Mr Debbarma, intensifying speculation about deepening rifts within the Manik Saha-led government. The core of the friction lies in growing discontent within TMP over two critical issues: the perceived lack of progress in implementing the Tripartite Accord signed in March 2024 and insufficient action against illegal infiltration, particularly following a mid-May notification from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) concerning Rohingya and Bangladeshi migrants in the state. The TMP contested the 2023 assembly polls alone but in March last year, after signing a tripartite agreement with the Centre and the Tripura government, joined the BJP-IPFT coalition government. The BJP-IPFT alliance had retained power in Tripura by winning 33 seats in the 60-member assembly. While the BJP received 32 seats, the IPFT could manage one. The TMP, which contested the assembly elections for the first time, secured 13 of the 42 seats it contested. After the meeting with the Governor, Mr Debbarma remained tight-lipped on specific details, stating, "Many things have been discussed. I will say whatever needs to be said, but this is a private meeting and I don't think it should be discussed in the public domain." Met the Hon Governor of Tripura Shri N. Indrasena Reddy today at the raj bhawan . — Pradyot_Tripura (@PradyotManikya) July 6, 2025 However, he strongly underscored the gravity of the infiltration issue. "Infiltration is a serious problem in Tripura," he said. "The future of the state and the entire Northeast is at stake. If we do not unite to stop this now, it will be a grave injustice to our next generation, who deserve a better tomorrow." He issued an appeal transcending party politics, urging all political outfits to unite against the threat. "This is bigger than politics. All political parties should jointly fight to stop illegal infiltration in Tripura. It affects not just our state, but the entire Northeast and India." Addressing the status of his party's alliance with the BJP and ongoing discussions, Mr Debbarma confirmed, "I am in regular contact with the Chief Minister. I spoke to him yesterday and will speak again if necessary. We have discussed various matters for the betterment of Tripura." Reacting to Chief Minister Saha's statement earlier Sunday that the implementation process of the Tripartite Agreement is underway, Mr Debbarma expressed cautious optimism. "Things are in progress - but the results must be visible on the ground. The Chief Minister is aware of the urgency. I have shared my views with him, and he has listened. Now we hope for action." The political temperature had already risen significantly on Saturday. TMP MLA Ranjit Debbarma threatened the party's withdrawal of support from the ruling alliance during a press conference. He also claimed that BJP MP Kriti Singh Debbarma, who is the TMP chief's sister and was a joint candidate of both parties, had expressed a willingness to resign if commitments made by both the state and central governments remained unfulfilled. Reacting to Mr Debbarma's remarks, Chief Minister Manik Saha on Sunday said his government has not received any official communication from the alliance partner. Speaking to reporters in Agartala during a public outreach programme marking 11 years of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government, Mr Saha said, "What their party members say is their matter, but I haven't received anything in writing." When asked about Tipra Motha leaders expressing frustration over the time-bound implementation of the Accord, he said, "I am in regular talks with the Tipra Motha chief. The process is ongoing."
