
US says its strikes degraded Iran's nuclear programme by one to two years
Defense Department spokesperson Sean Parnell said on Wednesday that the three Iranian nuclear facilities targeted by Washington were destroyed, echoing the president's remarks. He praised the strikes as a 'bold operation'.
'We have degraded their programme by one to two years at least,' Parnell told reporters. 'Intel assessments inside the department assess that.'
Since the US sent a group of B-2 stealth bombers to Iran on June 21, Trump has consistently lashed out at any suggestions that the attacks did not wreck the country's nuclear facilities.
He has maintained that Iran's nuclear programme has been 'obliterated like nobody's ever seen before'.
An initial US intelligence assessment, leaked to several media outlets last month, said the strikes failed to destroy key components of Iran's nuclear programme and only delayed its work by months.
For its part, Tehran has been coy about providing details about the state of its nuclear sites.
Some Iranian officials have said that the facilities sustained significant damage from US and Israeli attacks. But Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said last week that Trump had 'exaggerated' the impact of the strikes.
There has been no independent assessment of the aftermath of the US attacks, which came as part of a 12-day war between Israel and Iran. Visual analyses via satellite images cannot fully capture the scope of the damage at the underground sites, especially the country's largest enrichment facility, Fordow.
Another persistent mystery is the location and state of the stockpiles containing Iran's highly enriched uranium.
Iran's nuclear agency and regulators in neighbouring states have said they did not detect a spike in radioactivity after the bombings, as might be expected from such strikes.
But Rafael Grossi, the head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), did not rule out that the containers holding the uranium may have been damaged in the attacks.
'We don't know where this material could be or if part of it could have been under the attack during those 12 days,' Grossi told CBS News last week.
'So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved.'
Satellite images showed trucks moving out of Fordow before the US strikes.
Grossi also said that Iran could be enriching uranium again in a 'matter of months'. Enrichment is the process of enhancing the purity of radioactive uranium atoms to produce nuclear fuel.
The facilities targeted in the US strikes had been under constant IAEA surveillance. But now, Iran's nuclear programme is in the dark, away from the scrutiny of international inspectors.
After the war, the Iranian parliament passed a law suspending cooperation with the IAEA, citing the agency's failure to condemn the US and Israeli attacks on the country's nuclear facilities.
The Geneva Conventions prohibit attacks on 'installations containing dangerous forces, namely dams, dykes and nuclear electrical generating stations'.
Before the war started on June 13, Tehran claimed to have obtained Israeli documents that show that the IAEA was passing off information to Israel about Iran's nuclear programme – allegations that the agency denied.
Earlier on Wednesday, the US State Department called on Iran to allow the IAEA access to its nuclear programme.
'It is … unacceptable that Iran chose to suspend cooperation with the IAEA at a time when it has a window of opportunity to reverse course and choose a path of peace and prosperity,' State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said in a statement.
Israel launched a massive attack against Iran on June 13 without direct provocation, claiming that it was preemptively targeting Iran's push towards a nuclear weapon.
Tehran denies seeking a nuclear bomb. Israel, meanwhile, is widely believed to have an undeclared nuclear arsenal.
Israeli air strikes during the conflict killed hundreds of Iranian civilians, including nuclear scientists and their family members, as well as top military officials.
Iran responded with barrages of missiles that left widespread destruction and killed 29 people in Israel.
Ten days into the war, the US joined the Israeli campaign and bombed Iran's nuclear facilities. Tehran, in turn, launched a missile strike against a US air base in Qatar, an attack that resulted in no casualties.
Hours later, Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Officials in both countries have described the outcome of the war as a 'historic victory'.
Israel has similarly claimed that Iran's nuclear programme was destroyed. But Iran has insisted it foiled Israel's goals by maintaining the stability of its government as well as its nuclear and missile programmes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Scepticism and hope for end to Gaza war before Trump-Netanyahu meeting
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is visiting the United States on Monday, a visit analysts expect will focus on celebrating Israel and the US's self-anointed victory against Iran and discussing a proposal for a ceasefire in Israel's war on Gaza. This is the third time this year Netanyahu will be meeting US President Donald Trump, who claims the US and Israel 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear programme during a 12-day war and that he would resume bombing Iran if it restarts nuclear activities. Last week, Trump said Israel had agreed to conditions for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, which would allow all parties to work towards an end to Israel's 21-month-long war on the besieged enclave. On July 4, Hamas gave a 'positive' response to Qatari and Egyptian mediators about the latest ceasefire proposal. On Friday, after Hamas's response to the proposal, Trump said there could be a 'deal next week' and promised to be 'very firm' with Netanyahu to ensure a ceasefire. Israel has since said that Hamas has requested changes to the proposal that it found 'unacceptable', but that Israeli negotiators would be going to Qatar on Sunday to discuss the proposal. According to a leaked copy of the deal obtained by Al Jazeera, the ceasefire entails a 60-day pause in hostilities and a phased release of some of the 58 Israeli captives held in Gaza since a Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel's war on Gaza has killed at least 57,000 people, mostly women and children, in what United Nations experts, legal scholars and human rights groups describe as a genocide against Palestinians. Many experts told Al Jazeera that they are not optimistic a temporary ceasefire will lead to a permanent end to the war. 'The way [the ceasefire talks] are being framed leaves me sceptical,' said Omar Rahman, an expert on Israel-Palestine with the Middle East Council for Global Affairs. Rahman added that he believes Trump was focused on getting the Israeli captives released, but not on ending the war and the suffering of the people of Gaza. Trump previously promised an end to the war after pushing for a ceasefire just days before he became president in January. However, two months later, Trump did nothing when Israel unilaterally resumed its attacks on Gaza, killing thousands more people. Mairav Zonszein, an expert on Israel-Palestine for the International Crisis Group, said that could happen again. 'It all rests on Trump and the US to sustain real pressure [on Netanyahu], but that is highly doubtful,' she told Al Jazeera. 'I'm optimistic there could be some kind of ceasefire, but longevity and the terms are highly questionable,' Zonszein said. 'It's also possible we could see a ceasefire that does not last because … Israel still every so often just bombs something without repercussions [in Gaza],' she added. Yaser al-Banna, a Palestinian journalist in Gaza, said many in the Strip are divided over whether a ceasefire will end the war. While everyone prays it will, some people cannot imagine Netanyahu sticking to a deal. Netanyahu insists that the war will not end without a 'total victory' over Hamas, a concept he has not defined. 'About half the people in Gaza are very pessimistic… The other half believes this time could be different due to shared interests among Israel, the Palestinians, Arab states and the US to end this war,' he said. Many analysts believe that Trump is driven by his desire to strike grandiose deals in order to boast about his achievements in global affairs. On Monday, he is likely to take credit for ostensibly dismantling Iran's nuclear programme – even though that may not be true – and express his desire to retrieve the rest of the Israeli captives in Gaza. He also wants to get the 'Gaza issue' out of the way to pursue more normalisation deals between Israel and neighbouring Arab states, said Khaled Elgindy, an expert on Israel-Palestine and a professor of Arab Studies at Georgetown University in Washington, DC. 'Trump wants to be able to say that he got back the Israeli hostages… and got a Palestinian state… Then he can call himself master of the universe, but getting those things is much harder than he thinks,' Elgindy told Al Jazeera. It's unclear whether Netanyahu's political calculations align with Trump's ambitions. Israel's next parliamentary elections have to take place before October 2026, and Netanyahu could go to the polls sooner, riding on a likely wave of popularity if he succeeds in returning the remaining captives. Like Trump, he would also tout what he terms a stunning victory against Iran to the Israeli public. Those considerations are important because it is likely that Netanyahu's frail far-right coalition, held together by pressure to prolong the war on Gaza, would collapse if a permanent ceasefire is reached, said Hugh Lovatt, an expert on Israel-Palestine with the European Council on Foreign Relations. 'At the end of [the possible] 60-day ceasefire, [Netanyahu] could go to elections by committing to a full end to the war and collapse his coalition; or he could go back to war to keep his [far-right] coalition together should he judge the time not right for elections,' he told Al Jazeera. Staying in office is particularly important for Israel's longest-serving prime minister, who faces several domestic legal charges of fraud and bribery. During his much-anticipated meeting with Trump, experts expect them to discuss Netanyahu's trial, which many believe plays a large role in dictating his political calculations. Netanyahu's position as prime minister has enabled him to undermine the Israeli judicial system by appointing loyalists to high courts and delaying court hearings – an influence he would lose if his coalition unravels. Trump is acutely aware of Netanyahu's dilemma. On June 25, he called on Israel to drop the charges against Netanyahu, referring to the trial as a 'witch hunt'.Trump's comments suggest that he is trying to pressure Netanyahu's opponents to issue a pardon in exchange for ending the war on Gaza, said Georgetown's Elgindy. Elgindy referenced Trump's recent social media post where he alluded to suspending military aid to Israel unless charges against Netanyahu were dropped. 'The United States of America spends Billions of Dollars a year, far more than any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this,' Trump wrote on June 28. That would be a major – almost unfathomable – decision to emerge out of the meeting between Trump and Netanyahu, said Elgindy. 'I don't see him following through, but this is a typical [threat] that Trump would make,' he told Al Jazeera. 'His [modus operandi] is to blackmail and coerce. That is his version of diplomacy.' Elgindy added that it was distressing that Trump would threaten to cut military aid to Israel to protect Netanyahu and not beleaguered, starving Palestinians in Gaza. The decision to pardon Netanyahu lies with Israel's President Isaac Herzog, but such a move would be unprecedented, and the president has not indicated that he plans to do so. Analysts believe Herzog may be willing to pardon Netanyahu if he agrees to exit political life, but not simply to secure a ceasefire. Zonszein, from Crisis Group, adds that there are lawyers and justices in Israel who have warned 'for years' that it is in the public's interest to reach a plea bargain with Netanyahu due to the power he holds over the country. Their only condition is for Netanyahu to agree to leave politics. 'I don't think that is something Netanyahu is considering. If he was willing to leave political life, then he could have already negotiated a plea bargain,' she told Al Jazeera.


Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
LIVE: 12 killed in Israeli bombing of Gaza City home; talks set to resume
Israeli forces bomb a house in Gaza City, killing at least 12 people, a day after killing at least 78 Palestinians in attacks across the besieged Strip. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office says Israel will send negotiators to Qatar for ceasefire talks, but that changes to the deal requested by Hamas are 'unacceptable'.


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
LIVE: Israel bombs Gaza City home, killing 12, as truce talks set to resume
Israeli forces bomb a house in Gaza City, killing at least 12 people, a day after killing at least 78 Palestinians in attacks across the besieged Strip. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office says Israel will send negotiators to Qatar for ceasefire talks, but that changes to the deal requested by Hamas are 'unacceptable'.