logo
Rare and mysterious whiskey bottles found washed up on beach

Rare and mysterious whiskey bottles found washed up on beach

Fox News12-03-2025
A whiskey river wasn't on Austin Contegiacomo's mind when he found an ocean of it — a Prohibition-era stash, to be exact — washed up on a New Jersey beach while he was walking his dog last month.
Even for a guy who doesn't drink, it was a rare find. And it has made an even better story to tell.
"The history behind it is part of the mystery and really adds to the allure," Contegiacomo, 28, a Coast Guard helicopter rescue swimmer from Northfield, New Jersey, told Fox News Digital.
He had just gotten off a 24-hour duty and decided to take his fuzzy sheepadoodle, Koda, for a walk near Margate Pier, south of Atlantic City.
"I take him to the beach to play just about every day," Contegiacomo said.
"I was throwing the ball — and my dog tends to rub himself in stuff that smells weird. So there's this brown bottle in the sand and he starts rubbing on it."
Contegiacomo said his dog forgot about playing and became very focused on whatever was in the sand.
"I thought, 'Oh man, it looks like a bottle of pee,'" he said.
"So I was yelling at him to get off it, then maybe five feet ahead was another one. And as soon as he got off that one, he ran up to the next one and started rubbing on that."
After Koda discovered a third bottle, Contegiacomo said he began to realize they'd stumbled on something much more interesting than he'd originally thought.
"They were pretty much at the surface," he said. "And there were a ton of conches and shells and all types of other debris on the beach that day."
He added, "I think it was from dredging because they've been repairing the beaches and they do it in the winter to get ready for the summer. There hadn't been any storms, but it was a crazy amount of stuff washed up."
In total, Contegiacomo and his dog found 11 completely full, glass bottles of rare, old whiskey, all with the name Lincoln Inn etched on them.
Contegiacomo called a friend who did a quick internet search. They learned that Lincoln Inn was produced at a distillery in Montreal in the 1930s and that the company went out of business in the 1970s.
"He said, 'Dude, there's really not much info on this, but it looks like it's old,'" Contegiacomo said. "He said I should definitely keep it and find out more about it."
So Contegiacomo took off his jacket. He picked up all the bottles — each positioned not far from the others — and stashed them in his jacket.
Then he tied it up like a sack.
After he got them home, Contegiacomo posted about his find on Reddit, where a "bottle-digging" community as well as a group of whiskey aficionados began to weigh in on the discovery.
Members of the groups directed Contegiacomo to a diamond shape that was embossed on the bottom of the bottles. It was a mark that was initiated in 1928.
"The bottles have a flask shape," Contegiacomo said, "and given the type of screw and stuff, most people said it was between 1930s and 1940s."
Some of Contegiacomo's work buddies went back to the beach the next day and found one more bottle — bringing the discovered treasure to an even dozen.
Contegiacomo decided to gift a bottle to each of his friends and to his father.
"A lot of the guys thought it was super cool," he said.
"There's about 10 of us. A lot of the guys are from New Jersey and most people have family around here, so it's kind of a part of New Jersey's history – so I ended up giving pretty much all the bottles away to guys I work with."
A few of the whiskey bottles were clear and others were hazy, which Contegiacomo learned could have to do with filtration.
"Given the age of it, some people said that could be due to the way it was filtered or the charring, because they used to burn the [whiskey] barrels," he said.
"The one that I kept for myself is probably the best quality one."
Contegiacomo said the fact that the bottles were all still sealed and the whiskey at relatively the same level in each bottle gives him hope the liquor inside is still good.
"The ocean temperatures usually don't get anywhere near 70 degrees, even at the bottom of the waters in New Jersey," Contegiacomo said.
Exactly how the bottles of whiskey ended up in the water remains a mystery.
"Apparently [bootleggers] used to bring it down to about the Jersey Shore – and then small boats would take off from the Jersey Shore and they would pick the liquor up. I guess the boardwalk was pretty much a hot spot for rum running and stuff during Prohibition."
That's why Contegiacomo said he's not interested in drinking it or cashing in on his find.
"If any of us intend to try it, I don't think it'd be me that opens it," Contegiacomo said.
"Opening it and then seeing it empty or even half-empty kind of detracts from it. Even if it's a great whiskey or something, I don't think I'd appreciate the whiskey itself nearly as much as I appreciate the story and how it got here."
Sydney Borchers of Fox News Digital contributed reporting.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Mom Says Her Partner Is Mad She Told Him She Doesn't Want His Parents Around ‘All the Time'
New Mom Says Her Partner Is Mad She Told Him She Doesn't Want His Parents Around ‘All the Time'

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New Mom Says Her Partner Is Mad She Told Him She Doesn't Want His Parents Around ‘All the Time'

The mom confessed that she's starting to feel 'bitter' towards her partner's parents because of how much time they have with her babyNEED TO KNOW A mother is fed up with her partner's parents demanding to see her 8-month-old baby every day In a post on Reddit, the mom explained that they were initially only supposed to babysit the infant for four hours a day during the week 'I got irritated with my partner about it and it caused a disagreement,' she saidA new mom is calling time on her partner's parents' constant need to be around her 8-month-old baby. On Monday, July 28, the mother explained on Reddit's Am I the A------ forum that her future in-laws babysit for four hours each weekday while she and her partner go to work. She said that the arrangement has remained in place even though her partner is currently off work due to an injury. Despite seeing the infant five days a week, the mom revealed her partner's parents have also insisted on seeing the baby 'every' weekend. She recently missed out on bonding time with the tot as they enforced their plan to take the baby swimming. 'By the time I pick baby up from his parents' house after work, I get baby for 1-2 hours before baby goes to bed (I work 7:30 am - 5 pm),' the original poster (OP) said. 'Weekends are the only time I get more time with her.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The mother said her partner's parents want an 'excessive' amount of time with their first grandchild. Her own parents only get to see the baby once a month because of how much time her future in-laws demand. Comparing the situation to her childhood, the OP recalled seeing one set of her grandparents every few months and the other once every 3-4 weeks. 'I feel like I don't get enough time every day with my baby (and on the weekends when I'm not working) and it's honestly making me feel bitter towards them and my partner,' she said. 'They're saving us money without having to pay for daycare, which I'm grateful for,' the mom continued. 'I just don't get why they insist on seeing her on the weekends too.' 'I got irritated with my partner about it and it caused a disagreement,' she said. 'He doesn't think it's excessive or anything, but that they just want to see their grandchild, even if it means less time as a family we spend together.' Having confessed that she doesn't 'f---ing get it,' the mom asked, 'AITA [am I the a------] for not wanting them around all the time?' Responses to the post agreed with the mother that her partner's parents were being unreasonable with the amount of time they expected with her baby. Related: Several commenters argued that her partner should speak to them about it. 'Your bf [boyfriend] is really happy to not have to care for his child on weekends, so off the baby goes to his mother/father,' one person said. 'He will not say no to his parents for that reason, more than likely." 'Simply tell your future ILs [in-laws] that you really appreciate the childcare they provide during the week but that you will no longer bother them when YOU are free and not working so that you can enjoy your child to the fullest,' the same person continued. 'NTA [not the a------]Deal directly with the ILs. Your bf needs to come to grips with parenthood before you marry, though,' they added. 'Be sure that he understands that he will need to be available for his child when he is off work.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

Woman in Fight with Roommate Over Whether a Home Needs Both a Roomba and a Regular Vacuum
Woman in Fight with Roommate Over Whether a Home Needs Both a Roomba and a Regular Vacuum

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Woman in Fight with Roommate Over Whether a Home Needs Both a Roomba and a Regular Vacuum

'Most of the time, it just bonks around like a lost toddler at IKEA until someone takes pity on it and turns it around,' the woman saidNEED TO KNOW A woman moved into a shared apartment with two roommates who agreed to share cleaning responsibilities However, she was left unimpressed when one of her roommates began using a Roomba instead of a regular vacuum cleaner 'It doesn't have a hose, can't clean corners or high surfaces, and doesn't work for any kind of mess,' she saidA woman who recently moved into an apartment in Boston with three other PhD students is unsure if she 'overstepped' after buying a vacuum cleaner without discussing it first. On Monday, July 28, the woman explained in a post on Reddit's "Am I The A--hole" forum that she is living with two other women in their mid-twenties, whom she didn't know before moving in. She said they all discussed splitting up the responsibility of keeping the apartment clean prior to the arrangement. However, she was unaware that the vacuum one of her roommates would be bringing was a Roomba. The woman said robot vacuums are ideal for light maintenance if used frequently, but are unsuitable for vacuuming the entire apartment. 'It doesn't have a hose, can't clean corners or high surfaces, and doesn't work for any kind of mess,' she explained. Complaining about her roommate, the woman continued, 'She also only wants to run it every other week, which doesn't really keep up with the dust and dirt of three people. 'The Roomba also hasn't mapped the apartment well due to its infrequent use,' she said. 'Most of the time, it just bonks around like a lost toddler at IKEA until someone takes pity on it and turns it around.' The woman said that when she tried to discuss her concerns with her roommate, the Roomba owner disagreed on the need to have a separate regular vacuum cleaner. In an attempt to avoid an argument, the woman said she bought her own regular vacuum that had a bag and an allergy filter to use in her bedroom and shared areas. 'When I brought it home, she was annoyed and said I had gone behind her back and broken our agreement,' the woman said of her roommate. 'I didn't see it that way, and shared that I'm not asking anyone else to use it or share costs. I just wanted to be able to clean the apartment to a level that works for me." 'Our other roommate said she doesn't really have a preference and doesn't care, so it seems like she is currently steering clear of this,' she continued. 'There's no blame or fault to be found in her at all; I totally understand why she might want to stay neutral." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'I don't want to be the problem roommate, but now I'm wondering if I overstepped. AITA [am I the a--hole?],' the woman asked. Responses to the post reassured the woman that her views on the Roomba were fair. One person said her roommate was 'acting like a child,' while another argued there should be no issue with the addition of the vacuum because the Roomba can still be used. 'This is absurd. You are allowed to buy whatever you want for your shared apartment. Roommate sounds like a problem now and future,' someone else chimed in. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

Man strains girlfriend's mother's homemade soup to remove ginger: 'Where are your manners?'
Man strains girlfriend's mother's homemade soup to remove ginger: 'Where are your manners?'

Fox News

time13 hours ago

  • Fox News

Man strains girlfriend's mother's homemade soup to remove ginger: 'Where are your manners?'

A baffled boyfriend drew the ire of his girlfriend after he picked through her mother's soup in an insulting way – sparking a social media firestorm. Posting his story on a popular Reddit forum, the young man said the couple was visiting his girlfriend's mom's house when they were served seafood chowder. "[My girlfriend's mom] made it once before and it was really good, but she add[ed] a few pieces of ginger to flavor it," he wrote. "I really, really, really hate biting into ginger," he said. "I don't mind the flavor it imparts, I just hate the taste of actually eating a piece." The boyfriend said that he once bit into a piece of ginger in her past soups and it "almost ruined the whole meal." This time, the man said, he asked the mother if she used the root vegetable. She replied that she did and forgot to pick the pieces out. "She seemed genuinely apologetic about it," the man recalled. "I told her it was no problem and I had an idea." He continued, "I saw a colander hanging on a rack on the kitchen counter and I went to the kitchen and strained the soup into another bowl (which I asked if I could grab) and picked out the couple pieces of ginger." "The key to understanding the ginger dilemma is first understanding what the mother's intentions are in serving them [the] soup." He then "dumped the remaining strained pieces of potato and fish and shrimp and scallops and stuff back into the liquid." The man said, "I even [apologized] for the extra dishes and offered to help clean up afterward." The girlfriend's mom didn't seem to mind at the moment, but the Redditor's quick-thinking did not please his partner — who was quiet during the drive home. "She told me I didn't have to be such an a--hole and make a big show and dance about insulting her mom's food," he said. But the boyfriend tried to defend his actions, saying he liked the food "except for a couple of ingredients." "Still didn't smooth things over, though," he added. The Reddit community nearly unanimously branded the boyfriend as rude and tone-deaf. "This is … actually really embarrassing for you," one person wrote. "No, you don't grab a strainer and do that. Where are your manners?" "Picking them out of individual spoonfuls would have been much less dramatic," another added. "Stop being so picky or just don't eat those things from your bowl," a third person said. "No, you don't grab a strainer and do that. Where are your manners?" Carole Lieberman, M.D., a psychiatrist based in Beverly Hills, California, weighed in on the ginger dilemma. The relationship expert described the boyfriend's behavior to Fox News Digital as a "red flag." "Not just because it was rude, but because it signals a lack of awareness of other people's feelings, a need [for] control and self-centeredness," Lieberman said. "The key to understanding the ginger dilemma is first understanding what the mother's intentions are in serving them [the] soup." "What he did not only strained the soup, it strained their relationship." A home-cooked meal, she observed, is a symbol of nurturance and affection – in this case, a mother's love. "So, even though he reports that the mom didn't react like it was a big deal, when he hacked into and dismembered her soup, it was hurtful to her because it felt like he was rejecting her love," the psychiatrist said. The boyfriend would have been better served if he quietly placed the ginger pieces to the side instead of making a dramatic gesture, Lieberman said. "What he did not only strained the soup, it strained their relationship," she noted. But the silver lining, Lieberman said, is that the boyfriend's intentions were pure. "He didn't do these things to be rude," she concluded. Instead, "he rationalized that he was being thoughtful in taking care of the ginger dilemma himself, rather than asking the mother to fix it." Lieberman suggested that the girlfriend "should observe whether he is self-absorbed and controlling in other situations … before making any rash decisions about the relationship."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store