logo
Despite social studies standards controversy, OSBE meeting a stark contrast to past tense months

Despite social studies standards controversy, OSBE meeting a stark contrast to past tense months

Yahoo22-05-2025
Tensions rose for a second time — albeit mildly — over the official record of an Oklahoma State Board of Education vote to approve controversial social studies standards.
But after that back-and-forth on Wednesday, May 21, four new board members and Republican state schools Superintendent Ryan Walters appeared to be trying their hardest to be respectful toward each other during the board's monthly meeting. It was a stark contrast to the board's most recent meeting in April, when allegations of deceit on the part of Walters and lying by the board members about how the standards were passed set the tone for the meeting.
The standards, which require high school students to learn about debunked claims of voting irregularities in the 2020 presidential election, have pushed Oklahoma into the national spotlight. The board voted to send the standards to the Legislature in February, and the standards eventually took affect after lawmakers opted not to do anything to change them.
The circumstances surrounding how the standards were passed have turned the board's meeting minutes into a subject of controversy. Minutes are usually a routine item on most board agendas.
Three new board members appointed by Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt – Chris Van Denhende, Ryan Deatherage and Michael Tinney – sparred with Walters during the February meeting when the board considered the standards. Eventually, they were approved after Walters falsely told board members they had to approved that day for the agency to meet legislative deadlines.
But Deatherage was shown in the meeting minutes as having made a motion to approve the standards, when he was the lone vote against them. A motion by Deatherage to table the standards, and a subsequent vote, weren't reflected in the minutes. The new board members raised the issue in April and voted to table the minutes, pending changes.
Deatherage noted Wednesday the copy of the February board meeting minutes included in his informational packet – which is provided to board members – didn't reflect the changes. The board's executive secretary, Amy London, said that she was trying to save paper and thus didn't update the packets with the new version of the minutes, but that the new minutes could be found online.
Ultimately, the board voted 5-1 – with Walters in opposition – to again table approval of the February meeting minutes.
'It's all about the process,' Tinney said in making his motion to table.
After that, though, the new board members – including Becky Carson, named last month to the board – and Walters interacted mostly without conflict. Carson, a former teacher from Edmond, spoke about her concern of the number of Oklahoma teachers who are receiving emergency certifications, noting the high total – more than 4,000 during the 2024-25 school year – shocked her. She noted that number represented about 10% of teachers in the state.
She called emergency certifications 'a necessary evil at this point,' given Oklahoma's shortage of traditionally certified teachers.
Deatherage, who also serves as Kingfisher County's 911 director, spoke about mobile alert panic systems for Oklahoma schools and voted to approve a motion concerning them, after leading a motion last month to table a vote on the same agenda item.
The board quickly approved a request for Mannford Public Schools to not have to meet the 165-day instructional minimum for the 2024-25 school year, citing wildfires that ravaged that Creek County community in March.
After an executive session that lasted almost two hours, as the board prepared to vote on an action regarding the teacher's license of former Ringling High School football coach Phil Koons, a man in the audience in the tiny board meeting room stood up and said he was an attorney representing Koons, demanding to speak, saying he had spoken with the agency's attorneys about doing so.
Walters said he was OK with allowing the man – who never identified himself and whose identity wasn't known by the board's attorney, Chad Kutmas – to speak. The man said Koons wasn't given notice either of Wednesday's planned board action, or of an administrative hearing in his case.
Multiple other people who have had licenses revoked during Walters' tenure as superintendent also have complained about receiving no notice from the board, which is required. The subject of allowing due process to educators whose licenses might be suspended or revoked came up during a Senate confirmation hearing for Tinney on Tuesday.
Ultimately, the board tabled action regarding Koons' license until its June meeting, and the man quickly exited the room.
Board member Zachary Archer of Hammon did not attend the meeting. In 2025, he has attended only one board meeting, in February. He previously missed meetings in January and April. The March board meeting was canceled on the morning the meeting had been scheduled, with Walters citing a concern over a possible violation of the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act because the deadline to post the agenda online had been missed by 20 minutes.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Ryan Walters, OSBE members still disagree on social studies standards
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump threatens ‘very significant' Russia sanctions, bashes ‘all talk' Putin
Trump threatens ‘very significant' Russia sanctions, bashes ‘all talk' Putin

Politico

time19 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump threatens ‘very significant' Russia sanctions, bashes ‘all talk' Putin

'They will be very, very powerful and very bad for the countries involved,' the president warned of his secondary tariffs. With Putin rebuffing his efforts to end the war, Trump has gradually moved closer to the European position on arming Ukraine. | AP Photo/Alex Brandon By Seb Starcevic 07/15/2025 08:50 PM EDT President Donald Trump upped pressure on Russia to 'stop the killing' in Ukraine within 50 days, warning Tuesday that his threatened economic penalties against Moscow and its trading partners would be devastating. Trump said yesterday he would impose secondary tariffs of up to 100 percent on countries that still trade with Russia in an effort to force the Kremlin to the negotiating table with Ukraine, giving Moscow until early September to respond. A bill by Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut that has 85 Senate co-sponsors would authorize the president to impose secondary tariffs of at least 500 percent on imported goods from countries such as China, Brazil and India.

Inside Hakeem Jeffries' embrace of the Epstein strategy
Inside Hakeem Jeffries' embrace of the Epstein strategy

Axios

time24 minutes ago

  • Axios

Inside Hakeem Jeffries' embrace of the Epstein strategy

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is shocking some colleagues by fully embracing efforts to exploit divisions between President Trump and his MAGA base over the administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Why it matters: Amid demands from the liberal grassroots that Democrats take off the gloves with Trump, the Democratic leader has shifted from vowing not to swing at every pitch to adopting a " more is more" strategy. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told Axios he has been "very closely in coordination" with Jeffries' office and that "all indications we've gotten is support from the leadership on this." Zoom out: The Democratic leader has long been known for his often taciturn approach to salacious stories of the day, preferring to remain disciplined and on-message in his public communications. But he has signaled to allies he sees the Epstein story as part of the "more is more" approach and that it fits neatly into a broader narrative about alleged corruption in the Trump administration, sources told Axios. "He's not going to let go of Epstein," one senior House Democrat, who had initially predicted Jeffries wouldn't touch the issue, told Axios on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly about internal discussions. State of play: Democrats have spent the last week gleefully needling Trump and his Republican allies in Congress after the Justice Department said that Epstein had no "client list" and died by suicide. That claim runs counter to popular, longstanding conspiracy theories on the right, prompting backlash from much of the GOP grassroots. Several Democrats quickly weighed in by alleging that the Trump administration was engaged in an intentional coverup of the Epstein matter. Driving the news: What began as individual efforts to squeeze the Trump administration into releasing all documents related to Epstein morphed into a fully leadership-sanctioned campaign in less than 24 hours. Reps. Marc Veasey (D-Texas) and Khanna introduced measures that would demand and force the DOJ to publish the documents, respectively. Jeffries said Monday night he had not spoken to either lawmaker or evaluated their proposals, but hours later his members on the House Rules Committee were trying to get both measures to the floor. On Tuesday, Democratic leadership made its support clear by trying to pass a procedural motion that would force a vote on Khanna's bill. Both efforts failed. What they're saying: Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.), who was among the first members to weigh in on Epstein last week, told Axios "it seems like leadership is full steam ahead. ... I'm surprised. I felt like I was kind of out there by myself." Said House Oversight Committee ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.): "I think you've heard the leader himself, his posture is the same as ours: [Republicans] have been the ones obsessed with this ... and now they want to run away from it." What we're hearing: Even as Jeffries has given his blessing, he has cautioned not to abandon other messaging tactics that the party sees as fruitful — part of his "more is more" strategy. In a meeting of House Democrats' steering committee on Monday night, Jeffries urged lawmakers to keep hammering the administration on issues like the cost of living, according to two lawmakers who were present. "This is something he does really well, is trying to keep us focused," said one of the members. The bottom line: "It's a clear fit in something that's a huge priority for us, which is the corruption," a second senior House Democrat told Axios.

Senate GOP needs Vance on recissions vote
Senate GOP needs Vance on recissions vote

Politico

time33 minutes ago

  • Politico

Senate GOP needs Vance on recissions vote

Senate Majority Leader John Thune says he will bring the first procedural vote to the floor Tuesday on the White House's request to claw back $9.4 billion in spending. It's not clear he has even the 51 votes necessary to start debate on the package. Congress needs to approve the request before it expires Friday, or the administration will have to spend the money as lawmakers originally intended. That deadline is looming large as several GOP senators insist the administration clarify what spending it is actually seeking to rescind. They'll question President Donald Trump's budget director Russ Vought during senators' closed-door lunch Tuesday afternoon. 'We still are lacking the level of detail that is needed to make the right decisions,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins told reporters Monday evening. 'It's extremely unusual for any senator to not be able to get that kind of detailed information.' The Maine Republican is concerned not just over the administration's proposal to scale down the global AIDS-fighting program PEPFAR, but also about broader cutbacks in overseas public health. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) told POLITICO he's particularly interested in protecting funding for global food aid programs like Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program. It's increasingly evident the rescissions package will have to be changed in order to pass the Senate, and Thune told reporters as he left the Capitol on Monday that leadership is working with wary senators to 'see what a path forward on amendments looks like.' Senate leaders expect a vote-a-rama on amendments to start Wednesday, teeing up a final vote late Wednesday or early Thursday. If senators are able to advance a package with tweaks, House GOP leaders plan to put the package on the floor Thursday; they have already started to clear away procedural hurdles that would prevent them from passing the spending cut proposal ASAP. Throwing another wrinkle into it all, though, is that House GOP leaders don't want the Senate amending the package at all, knowing their members will be jammed with changes they don't like and be forced to choose between passing a watered-down product or missing the deadline to act. 'I think you got to respect the White House's request, and that's what we did, so I hope that's what we get back,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Monday. 'There are two big categories of rescissions, and I'm not sure either of them should be subject to dispute.' It's also unclear whether an amended rescissions package would even have the support in the Republican House. Fiscal hawks are already drawing red lines, with Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) going as far as telling POLITICO he won't support a rescissions package that is 'a penny less' than the House-approved version. MEANWHILE, IN OTHER FUNDING FIGHTS — Senate appropriators remain at a standstill on moving a funding bill forward for the Commerce and Justice departments. They're trying to schedule a briefing with the FBI on the administration's rationale for abandoning the plan to move the bureau to suburban Maryland, according to Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), whose stand against Trump's desire for a site in the District of Columbia derailed a markup of the bill last week. But Van Hollen insists that even if the FBI assures senators that the Washington location is a secure site, he won't back off his attempt to block the administration from diverting about $1.4 billion that has been set aside for relocating the agency's campus to Maryland. Across the Capitol: House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole said that House leaders began whipping votes Monday night as the chamber prepares to take its vote on the $831.5 billion defense appropriations bill later this week. While defense appropriations bills have been bipartisan in the past, Republicans are expecting this measure to be a largely party-line affair. What else we're watching: — Epstein meltdown: We'll see if Republican leaders' headache from their members over the DOJ's failure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein continues. Rep. Norman voted Monday in favor of a Democratic amendment in the House Rules Committee that would have forced a floor vote on the DOJ releasing more materials from the federal case. — Russia sanctions timeline: The bipartisan Russian sanctions bill might stall in the House and Senate after Trump announced secondary tariffs on countries trading with Russia. Thune said Monday he would hold off on advancing the bill for now. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise also said a vote could be delayed to post-August recess. — Dems' last stand against a controversial Trump pick: Senate Democrats are making a final bid to draw the spotlight to a whistleblower's allegations that Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official and 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals nominee, urged defiance of the same judicial branch he is seeking to join. Democrats want the whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, to testify before senators prior to their confirmation vote on Bove, which is set for Thursday morning. Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus, Jennifer Scholtes, Meredith Lee Hill and Cassandra Dumay contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store